Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 78(3): 369-379.e1, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33857533

RESUMO

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: As the proportion of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) compared with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in the United States has increased, there has been a concurrent increase in interventions. We explored AVF and AVG maturation and maintenance procedural burden in the first year of hemodialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients initiating hemodialysis from July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014, and having a first-time AVF or AVG placement between dialysis initiation and 1 year (N = 73,027), identified using the US Renal Data System (USRDS). PREDICTORS: Patient characteristics. OUTCOME: Successful AVF/AVG use and intervention procedure burden. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: For each group, we analyzed interventional procedure rates during maturation maintenance phases using Poisson regression. We used proportional rate modeling for covariate-adjusted analysis of interventional procedure rates during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: During the maturation phase, 13,989 of 57,275 patients (24.4%) in the AVF group required intervention, with therapeutic interventional requirements of 0.36 per person. In the AVG group 2,904 of 15,572 patients (18.4%) required intervention during maturation, with therapeutic interventional requirements of 0.28 per person. During the maintenance phase, in the AVF group 12,732 of 32,115 patients (39.6%) required intervention, with a therapeutic intervention rate of 0.93 per person-year. During maintenance phase, in the AVG group 5,928 of 10,271 patients (57.7%) required intervention, with a therapeutic intervention rate of 1.87 per person-year. For both phases, the intervention rates for AVF tended to be higher on the East Coast while those for AVG were more uniform geographically. LIMITATIONS: This study relies on administrative data, with monthly recording of access use. CONCLUSIONS: During maturation, interventions for both AVFs and AVGs were relatively common. Once successfully matured, AVFs had lower maintenance interventional requirements. During the maturation and maintenance phases, there were geographic variations in AVF intervention rates that warrant additional study.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/epidemiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 71(6): 793-801, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29429750

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred form of hemodialysis vascular access, but maturation failures occur frequently, often resulting in prolonged catheter use. We sought to characterize AVF maturation in a national sample of prevalent hemodialysis patients in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Nonconcurrent observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Prevalent hemodialysis patients having had at least 1 new AVF placed during 2013, as identified using Medicare claims data in the US Renal Data System. PREDICTORS: Demographics, geographic location, dialysis vintage, comorbid conditions. OUTCOMES: Successful maturation following placement defined by subsequent use identified using monthly CROWNWeb data. MEASUREMENTS: AVF maturation rates were compared across strata of predictors. Patients were followed up until the earliest evidence of death, AVF maturation, or the end of 2014. RESULTS: In the study period, 45,087 new AVFs were placed in 39,820 prevalent hemodialysis patients. No evidence of use was identified for 36.2% of AVFs. Only 54.7% of AVFs were used within 4 months of placement, with maturation rates varying considerably across end-stage renal disease (ESRD) networks. Older age was associated with lower AVF maturation rates. Female sex, black race, some comorbid conditions (cardiovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, diabetes, needing assistance, or institutionalized status), dialysis vintage longer than 1 year, and catheter or arteriovenous graft use at ESRD incidence were also associated with lower rates of successful AVF maturation. In contrast, hypertension and prior AVF placement at ESRD incidence were associated with higher rates of successful AVF maturation. LIMITATIONS: This study relies on administrative data, with monthly recording of access use. CONCLUSIONS: We identified numerous associations between AVF maturation and patient-level factors in a recent national sample of US hemodialysis patients. After accounting for these patient factors, we observed substantial differences in AVF maturation across some ESRD networks, indicating a need for additional study of the provider, practice, and regional factors that explain AVF maturation.


Assuntos
Falha de Equipamento , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal/métodos , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Retratamento , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...