Remote Assessment for ALS using Multimodal Dialog Agents: Data Quality, Feasibility and Task Compliance.

We investigate the feasibility, task compliance and audiovisual data quality of a multimodal dialog-based solution for remote assessment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). 53 people with ALS and 52 healthy controls interacted with Tina, a cloud-based conversational agent, in performing speech tasks designed to probe various aspects of motor speech function while their audio and video was recorded. We rated a total of 250 recordings for audio/video quality and participant task compliance, along with the relative frequency of different issues observed. We observed excellent compliance (98%) and audio (95.2%) and visual quality rates (84.8%), resulting in an overall yield of 80.8% recordings that were both compliant and of high quality. Furthermore, recording quality and compliance were not affected by level of speech severity and did not differ significantly across end devices. These findings support the utility of dialog systems for remote monitoring of speech in ALS.

A multimodal dialog approach to mental state characterization in clinically depressed, anxious, and suicidal populations.

Background: The rise of depression, anxiety, and suicide rates has led to increased demand for telemedicine-based mental health screening and remote patient monitoring (RPM) solutions to alleviate the burden on, and enhance the efficiency of, mental health practitioners. Multimodal dialog systems (MDS) that conduct on-demand, structured interviews offer a scalable and cost-effective solution to address this need. Objective: This study evaluates the feasibility of a cloud based MDS agent, Tina, for mental state characterization in participants with depression, anxiety, and suicide risk. Method: Sixty-eight participants were recruited through an online health registry and completed 73 sessions, with 15 (20.6%), 21 (28.8%), and 26 (35.6%) sessions screening positive for depression, anxiety, and suicide risk, respectively using conventional screening instruments. Participants then interacted with Tina as they completed a structured interview designed to elicit calibrated, open-ended responses regarding the participants' feelings and emotional state. Simultaneously, the platform streamed their speech and video recordings in real-time to a HIPAA-compliant cloud server, to compute speech, language, and facial movement-based biomarkers. After their sessions, participants completed user experience surveys. Machine learning models were developed using extracted features and evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: For both depression and suicide risk, affected individuals tended to have a higher percent pause time, while those positive for anxiety showed reduced lip movement relative to healthy controls. In terms of single-modality classification models, speech features performed best for depression (AUC = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.51-0.78), facial features for anxiety (AUC = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.43-0.71), and text features for suicide risk (AUC = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.52-0.78). Best overall performance was achieved by decision fusion of all models in identifying suicide risk (AUC = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.65-0.87). Participants reported the experience comfortable and shared their feelings. Conclusion: MDS is a feasible, useful, effective, and interpretable solution for RPM in real-world clinical depression, anxiety, and suicidal populations. Facial information is more informative for anxiety classification, while speech and language are more discriminative of depression and suicidality markers. In general, combining speech, language, and facial information improved model performance on all classification tasks.