[Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalizations: From request to a call center to hospitalization]. / Admission en soins psychiatriques a la demande d'un tiers : de l'appel au SAMU a l'hospitalisation.

BACKGROUND: Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization (IPH) is a heavy and complex psychiatric exception measure. In the Seine-Saint-Denis department (low medical density), the evaluation of the patient in psychiatric decompensation is the responsibility of the out-of-hours general practitioners (GP) mandated by the call center. Their feeling is the non-achievement of the procedure once the patient arrives at the emergency room. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients following a request for IPH from these GP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study based on all requests for IPH received during 2016 at the Seine-Saint-Denis emergency medical call center. The characteristics of the call and the patient, as well as the decisions of the regulator and the GP were collected. The decision of hospitalization in the emergency room was sought for patients referred for IPH. RESULTS: Of the 7541 calls for decompensation, 539 were for an IPH. These calls occurred during non-working hours in 55 % of cases. A GP was involved in more than two-thirds of the cases and requested an IPH for 240/304 (79 %) patients. Patients were male in 56 % of cases with an average age of 40 (±16) years. IPH was confirmed for 132 (61 %) patients. This rate did not differ from the 65 % reported in the literature (Z-test, P=0.26). Voluntary hospitalization was performed for 37 (17 %) other patients. DISCUSSION: The IPH rate for patients referred by GP mandated by the call center was comparable to that following the requests of the attending physicians, validating their intervention in this critical context.

[When the patient calls the SAMU because his pacemaker is making "beep-beep". Study on physicians' knowledge on pacemaker sound alarm]. / Quand le patient appelle le Samu car son pacemaker fait « tic-tac ¼. Enquête sur la connaissance de l'existence d'une alarme sonore dans les pacemakers.

INTRODUCTION: More than 60,000 pacemakers are inserted every year in France. This number has been steadily increasing for a decade. Miscellaneous incidents can lead patients with pacemakers or their relatives to contact emergency services. Following the call to the SAMU-Center 15 of a asymptomatic 90-year-old woman reported that her pacemaker was making "beep-beep", we assessed the knowledge of physicians of the SAMU-Center 15 (call center) dispatching center on the existence of pacemaker sound alarms. METHODS: Forty-two physicians, emergency physicians and general practitioners, regularly participating in the medical dispatching of the SAMU-Center 15 in Seine-Seine-Denis were interviewed. We asked them how a patient with a pacemaker could be informed of a malfunction of it without being symptomatic. RESULTS: No physician interviewed mentioned an audible alarm. All of them confirmed their ignorance of its existence. One physician had already been asked for a similar reason and had referred the patient to the emergency department without knowing it was an alarm. CONCLUSION: Patients and physicians seem insufficiently aware of the existence of the existence of pacemakers' sound alarm. An effort must be made regarding the information on the existence of such an alarm and the way to managed it.

[Orientation of patients referred by their general practionner to the public or private hospital sector in France: A prospective epidemiologic study]. / Orientation des patients par leur médecin généraliste vers les secteurs hospitaliers publics ou privés en France : étude épidémiologique prospective du réseau Sentinelles.

PURPOSE: In-patients characteristics generate cost differences between hospitals. In France, there are few data on the characteristics on the patients referred to hospitals by their general practitioners (GPs) and none on the predictors of referral to the public or for-profit hospitals. The aim of this study was to analyze those characteristics and the predictors of referral to the public or for-profit hospitals. METHODS: We collected, prospectively, the request for hospitalizations made by the GPs of the Sentinelles network in France, from 2007 to 2009. Patients' characteristics and also the reasons for that request were analyzed. A logistic regression was used to compare the population between local hospitals. RESULTS: Ten thousand seven hundred and eighteen statements were collected. The median age was 73 years. Patients were women in 51% of the cases, and only 14% of the hospitalizations had been planned. Hospitalization in the public sector was preferred for young children and the elderly (P<0.001). When compared to the patients referred to the private sector, patients addressed to the public sector were more often seen for emergencies (OR: 2.3 [2.0-2.8]), by a doctor different from their referring GP (OR: 1.7 [1.4-2.1]) and out of the GP's office. The reasons for hospital admission were different depending on the sector of hospitalization (P<0.001), patients addressed to the public sector hospitals presented with greater comorbidity or more complex diagnosis (for example: feeling ill, fainting or syncope and fever) or a greater disability (for example: stroke, neurological and psychiatric diseases). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that GPs send their patients to the public or for-profit hospitals according to criteria of severity, comorbidity and disability.