Diagnostic Accuracy of Frequency-Doubling Technology and the Moorfields Motion Displacement Test for Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: Portable perimetric testing could be useful for community-based glaucoma screening programs. Frequency-doubling technology (FDT) and the Moorfields motion displacement test (MDT) are portable perimeters that have shown promise as potential screening tools for glaucoma. This study's goal was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of FDT and MDT for visual field defects and glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of patients aged ≥ 50 years who presented to a glaucoma clinic in South India and had never undergone Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) visual field testing in the past. METHODS: Participants underwent 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard HFA perimetry, FDT perimetry, MDT perimetry, and iPad perimetry using visualFields Easy in random order. Ophthalmologist grades of HFA and optic nerve head photographs were used as reference standards for glaucoma and field defect presence. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various parameters for each test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: Overall, 292 eyes from 173 participants were included, with 112 eyes classified as moderate or worse glaucoma. For moderate or worse glaucoma detection, the best parameter on FDT was mean deviation (MD) (AUROC, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.89) and the best parameter on MDT was global probability of true damage (GPTD) (AUROC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91). When specificity was set to 90%, the sensitivity for detection of moderate or worse glaucoma was 55% (95% CI, 39%-68%) for FDT MD and 62% (95% CI 52%-71%) for MDT GPTD. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency-doubling technology and MDT perimetry had fair diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma detection when administered to naïve test takers in this South Indian population. Although not appropriate for use as a sole glaucoma screening test, these perimetric tests may be useful as ancillary tests. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Antiamoebic Susceptibility in Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Comparison of Isolates From South India and Northern California.

PURPOSE: Outcomes of Acanthamoeba keratitis are often worse in India than in the United States. The goal of this study was to determine whether antiamoebic susceptibility patterns were different when comparing Acanthamoeba isolates from India with those of the United States. METHODS: Acanthamoeba isolates were obtained from corneal scrapings of 43 patients with infectious keratitis seen at the Francis I. Proctor Foundation (N = 23) and Aravind Eye Hospital (N = 20) from 2008 through 2012 and plated on growth media. A previously described minimum cysticidal concentration (MCC) assay was performed by a single laboratory technician to assess susceptibility to 5 antiamoebic agents for all isolates. Testing was conducted in triplicate, with the median MCC chosen for analyses. RESULTS: The MCC (µg/mL) of polyhexamethylene biguanide was 6.25 [IQR 5.47-12.5] for Aravind isolates and 6.25 [IQR 6.25-9.375] for Proctor isolates ( P = 0.75), corresponding values were 6.25 [IQR 3.125-6.25] and 3.125 [IQR 3.125-9.375] for chlorhexidine ( P = 0.81), 2500 [IQR 2500-5000] and 5000 [IQR 1250-20,000] for voriconazole ( P = 0.25), 15.6 [IQR 15.6-39.0625] and 15.6 [IQR 15.6-31.25] for hexamidine ( P = 0.92), and 15.6 [IQR 7.81-15.6] and 15.6 [IQR 7.81-31.25] for propamidine ( P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no statistically significant differences in antiamoebic susceptibility of Indian versus US samples from Acanthamoeba keratitis clinical isolates. These findings suggest that differences in antiamoebic susceptibility are likely not responsible for differential outcomes in Acanthamoeba keratitis between the 2 locations.

Diagnostic accuracy of an iPad application for detection of visual field defects.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Tablet-based perimetry could be used to test for glaucomatous visual field defects in settings without easy access to perimeters, although few studies have assessed diagnostic accuracy of tablet-based tests. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of iPad perimetry using the visualFields Easy application. SUBJECTS/METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of patients undergoing their first Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) visual field test at a glaucoma clinic in India. Participants underwent 24-2 SITA Standard HFA testing and iPad-based perimetry with the visualFields Easy application. Reference standards for both visual field loss and suspected glaucoma were determined by ophthalmologist review of HFA results and optic disc photographs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess diagnostic accuracy at various test thresholds. RESULTS: 203 eyes from 115 participants were included, with 82 eyes classified as moderate or worse glaucoma. iPad perimetry had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.64 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.71) for detection of any visual field defect relative to HFA and an AUROC of 0.68 (0.59 to 0.76) for detection of moderate or worse glaucoma relative to ophthalmologist examination. At a set specificity of 90%, the sensitivity of iPad perimetry for detection of moderate or worse glaucoma was 35% (22-48%). CONCLUSIONS: iPad perimetry using the visualFields Easy application had inadequate diagnostic accuracy to be used as a screening tool for glaucoma in this South Indian population.

Macular Atrophy Incidence, Progression, and Visual Acuity Effects in 5-Year Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Macular atrophy (MA) contributes to declining vision during prolonged anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) so greater understanding of its incidence, evolution, and impact on visual acuity is merited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy for ≥ 5 years. Near-infrared reflectance images and vision data were extracted every 6 months. MA lesion areas were measured using ImageJ. RESULTS: Vision showed a mean decline of -1.2 letters/year. Eyes with MA showed a greater decrease of -1.6 letters/year compared to eyes without MA (-0.7 letters/year). Cumulative incidence of MA was 38% at 5 years. MA was significantly associated with declining vision, showing a -0.7 letter decrease for every 1 mm2 increase in lesion size. CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year course of nAMD treatment, MA affected most eyes, and MA progression was significantly associated with vision decline. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53:546-552.].

Bilateral optic disc pits in a pediatric patient with Cobb syndrome.

PURPOSE: To describe a patient with Cobb Syndrome, a rare congenital disorder characterized by cutaneous and spinal arteriovenous malformations, who was found to have bilateral optic nerve pits. OBSERVATIONS: A 15-year-old boy diagnosed with Cobb Syndrome, manifesting as a large cutaneous port-wine stain associated with an underlying left paraspinous arteriovenous malformation resulting in severe scoliosis, presented for a screening ophthalmological exam. The patient had no visual symptoms. On examination, his visual acuity was 20/20 in each eye; however, bilateral optic disc pits were discovered on biomicroscopy and confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: The unusual finding of bilateral optic disc pits in this rare congenital neurocutaneous disorder represents the first report of ophthalmic abnormalities in association with Cobb syndrome. Patients with Cobb Syndrome may be considered for screening ophthalmological exam for the detection of subclinical optic nerve abnormalities.