Is hormone replacement a risk factor for ischemic stroke in women with factor V Leiden mutation?

OBJECTIVE: To describe a patient with multifocal cerebral ischemia whose only identified potential risk factors were use of postmenopausal hormone replacement and heterozygosity to factor V Leiden mutation. DESIGN: A case report. SETTING: A tertiary care center. PATIENT: A 51-year-old woman taking hormone replacement (0.625 mg/d of estrogen alternating with 10 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone) presented with a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. She had persistent multifocal non-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. A stereotactic biopsy of the brain performed to exclude gliomatosis cerebri was consistent with cerebral ischemia. An extensive evaluation to uncover the cause of stroke revealed only heterozygosity to factor V Leiden mutation. MAIN OUTCOME AND RESULTS: Hormonal replacement was discontinued and the patient had no recurrent ischemic strokes. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal hormonal replacement may be a risk factor for ischemic stroke in women with the factor V Leiden mutation. Ongoing trials of hormonal replacement provide an opportunity to test this hypothesis.

High-dose chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: evaluation of infusing peripheral blood stem cells containing occult tumor cells.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of detecting occult tumor cells in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvests and to determine the impact of infusing such cells on relapses after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Peripheral blood stem cell harvests from 223 patients with breast cancer were examined by an immunocytochemistry (ICC) method for detection of occult tumor cells, and infused after HDC without consideration of test results. Two hundred and four patients, 114 with stage II-III and 90 with stage IV disease who received only PBSC, that were tested by ICC were evaluated for time to relapse. Five hundred and eighty-one of 619 PBSC harvests (94%) from 223 patients were tested. Fifty-three of 581 harvests (9%), 8% from stage II-III and 10% from stage IV patients, were positive by ICC (P = 0.68). Forty-one of 223 patients (18%), 17/122 (14%) with stage II-III and 24/101 (24%) with stage IV disease, had positive harvests (P = 0.06). Eleven percent of patients who had 1-2 harvests tested were positive as compared to 32% of patients who had > or =3 PBSC harvests tested (P < 0.001). Nineteen patients who were infused with a mixture of ICC negative and untested PBSC harvests were excluded from analyses of relapse. The probabilities of relapse at 18 months for the 97 patients with stage II-III disease infused with ICC-negative and the 17 with ICC-positive PBSC were 0.19 and 0.13, respectively (P = 0.48). The probabilities of relapse at 18 months for patients achieving a CR or a CR in non-bone sites and improvement in bone lesions were 0.55 for the ICC-negative group (n = 30) and 0.45 for the ICC-positive group (n = 11) (P = 0.60). It was concluded that occult tumor cells were detected by ICC in PBSC harvests from a relatively small fraction of women with breast cancer, but were not associated with a significant increase in the probability of early relapse or progression when infused after HDC.

Phase II and pharmacodynamic studies of pyrazine diazohydroxide (NSC 361456) in patients with advanced renal and colorectal cancer.

Pyrazine diazohydroxide (PZDH) is a novel antitumor agent that forms DNA adducts via the reactive pyrazine diazonium ion. In a recent Phase I study of PZDH, we identified a recommended Phase II dose of 100 mg/m2/day x 5, given as a 5-min i.v. bolus with the cycles repeated every 42 days (N. J. Vogelzang, et al, Cancer Res., 54: 114-119, 1994). There was a moderate negative correlation between serum chloride concentration and logarithm platelet nadir, suggesting the hypothesis that PZDH is activated in an acidic environment, leading to more toxicity in acidotic patients. Therefore, the University of Chicago Phase II cooperative network conducted two Phase II studies of PZDH in renal cancer (15 patients, 2 with liver metastases) and in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer (14 patients, 13 with liver metastases) to determine efficacy in each disease and to correlate safety and tolerance of the drug with PZDH pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and with arterial blood gas measurements. There were no responses seen in either tumor type. The primary toxicity of PZDH was myelosuppression with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, < 1000/microl) and thrombocytopenia (<50,000 cells/microl), seen in 41 and 24% of all cycles, respectively. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed no significant correlation between plasma levels at 5, 60, and 120 min; WBCs; absolute neutrophil and platelet count nadirs; and initial serum chloride or blood pH levels. The colorectal patients experienced significantly more thrombocytopenia than did the renal cancer patients (median platelet nadir after cycle 1 was 151 x 10(3)/microl for renal patients versus 76 x 10(3)/microl for colon patients; P = 0.04), suggesting either that prior 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin reduced bone marrow reserve or that colorectal patients with liver metastases experienced more PZDH toxicity. Regression analyses revealed a possible relationship (P = 0.06) between serum pH and thrombocytopenia (i.e., for each increase of 0.03 in pH, there was a 34% increase in the platelet nadir), but there was no relationship between serum chloride and thrombocytopenia. Curiously, an increase in alkaline phosphatase was associated with an increase in the platelet nadir (P = 0.02). If PZDH continues to be developed as an antineoplastic agent, further studies of these relationships are suggested.

High-dose chemotherapy with BUCY or BEAC and unpurged peripheral blood stem cell infusion in patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Forty-nine patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BUCY) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and CY (BEAC) followed by unpurged autologous peripheral blood stem (PBSC) infusion. All patients had failed initial chemotherapy or progressed after an initial remission. Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized with CY alone (n = 1), CY, etoposide (n = 19), or CY, etoposide and cisplatin (n = 29) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Twenty-two patients received BU, 16 mg/kg, and CY, 120 mg/kg. Twenty-seven patients received carmustine 300 mg/m2, etoposide 600 mg/m2, cytarabine 600 mg/m2, and CY 140 mg/kg. Four patients (8%) died of non-relapse causes, two (9%) in the BUCY group and two (7%) in the BEAC group. Twenty-seven patients (55%) relapsed or progressed at a median of 9.4 months (2-38) from PBSC infusion. Ten patients who relapsed are alive a median of 31 months (range, 6-47) after relapse. The probabilities of relapse at 3.6 years for patients receiving BUCY or BEAC were 0.57 and 0.70, respectively (P = 0.92). Twenty-seven patients (55%) are alive at a median of 3.6 years (range, 1-5). The probabilities of survival at 3.6 years for patients receiving BUCY or BEAC were 0.58 and 0.55, respectively (P = 0.72). The probabilities of EFS at 3.6 years for patients receiving BUCY or BEAC were 0.36 and 0.28, respectively (P = 0.82). It was concluded that BUCY is an active regimen for the treatment of patients with low-grade NHL.

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells after the administration of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of 497 patients.

BACKGROUND: There is great interpatient variability in the number of peripheral blood stem cells collected, as measured by CD34+ cell content, after the administration of chemotherapy and a growth factor. The ability to predict patients who fail to yield adequate quantities of CD34+ cells would be of value. However, very few reports include large numbers of patients treated in an identical fashion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 1995, 497 consecutive patients with a variety of malignant diseases received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (6 micrograms/kg/day) for mobilization and collection of a target dose > or = 2.5 x 10(8) CD34+ cells per kg. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with failure to achieve this target harvest. RESULTS: A median of 14.71 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 0.08-137.55) was harvested with a median of 2 (range, 1-11) apheresis procedures. Ninety-one percent of patients yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(5) CD34+ cells per kg. Patients with Stage II-III breast cancer, who had pretreatment platelet counts > or = 150 x 10(9) per L and patients who underwent < or = 1 prior chemotherapy regimen had improved CD34+ cell yields. However, most patients with adverse risk factors yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. CONCLUSION: A regimen of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor led to the successful collection of adequate numbers of CD34+ cells in most patients without excessive toxicity. These observations confirm previous reports that intense prior therapy adversely affects the quantity of CD34+ cells harvested. Pretreatment and posttreatment variables did not predict with any certainty the small fraction of patients who fail to yield > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg via multiple apheresis procedures.