The cheating liver: imaging of focal steatosis and fatty sparing.

Focal steatosis and fatty sparing are a frequent finding in liver imaging, and can mimic solid lesions. Liver regional variations in the degree of fat accumulation can be related to vascular anomalies, metabolic disorders, use of certain drugs or coexistence of hepatic masses. CT and MRI are the modalities of choice for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. Knowledge of CT and MRI appearance of focal steatosis and fatty sparing is crucial for an accurate diagnosis, and to rule-out other pathologic processes. This paper will review the CT and MRI techniques for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and the CT and MRI features of common and uncommon causes of focal steatosis and fatty sparing.

Delayed diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a 32-year-old man with knee pain.

A 32-year-old Bangladeshi male was admitted at our emergency department for trauma of the left knee. The radiographs showed absence of fracture, and presence of an indeterminate oval lucency in the proximal tibia. Further examinations were suggested, but the patient refused. 6 months later, the patient re-presented at our emergency department. A CT scan showed progression of musculoskeletal involvement and spread to the liver. This case underlines the importance of considering tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis of indeterminate bone lesions in immigrant patients.

The use of microwaves ablation in the treatment of epiphyseal osteoid osteomas.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to demonstrate the feasibility and the reliability of microwave ablation (MWA) of epiphyseal osteoid osteomas (OO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February to November 2012, 7 patients (4 males and 3 females; age range 16-30 years) with epiphyseal OOs were treated with MWA. The treatment was performed with 16 G antennas with a power of 20 W for 2 min. The OOs were approached by using coaxial needles inserted with hammer or with automatic drill. All patients underwent spinal anaesthesia, with posttreatment 6-8 h observation before discharging. We treated epiphyseal OOs placed away from nervous and vascular nontarget structures, located in: femoral head (n = 2), femoral lesser trochanter (n = 2), femoral neck (n = 2), and proximal tibial epiphysis (n = 1). CT was used to visualize the nidus and to insert the needle for thermal ablation and for postprocedure control. Technical success was considered the positioning of the antenna in the nidus, while the efficacy of treatment was clinically evaluated as the complete remission of pain after the procedure by using the visual analogue score (VAS). Follow-up was performed by using VAS score 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure, whereas MRI examination was performed immediately after the procedure, at 1 month, and in any case of recurrence. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS: All patients experienced resolution of the symptomatology (VAS = 0) in ~1 week until the last follow-up, with residual VAS < 2 points occurring only from 1 to 7 days after the procedure. No intraprocedural complication was noted, whereas one patient had back pain for 2 months after the procedure, likely due to spinal analgesic injection. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, MWA can be safely performed with excellent results without complications in selected cases of epiphyseal OOs; however, the clinical significance of this report is limited because there were only few patients included in this study. Thus, these data must be confirmed by further and larger studies.