Block of the Pericapsular Nerve Group of the Hip with and without Ultrasound Guidance: Comparative Cadaveric Study / Bloqueio do grupo de nervos pericapsulares do quadril com e sem auxílio de ultrassonografia: Estudo cadavérico comparativo

Abstract Objective To evaluate the technical reproducibility of a block of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) of the hip aided or not by ultrasound in cadavers. Materials and Methods The present is a randomized, descriptive, and comparative anatomical study on 40 hips from 2 cadaver groups. We compared the PENG block technique with the method with no ultrasound guidance. After injecting a methylene blue dye, we verified the dispersion and topographical staining of the anterior hip capsule through dissection. In addition, we evaluated the injection orifice in both techniques. Results In the comparative analysis of the techniques, there were no puncture failures, damage to noble structures in the orifice path, or differences in the results. Only 1 hip from each group (5%) presented inadequate dye dispersion within the anterior capsule, and in 95% of the cases submitted to either technique, there was adequate dye dispersion at the target region. Conclusion Hip PENG block with no ultrasound guidance is feasible, safe, effective, and highly reliable compared to its conventional counterpart. The present is a pioneer study that can help patients with hip pain from various causes in need of relief.

Resumo Objetivo Propor e avaliar a reprodutibilidade técnica do bloqueio do grupo de nervos pericapsulares (pericapsular nerve group, PENG, em inglês) do quadril sem o auxílio da ultrassonografia, em cadáveres, de forma comparativa à realização do bloqueio guiado pela ultrassonografia em outro grupo de cadáveres. Materiais e Métodos Estudo anatômico randomizado, descritivo e comparativo, realizado em 40 quadris divididos em 2 grupos amostrais de cadáveres. Fez-se uma comparação da técnica do bloqueio do PENG à técnica não guiada por ultrassonografia injetando-se corante azul de metileno, seguida de dissecção para verificação da dispersão e da coloração topográfica da cápsula anterior do quadril, além de avaliação do pertuito das injeções entre as técnicas. Resultados Na análise comparativa das técnicas, não houve falha na punção, lesão de estruturas nobres no pertuito, ou diferença nos resultados. Não houve adequada dispersão do corante pela cápsula anterior somente em 1 quadril de cada grupo (5%), e em 95% dos casos submetidos a qualquer uma das técnicas observou-se dispersão adequada do corante pela região alvo. Conclusão O bloqueio do PENG do quadril sem auxílio de ultrassonografia é factível, seguro, eficaz, e com alta confiabilidade quando comparado à sua realização guiada pelo aparelho de imagem. Este estudo é pioneiro, e pode ajudar muito os pacientes que têm dor no quadril por diversas causas e necessitam alívio.

Accuracy of Hip Pericapsular Nerve Block (PENG) without Ultrasound Aid in Patients with Hip Pain / Acurácia do bloqueio dos nervos pericapsulares (PENG) do quadril sem auxílio de ultrassonografia em pacientes com dor no quadril

Abstract Objective To describe and evaluate the accuracy of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block technique with no ultrasound guidance. Method Series of 40 infiltrations in patients with hip pain undergoing outpatient follow-up in the hip surgery group or admitted to the emergency room from a hospital in São Paulo, SP, Brazil. The hip PENG technique was guided by palpable anatomical pelvic structures, with no ultrasound orientation for needle positioning, using the equipment only to check the correct location after an unguided puncture. Results In the 40 hips infiltrated from 35 patients with a mean age of 59.2 years, the success rate was 85%. Among the mispositioned cases, 71.4% occurred in the first 13 applications and 28.6% in the subsequent 27 applications. In all patients, the neurovascular bundle was in the medial third of the pen-made demarcation. Even in cases with a failed needle location, the distance from the neurovascular bundle was safe. A single adverse effect occurred, with spontaneous improvement of the femoral nerve apraxia within two days. Conclusion Unguided PENG block is a viable technique for a physician knowledgeable about its application in services with no ultrasound availability.

Resumo Objetivo Descrever e avaliar a acurácia da técnica do bloqueio PENG realizado sem auxílio de ultrassonografia. Método Série de 40 infiltrações em pacientes com dor no quadril, em acompanhamento ambulatorial no grupo de cirurgia do quadril ou admitidos no pronto atendimento de um hospital na cidade de São Paulo. Utilizada a técnica de bloqueio nervoso pericapsular do quadril (PENG) guiado por estruturas anatômicas palpáveis da pelve e sem auxílio de ultrassonografia no posicionamento da agulha, usando o aparelho apenas para conferência da localização correta após punção não guiada. Resultados Nos 40 quadris infiltrados em 35 pacientes com idade média de 59,2 anos, obtivemos um índice de acerto de 85%. Dos casos mal posicionados 71,4% ocorreram nas primeiras 13 aplicações e 28,6% nas 27 aplicações subsequentes. Em todos os pacientes o feixe neurovascular estava situado no terço medial da marcação realizada à caneta e mesmo nos casos em que houve falha da localização da agulha havia distância segura ao feixe neurovascular. Obtivemos apenas 1 caso de efeito adverso, onde ocorreu apraxia do nervo femoral com melhora espontânea em 2 dias. Conclusão O bloqueio PENG não guiado é uma técnica viável e pode ser realizada por um médico que já possui conhecimento na aplicação, em serviços onde não haja disponibilidade do aparelho de ultrassonografia.

Correlation between Intensity of Pain and Disability Due to Intra-articular Lesions in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Objective To correlate radiographic alterations and lesions in intra-articular structures of the acetabulum with the intensity of pain and disability of patients diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods A retrospective analysis of the preoperative data of 182 patients (190 hips) was performed. Clinical variables such as age, gender, the practice of physical activity, and radiographic variables, such as the Wiberg and alpha angles, were evaluated. Through an intraoperative video, the extent of the chondral and labial lesions was evaluated considering the clock-face method, the degree of joint involvement by the Outerbridge classification, and the presence of wave lesions. The variables were analyzed by linear regression, with the intensity of the pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional disability measured by the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Results The mean age of the patients was of 38.5 ± 9.6 years, the mean intensity of the pain was of 7.8 ± 1.6, and the mean mHHS score was of 56.3 ± 12.7. In total, 61% of the sample were classified as Outerbridge III or IV, and 12.6% had wave lesions. There was a correlation between the male gender (r = 0.497) and lower intensity of the pain, and a correlation of age (r = -0.27), the male gender (r = 8.419) and physical activity with higher functional scores on the mHHS (r = 4.729). Conclusion There was no correlation of the radiographic and arthroscopic parameters of the present study and the intensity of pain and the disability of the patients. The male gender is related to lower intensity of pain, and higher functional ability is related to the male gender, lower age, and the practice of physical activity. Level of Evidence IV.

Correlation between Intensity of Pain and Disability Due to Intra-articular Lesions in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome / Correlação entre intensidade da dor e incapacidade com as lesões intra-articulares em pacientes com síndrome do impacto femoroacetabular

Abstract Objective To correlate radiographic alterations and lesions in intra-articular structures of the acetabulum with the intensity of pain and disability of patients diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods A retrospective analysis of the preoperative data of 182 patients (190 hips) was performed. Clinical variables such as age, gender, the practice of physical activity, and radiographic variables, such as the Wiberg and alpha angles, were evaluated. Through an intraoperative video, the extent of the chondral and labial lesions was evaluated considering the clock-face method, the degree of joint involvement by the Outerbridge classification, and the presence of wave lesions. The variables were analyzed by linear regression, with the intensity of the pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional disability measured by the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Results The mean age of the patients was of 38.5 ± 9.6 years, the mean intensity of the pain was of 7.8 ± 1.6, and the mean mHHS score was of 56.3 ± 12.7. In total, 61% of the sample were classified as Outerbridge III or IV, and 12.6% had wave lesions. There was a correlation between the male gender (r = 0.497) and lower intensity of the pain, and a correlation of age (r = -0.27), the male gender (r = 8.419) and physical activity with higher functional scores on the mHHS (r = 4.729). Conclusion There was no correlation of the radiographic and arthroscopic parameters of the present study and the intensity of pain and the disability of the patients. The male gender is related to lower intensity of pain, and higher functional ability is related to the male gender, lower age, and the practice of physical activity. Level of Evidence IV.

Resumo Objetivo Correlacionar alterações radiográficas e lesões de estruturas intra-articulares do acetábulo com a intensidade da dor e a incapacidade de pacientes com diagnóstico de síndrome do impacto femoroacetabular. Métodos Realiou-se uma análise retrospectiva de dados pré-operatórios de 182 pacientes (190 quadris). Foram avaliadas variáveis clínicas como idade, sexo e prática de atividade física, e variáveis radiográficas, como ângulo de Wiberg e o ângulo alfa. Por meio do vídeo intraoperatório, foi avaliada a extensão das lesões condrais e labiais considerando-se o método clock-face, o grau de comprometimento articular pela classificação de Outerbridge, e a presença de lesão em onda. As variáveis foram analisadas por meio de regressão linear, tendo como variáveis dependentes a intensidade da dor, avaliada pela Escala Visual Analógica (EVA), e a incapacidade funcional, mensurada pelo Harris Hip Score modificado (HHSm). Resultados A média de idade dos pacientes foi de 38,5 ± 9,6 anos, a da intensidade da dor, 7,8 ± 1,6, e a do HHSm, 56,3 ± 12,7. No total, 61% da amostra apresentava Outerbridge III ou IV, e 12,6% apresentava lesão em onda. Observou-se correlação do sexo masculino (r = 0,497) com menor intensidade da dor, e correlação da idade (r = −0,27), do sexo masculino (r = 8,419) e da realização de atividade física com maior escore funcional no HHSm (r = 4,729). Conclusão Não houve correlação dos parâmetros radiográficos e artroscópicos deste estudo com a intensidade da dor e a incapacidade dos pacientes. O sexo masculino está relacionado com menor intensidade da dor, e maior capacidade funcional está relacionada com o sexo masculino, menor idade, e a prática de atividade física. Nível de Evidência IV.

Is There Any Difference Between a Spherical Marker and a Simple Coin for Hip Replacement Digital Planning?

Objective To evaluate the accuracy and differences between 2 types of metallic markers, sphere, and coin, for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty. Methods Four spherical metallic markers and four coins, both 25 mm in diameter, were placed on the greater trochanter, pubic symphysis, between the thighs, and on the table of the exam, for radiographic examination of the hip in 33 patients with hip prosthesis. The prosthesis head was used for calibration and two examiners measured the markers' image diameters, and the results were analyzed statistically. Results In the greater trochanter, the sphere and the coin were not visualized in 19 radiographs (57.6%). Between the thighs, the coin marker was not visualized in 13 radiographs (39.4%). In the greater trochanter, the 25-mm accuracy of the coin and the sphere was, respectively, between 57.1 and 63.3% and between 64.3 and 92.9%. The coin between the thighs reached 25-mm accuracy in between 50 and 60% of cases. Over the exam table, the coin and sphere markers reached, respectively, the mean diameters of 22.91 mm and 23 mm, the lowest coefficient of variation, the lowest confidence interval, and the easiest positioning. There was statistical difference between the evaluations of the markers (coin vs. sphere) in all positions ( p < 0.032), except for the exam table position ( p = 0.083). Conclusions The coin between the thighs is the best marker for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty, and we suggest the use of another coin on the exam table for comparison, considering the 8% reduction in relation to its real size.

Is There Any Difference Between a Spherical Marker and a Simple Coin for Hip Replacement Digital Planning? / Existe alguma diferença entre um marcador esférico e uma moeda simples para planejamento digital de substituição de quadril?

Abstract Objective To evaluate the accuracy and differences between 2 types of metallic markers, sphere, and coin, for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty. Methods Four spherical metallic markers and four coins, both 25 mm in diameter, were placed on the greater trochanter, pubic symphysis, between the thighs, and on the table of the exam, for radiographic examination of the hip in 33 patients with hip prosthesis. The prosthesis head was used for calibration and two examiners measured the markers' image diameters, and the results were analyzed statistically. Results In the greater trochanter, the sphere and the coin were not visualized in 19 radiographs (57.6%). Between the thighs, the coin marker was not visualized in 13 radiographs (39.4%). In the greater trochanter, the 25-mm accuracy of the coin and the sphere was, respectively, between 57.1 and 63.3% and between 64.3 and 92.9%. The coin between the thighs reached 25-mm accuracy in between 50 and 60% of cases. Over the exam table, the coin and sphere markers reached, respectively, the mean diameters of 22.91 mm and 23 mm, the lowest coefficient of variation, the lowest confidence interval, and the easiest positioning. There was statistical difference between the evaluations of the markers (coin vs. sphere) in all positions (p< 0.032), except for the exam table position (p= 0.083). Conclusions The coin between the thighs is the best marker for radiographic calibration in the preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty, and we suggest the use of another coin on the exam table for comparison, considering the 8% reduction in relation to its real size.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a precisão e as diferenças entre 2 tipos de marcadores metálicos, esfera e moeda, para calibração radiográfica no planejamento pré-operatório da artroplastia de quadril. Métodos Quatro marcadores metálicos esféricos e quatro moedas, ambas de 25 mm de diâmetro, foram colocadas em trocânter maior, sínfise púbica, entre as coxas e a mesa do exame, para exame radiográfico do quadril em 33 pacientes com prótese de quadril. A cabeça da prótese foi utilizada para calibração e dois examinadores mediram os diâmetros da imagem dos marcadores, e os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente. Resultados No trocânter maior, a esfera e a moeda não foram visualizadas em 19 radiografias (57,6%). Entre as coxas, o marcador de moeda não foi visualizado em 13 radiografias (39,4%). No trocânter maior, a precisão de 25 mm da moeda e da esfera foi, respectivamente, entre 57,1 e 63,3% e entre 64,3 e 92,9%. A moeda entre as coxas atingiu 25 mm de precisão entre 50 e 60%. Sobre a mesa de exame, os marcadores de moeda e esfera atingiram, respectivamente, diâmetros médios de 22,91 mm e 23 mm, o menor coeficiente de variação, o menor intervalo de confiança e o posicionamento mais fácil. Houve diferença estatística entre as avaliações dos marcadores (moeda vs. esfera) em todas as posições (p< 0,032), com exceção da posição na mesa de exame (p= 0,083). Conclusões A moeda entre as coxas é o melhor marcador para calibração radiográfica no planejamento pré-operatório da artroplastia de quadril, e sugerimos o uso de outra moeda na mesa de exame para comparação, considerando os 8% de redução em relação ao seu tamanho real.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 1: Pathophysiology and Biomechanics.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an important cause of hip pain, and the main etiology of hip osteoarthritis in the young population. Femoroacetabular impingement is characterized by subtle alterations in the anatomy of the acetabulum and proximal femur, which can lead to labrum tearing. The acetabular labrum is essential to the stability of the hip joint. Three types of FAI were described: cam (anespherical femoral head), pincer (acetabular overcoverage) and mixed (characteristics of both cam and pincer). The etiology of FAI is related to genetic and environmental characteristics. Knowledge of this condition is essential to adequately treat patients presenting with hip pain.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 3: Surgical Treatment.

In the last 15 years, the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement has become more frequent; with the advance of surgical indications, different techniques have been developed. Surgical treatment includes a wide variety of options, namely: periacetabular osteotomy, surgical hip dislocation, arthroscopy with osteochondroplasty via a small incision, modified anterior approach technique, and exclusively arthroscopic technique. The type of approach should be chosen according to the complexity of the morphology of the femoroacetabular impingement and to the surgeon's training. The techniques most used today are arthroscopy, surgical dislocation of the hip, and periacetabular osteotomy. The present article aims to describe the current main surgical techniques used to treat femoroacetabular impingement, their indications, advantages and disadvantages, complications and clinical results.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 2: Clinical Diagnosis, Physical Examination and Imaging.

The clinical diagnosis of femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) continues to evolve as the understanding of normal and pathological hips progresses. Femoral acetabular impingement is currently defined as a syndrome in which the diagnosis consists of the combination of a previously-obtained comprehensive clinical history, followed by a consistent and standardized physical examination with specific orthopedic maneuvers. Additionally, radiographic and tomographic examinations are used for the morphological evaluation of the hip, and to ascertain the existence of sequelae of childhood hip diseases and the presence of osteoarthritis. The understanding of the femoral and acetabular morphologies and versions associated with images of labral and osteochondral lesions obtained through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes to the confirmation of this syndrome in symptomatic patients, and helps in the exclusion of differential diagnoses such as iliopsoas tendon snaps, subspine impingement, ischiofemoral impingement, and other hip joint pathologies.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 2: Clinical Diagnosis, Physical Examination and Imaging / Impacto femoroacetabular e lesão do lábio acetabular - Parte 2: Diagnóstico clínico, exame físico e imagiologia

Abstract The clinical diagnosis of femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) continues to evolve as the understanding of normal and pathological hips progresses. Femoral acetabular impingement is currently defined as a syndrome in which the diagnosis consists of the combination of a previously-obtained comprehensive clinical history, followed by a consistent and standardized physical examination with specific orthopedic maneuvers. Additionally, radiographic and tomographic examinations are used for the morphological evaluation of the hip, and to ascertain the existence of sequelae of childhood hip diseases and the presence of osteoarthritis. The understanding of the femoral and acetabular morphologies and versions associated with images of labral and osteochondral lesions obtained through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes to the confirmation of this syndrome in symptomatic patients, and helps in the exclusion of differential diagnoses such as iliopsoas tendon snaps, subspine impingement, ischiofemoral impingement, and other hip joint pathologies.

Resumo O diagnóstico clínico do impacto femoroacetabular continua a evoluir conforme o entendimento dos quadris normal e patológico progride. Impacto femoroacetabular é atualmente definido como uma síndrome na qual o diagnóstico se baseia no somatório de uma história clínica abrangente obtida previamente, seguida de um exame físico coerente e padronizado com manobras ortopédicas específicas. Além disso, exames radiográficos e tomográficos são usados para a avaliação morfológica do quadril, e para verificar a existência de sequelas de doenças do quadril da infância e a presença de osteoartrose. O entendimento da morfologia e versão femoral e acetabular associado às imagens de lesões labrais e osteocondrais obtidas com a ressonância magnética contribuem para a confirmação da síndrome nos pacientes sintomáticos, além de auxiliar na exclusão de diagnósticos diferenciais, como ressalto do tendão do músculo iliopsoas, impacto subespinhal, impacto isquiofemoral, e outras patologias da articulação do quadril.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 1: Pathophysiology and Biomechanics / Impacto femoroacetabular e lesão do lábio acetabular - Parte 1: Fisiopatologia e biomecânica

Abstract Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an important cause of hip pain, and the main etiology of hip osteoarthritis in the young population. Femoroacetabular impingement is characterized by subtle alterations in the anatomy of the acetabulum and proximal femur, which can lead to labrum tearing. The acetabular labrum is essential to the stability of the hip joint. Three types of FAI were described: cam (anespherical femoral head), pincer (acetabular overcoverage) and mixed (characteristics of both cam and pincer). The etiology of FAI is related to genetic and environmental characteristics. Knowledge of this condition is essential to adequately treat patients presenting with hip pain.

Resumo O impacto femoroacetabular (IFA) é uma importante causa de dor no quadril, e a principal etiologia da osteoartrose do quadril no jovem. O IFA é caracterizado por alterações sutis da anatomia do acetábulo e do fêmur proximal que podem causar lesões do complexo condrolabial. O lábio é uma estrutura fibrocartilaginosa essencial na estabilidade articular. Três tipos de IFA são descritos: came (onde há uma anesfericidade da cabeça femoral), pincer (onde há uma sobrecobertura acetabular) e misto (que apresenta características de ambos). A etiologia do IFA está relacionada com características genéticas e ambientais. O conhecimento desta doença e sua fisiopatologia é essencial para o tratamento de pacientes que apresentam dor no quadril.

Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears - Part 3: Surgical Treatment / Impacto femoroacetabular e lesão do lábio acetabular - Parte 3: Tratamento cirúrgico

Abstract In the last 15 years, the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement has become more frequent; with the advance of surgical indications, different techniques have been developed. Surgical treatment includes a wide variety of options, namely: periacetabular osteotomy, surgical hip dislocation, arthroscopy with osteochondroplasty via a small incision, modified anterior approach technique, and exclusively arthroscopic technique. The type of approach should be chosen according to the complexity of the morphology of the femoroacetabular impingement and to the surgeon's training. The techniques most used today are arthroscopy, surgical dislocation of the hip, and periacetabular osteotomy. The present article aims to describe the current main surgical techniques used to treat femoroacetabular impingement, their indications, advantages and disadvantages, complications and clinical results.

Resumo Nos últimos 15 anos, o diagnóstico do impacto femoroacetabular tem se tornado cada vez mais frequente; com o avanço do entendimento de quais pacientes potencialmente se beneficiariam do tratamento cirúrgico, diferentes técnicas foram desenvolvidas. O tratamento cirúrgico inclui grande variedade de opções, sendo elas: osteotomia periacetabular, técnica de luxação cirúrgica do quadril, artroscopia com osteocondroplastia via pequena incisão, técnica via anterior modificada, e técnica exclusivamente artroscópica. O tipo de abordagem deve ser escolhido de acordo com a complexidade da morfologia do impacto femoroacetabular e com o treinamento do cirurgião. As técnicas mais utilizadas atualmente são a artroscopia, a luxação cirúrgica do quadril e a osteotomia periacetabular. O presente artigo busca descrever as principais técnicas cirúrgicas utilizadas para o tratamento do impacto femoroacetabular, suas indicações, vantagens e desvantagens, complicações e resultados clínicos.

Errata - Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning??

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693052.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693052.].

Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning?

Objective The present paper aims to evaluate the influences of individual characteristics in radiographic magnification and to identify the most accurate method for radiographic calibration. Methods During radiographical exam of 50 patients with hip prosthesis, anthropometric data was collected and 4 spherical metal markers with 25 mm diameters were positioned: at the greater trochanter level and lateral to it, over the pubic symphysis, between the thighs at the greater trochanter level, and over the exam table. Since the prosthesis head is the best internal radiographic marker for hip arthroplasty, it was our calibration parameter. Two examiners measured the markers' image for further analysis. Results The sample consisted of 50 participants, 19 of whom were male. A difference in pubic symphysis magnification was found. Other individual characteristics (weight, height and body mass index) had weak correlation. The higher accuracy of the markers was at the greater trochanter, between 68.4 and 78.9%, visualized in only19 radiographs. The marker positioned between the thighs was visualized in all radiographs, with an accuracy ranging from 30 to 46%. Conclusions Of all individual characteristics, only gender influences magnification at the pubic symphysis. We suggest the use of two spherical markers: at the greater trochanter, due the best accuracy, and between the thighs, considered the best positioning for better visibility.

Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning? / É importante saber onde posicionar o marcador esférico para o planejamento digital de artroplastia de quadril?

Abstract Objective The present paper aims to evaluate the influences of individual characteristics in radiographic magnification and to identify the most accurate method for radiographic calibration. Methods During radiographical exam of 50 patients with hip prosthesis, anthropometric data was collected and 4 spherical metal markers with 25 mm diameters were positioned: at the greater trochanter level and lateral to it, over the pubic symphysis, between the thighs at the greater trochanter level, and over the exam table. Since the prosthesis head is the best internal radiographic marker for hip arthroplasty, it was our calibration parameter. Two examiners measured the markers' image for further analysis. Results The sample consisted of 50 participants, 19 of whom were male. A difference in pubic symphysis magnification was found. Other individual characteristics (weight, height and body mass index) had weak correlation. The higher accuracy of the markers was at the greater trochanter, between 68.4 and 78.9%, visualized in only19 radiographs. The marker positioned between the thighs was visualized in all radiographs, with an accuracy ranging from 30 to 46%. Conclusions Of all individual characteristics, only gender influences magnification at the pubic symphysis. We suggest the use of two spherical markers: at the greater trochanter, due the best accuracy, and between the thighs, considered the best positioning for better visibility.

Resumo Objetivo Os objetivos desse artigo são avaliar as influências das características pessoais na magnificação radiográfica e identificar o método de maior acurácia e o mais adequado. Métodos Durante o exame radiográfico em 50 pacientes com prótese de quadril, foram coletados dados antropométricos e posicionados quatro marcadores metálicos esféricos: ao nível e lateral ao trocânter maior, na sínfise púbica, ao nível do trocânter maior entre as coxas, sobre a mesa do exame. A cabeça da prótese é o melhor marcador radiográfico interno e foi o nosso parâmetro de calibragem. Dois avaliadores mediram as imagens desses marcadores para análise de resultados. Resultados Foram selecionados 50 participantes, sendo 19 do sexo masculino. Houve diferença de magnificação entre os sexos na posição sínfise púbica. As outras características pessoais avaliadas (peso, altura e índice de massa corpórea) tiveram correlação fraca. A maior acurácia do marcador foi no trocânter maior, entre 68,4 e 78,9%, visualizado em apenas 19 radiografias. O marcador entre as coxas obteve acurácia entre 30 e 46% e foi visualizado em todas as radiografias. Conclusão Das características pessoais, apenas o sexo influencia a magnificação e somente na posição da sínfise púbica. Sugerimos padronizar o uso de duas esferas: no trocanter maior, pela maior acurácia, e entre as coxas, por ser o mais adequado e com melhor visibilidade em todas radiografias.

Post-Treatment Classification for Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy / Classificação pós-tratamento para lesões condrais acetabulares na artroscopia de quadril

Abstract Objective To describe a postarthroscopic treatment classification system for acetabular chondral damage in the hip and to report the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of such classification. Methods This is a retrospective review of ninety-nine digital video recordings made during arthroscopic surgery. Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and evaluated at the hip arthroscopy outpatient clinic between March 2015 and March 2016 were included in the study. Patients with a history of previous hip surgery, radiologic evidence of advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade > 2), who underwent labral resection, or whose digital recordings were incomplete or of insufficient quality for adequate review were excluded. Two orthopedic surgeons, who did not participate in the surgery, independently reviewed the video recordings and classified the remaining acetabular cartilage using the post-treatment classification system. Intraobserver and interobserver analysis was then conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.790; p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.882; p < 0.001) were observed. Both ICC values were statistically significant. Conclusion The posttreatment classification of the remaining acetabular cartilage has excellent intra and interobserver reliability.

Resumo Objetivo Descrever um sistema de classificação de tratamento pós-artroscópico para as lesões condrais acetabulares no quadril e relatar as confiabilidades intra e interobservador deste sistema. Métodos Esta é uma revisão retrospectiva de 99 gravações de vídeo digital realizadas durante artroscopia. Os pacientes submetidos a tratamento artroscópico para impacto femoroacetabular e avaliados no ambulatório de quadril entre março de 2015 e março de 2016 foram incluídos no estudo. Os pacientes com histórico de cirurgia anterior do quadril, evidência radiológica de osteoartrose avançada (Tönnis > 2), pacientes submetidos à ressecção labral ou cujas gravações digitais estavam incompletas ou de qualidade insuficiente para avaliação adequada foram excluídos. Dois ortopedistas, que não participaram da cirurgia, revisaram de forma independente as gravações de vídeo e classificaram a cartilagem acetabular remanescente usando o sistema de classificação pós-tratamento. A análise intra e interobservador foi então realizada utilizando o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). Resultados Excelente confiabilidade intraobservador (CCI = 0,790; p < 0,001) e confiabilidade interobservador (CCI = 0,882; p < 0,001). Ambos os valores de CCI foram estatisticamente significativos. Conclusão a classificação pós-tratamento da cartilagem acetabular remanescente possui excelente confiabilidade intra e interobservador.

Does Computed Tomography Improve Reproducibility in the Classification of Transtrochanteric Fractures?

With the aging of the population, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of hip fractures, with high mortality rates, sequelae and expenses. Understanding the fracture profile and classifying it correctly is critical to define the appropriate treatment. Several radiographic classifications have been developed for transtrochanteric fractures, such as Tronzo, Evans-Jensen, AO and Boyd-Griffin, but their reproducibility is not always satisfactory. The present review aimed to elucidate whether the addition of computed tomography (CT) implies a greater reproducibility than simple radiography in the classification of transtrochanteric fractures, and whether this is a better examination to identify the fracture trait. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane databases between July 2016 and June 2017, limited to the last 15 years. All retrospective, prospective and systematic reviews articles published in the English language, with evaluation of men and/or women, were considered for review. We have excluded case reports, studies that evaluated tomography or radiographs in isolation, and duplicate studies. The research presented 112 articles, of which 5 contemplated the proposed criteria. Reproducibility for the classification of transtrochanteric fractures presented variable results and was influenced by factors such as the type of classification, the use of the simplified or complete classification, the specialty of the evaluator, his experience, and the methodology proposed by the works. There are indications that there is benefit for the use of CT, especially for fractures considered unstable, but its use as a tool to ensure better reproducibility (intra- and interobserver) remains controversial and needs further studies.

Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle / Avaliação comparativa das incidências radiográficas cross-table e Ducroquet para a medição do ângulo alfa do quadril

Abstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were takenwith 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet viewswas standardizedwith the patient in the supine position,with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle wasmeasured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation andanother 4weeks afterwards. The t Student test was usedand calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. Conclusion In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view.

Resumo Objetivo O objetivo do presente trabalho é comparar a equivalência da medida do ângulo alfa do quadril usando as incidências laterais de Ducroquet e de cross-table. Método Estudamos 90 pacientes, com um total de 95 quadris, e padronizamos a realização das radiografias conhecidas como "Ducroquet" e "cross-table." A incidência de perfil de cross-table foi realizada em 15° de rotação interna com o paciente em posição supina, e a incidência de perfil de Ducroquet foi padronizada com o paciente posicionado em decúbito dorsal, em 90° de flexão e 45° de abdução do quadril. O ângulo alfa foi medido em ambas as radiografias de perfil, por dois radiologistas especializados em afecções musculoesqueléticas. As medidas foram realizadas em 2 épocas diferentes: uma avaliação inicial e outra após 4 semanas. O teste t de Student foi utilizado e calculou o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). Resultados Encontramos boa correlação intraobservador para ambas as incidências radiográficas em diferentes momentos. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre as medidas feitas pelas duas visualizações. No entanto, a correlação interobservadores foi baixa. Conclusão A incidência radiográfica de perfil de Ducroquet é uma boa opção para a medida do ângulo alfa e pode ser usada ao invés da incidência radiográfica de perfil cross-table.

Does Computed Tomography Improve Reproducibility in the Classification of Transtrochanteric Fractures? / A tomografia computadorizada melhora a reprodutibilidade na classificação das fraturas transtrocanterianas?

Abstract With the aging of the population, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of hip fractures, with high mortality rates, sequelae and expenses. Understanding the fracture profile and classifying it correctly is critical to define the appropriate treatment. Several radiographic classifications have been developed for transtrochanteric fractures, such as Tronzo, Evans-Jensen, AO and Boyd-Griffin, but their reproducibility is not always satisfactory. The present review aimedto elucidatewhether the addition of computed tomography (CT) implies a greater reproducibility than simple radiography in the classification of transtrochanteric fractures, andwhether this is a better examination to identify the fracture trait. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane databases between July 2016 and June 2017, limited to the last 15 years. All retrospective, prospective and systematic reviews articles published in the English language, with evaluation of men and/or women, were considered for review. We have excluded case reports, studies that evaluated tomography or radiographs in isolation, and duplicate studies. The research presented 112 articles, of which 5 contemplated the proposed criteria. Reproducibility for the classification of transtrochanteric fractures presented variable results and was influenced by factors such as the type of classification, the use of the simplified or complete classification, the specialty of the evaluator, his experience, and themethodology proposed by the works. There are indications that there is benefit for the use of CT, especially for fractures considered unstable, but its use as a tool to ensure better reproducibility (intraand interobserver) remains controversial and needs further studies.

Resumo Com o envelhecimento populacional, houve um aumento significante da prevalência das fraturas do quadril, com alto índice de mortalidade, de sequelas, e alto custo. Compreender o perfil da fratura e classificá-la de forma correta é fundamental para definir o tratamento adequado. Diversas classificações radiográficas foram desenvolvidas para as fraturas transtrocanterianas, tais como as de Tronzo, de Evans-Jensen, de Boyd-Griffin e AO, porém sua reprodutibilidade nem sempr é satisfatória. O presente trabalho objetivou analisar se o acréscimo da tomografia computadorizada (TC)implica em maior reprodutibilidade do que a radiografia simples na classificação das fraturas transtrocanterianas e se esta é melhor para a identificação do traço de fratura. Foi realizada uma pesquisa nas bases de dados PubMed, Lilacs, Scielo e Cochrane entre julho de 2016 e junho de 2017, limitada aos últimos 15 anos. Todos os trabalhos retrospectivos, prospectivos e revisões sistemáticas publicados na língua inglesa, com avaliação de homens e/ou de mulheres, foram considerados para a revisão. Foram excluídos relatos de casos, estudos que avaliaram de forma isolada a TC ou radiografias e estudos duplicados. A pesquisa apresentou 112 artigos, dos quais 5 preencheram os critérios propostos. A reprodutibilidade para a classificação das fraturas transtrocanterianas apresentou resultados variáveis e influenciados por fatores como o tipo de classificação, o uso da classificação simplificada ou completa, a especialidade do avaliador, a experiência e a metodologia proposta pelos trabalhos. Há indícios de que há algum benefício para o uso da TC, sobretudo para fraturas consideradas instáveis,

Post-Treatment Classification for Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy.

Objective To describe a postarthroscopic treatment classification system for acetabular chondral damage in the hip and to report the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of such classification. Methods This is a retrospective review of ninety-nine digital video recordings made during arthroscopic surgery. Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and evaluated at the hip arthroscopy outpatient clinic between March 2015 and March 2016 were included in the study. Patients with a history of previous hip surgery, radiologic evidence of advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade > 2), who underwent labral resection, or whose digital recordings were incomplete or of insufficient quality for adequate review were excluded. Two orthopedic surgeons, who did not participate in the surgery, independently reviewed the video recordings and classified the remaining acetabular cartilage using the post-treatment classification system. Intraobserver and interobserver analysis was then conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.790; p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.882; p < 0.001) were observed. Both ICC values were statistically significant. Conclusion The posttreatment classification of the remaining acetabular cartilage has excellent intra and interobserver reliability.