In-vivo and ex-vivo tests for culprit drugs identification in severe cutaneous adverse drugs reactions.

Drug causality assessment in severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) remains challenging. We investigated the usefulness of in-vivo drug patch tests (PT), ex-vivo interferon (IFN)-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay, and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) in 30 SCARs patients within the past 36 months. Drug PT yielded a 20% positivity rate (n = 6), while IFN-γ ELISpot and LTT showed positive rates of 56.67% (n = 17) and 41.38% (n = 12), respectively. Combining the three tests resulted in an overall positive rate of 66.67% (n = 20) of cases. IFN-γ ELISpot offered additional positivity, especially with oxypurinol. Employing a combined diagnostic approach may enhance the chances of obtaining a positive result.

Global prevalence and clinical manifestations of cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Although vaccination is widely accepted as an effective method of preventing and controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, many people are concerned about possible cutaneous side-effects, which can delay or prevent them from being vaccinated. The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the global prevalence and clinical manifestations of cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021, and reference lists for each selected article were screened. Case reports, case series, observational studies and randomized controlled trials that provided information on cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccines were included. A total of 300 studies were included in a systematic review of which 32 studies with 946 366 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of cutaneous manifestations following COVID-19 vaccination was 3.8% (95% CI, 2.7%-5.3%). COVID-19 vaccines based on the mRNA platform had a higher prevalence than other platforms at 6.9% (95% CI, 3.8%-12.3%). Various cutaneous manifestations have been reported from injection site reactions, which were the most common (72.16%) to uncommon adverse reactions such as delayed inflammatory reactions to tissue filler (0.07%) and flares of pre-existing dermatoses (0.07%). Severe cutaneous reactions such as anaphylaxis have also been reported, but in rare cases (0.05%). In conclusion, cutaneous adverse reactions are common, especially in those receiving mRNA vaccines. Most reactions are mild and are not contraindications to subsequent vaccination except for anaphylaxis, which rarely occurs. COVID-19 vaccination may also be associated with flares of pre-existing dermatoses and delayed inflammatory reactions to tissue filler. Patients with a history of allergies, pre-existing skin conditions or scheduled for filler injections should receive additional precounselling and monitoring. A better understanding of potential side-effects may strengthen public confidence in those wary of new vaccine technologies.

Acute urticaria alone after CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccination should not be a contraindication for revaccination.

Patients who develop an immediate allergic reaction within the first 4 h of COVID-19 vaccine injection are recommended not to receive the same vaccine again. This recommendation mainly focuses on the mRNA and adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines, but data for whole virus vaccines are unknown. We report seven patients who developed an immediate reaction within 4 h (six had generalized urticaria, one had localized urticaria) after the first vaccination with CoronaVac, the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The results of skin tests and basophil activation tests suggested that spike peptides play a role in exacerbating urticaria in some patients. However, all subjects who developed urticaria within 4 h after CoronaVac vaccination were successfully revaccinated without graded challenge, although recurrent urticaria was common. This preliminary result indicates that acute urticaria alone should not be a contraindication for the second dose of CoronaVac if the supply of alternative vaccines is limited.

Chronic occupational exposure to lead leads to significant mucocutaneous changes in lead factory workers.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lead toxicity is a worldwide public health problem. Lead possesses deleterious effects on many organ systems. However, little is known regarding its clinical and biophysical effects on the skin. OBJECTIVE: To investigate mucocutaneous signs and biophysical property changes in skin after chronic lead toxicity. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven patients who were car battery workers participated in the study. Complete history and physical examination were performed. Blood was collected for laboratory analyses. Thorough skin examination by dermatologists was carried out in 134 subjects. Additionally, 96 patients with blood lead levels (BLL) >70 µg/dL were further evaluated for skin elasticity, sebum content, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), hydration, pH and pigmentation. An equal number of age-, sex- and skin-type-matched subjects were recruited as controls. RESULTS: The mean BLL of all subjects was 74.15 ± 11.58 µg/dL. The most frequently observed signs were gingival brown pigmentation in 112 (83.6%), gingivitis in 111 (82.8%) and lead line in 66 (49.3%) patients. The lead line was found in subjects with significantly higher BLLs (adjusted mean difference 6.45, 95% CI 2.30-10.60 µg/dL, P = 0.003) and in association with gingivitis (adjusted OR 7.32, 95% CI 2.08-25.74, P = 0.002). Mean BLL of the patients who underwent biophysical assessment was 82.77 ± 9.80 µg/dL. Patients exhibited a statistically significant lower skin hydration observed by corneometer as well as elasticity. The adjusted ORs of having dry skin and lower elasticity were 15.32 (95% CI 4.41-53.24), P < 0.001) and 1.96 (95% CI 1.06-3.60), P = 0.031), respectively. These differences were not significant for sebum content, TEWL, pH and pigmentation. CONCLUSION: Importantly, even in normal-appearing skin, level of hydration and elasticity decreased in lead-intoxicated patients. These results suggest that lead might possess harmful effects on the skin at measurable levels.

Skin signs in juvenile- and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: clues to different systemic involvement.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to explore the differences of skin signs between juvenile- and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and to identify their associations to the development of systemic involvement. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 377 systemic lupus erythematosus patients was performed. RESULTS: In total, 171 patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and 206 with adult systemic lupus erythematosus were studied. All patients were of Southeast Asian descent. The mean duration of follow up was 8.18 ± 6.19 and 9.36 ± 7.68 years for juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and adult systemic lupus erythematosus, respectively. At diagnosis, most patients presented with acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, whereas chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus was twice as common in adult systemic lupus erythematosus ( p < 0.001). The mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus was significantly higher than that of adult systemic lupus erythematosus (14.29 ± 7.13 vs 11.27 ± 6.53). Multivariate analysis revealed the following associations in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and non-scarring alopecia with increased risk of arthralgia, mucosal ulcers with leukopenia, cutaneous vasculitis with seizure, and finding of granular casts. On the contrary, the associations for adult systemic lupus erythematosus were oral ulcers with arthralgia and cutaneous vasculitis with myositis. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous signs in systemic lupus erythematosus may signal prognostic implication. Interestingly, despite similar cutaneous lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus, different ages of onset are associated with different systemic involvement.

The measurement of drug-induced interferon γ-releasing cells and lymphocyte proliferation in severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

BACKGROUND: The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is a standard laboratory method to identify culprit drugs in patients with a history of drug-induced non-immediate hypersensitivity and is mainly performed during the recovery phase. The measurement of drug-specific interferon γ (IFN-γ)-releasing cells has been introduced to confirm culprit drugs, even during the acute phase of drug allergy. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the capability of the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) to detect drug-specific IFN-γ-releasing cells during the acute phase and the capability of LTT to identify culprit drugs during the recovery phase in patients presenting with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 23 SCAR patients were collected during the acute and recovery phases and assayed for drug-specific IFN-γ-releasing cells and lymphocyte proliferation, respectively. RESULTS: Drug-specific IFN-γ-releasing cells were detectable in 73.9% of SCAR subjects (55.6% and 85.7% in patients who were and were not taking systemic steroids, respectively), whereas LTT results were positive in 52.2% of SCAR subjects. The frequencies of drug-specific IFN-γ-releasing cells were significantly higher in patients with positive LTT than in those with negative LTT (260.1 ± 110.0 and 46.6 ± 20.7 cells/106 PBMCs, P = 0.01). A significant correlation between the results of the IFN-γ ELISpot assay and LTT was demonstrated (r = 0.65, P value <0.01). CONCLUSION: The IFN-γ ELISpot assay could be a useful tool to identify culprit drugs in SCAR patients when culprit drug identification is urgently needed during the acute phase of drug allergy.

In vitro test to confirm diagnosis of allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

BACKGROUND: Allopurinol is a frequent cause of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The reactions can potentially be fatal. As drug rechallenge in patients with a history of drug-induced SCARs is contraindicated, in vitro testing may have a diagnostic role as a confirmation test. OBJECTIVES: To study the diagnostic value of interferon (IFN)-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay as a confirmatory test in patients with a history of allopurinol-induced SCARs. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 24 patients with a history of allopurinol-induced SCAR (13 DRESS, 11 SJS/TEN) and 21 control subjects were incubated with allopurinol or oxypurinol in the presence or absence of antiprogrammed death ligand 1 antibody (anti-PD-L1). The numbers of IFN-γ-releasing cells after stimulation in each group were subsequently measured with ELISpot. RESULTS: The numbers of IFN-γ-releasing cells in allopurinol-allergic subjects were significantly higher than in control subjects when stimulating PBMCs with oxypurinol 100 µg mL-1 , especially when adding anti-PD-L1 supplementation. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve results, the optimal discriminatory power of IFN-γ ELISpot in confirming diagnosis of allopurinol-induced SCARs can be obtained using 16 spot-forming cells per 106 PBMCs as a cut-off value upon oxypurinol/anti-PD-L1 stimulation (79·2% sensitivity and 95·2% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of oxypurinol/anti-PD-L1-inducing IFN-γ-releasing cells yields a high diagnostic value in distinguishing between allopurinol-allergic and control subjects. This technique is beneficial in confirming diagnosis of allopurinol-induced SCARs in patients whose reaction develops while taking multiple drugs.

Non-ablative fractional photothermolysis in treatment of idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis (IGH) is a common pigmentary disorder affecting a large number of individuals. Many patients seek medical attention due to aesthetic concern. However, no standard treatment is available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and side-effects of non-ablative fractional photothermolysis (FP) as a treatment of IGH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 lesions from 30 patients with IGH were treated. In each patient, two lesions on the extremities were assigned to treatment group, while lesions from the other side served as control. The treatment was delivered by fractional 1550-nm ytterbium/erbium fibre laser for four times at 4-week intervals. Lesional skin colour was measured by colourimetry. Digital photographs and dermoscopic digital photographs were taken at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16. In addition, patient satisfaction score and side-effects were recorded. All clinical photographs were evaluated by three experienced dermatologists to determine clinical improvement using a quartile grading scale. RESULTS: Colourimetry of the treatment side showed normalization of skin colour at each visit and was statistically significant when compared with control after two treatments (week 8) and continued to decrease until 4 weeks' follow-up (week 16) (P = 0.047, 0.016 and 0.06 respectively). Physicians' improvement grading score showed that 83.34% of the lesions in treatment group vs. 18.34% in the control group showed some improvement. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Common side-effects were erythema and oedema in treatment area, which were mild and transient. No post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was observed. CONCLUSION: Non-ablative FP appears to be an effective way to treat IGH. The improvements are documented by both objective and subjective measurements.

Erlotinib induced target-like purpura.

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, used as a treatment for advanced stage cancer. The most common side effect is cutaneous toxicity including the already known papulopustular reaction. We herein report a case of erlotinib induced target-like purpura, a peculiar cutaneous adverse event. A 57-year-old patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer was treated by erolotinib 150 mg daily. After taking the drug for three days, an unusual target-like purpura developed on her lower legs. Skin biopsy specimen taken from the lesion revealed an extravasation of erythrocytes in the upper dermis without destruction of blood vessel walls. This skin eruption cleared after the drug was withdrawn and recurred after erlotinib was re-challenged. The mechanism underlying this cutaneous adverse event remains to be elucidated. Physicians should be aware of the rare side effect of this increasingly used drug.

Topical tacrolimus significantly promotes repigmentation in idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis (IGH) is an idiopathic disorder affecting a large number of people. Effective treatments are not yet available. Objectives To investigate the efficacy of topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment compared with placebo in the treatment of IGH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were included in the study. Lesions on one side of the body were selected to have a treatment with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment, whereas those on the other side served as a control with placebo ointment that had the same physical appearance. Colorimeter was used to assess skin colour at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Mean luminosity scale after adjusted for baseline from the treated side gradually decreased and reached statistical significance compared with the control group after 6 months of treatment (P = 0.019). Physicians' improvement grading score showed that 11% of the patients demonstrated improvement of their skin lesions on the treated side after 6 months' treatment. CONCLUSION: Topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment appeared to be an effective and safe treatment for IGH. The improvements were best observed by colorimetry, yet, they were not statistically significant upon clinical assessments.