Infectious Disease Risks and Vulnerabilities in the Aftermath of an Environmental Disaster in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

In January 2019, the state of Minas Gerais experienced another environmental disaster with the collapse of a mining dam near the city of Brumadinho. This disaster has resulted in 256 deaths and 14 people still missing. Toxic mud has contaminated the Paraopeba River resulting in significant fish and wildlife deaths in the river and surrounding areas. The effect of environmental disasters such as this is felt across multiple sectors damaging ecosystems in agriculture, wildlife and human communities. Environmental disasters cause significant disruption of ecosystems, flooding, contamination of water supplies, and displacement of human populations, which can result in increases in transmission and outbreaks of mosquito-borne and zoonotic diseases that can become a serious and long-term public health problem for the region.

Durability of the first combined antiretroviral regimen in patients with AIDS at a reference center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from 1996 to 2005.

Finding a better first antiretroviral regimen is one of the strategies used to improve span and quality of life of HIV/AIDS patients. 891 patients were followed during 24 months or until interruption/abandonment of treatment, changing regimen or death. At the end of 6 months, 69% of the patients were still being treated with the first regimen, 54% at 12 months, 48% at 18 months and 39% at 24 months. AZT-3TC-EFV was the most prescribed regimen and with the lesser discontinuation. NNRTI regimens showed high effectiveness and durability compared to PI regimens. Irregular medication dispensation was the only risk factor for failure/interruption of treatment in multivariate analyses. Intolerance/adverse effects were mainly responsible for first regimen discontinuation, followed by abandonment/non-adherence and virologic failure. Results showed significant difference between causes of interruption of first HAART with higher percentage of intolerance/adverse effects with PI regimens and higher immunologic failure with NNRTI regimens. Even with the availability of more potent and tolerable drugs, lack of adherence to HAART and high level of adverse effects are still the most important barriers to prolonged success of treatment. This study adds relevant information about durability and effectiveness of HAART in the first decade of its use in Brazil.

Durability of the first combined antiretroviral regimen in patients with AIDS at a reference center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from 1996 to 2005

Finding a better first antiretroviral regimen is one of the strategies used to improve span and quality of life of HIV/AIDS patients. 891 patients were followed during 24 months or until interruption/abandonment of treatment, changing regimen or death. At the end of 6 months, 69 percent of the patients were still being treated with the first regimen, 54 percent at 12 months, 48 percent at 18 months and 39 percent at 24 months. AZT-3TC-EFV was the most prescribed regimen and with the lesser discontinuation. NNRTI regimens showed high effectiveness and durability compared to PI regimens. Irregular medication dispensation was the only risk factor for failure/interruption of treatment in multivariate analyses. Intolerance/adverse effects were mainly responsible for first regimen discontinuation, followed by abandonment/non-adherence and virologic failure. Results showed significant difference between causes of interruption of first HAART with higher percentage of intolerance/adverse effects with PI regimens and higher immunologic failure with NNRTI regimens. Even with the availability of more potent and tolerable drugs, lack of adherence to HAART and high level of adverse effects are still the most important barriers to prolonged success of treatment. This study adds relevant information about durability and effectiveness of HAART in the first decade of its use in Brazil.

Treatment switch guided by HIV-1 genotyping in Brazil.

We assessed the performance of HIV-1 genotyping tests in rescue therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (genotyped), included those switching to new antiretroviral drugs based on HIV-1 genotyping data, and group 2 (standard of care -SOC), comprised those in rescue therapy who had not used this test. This was an open and non-randomized study, with 74 patients, followed up for a mean period of 12 months, from February 2002 to May 2003. The groups differed in the duration of antiretroviral use, experience with diverse drug classes (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors) and viral load <2.6 log10 copies/mL at any time during treatment. In 23 patients (group 1), the switch in antiretroviral (ARV) regimen was based on genotyping data; this test was not used for 51 patients (group 2). Two CD4 + lymphocyte counts and viral load counts were made for each patient during the study. Data from the pharmacy where patients received antiretroviral agents, medical charts, and direct interviews with patients to assess compliance to treatment, were analyzed. In the genotyped group, the average drop in viral load was 2.8 log10, compared with a 1.5 log10 difference in group 2; the difference was significant in the first assessment performed six months after switching (p=0.001). Considering the patients with viral load < 2.6 log10 (400 copies/mL) after switching, the patients in group 1 had a better performance in the first assessment (73.9% versus 31.1% in groups 1 and 2, respectively); this difference was significant (p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, the variables associated with a greater drop in viral load in the first assessment were the patients whose switching was based on genotyping (group 1), those with a past history of viral load < 2.6 log10 and correct use of antiretroviral agents. In conclusion, the genotyping test and adherence were found to be independent factors for success in the management of patients who failed treatment.

Treatment switch guided by HIV-1 genotyping in Brazil

We assessed the performance of HIV-1 genotyping tests in rescue therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (genotyped), included those switching to new antiretroviral drugs based on HIV-1 genotyping data, and group 2 (standard of care -SOC), comprised those in rescue therapy who had not used this test. This was an open and non-randomized study, with 74 patients, followed up for a mean period of 12 months, from February 2002 to May 2003. The groups differed in the duration of antiretroviral use, experience with diverse drug classes (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors) and viral load <2.6 log10 copies/mL at any time during treatment. In 23 patients (group 1), the switch in antiretroviral (ARV) regimen was based on genotyping data; this test was not used for 51 patients (group 2). Two CD4 + lymphocyte counts and viral load counts were made for each patient during the study. Data from the pharmacy where patients received antiretroviral agents, medical charts, and direct interviews with patients to assess compliance to treatment, were analyzed. In the genotyped group, the average drop in viral load was 2.8 log10, compared with a 1.5 log10 difference in group 2; the difference was significant in the first assessment performed six months after switching (p=0.001). Considering the patients with viral load < 2.6 log10 (400 copies/mL) after switching, the patients in group 1 had a better performance in the first assessment (73.9 percent versus 31.1 percent in groups 1 and 2, respectively); this difference was significant (p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, the variables associated with a greater drop in viral load in the first assessment were the patients whose switching was based on genotyping (group 1), those with a past history of viral load < 2.6 log10 and correct use of antiretroviral agents. In conclusion, the genotyping test and adherence were found to be independent factors for success in the management of patients who failed treatment.