Comparison between 200 mg generic celecoxib hard capsules and Celebra®: bioequivalence study in healthy male and female subjects under fasting conditions after a single dose / Comparação entre celecoxibe genérico de 200 mg em cápsulas duras e Celebra®: estudo de bioequivalência em indivíduos saudáveis do sexo masculino e feminino, em jejum, após uma dose única

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the bioequivalence between two 200 mg celecoxib hard capsule formulations administered to healthy male and female participants under fasting conditions with the aim of providing an alternative pharmaceutical product to the reference drug, Celebra®. METHODS: A randomized, open label, single dose, 2x2 crossover trial was conducted with 60 adult healthy subjects under fasting conditions comparing single doses of two celecoxib hard capsules formulation. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated following the determination of drugs concentrations in human plasma using a validated liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometer detector method (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Statistical analysis provided geometric mean of test/reference ratio, confidence intervals, intra-subject variation coefficient and power of the test to the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞. Confidence intervals for the geometric mean (90% CI) of the test/reference drugs for celecoxib were 98.26 to 122.75% for Cmax, 100.27% to 110.78% for AUC0-t, and 96.87% to 110.29% for AUC0-∞. The power of the test found was 95.09% for Cmax, 100.00% for AUC0-t, and 99.99% for AUC0-∞. CONCLUSION: The formulations met the Brazilian standards for interchangeability, as the confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC0-t ratios are within the range of 80% to 125%, thus meeting the requirements of the legislation during market registration. The researched product was approved by the regulatory authorities and became a commercially competitive option to the reference product for the Brazilian population.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a bioequivalência entre duas formulações de cápsulas duras de celecoxibe de 200 mg administradas a participantes saudáveis do sexo masculino e feminino em condições de jejum com o objetivo de fornecer um produto farmacêutico alternativo ao fármaco de referência, Celebra®. MÉTODOS: Estudo randomizado, aberto, de dose única e cruzado 2x2. Foi conduzido com 60 indivíduos adultos saudáveis em condições de jejum, comparando doses únicas de duas formulações de cápsulas duras de celecoxibe. Os parâmetros farmacocinéticos foram calculados após a determinação das concentrações dos fármacos no plasma humano usando uma cromatografia líquida validada com um método detector de espectrômetro de massa em tandem (LC-MS/MS). RESULTADOS: A análise estatística forneceu a média geométrica da razão teste/referência, os intervalos de confiança, o coeficiente de variação intra-sujeito e o poder do teste para os parâmetros farmacocinéticos Cmáx, AUC0-t e AUC0-∞. Os intervalos de confiança para a média geométrica (IC 90%) dos fármacos teste/referência para o celecoxibe foram 98,26 a 122,75% para Cmáx, 100,27% a 110,78% para AUC0-t e 96,87% a 110,29% para AUC0-∞. O poder do teste encontrado foi de 95,09% para Cmáx, 100,00% para AUC0-t e 99,99% para AUC0-∞. CONCLUSÃO: As formulações atenderam aos padrões brasileiros de intercambialidade, pois os intervalos de confiança para as razões Cmáx e AUC0-t estão dentro da faixa de 80% a 125%, atendendo, assim, às exigências da legislação para o registro no mercado. O produto pesquisado foi aprovado pelas autoridades regulatórias e tornou-se uma opção comercialmente competitiva ao produto de referência para a população brasileira.

Bioequivalence of 2 formulations of montelukast (5 mg chewable tablet) in the fasting state: an open-label randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover study / Estudo de bioequivalência entre duas formulações de comprimidos mastigáveis de Montelucaste de 5 mg em condições de jejum: um estudo randomizado, de dose única, aberto, dois períodos, cruzado

Introduction: Montelukast, a selective and active leukotriene receptor antagonist, is one of the most common agents in asthma treatment for both adults and children. Objective: To assess whether the pharmacokinetic profiles of two formulations of montelukast were similar after a single 5 mg dose (chewable tablets), administered orally under fasting conditions, sampling blood before and 36 hours after administration. Methods: This was a randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period, crossover study of 2 chewable tablet formulations of the drug: Singulair®, provided by Merck Sharp and Dohme Farmacêutica Ltda. (reference), and generic montelukast, manufactured by Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. (test). Plasma samples obtained from 35 participants were analyzed for montelukast through high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, with montelukast-d6 as the internal standard. Peak montelukast concentrations were 299.313 (SD, 11.039) ng/mL for the reference formulation and 279.803 (SD, 10.085) ng/mL for test formulation. Results: Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between AUC0-36h, AUC0-inf, or Cmax between formulations, with the following test/reference ratios: 102.458 for AUC0-36h, 102.522 for AUC0-inf, and 93.490 for Cmax. No serious adverse events were reported during the trial. Our results demonstrated the bioequivalence of Singulair® and Eurofarma's generic montelukast. Conclusions: Our results revealed that the new generic tablets are clinically safe and can be used interchangeably with the brand name product. Eurofarma's montelukast offers a safe, effective, and cheaper treatment option for people with asthma or allergic rhinitis.

Introdução: O montelucaste, um antagonista seletivo e ativo dos receptores de leucotrienos, é um dos agentes mais comumente usados na prática clínica no tratamento da asma, tanto em adultos quanto em crianças. Objetivo: Avaliar se os perfis farmacocinéticos de duas formulações de montelucaste eram semelhantes após uma dose única de comprimidos mastigáveis de 5 mg, administrados por via oral em jejum, coletando amostras de sangue desde antes da administração até 36 horas depois disso. Métodos: Estudo comparativo randomizado, 2 sequências e 2 períodos, cruzado, de dois medicamentos em comprimidos mastigáveis: Singulair®, fornecido pela Merck Sharp e Dohme Farmacêutica Ltda. (referência) e Montelucaste 5 mg, fabricado pela Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. (teste). Amostras de plasma obtidas de 35 indivíduos elegíveis foram analisadas para montelucaste por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência acoplada a espectrometria de massa em tandem, tendo Montelucaste-d6 como padrão interno. As concentrações máximas de montelucaste foram 299,313±11,039 ng/mL para referência e 279,803±10,085 ng/mL para formulação de teste. Resultados: A análise estatística não mostrou diferenças significativas para AUC0-36h, AUC0-inf e nem para Cmax entre as formulações, apresentando as razões Teste/Referência: 102,458 para AUC0-36h, 102,522 para AUC0-inf e 93,490 para Cmax. Nenhum evento adverso grave foi relatado durante o estudo. De acordo com a regulamentação brasileira, o atual estudo farmacocinético demonstrou bioequivalência entre os agentes individuais e forneceu evidências de bioequivalência entre Singulair® e Montelukast fabricado pela Eurofarma. Resultado: Os resultados mostraram que os novos comprimidos genéricos são clinicamente seguros e podem ser trocados pela marca original. O montelucaste da Eurofarma oferece uma opção de tratamento mais barata, segura e eficaz para indivíduos com asma ou rinite alérgica.

Bioequivalence/bioavailability Study of a New Formulation of Imatinib Mesylate 100 mg Coated Tablets versus Glivec® in Brazilian Healthy Male Volunteers in Fed State / Estudo de Bioequivalência/Biodisponibilidade de uma Nova Formulação de Mesilato de Imatinibe versus Glivec® em Voluntários Saudáveis Brasileiros em Condições Alimentares / Estudio de Bioequivalencia/Biodisponibilidad de una Nueva Formulación de Mesilato de Imatinib versus Glivec® en Voluntarios Saludables Brasileños Bajo Condiciones Alimentarias

Introduction: Imatinib mesylate is currently the first-line oral treatment for all stages of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and is also used in some cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Objective: Investigate the bioavailability of two products containing imatinib mesylate, 100 mg coated tablet, to determine if they are bioequivalent. Method: The study was conducted using an open-label, randomized, balanced design and the formulations were administered orally in a single dose to 48 healthy adult males, in fed state, followed by sequential blood withdraws for the next 72 hours. Forty-eight male healthy volunteers were selected to participate in the study. Test formulation from Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. Brazil was compared to from Novartis Biociências S.A. The comparative bioavailability of the formulations was assessed based on statistical comparisons of relevant pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from drug concentration data from collected blood samples measured using an analytical method based on high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Results: The ratio of the geometric means between the test and the reference, with a 90% confidence interval, of pharmacokinetic parameters for Cmax was 102.26% (94.17-111.04%) and for AUC0-t was 101.24% (95.19-107.68%). Conclusion: Imatinib mesylate 100 mg (test product) from Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. was considered bioequivalent to the reference Glivec® 100 mg manufactured by Novartis Biociências S.A, and the test product can be interchangeable with the reference, based on their pharmacokinetic performance

Introdução: O mesilato de imatinibe é atualmente o tratamento oral de primeira linha para todos os estágios de leucemia mieloide crônica (LMC) e é usado também em alguns casos de tumores gastrointestinais (GIST) e na leucemia linfoide aguda (LLA). Objetivo: Investigar a biodisponibilidade de dois produtos contendo mesilato de imatinibe de 100 mg em comprimidos revestidos para determinar se são bioequivalentes. Método: Estudo conduzido usando um desenho aberto, randomizado e balanceado. As formulações foram administradas de forma oral em única dose a 48 participantes saudáveis do sexo masculino após alimentação, seguido de coletas de sangue por 72 horas. Quarenta e oito participantes saudáveis foram selecionados para participar do estudo. A formulação teste da Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. foi comparada com a formulação referência da Novartis Biociências S.A. A biodisponibilidade relativa das formulações foi avaliada em comparações estatísticas dos parâmetros farmacocinéticos relevantes obtidos de concentrações de droga das amostras coletadas mediante a utilização de um método analítico baseado em cromatografia líquida de alta performance acoplada à espectrometria de massas. Resultados: A razão das médias geométricas entre teste e referência com intervalo de confiança 90% dos parâmetros farmacocinéticos para Cmáx foi de 102,26% (94,17-111,04%) e para ASC0-t foi de 101,24% (95,19-107,68). Conclusão: Mesilato de imatinib 100 mg (produto teste) da Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. foi considerado bioequivalente ao Glivec® 100 mg produzido por Novartis Biociências S.A., e o produto teste pode ser intercambiável como referência com base em seu desempenho farmacocinético

Introducción: El mesilato de imatinibe es actualmente el tratamiento oral de primera línea para todos los estadios de leucemia mieloide crónica (LMC) y es usado también en algunos casos de tumores gastrointestinales (GIST) y leucemia linfoide aguda (LLA). Objetivo: Investigar la biodisponibilidad de dos productos de mesilato de imatinibe de 100 mg en comprimidos revestidos para determinar si son bioequivalentes. Método: Estudio ejecutado usando un diseño abierto, aleatorizado y balanceado. Las formulaciones fueron administradas de forma oral en dosis única a 48 participantes saludables de sexo masculino en condiciones de alimentación, seguidas de muestras de sangre por 72 horas. Cuarenta y ocho participantes saludables fueron seleccionados para participar del estudio. La formulación de prueba de Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. fue comparada con la formulación referencia de Novartis Biociências S.A. La biodisponibilidad relativa de las formulaciones fue evaluada mediante comparaciones estadísticas de los parámetros farmacocinéticos relevantes obtenidos de concentraciones del fármaco de muestras recolectadas con la utilización de un método analítico basado en cromatografía de alto rendimiento acoplada a espectrometría de masas. Resultados: La relación de las medias geométricas entre la prueba y la referencia con un intervalo de confianza del 90% de los parámetros farmacocinéticos para Cmax fue 102,26% (94,17-111,04%) y para AUC0-t fue 101,24% (95,19-107,68). Conclusión: El mesilato de imatinib 100 mg (producto de prueba) de Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. fue considerado bioequivalente al Glivec® 100 mg producido por Novartis Biociências S.A. y el producto de prueba puede ser intercambiable con el de referencia en función de su desempeño farmacocinético

A rare association between factor H deficiency and lupus: Case report and experimental treatment with curcumin.

Factor H (FH) is one of the most important regulatory proteins of the alternative pathway of the complement system. FH deficiency is a rare condition that causes unregulated C3 consumption, leading to an increased susceptibility to infections and glomerulopathies. Our previous studies have demonstrated a FH deficient patient carrying a c.452G > A, p.R127H FH mutation which leads to a misfolded protein and its retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. In his cultured fibroblasts, FH-delayed secretion was partially rescued when treated with curcumin, and once secreted, exhibited normal regulatory function. Here, we report a childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) in this FH deficient patient and the results of experimental treatment with curcumin aiming to rescue FH secretion and regulatory activity.

Acute Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

This study evaluated the scientific evidence on the acute effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on biochemical, cardiovascular, and metabolic parameters in patients with diabetes mellitus. The research took place using two databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) with eligible studies conducted between 2010 and 2020, using the following keywords: (1) high-intensity training/exercise; (2) interval training/exercise; (3) HIIT/exercise; AND "diabetes". Data extraction was then performed on the eligible studies through content analysis using the categories: author and year of publication; sample characteristics; methods and data collected; intervention protocol; and results found. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Fourteen studies were included, evaluating 168 people with diabetes (122/46 type 2/1) and 42 normoglycemic individuals, which evaluated markers such as capillary and fasting blood glucose, 24-h blood glucose profile, postprandial blood glucose, incidence, and prevalence of hyperglycemia, vascular function and pressure response and control of inflammatory markers. Physical exercise was found to have several acute beneficial effects on the health of the diabetic population, such as reduced capillary and postprandial blood glucose, blood glucose profile, and blood pressure. Moreover, HIIT seems to be a safe and effective alternative in glycemic control and associated factors, superior to continuous moderate-intensity training.

Repeat analysis and incurred sample reanalysis: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the global bioanalysis consortium harmonization team.

The A7 harmonization team (A7 HT), a part of the Global Bioanalysis Consortium (GBC), focused on reviewing best practices for repeat analysis and incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) as applied during regulated bioanalysis. With international representation from Europe, Latin America, North America, and the Asia Pacific region, the team first collated common practices and guidance recommendations and assessed their suitability from both a scientific and logistical perspective. Subsequently, team members developed best practice recommendations and refined them through discussions and presentations with industry experts at scientific meetings. This review summarizes the team findings and best practice recommendations. The few topics where no consensus could be reached are also discussed. The A7 HT recommendations, together with those from the other GBC teams, provide the basis for future international harmonization of regulated bioanalytical practices.

Quantification of imatinib in human serum: validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic assays.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib mesylate has been a breakthrough treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. It has become the ideal tyrosine kinase inhibitor and the standard treatment for chronic-phase leukemia. Striking results have recently been reported, but intolerance to imatinib and noncompliance with treatment remain to be solved. Molecular monitoring by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard for monitoring patients, and imatinib blood levels have also become an important tool for monitoring. METHODS: A fast and cheap method was developed and validated using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantification of imatinib in human serum and tamsulosin as the internal standard. Remarkable advantages of the method includes use of serum instead of plasma, less time spent on processing and analysis, simpler procedures, and requiring reduced amounts of biological material, solvents, and reagents. Stability of the analyte was also studied. This research also intended to drive the validation scheme in clinical centers. The method was validated according to the requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration and Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency within the range of 0.500-10.0 µg/mL with a limit of detection of 0.155 µg/mL. Stability data for the analyte are also presented. CONCLUSION: Given that the validated method has proved to be linear, accurate, precise, and robust, it is suitable for pharmacokinetic assays, such as bioavailability and bioequivalence, and is being successfully applied in routine therapeutic drug monitoring in the hospital service.

Determination of serum levels of imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: validation and application of a new analytical method to monitor treatment compliance.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to monitor imatinib mesylate therapeutically in the Tumor Biology Laboratory, Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). A simple and sensitive method to quantify imatinib and its metabolite (CGP74588) in human serum was developed and fully validated in order to monitor treatment compliance. METHODS: The method used to quantify these compounds in serum included protein precipitation extraction followed by instrumental analysis using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The method was validated for several parameters, including selectivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and linearity. RESULTS: The parameters evaluated during the validation stage exhibited satisfactory results based on the Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) guidelines for validating bioanalytical methods. These parameters also showed a linear correlation greater than 0.99 for the concentration range between 0.500 µg/mL and 10.0 µg/mL and a total analysis time of 13 minutes per sample. This study includes results (imatinib serum concentrations) for 308 samples from patients being treated with imatinib mesylate. CONCLUSION: The method developed in this study was successfully validated and is being efficiently used to measure imatinib concentrations in samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients to check treatment compliance. The imatinib serum levels of patients achieving a major molecular response were significantly higher than those of patients who did not achieve this result. These results are thus consistent with published reports concerning other populations.

Determination of serum levels of imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: validation and application of a new analytical method to monitor treatment compliance

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to monitor imatinib mesylate therapeutically in the Tumor Biology Laboratory, Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). A simple and sensitive method to quantify imatinib and its metabolite (CGP74588) in human serum was developed and fully validated in order to monitor treatment compliance. METHODS: The method used to quantify these compounds in serum included protein precipitation extraction followed by instrumental analysis using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The method was validated for several parameters, including selectivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and linearity. RESULTS: The parameters evaluated during the validation stage exhibited satisfactory results based on the Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) guidelines for validating bioanalytical methods. These parameters also showed a linear correlation greater than 0.99 for the concentration range between 0.500 µg/mL and 10.0 µg/mL and a total analysis time of 13 minutes per sample. This study includes results (imatinib serum concentrations) for 308 samples from patients being treated with imatinib mesylate. CONCLUSION: The method developed in this study was successfully validated and is being efficiently used to measure imatinib concentrations in samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients to check treatment compliance. The imatinib serum levels of patients achieving a major molecular response were significantly higher than those of patients who did not achieve this result. These results are thus consistent with published reports concerning other populations.

Chlorpromazine quantification in human plasma by UPLC-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Application to a comparative pharmacokinetic study.

In the present study a method to quantify chlorpromazine in human plasma using cyclobenzaprine as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from human plasma by a liquid-liquid extraction with diethyl ether/dichloromethane (70/30, v/v) and analyzed by an ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to an electrospray tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in positive mode (UPLC-ES(+)-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed isocratically on an Aquity UPLC BEH C18 1.7 µm (50 mm × 2.1 mm i.d.) operating at 40°C. The mobile phase was a mixture of 65% water+1% formic acid and 35% of acetonitrile at a flow-rate of 0.5 mL/min. The lowest concentration quantified was 0.5 ng/mL and a linear calibration curve over the range 0.5-200 ng/mL was obtained, showing intra-assay precisions from 2.4 to 5.8%, and inter-assay precisions from 3.6 to 9.9%. The intra-assay accuracies ranged from 96.9 to 102.5%, while the inter-assay accuracies ranged from 94.1 to 100.3%. This analytical method was applied in a relative bioavailability study in order to compare a test chlorpromazine 100 mg simple dose formulation versus a reference in 57 volunteers of both sexes. The study was conducted in an open randomized two-period crossover design and with a fourteen days washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 144-h interval. Since the 90% CI for both C(max), AUC(last) and AUC(0-inf) were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration and ANVISA, it was concluded that chlorpromazine 100 mg/dose was bioequivalent to the reference formulation, according to both the rate and extent of absorption.

The role of soluble fiber intake in patients under highly effective lipid-lowering therapy.

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that statins can increase intestinal sterol absorption. Augments in phytosterolemia seems related to cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: We examined the role of soluble fiber intake in endogenous cholesterol synthesis and in sterol absorption among subjects under highly effective lipid-lowering therapy. DESIGN: In an open label, randomized, parallel-design study with blinded endpoints, subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia (n = 116) were assigned to receive during 12 weeks, a daily dose of 25 g of fiber (corresponding to 6 g of soluble fibers) plus rosuvastatin 40 mg (n = 28), rosuvastatin 40 mg alone (n = 30), sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg plus 25 g of fiber (n = 28), or sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 30) alone. RESULTS: The four assigned therapies produced similar changes in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides (p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and did not change HDL-cholesterol. Fiber intake decreased plasma campesterol (p < 0.001 vs. baseline), particularly among those patients receiving ezetimibe (p < 0.05 vs. other groups), and ß-sitosterol (p = 0.03 vs. baseline), with a trend for lower levels in the group receiving fiber plus ezetimibe (p = 0.07). Treatment with rosuvastatin alone or combined with soluble fiber was associated with decreased levels of desmosterol (p = 0.003 vs. other groups). Compared to non-fiber supplemented individuals, those treated with fibers had weight loss (p = 0.04), reduced body mass index (p = 0.002) and blood glucose (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Among subjects treated with highly effective lipid-lowering therapy, the intake of 25 g of fibers added favorable effects, mainly by reducing phytosterolemia. Additional benefits include improvement in blood glucose and anthropometric parameters.

A novel and sensitive method for ethinylestradiol quantification in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) tandem mass spectrometry: application to a comparative pharmacokinetics study.

In the present study, a novel, fast, sensitive and robust method to quantify ethinylestradiol in human plasma using 17alpha-ethinylestradiol-d4 as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from acidified plasma by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using diethyl ether-hexane followed by online solid phase extraction (SPE) using online C18 cartridges. Extracted samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to atmospheric pressure photoionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-APPI-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed isocratically on a C18, 5 microm analytical column. The method had a chromatographic run time of 2.50 min and a linear calibration curve over the range 5-500 pg ml(-1) (r(2)>0.9992). The lowest concentration quantified was 5 pg ml(-1), demonstrating acceptable accuracy and precision. The intra-assay precisions ranged from 2.1 to 14.6%, while inter-assay precisions ranged from 4.4 to 11.4%. The intra-assay accuracies ranged from 94.6 to 103.8%, while the inter-assay accuracies ranged from 98.9 to 101.6%. The recovery of ethinylestradiol was determined as part of the assay validation process and was 73.1 and 79.0% for the concentrations 15 and 375 pg ml(-1), respectively. Short-term stability showed that ethinylestradiol was stable in plasma for at least 19 h at room temperature or for at least 385 days when stored at -20 degrees C. In the study of bioequivalence conducted in Brazil, healthy volunteers received two ethinylestradiol 0.035 mg tablet formulations using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 2-week washout interval. Since the 90% confidence interval for C(max) and area under the curve ratios were all inside the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that the two ethinylestradiol formulations are bioequivalent with respect to both the rate and the extent of absorption.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a nitric oxide-releasing derivative of enalapril in male beagles.

1. Pharmacological compounds that release nitric oxide (NO) have been useful tools in the evaluation of the broad role of NO in physiopathology and therapeutics. The present study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of enalapril and an NO-releasing enalapril molecule (NCX899) in conscious male beagles. The effects of both enalapril and NCX899 in the arterial hypertension and bradycardia induced by acute NO inhibition in anaesthetized dogs were also investigated. 2. Dogs received either NCX899 (4 micromol/kg, i.v.) or enalapril (4 micromol/kg, i.v.), after which plasma concentrations of the analytes and metabolites were quantified by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). 3. In the NCX899 group, the area under the time-course curve (AUC(0-24h)) was 29.18 +/- 4.72, 229.37 +/- 51.32 and 5159.23 +/- 514.88 microg.h/L for the analytes nitro-enalapril, enalapril and enalaprilat, respectively. In the enalapril group, the AUC(0-24h) was 704.53 +/- 158.86 and 4149.27 +/- 847.30 microg.h/L for the analytes enalapril and enalaprilat, respectively. Statistical analysis of data from both groups showed a significant difference for the analyte enalapril, but not for enalaprilat. Moreover, NCX899 and enalapril were equally effective in inhibiting the activity of serum angiotensin-converting enzyme. 4. In anaesthetized dogs, i.v. administration of the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME; 0.1-10 mg/kg) significantly elevated arterial blood pressure, with concomitant bradycardia. The compound NCX899 significantly attenuated both arterial hypertension and bradycardia, whereas enalapril had no significant effect. 5. In conclusion, the present results showed that the NO-releasing derivative of enalapril NCX899 presents a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship similar to its parent compound enalapril. Moreover, NCX899 (but not enalapril) was effective in protecting against the cardiovascular changes induced by acute NOS inhibition.

Quantification of carvedilol in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry: application to bioequivalence study.

A rapid, sensitive and specific method to quantify carvedilol in human plasma using metoprolol as the internal standard (IS) is described. The analyte and the IS were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction using a diethyl-ether solvent. After removed and dried the organic phase, the extracts were reconstituted with a fixed volume of acetonitrile-water (50/50; v/v). The extracts were analyzed by a high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed isocratically on Alltech Prevail C18 5 microm analytical column, (150 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.). The method had a chromatographic run time of 3.5 min and a linear calibration curve over the range 0.1-200 ng ml(-1) (r2>0.997992). The limit of quantification was 0.1 ng ml(-1). This HPLC-MS/MS procedure was used to assess the bioequivalence of two carvedilol 25 mg tablet formulations (carvedilol test formulation from Laboratórios Biosintética Ltda and Coreg from Roche Químicos e Farmacêuticos S.A standard reference formulation). A single 25 mg dose of each formulation was administered to healthy volunteers. The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 2-week wash-out interval. Since the 90% CI for C(max) and AUCs ratios were all inside the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration Agency, it was concluded that carvedilol formulation elaborated by Laboratórios Biosintética Ltda is bioequivalent to Coreg formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption.

Lisinopril quantification in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry.

An analytical method based on liquid chromatography with positive ion electrospray ionization (ESI) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry detection was developed for the determination of Lisinopril in human plasma using Enalaprilat as internal standard. The analyte and internal standard were extracted from the plasma samples by solid-phase extraction using Waters HLB Oasis SPE cartridges and chromatographed on a C8 analytical column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/water (60:40, v/v) + 20 mM acetic acid + 4.3 mM of triethylamine. The method had a chromatographic total run-time of 6.5 min and was linear within the range 2.00-200 ng/ml. Detection was carried out on a Micromass triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The precision (CV%) and accuracy, calculated from limit of quantification (LOQ) samples (n = 8), were 8.9 and 98.9%, respectively. The method herein described was employed in a bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations of Lisinopril 20mg.

Determination of pantoprazole in human plasma by LC-MS-MS using lansoprazole as internal standard.

An analytical method based on liquid chromatography with positive ion electrospray ionization (ESI) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry detection was developed for the determination of pantoprazole (CAS 102625-70-7) in human plasma using lansoprazole (CAS 103577-45-3) as the internal standard. The analyte and internal standard were extracted from the plasma samples by liquid/liquid extraction using diethyl-ether/dichloromethane (70:30; v/v) and chromatographed on a C8 analytical column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/ water/methanol (57:25:18; v/v/v) + 10 mmol/l acetic acid + 20 mmol/l ammonium acetate. The method has a chromatographic total run time of 4.5 min and was linear within the range 5.0-5,000 ng/ mL. Detection was performed on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer by Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM). The intra- and inter-run precisions calculated from quality control (QC) samples were 4.2 % and 3.2 %, respectively. The accuracies as determined from QC samples were -5.0 % (intra-run) and 2.0 % (inter-run). The method herein described was employed in a bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations of pantoprazole.