Adverse Events and Discontinuation Rates Associated with Sirolimus Treatment in Adult Renal Transplant Patients in Latin America vs Non-Latin American Countries.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus is approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection following renal transplantation. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to sirolimus discontinuation differ geographically. METHODS: Rates of TEAEs, serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations were evaluated in 3 clinical trials of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus. Posttransplantation, patients were treated over 4 years (study 1), over 1 year (study 2), and over 2 years (study 3). TEAEs, SAEs, and discontinuation rates were compared between Latin America (LATAM) vs North America (NA) and Europe/rest of world (EU/ROW). Data from studies 2 and 3, with similar times to conversion, were pooled. RESULTS: Study 1 comprised 551 patients (LATAM, n=189); studies 2/3 comprised 395 (LATAM, n=111). LATAM patients were significantly younger than NA or EU/ROW patients in study 1 and studies 2/3 (P < .0001), with a lower proportion of white patients and higher proportion of patients of other races in LATAM vs NA (P < .0001) and EU/ROW (P = .02) groups. Almost all patients reported TEAEs. Discontinuation because of medical events was significantly lower (P < .05) in LATAM vs NA or EU/ROW. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were more common, and anemia and peripheral edema less common in LATAM; diarrhea and proteinuria did not differ by region. Types of AEs leading to discontinuation did not differ by region. CONCLUSION: LATAM renal transplant recipients converted to sirolimus were more likely to remain on therapy than patients in other regions.

Lower malignancy rates in renal allograft recipients converted to sirolimus-based, calcineurin inhibitor-free immunotherapy: 24-month results from the CONVERT trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-term immunosuppression imposes increased malignancy risk in renal allograft recipients, significantly contributing to overall morbidity and mortality. This study examined malignancy rates in renal allograft recipients at 2 years after conversion to a sirolimus (SRL)-based, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, multicenter study (the CONVERT Trial) randomly assigned 830 patients to SRL conversion (n=555) or CNI continuation (n=275). Patients with history of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease or known/suspected malignancy within 5 years before screening were excluded. As part of standard safety measurements, subjects were monitored for any malignancy occurrence; both skin and nonskin malignancies were reported, even if the patient discontinued from the therapy. Malignancy rates were analyzed based on exposure time to study drugs (i.e., number of events per 100 person-years of follow-up). RESULTS: At 2 years postconversion, the total number of malignancies per 100 person-years of exposure was significantly lower among SRL conversion patients compared with CNI continuation (2.1 vs. 6.0, P<0.001). Patients undergoing SRL-based, CNI-free therapy had significantly lower rates of the subset of nonmelanoma skin carcinomas through 2 years postconversion (1.2 vs. 4.3, P<0.001). This difference persisted after excluding patients with a history of malignancy before randomization. The rate of all other malignancies was not significantly different between treatment groups (P=0.058). CONCLUSION: In renal allograft recipients, SRL-based immunosuppression was associated with a lower rate of malignancy at 2 years postconversion compared with continuation of CNI-based immunosuppression. This reduction was driven by a significant reduction in nonmelanoma skin carcinoma rates; the rate of all other malignancies was numerically lower but did not achieve statistical significance.

Belatacept-based regimens versus a cyclosporine A-based regimen in kidney transplant recipients: 2-year results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies.

BACKGROUND: At 1 year, belatacept was associated with similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, and an improved cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine A (CsA) in the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as Firstline Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT) and Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as Firstline Immunosuppression Trial-EXTended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT) studies. Acute rejection was more frequent with belatacept in BENEFIT. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)--specifically central nervous system PTLD--was observed more frequently in belatacept-treated patients. This analysis assesses outcomes from BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT after 2 years of treatment. METHODS: Patients received a more intensive (MI) or a less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept or a CsA-based regimen. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-three of 666 patients (74%) in BENEFIT and 347 of 543 (64%) in BENEFIT-EXT completed 2 years of treatment. The proportion of patients who survived with a functioning graft was similar across groups (BENEFIT: 94% MI, 95% LI, and 91% CsA; BENEFIT-EXT: 83% MI, 84% LI, and 83% CsA). Belatacept's renal benefits were sustained, as evidenced by a 16 to 17 mL/min (BENEFIT) and an 8 to 10 mL/min (BENEFIT-EXT) higher calculated glomerular filtration rate in the belatacept groups versus CsA. There were few new acute rejection episodes in either study between years 1 and 2. Because PTLD risk was highest in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (-) patients, an efficacy analysis of EBV (+) patients was performed and was consistent with the overall population results. There were two previously reported cases of PTLD in each study between years 1 and 2 in the belatacept groups. The overall balance of safety and efficacy favored the LI over the MI regimen. CONCLUSIONS: At 2 years, belatacept-based regimens sustained better renal function, similar patient/graft survival, and an improved cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus CsA; outcomes that were maintained in EBV (+) patients. No new safety signals emerged.