Development of a Predictive Model for Persistent Instability Following Conservative Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Odontoid fractures are common cervical spine fractures; however, significant controversy exists regarding their treatment. Risk factors for failure of conservative therapy have been identified, although no predictive risk score has been developed to aid in decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients evaluated at a level 1 trauma center. Patients identified with type II odontoid fractures as classified by the D'Alonzo Classification system who were treated with external orthosis were included in analysis. Patients were considered to have failed conservative therapy if they were offered surgical intervention. A machine learning method (Risk-SLIM) was then utilized to create a risk stratification score based on risk factors to identify patients at high risk for requiring surgical intervention due to persistent instability. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were identified as presenting with type II odontoid fractures that were treated conservatively; 38 patients were offered surgery for persistent instability. The Odontoid Fracture Predictive Model (OFPM) was created using a machine learning algorithm with a 5-fold cross validation area under the curve of 0.7389 (95% CI: 0.671 to 0.808). Predictive factors were found to include fracture displacement, displacement greater than 5 mm, comminution at the fracture base, and history of smoking. The probability of persistent instability was <5% with a score of 0 and 88% with a score of 5. CONCLUSIONS: The OFPM model is a unique, quick, and accurate tool to assist in clinical decision-making in patients with type II odontoid fractures. External validation is necessary to evaluate the validity of these findings.

Management of failed Chiari decompression and intrasyringeal hemorrhage in Noonan syndrome: illustrative cases.

BACKGROUND: Noonan syndrome (NS) is a rare genetic RASopathy with multisystem implications. The disorder is typically characterized by short stature, distinctive facial features, intellectual disability, developmental delay, chest deformity, and congenital heart disease. NS may be inherited or arise secondary to spontaneous mutations of genes in the Ras/mitogen activated protein kinase signaling pathways. OBSERVATIONS: Numerous case reports exist detailing the association between NS and Chiari I malformation (CM-I), although this relationship has not been fully established. Patients with NS who present with CM-I requiring operation have shown high rates reoperation for failed decompression. The authors reported two patients with NS, CM-I, and syringomyelia who had prior posterior fossa decompressions without syrinx improvement. Both patients received reoperation with successful outcomes. LESSONS: The authors highlighted the association between NS and CM-I and raised awareness that patients with these disorders may be at higher risk for failed posterior fossa decompression, necessitating reoperation.

Outcomes following conservative treatment of extension fractures in the setting of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: is external orthosis alone a reasonable option?

OBJECTIVE: Extension fractures in the setting of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) represent highly unstable injuries. As a result, these fractures are most frequently treated with immediate surgical fixation to limit any potential risk of associated neurological injury. Although this represents the standard of care, patients with significant comorbidities, advanced age, or medical instability may not be surgical candidates. In this paper, the authors evaluated a series of patients with extension DISH fractures who were treated with orthosis alone and evaluated their outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2015 to 2022 was conducted at a large level 1 trauma center. Patients with extension-type DISH fractures without neurological deficits were identified. All patients were treated conservatively with orthosis alone. Baseline patient characteristics and adverse outcomes are reported. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified as presenting with extension fractures associated with DISH without neurological deficit. Of these, 22 patients had complete follow-up on final chart review. Of these 22 patients, 21 (95.5%) were treated successfully with external orthosis. One patient (4.5%) who was noncompliant with the brace had an acute spinal cord injury 1 month after presentation, requiring immediate surgical fixation and decompression. No other complications, including skin breakdown or pressure ulcers related to bracing, were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of extension-type DISH fractures may be a reasonable option for patients who are not candidates for safe surgical intervention; however, a risk of neurological injury secondary to delayed instability remains, particularly if patients are noncompliant with the bracing regimen. This risk should be balanced against the high complication rate and potential mortality associated with surgical intervention in this patient population.

Creation and validation of a predictive model for lumbar synovial cyst recurrence following decompression without fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) represent a relatively rare clinical pathology that may result in radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication. Because of the potential for recurrence of these cysts, some authors advocate for segmental fusion, as opposed to decompression alone, as a way to eliminate the risk for recurrence. The objective of this study was to create a predictive score for synovial cyst recurrence following decompression without fusion. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed of all patients evaluated at a single center over 20 years who were found to have symptomatic LSCs requiring intervention. Only patients undergoing decompression without fusion were included in the analysis. Following this review, baseline characteristics were obtained as well as radiological information. A machine learning method (risk-calibrated supersparse linear integer model) was then used to create a risk stratification score to identify patients at high risk for symptomatic cyst recurrence requiring repeat surgical intervention. Following the creation of this model, a fivefold cross-validation was completed. RESULTS: In total, 89 patients were identified who had complete radiological information. Of these 89 patients, 11 developed cyst recurrence requiring reoperation. The Lumbar Synovial Cyst Score was then created with an area under the curve of 0.83 and calibration error of 11.0%. Factors predictive of recurrence were found to include facet inclination angle > 45°, canal stenosis > 50%, T2 joint space hyperintensity, and presence of grade I spondylolisthesis. The probability of cyst recurrence ranged from < 5% for a score of 2 or less to > 88% for a score of 7. CONCLUSIONS: The Lumbar Synovial Cyst Score model is a quick and accurate tool to assist in clinical decision-making in the treatment of LSCs.

Degenerative Spine Disorders and Multiple Sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease that results in demyelination of the central nervous system (CNS). MS affects as many as 350,000 individuals in the United States and commonly presents before the age of 45 years. Patients with MS, as the general population, are likely to encounter degenerative changes of the spine as they age, and this can pose a unique challenge to both patients with MS and physicians, as both conditions can have a great deal of symptomatic overlap despite stark differences in management. Currently there is no definitive approach that allows physicians to distinguish between the 2 conditions; however, specific clinical and radiologic findings have been identified as being useful in evaluating these patients.

Update on Spinal Fusion.

Spinal fusion is frequently performed for a variety of indications. It is performed to treat instability due to trauma, infection, or neoplasm. It may be used to treat regional or global spinal deformity. There are even occasions when it is appropriate as a treatment of low back pain without overt instability or deformity. One common indication for fusion is as an adjunct to decompression for patients with neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy caused by stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis. There have been a number of high-quality publications in high-quality journals that have reported conflicting results regarding the utility of fusion in this patient population. The existence of conflicting data from seemingly similarly designed trials has resulted in some confusion as to when a fusion should be used. This chapter will describe the controversy, discuss the likely basis for the disparate results reported in the literature, and recommend a reasonable treatment strategy. Going forward, the SLIP II study is an ongoing randomized, controlled trial designed to help clarify the situation. Preliminary findings drawn from this study will be discussed.

Classification and Reliability of Lumbar Facet Cysts Grading Scales.

BACKGROUND: The presence of symptomatic lumbar facet cysts has been associated with segmental instability. Given this association, decompression versus decompression with fusion is a frequently debated topic. Multiple grading scales have been devised to identify patients at high risk for development of cyst recurrence; however, there exists no external evaluation of these scales. METHODS: A retrospective review of 54 patients undergoing initial treatment for lumbar synovial cysts at a single institution over the past 12 years was conducted. Surgical treatment consisted of decompression with cystectomy without fusion. Patients were assessed and classified according to the NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG) and Rosenstock Classification systems. Five neurosurgeons reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance images, and results were classified. Interrater reliability was assessed using both Gwet's AC1 coefficient and Krippendorff's alpha. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate predictive ability of both classification systems. RESULTS: In total, of the 54 patients who underwent decompression, 7 had cyst recurrence. Overall cyst recurrence was most common in NSURG grade 2 cysts (3/12, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (4/27, 14.8%). Of the NSURG grade 3 and 4 patients, none had cyst recurrence. In the Rosenstock grades the most common recurrence was in grade 3 cysts (1/4, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (5/26, 19.2%). Interrater reliability demonstrated good reproducibility on Gwet's AC1 and Krippendorff's alpha on both grading scales. Neither score was predictive of cyst recurrence (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Rosenstock and NeuroSpine scores demonstrate good overall interrater reliability but are inconsistent in their ability to predict recurrence of lumbar facet cysts.

Cervical fusion for treatment of degenerative conditions: development of appropriate use criteria.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: High quality evidence is difficult to generate, leaving substantial knowledge gaps in the treatment of spinal conditions. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) are a means of determining appropriate recommendations when high quality evidence is lacking. PURPOSE: Define appropriate use criteria (AUC) of cervical fusion for treatment of degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Appropriate use criteria for cervical fusion were developed using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology. Following development of clinical guidelines and scenario writing, a one-day workshop was held with a multidisciplinary group of 14 raters, all considered thought leaders in their respective fields, to determine final ratings for cervical fusion appropriateness for various clinical situations. OUTCOME MEASURES: Final rating for cervical fusion recommendation as either "Appropriate," "Uncertain" or "Rarely Appropriate" based on the median final rating among the raters. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for scenarios included patients aged 18 to 80 with degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. Key modifiers were defined and combined to develop a matrix of clinical scenarios. The median score among the raters was used to determine the final rating for each scenario. The final rating was compared between modifier levels. Spearman's rank correlation between each modifier and the final rating was determined. A multivariable ordinal regression model was fit to determine the adjusted odds of an "Appropriate" final rating while adjusting for radiographic diagnosis, number of levels and symptom type. Three decision trees were developed using decision tree classification models and variable importance for each tree was computed. RESULTS: Of the 263 scenarios, 47 (17.9 %) were rated as rarely appropriate, 66 (25%) as uncertain and 150 (57%) were rated as appropriate. Symptom type was the modifier most strongly correlated with the final rating (adjusted ρ2 = 0.58, p<.01). A multivariable ordinal regression adjusting for symptom type, diagnosis, and number of levels and showed high discriminative ability (C statistic = 0.90) and the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of receiving a final rating of "Appropriate" was highest for myelopathy (aOR, 7.1) and radiculopathy (aOR, 4.8). Three decision tree models showed that symptom type and radiographic diagnosis had the highest variable importance. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate use criteria for cervical fusion in the setting of cervical degenerative disorders were developed. Symptom type was most strongly correlated with final rating. Myelopathy or radiculopathy were most strongly associated with an "Appropriate" rating, while axial pain without stenosis was most associated with "Rarely Appropriate."

Comparison of Decompression versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Synovial Cysts and Predictive Factors for Cyst Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The management of lumbar synovial cysts (LSC) has been a controversial topic for many years. Whereas many authors label LSC as markers of instability and thus necessitating fusion, others suggest that decompression alone without fusion is a viable initial treatment option. Our objective was to clarify outcomes in patients undergoing decompression alone and decompression with fusion for symptomatic LSC and identify factors for cyst recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed of all patients undergoing initial treatment for LSC at a single institution ranging from January 1999 to February 2020. Surgical treatment included either decompression with cystectomy or decompression with cystectomy and a fusion procedure. Preoperative symptoms were collected and included radicular pain, motor deficits, sensory deficits, or bowel/bladder changes. Radiographic data were calculated individually and confirmed with radiology reports. Categorical variables were assessed using χ2 analysis and continuous variables were assessed with the 2-sample t test. RESULTS: In total, 161 patients were identified as presenting with symptomatic LSC. Of these, 104 patients underwent decompression alone versus 57 who underwent decompression and fusion. In the decompression group 11 patients required reoperation at the level of the cyst compared with none in those undergoing fusion as their initial procedure (10.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.012). On subgroup analysis of those undergoing decompression as their initial procedure, patients with cyst recurrence demonstrated a statistically significant greater coronal facet inclination angle compared with those without cyst recurrence (52.4° vs. 40.6°, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Decompression alone is a reasonable choice for the initial management of LSC, although it does carry a significant risk of same-level reoperation due to cyst recurrence and spondylolisthesis. Preoperative coronal facet inclination angle may be a useful measurement in predicting cyst recurrence following decompression.

Continuous improvement in patient safety and quality in neurological surgery: the American Board of Neurological Surgery in the past, present, and future.

The American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) was incorporated in 1940 in recognition of the need for detailed training in and special qualifications for the practice of neurological surgery and for self-regulation of quality and safety in the field. The ABNS believes it is the duty of neurosurgeons to place a patient's welfare and rights above all other considerations and to provide care with compassion, respect for human dignity, honesty, and integrity. At its inception, the ABNS was the 13th member board of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), which itself was founded in 1933. Today, the ABNS is one of the 24 member boards of the ABMS.To better serve public health and safety in a rapidly changing healthcare environment, the ABNS continues to evolve in order to elevate standards for the practice of neurological surgery. In connection with its activities, including initial certification, recognition of focused practice, and continuous certification, the ABNS actively seeks and incorporates input from the public and the physicians it serves. The ABNS board certification processes are designed to evaluate both real-life subspecialty neurosurgical practice and overall neurosurgical knowledge, since most neurosurgeons provide call coverage for hospitals and thus must be competent to care for the full spectrum of neurosurgery.The purpose of this report is to describe the history, current state, and anticipated future direction of ABNS certification in the US.

Interobserver variance and patient heterogeneity influencing the treatment of grade I spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Despite well done randomized clinical trials, the role of fusion as an adjunct to decompression for the treatment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. There is substantial variation in the use of fusion as well as the techniques used for fusion for a population of patients all described by a single ICD10 code. PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the source of the variation in the perceived role of fusion by looking at surgeon as well as patient-specific factors. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study examining the variability of recommendations from an expert panel of surgeons-based imaging and clinical vignettes. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis. OUTCOME MEASURES: A six-category treatment schema based on level of invasiveness of proposed surgeries with one through three representing nonfusion strategies and categories four through six representing fusion strategies. METHODS: The authors are conducting the ongoing spinal laminectomy vs instrumented pedicle screw II study in which patients with grade one degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis are randomized to two groups: a review group in which patients are treated as per recommendations of an expert panel and a nonreview group in which patients are treated as per the referring surgeon's preference. In the former (review group), clinical vignettes and radiographic studies were evaluated by an expert panel of spine surgeons. The panel then provided these recommendations to the referring surgeon. We investigated the underlying variability by looking both at the number of similar or different recommendations received by an individual patient (surgeon-related variability) as well as the number of similar or different recommendations offered by individual surgeons across the population of patients (patient heterogeneity). Agreement between surgeons for fusion vs nonfusion (Categories 1-3 vs 4-6) was calculated using a Kappa value from a mixed effects logistic regression model. We looked at Kappa for agreement and weighted Kappa for association of ratings on the ordinal 1 to 6 scale with a mixed effects linear regression model. Additionally, we analyzed the summary of data between patients after averaging the rater scores within patients. Similarly, we summarized the data between surgeons after averaging their scores over the patients that each surgeon reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients received 1,463 treatment recommendations. On average, fusion was recommended 58.5% of the time. Overall agreement was low, and perfect agreement on the need for fusion was seen in only 24 (21.1%) of patients. Kappa statistic for agreement on fusion was 0.378 (95% confidence interval 0.324-0.432). The average score across surgeons was 4.2 (0.6) with a range of 3 to 5.3. The most common single recommendation was for fusion with interbody fusion (40.8%) and the lowest was for decompression with noninstrumented fusion (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated variability in surgical approach when individual patients were evaluated by a panel of surgeons indicating that even "expert" surgeons disagree with each other regarding the need for fusion in individual patients. We were also able to demonstrate that individual patients received consistent recommendations that were very different from those received by other individuals evaluated by the same surgeons. This indicates that there is patient-related heterogeneity driving variability independent of surgeon factors.

Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The North American Spine Society's (NASS) Evidence Based Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain features evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating adult patients with nonspecific low back pain. The guideline is intended to reflect contemporary treatment concepts for nonspecific low back pain as reflected in the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of February 2016. PURPOSE: The purpose of the guideline is to provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine specialists when making clinical decisions for adult patients with nonspecific low back pain. This article provides a brief summary of the evidence-based guideline recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with this condition. STUDY DESIGN: This is a guideline summary review. METHODS: This guideline is the product of the Low Back Pain Work Group of NASS' Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Development Committee. The methods used to develop this guideline are detailed in the complete guideline and technical report available on the NASS website. In brief, a multidisciplinary work group of spine care specialists convened to identify clinical questions to address in the guideline. The literature search strategy was developed in consultation with medical librarians. Upon completion of the systematic literature search, evidence relevant to the clinical questions posed in the guideline was reviewed. Work group members utilized NASS evidentiary table templates to summarize study conclusions, identify study strengths and weaknesses, and assign levels of evidence. Work group members participated in webcasts and in-person recommendation meetings to update and formulate evidence-based recommendations and incorporate expert opinion when necessary. The draft guideline was submitted to an internal and external peer review process and ultimately approved by the NASS Board of Directors. RESULTS: Eighty-two clinical questions were addressed, and the answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded according to the levels of evidence of the supporting literature. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence-based clinical guideline has been created using techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with nonspecific low back pain. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, literature search parameters, literature attrition flowchart, suggestions for future research, and all of the references, is available electronically on the NASS website at https://www.spine.org/ResearchClinicalCare/QualityImprovement/ClinicalGuidelines.aspx.

Computed Tomography Guidance for Percutaneous Glycerol Rhizotomy for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy (PGR) is a well-described treatment for trigeminal neuralgia; however, the technique in using surface landmarks and fluoroscopy has not drastically changed since being first introduced. In this paper, we describe a protocol for PGR using computed tomography (CT) guidance based on an experience of over 7 yr and 200 patients. OBJECTIVE: To introduce an approach for PGR using CT guidance and, in doing so, demonstrate possible benefits over the traditional fluoroscopic technique. METHODS: Using a standard CT scanner, patients are placed supine with head in extension. Barium paste and a CT scout image are used to identify and plan a trajectory to the foramen ovale. A laser localization system built into the CT scanner helps to guide placement of the spinal needle into the foramen ovale. The needle position in the foramen is confirmed with a short-sequence CT scan. RESULTS: CT-guided PGR provides multiple benefits over standard fluoroscopy, including improved visualization of the skull base and significant reduction in radiation exposure to the surgeon and staff. Side benefits include improved procedure efficiency, definitive imaging evidence of correct needle placement, and potentially increased patient safety. We have had no significant complications in over 200 patients. CONCLUSION: CT-guided PGR is a useful technique for treating trigeminal neuralgia based on better imaging of the skull base, better efficiency of the procedure, and elimination of radiation exposure for the surgeon and staff compared to traditional fluoroscopic based techniques.

Use of a Laryngeal Mask Airway Decreases Radiation Exposure During Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Glycerol Rhizotomy for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

BACKGROUND: We have been using computed tomography (CT) guidance for percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy (PGR) for the last 7 years. As a quality improvement exercise, we recently began using general anesthesia (GA) with the use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) because of our perception that the procedure went faster and that there was less radiation exposure because of less patient movement. We aim to compare PGR radiation exposure and procedural time between patients receiving local anesthetic with sedation and those receiving GA/LMA. METHODS: A single-center historical cohort study was performed using patients treated with PGR between 2017 and 2019. Ninety-two surgeries were conducted during the study period: 64 surgeries had local anesthetic with intravenous sedation, and 28 surgeries had deeper anesthetic with LMA. Data analyzed included the number of CT sequences obtained, needle placement time, and total radiation dose. RESULTS: Use of GA/LMA resulted in a 23% decrease in mean radiation dose (565.5 vs. 436.1 µGy × cm, P = 0.014), number of CT sequences required (7.4 vs. 5.7, P = 0.003), and needle placement time (12.8 vs. 9.8 minutes, P = 0.006). Additionally, 10 patients underwent multiple glycerol rhizotomies during the collection period with both anesthetic types being used at least once. Seven of 10 patients (70.0%) had a reduction in total radiation dose, number of CT sequences obtained, and needle placement time when GA/LMA was used. There were no procedure- or anesthetic-related complications in this patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GA/LMA during PGR is associated with decreased radiation exposure without increased anesthetic complications.