Safety and Efficacy of Arterial Closure Devices in an Office-Based Angiosuite.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 5 arterial closure devices in an outpatient endovascular surgery center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases using femoral arterial access performed between January 2012 and December 2013. Five different arterial closure devices (AngioSeal, Perclose, StarClose, ExoSeal, and Mynx) were used by 7 endovascular surgeons. All femoral arteries were accessed with 6F sheaths under ultrasound guidance. All patients received systemic anticoagulation with sodium heparin (70 IU/kg). Sheath-shot angiograms of all arterial punctures were taken before deploying closure devices. Device failure was defined as any partial or complete failure requiring additional closure assistance. Minor complication was defined as any event that occurred because of incomplete hemostasis but did not result in hospitalization, including hematoma, hypotension, bleeding, arterial dissection, or extended recovery. Major complication was defined as any event that occurred because of incomplete hemostasis requiring inpatient management. Any device failure was identified per device and per surgeon. Device safety, efficacy, and relationships between other variables were analyzed using a binomial logistic regression. Results with P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: During the study period, there were a total of 3142 endovascular procedures, including 1976 arterial cases (62.9%). Out of 1898 femoral artery punctures, closure devices were used in 1810 (95.4%), which forms the basis of this report. Device failure occurred in 151 cases (8.34%), and minor complications occurred in 53 cases (2.93%). There were 11 hospitalizations (0.61%). AngioSeal had both the lowest device failure rate (3.5%) and minor complication rate (1.3%). Our data showed a significant difference between the respective arterial closure devices for device failure rate (P = 0.007) and minor complication rate (P = 0.049), but not for major complication rate (P = 0.199). No significant difference was observed between surgeons for device failure (P = 0.798), minor complication (P = 0.218), or major complication rate (P = 0.899). CONCLUSIONS: With the lowest device failure and minor complication rate, AngioSeal is a consistently well-performing arterial closure device in the office surgical suite setting.

Radial artery access for peripheral endovascular procedures.

OBJECTIVE: The radial artery is often used for coronary angiography, with a demonstrated decrease in local complications and an increase in postoperative mobility of the patient. Data on radial artery access for peripheral endovascular procedures, however, are limited. We describe our experience with radial artery access for diagnostic and endovascular interventions. METHODS: Between February 2012 and March 2015, there were 95 endovascular procedures performed using radial artery access in 80 unique patients. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. Perioperative, postoperative, and 30-day follow-up data were evaluated retrospectively for major and minor complications. Major adverse events included any immediate hospitalization admission, stroke, hand amputation, bleeding requiring transfusion, hematoma requiring surgery, and death. Minor complications included superficial bleeding and hematoma. RESULTS: The patients (52.6% male, 47.4% female) had a mean age of 72.1 ± 9.4 years. Radial artery access was used for diagnostic purposes in 15.8% of all procedures and for therapeutic intervention, including angioplasty and stenting, in 84.2%. The radial artery was the only access point in 80% of patients and was accessed in conjunction with other sites in 20%. Percutaneous access was achieved in 100% of patients with a 100% technical success rate. Hemostasis after catheterization was achieved by manual compression (22.1%) and TR band (Terumo Medical, Tokyo, Japan; 77.9%). Major adverse events occurred in three cases (3.2%) and were unrelated to radial artery access. Radial artery access site-related complications occurred in three cases (3.2%), all of which were minor hematomas that required no treatment. The risk of radial artery complication was not associated with procedure type, vessels treated, or use of heparin. The incidence of stroke, hand ischemia, and upper extremity limb or finger loss was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Radial artery access for peripheral endovascular procedures appears to be safe and effective and should be considered more often. Complication rates are lower than those reported for femoral artery access.

New Vein Compression Entities in Patients with Unexplained Leg Swelling.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study identifies often overlooked anatomical sites for nonthrombotic venous outflow obstruction (NTVO) in patients with unexplained lower extremity edema and pain. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 75 consecutive patients experiencing symptoms of unexplained lower extremity edema with pain that were unexplained by ultrasound, computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), who subsequently underwent venography in an outpatient medical office from 2010 to 2014. We categorized venograms based on the presence or absence of NTVO lesions and calculated prevalence of each at specific sites. The patients with NTVO lesions showing >50% stenosis on venography were then treated with angioplasty and/or stenting. After intervention, we documented subjective levels of pain and edema. RESULTS: Of the 75 venograms reviewed, physicians classified 52 as normal and 23 as showing evidence of compression, including 9 with May-Thurner syndrome and 14 with anatomical compressions at previously underreported sites. These 14 compression sites occurred at the following: iliofemoral vein at the inguinal ligament region (n = 7, 50%), external iliac vein at the iliac artery bifurcation (n = 1, 7.1%), both inguinal ligament region and iliac artery bifurcation (n = 4, 28.6%), and popliteal vein at the popliteal fossa (n = 2, 14.3%). Nine of the 14 patients (64.3%) reported total or near total resolution of lower extremity pain and edema at follow-up between 1 and 7 months (mean = 5.3 ± 2 months, median = 6 months) after balloon angioplasty and/or stent. Five with failed primary interventions underwent subsequent stenting and/or angioplasty and reported total or near total resolution of pain and clinical resolution of edema. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence to broaden the disease profile of venous compression syndromes to other sites such as the hypogastric artery, inguinal ligament, and popliteal fossa. The results support previous research that suggests increased incidence of NTVO exists among patients with unexplained lower extremity edema and pain. In an effort to encourage further exploration, we developed a diagnostic algorithm to support a critical and systematic review of patients with lower extremity edema and pain that may go unexplained using traditional diagnostic measures, including ultrasound, CTA, and MRI alone.

Treatment outcomes and lessons learned from 5134 cases of outpatient office-based endovascular procedures in a vascular surgical practice.

Introduction The office-based endovascular facility has increased in number recently due in part to expedient patient experience. This study analyzed treatment outcomes of procedures performed in our office-based endovascular suite. Methods Treatment outcomes of 5134 consecutive procedures performed in our office-based endovascular suites from 2006 to 2013 were analyzed. Five sequential groups (group I-V) of 1000 consecutive interventions were compared with regard to technical success and treatment outcomes. Results Our patients included 2856 (56%) females and 2267 (44%) males. Procedures performed included diagnostic arteriogram, arterial interventions, venous interventions, dialysis access interventions, and venous catheter management, which were 1024 (19.9%), 1568 (30.6%), and 3073 (60.0%), 621(12.1%), and 354 (6.9%), respectively. The complication rates for group I, II, III, IV, and V were 3%, 1.5%, 1%, 1.1%, and 0.7%, respectively. The complication rate was higher in group I when compared to each of the remaining four groups ( p < 0.05). Nine patients (0.18%) died within the 30-day period following their procedures, and none were procedure related. Conclusions Endovascular procedure can be performed safely in an office-based facility with excellent outcomes. Lessons learned in establishing office-based endovascular suites with efforts to reduce procedural complications and optimize quality patient care are discussed.