Risperidone versus perphenazine in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbations.

Risperidone (RIS), a new neuroleptic with 5-HT2- and dopamine D2 receptor-blocking properties, was compared with perphenazine (PER) in a double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group study in 107 chronic schizophrenics with acute exacerbation. RIS 5-15 mg or PER 16-48 mg daily was given for 8 weeks. Psychopathology was assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression. Seventy-eight patients completed the trial; there was an equal number of dropouts on both drugs. The mean daily dose at endpoint was 8.5 mg RIS and 28 mg PER. The reduction in total PANSS score to endpoint did not differ significantly, although there was a tendency in favour of RIS. The number of patients with predominantly negative symptoms who showed at least 20% reduction in total PANSS score was significantly larger in the RIS group. Furthermore, the number of patients showing at least 20% reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score (BPRS being a subscale of PANSS) was significantly larger in the RIS group. The hostility cluster of BPRS improved more on RIS than on PER in the endpoint analysis. The overall prevalence of side effects was fairly similar in the two groups.

Zuclopenthixol and perphenazine in patients with acute psychotic states. A double-blind multicentre study.

Fifty-four patients with acute psychotic states were included in a double-blind multicentre study of zuclopenthixol and perphenazine given orally. Fourteen patients had not received test preparations for a minimum of 3 weeks as stated in the protocol, and were excluded. The remaining 40 patients received the test preparations for 3 to 12 weeks, with an average of 49 days for patients receiving zuclopenthixol and 45 days for patients receiving perphenazine. Clinical evaluations were done at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 including the CGI, a CPRS subscale for schizophrenia, and the UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. The patients received on average 37 mg zuclopenthixol or 30 mg perphenazine daily. Statistically, significant reductions on the CGI, severity of illness, and on the CPRS (total score) were found for both drugs when comparing baseline with later scores. No significant differences between the drugs were found. It was also impossible to demonstrate a difference in clinical profile between the two drugs on the basis of the single items on the CPRS. Although small differences between the two drugs were found, as regards number and type of side effects, it is concluded that the pattern of side effects was almost identical in the two treatment groups.

Clopenthixol decanoate and perphenazine enanthate in schizophrenic patients. A double-blind Nordic multicentre trial.

The clinical properties of clopenthixol decanoate has been investigated versus perphenazine enanthate in a double-blind clinical multicentre trial including 14 psychiatric hospitals in Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. Test treatment was initiated in 172 chronic schizophrenic patients and the planned 6 months test period was completed by 57 patients receiving clopenthixol decanoate and 48 receiving perphenazine enanthate. The therapeutic effect was assessed by means of CGI, BPRS, and NOSIE-30 and was found significant with both test drugs. Significant differences in the effect were seen only in "Hostile-suspiciousness" (BPRS) and "Social interest" (NOSIE-30). For these items clopenthixol decanoate was found superior to perphenazine enanthate. The influence of side effects on the patients' functioning was found to be slightly, but not significantly more troublesome in the perphenazine enanthate patients.