Evidence of improved microvascular perfusion when using antegrade and retrograde cardioplegia.

BACKGROUND: The maximum degree of microvascular distribution of cardioplegic solution is considered important to achieve optimum myocardial protection. This study attempts to demonstrate that the addition of retrograde cardioplegia to antegrade cardioplegia improves overall microvascular perfusion. METHODS: Explanted human hearts (n = 6) were treated with cold cardioplegic arrest and bicaval cardiectomy. Blood cardioplegia (37 degrees C) containing colored microspheres (color A for antegrade, color B for retrograde) was simultaneously infused antegrade at a pressure of 80 mm Hg and retrograde at a pressure of 40 mm Hg for 2 minutes. The ventricular myocardium was then sampled at three sites to determine absolute and relative cardioplegic microvascular flow. RESULTS: Of the total microvascular capillary flow, 27% to 32% was found to be the contribution of retrogradely delivered cardioplegia. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being delivered simultaneously and at a lower pressure, retrograde cardioplegia contributed substantially to overall microvascular perfusion. This suggests that antegrade cardioplegia alone does not perfuse all available myocardial capillaries and that the addition of retrograde cardioplegia enhances overall microvascular distribution and perfusion.

A comparison of distribution between simultaneously or sequentially delivered antegrade/retrograde blood cardioplegia.

UNLABELLED: Commercially available cardioplegia delivery systems now allow for antegrade (aortic root, coronary ostia, saphenous vein graft) perfusion to occur either sequentially or simultaneous with retrograde (coronary sinus) perfusion. This study was designed to compare the total flow and local distribution of sequential versus simultaneous antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia delivery. METHODS: Explanted human hearts diagnosed with idiopathic cardiomyopathy underwent a cold cardioplegic arrest and bicaval cardiectomy. Thirty-seven degree centigrade blood cardioplegia containing colored microspheres was then delivered antegrade (red color) at a pressure of 80 mmHg or retrograde (blue color) at a pressure of 40 mmHg. In the sequential group (n = 6), cardioplegia was delivered antegrade and then retrograde for 2 minutes, respectively. For the simultaneous group (n = 6), cardioplegia was delivered both antegrade and retrograde for 2 minutes. The ventricular myocardium was then sampled at 12 representative sites to determine regional cardioplegic flow. RESULTS: Mean total cardioplegia delivery/minute was 0.69 +/- 0.62 mL/g per minute for sequential cardioplegia, and 0.46 +/- 0.19 mL/g per minute for simultaneous cardioplegia (p > 0.05, NS). At the 12 ventricular sites sampled, mean regional cardioplegic flow (mL/g per min) was in general slightly greater for sequential delivery. However, this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05, NS). CONCLUSION: The data suggest that there may be a slight advantage in total cardioplegia delivery and regional cardioplegia delivery when using sequential rather than simultaneous cardioplegia delivery. However, this difference was not statistically significant and is likely not of clinical significance. Therefore, we would recommend using either sequential or simultaneous antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia based upon whichever technique facilitates the conduct of the individual operation.