Baseline Characteristics and mNAPSI Change from Baseline Scores Through Month 12 for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Nail Psoriasis Treated with Biologics from PSoHO.

INTRODUCTION: Nail psoriasis is highly prevalent among patients with psoriasis yet remains one of the most challenging areas to treat. To better understand the treatment landscape for psoriatic nail disease, more studies are needed that compare the effectiveness of different biologics for patients with nail psoriasis. This study contributes to this objective by directly comparing the effectiveness of approved biologics in improving nail psoriasis for patients up to month 12 in a real-world setting. METHODS: Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year, prospective, non-interventional cohort study of adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. This study assessed the change in modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) score from baseline to months 3, 6 and 12 for 763 patients and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics versus other approved biologics, as well as ixekizumab versus secukinumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and adalimumab. Comparative adjusted analyses used frequentist model averaging (FMA). Least square mean difference (LSMD) in mNAPSI scores are presented as observed. RESULTS: Irrespective of the severity of nail psoriasis at baseline, the anti-IL-17A cohort had greater mean mNAPSI reductions from baseline compared to the other biologics cohort through month 12, reaching significance at months 3 and 6 in the adjusted analysis. For patients with moderate-to-severe nail psoriasis, ixekizumab showed numerically higher mean reductions in mNAPSI scores compared to all other studied biologics, reaching significance versus guselkumab at all timepoints and risankizumab at month 6. CONCLUSION: This real-world study showed that patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and any severity of concomitant nail involvement had significantly faster and more substantial improvements in nail psoriasis up to month 6 in the anti-IL-17A cohort compared to the other biologics cohort. Of the individual biologics studied, ixekizumab showed the highest numerical improvements in nail psoriasis at month 12. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUPAS24207.

Measuring Situational Cognitive Performance in the Wild: A Psychometric Evaluation of Three Brief Smartphone-Based Test Procedures.

Mobile devices provide new opportunities to draw conclusions about cognitive performance in everyday situations. To gain insights into cognitive performance patterns in healthy adult populations, we adapted three established cognitive tests for smartphone use: the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), and Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). To increase their feasibility for ambulatory assessment, we identified the minimum measurement durations that provide reliable and valid state measures of cognitive performance. Over 2 weeks, 46 participants performed each test once per day at random times, along with self-reports (e.g., on concentration, mood, and mental demands). The validity and reliability of change are promising for the 30-second PVT and 90-second DSST and SART. The DSST and SART provide fruitful outcomes for ambulatory field studies linked to mood, stress, and mental demands. We provide digital versions of the adapted DSST and SART online for free.

Treatment satisfaction of adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with baricitinib in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: results from a cross-sectional international patient survey.

INTRODUCTION: We explored patient satisfaction with baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with baricitinib in clinical practice for ≥4 weeks in France, Germany, and the UK completed a one-time online survey under market research methodologies. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale and abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9). Patients reported demographic, disease, and treatment information. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 170 patients with a mean age of 39.3 years (SD = 13.5), 59% (n = 101) were female. At baricitinib initiation, 79% rated their AD as "Severe", yet 28% reported body surface area (BSA) involvement ≥10%. Most were "Satisfied" or "Very satisfied" (76%/18%) with baricitinib, with high rates reported for controlling itch (36%/56%). Itch improvements were noted by 97% of patients. Some tapered/stopped (50%/32%) topical corticosteroid use, aligned with reported improvements on the patient global assessment and BSA. Mean TSQM-9 convenience score was 78.0 (SD = 14.0). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with itch control was particularly high, reflected in rates of improvement in itch since starting baricitinib. On the TSQM-9, the convenience score was the highest. Many patients tapered/stopped concomitant topicals, indicating baricitinib's effect in controlling AD symptoms.

Comparative effectiveness of biologics for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and special area involvement: week 12 results from the observational Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO).

Introduction: Psoriasis localized at the scalp, face, nails, genitalia, palms, and soles can exacerbate the disease burden. Real-world studies comparing the effectiveness of treatments for these special areas are limited. Methods: Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an international, prospective, non-interventional, study comparing the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics (ixekizumab and secukinumab) compared to other approved biologics and the pairwise comparative effectiveness of ixekizumab relative to five other individual biologics for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. To determine special area involvement, physicians answered binary questions at baseline and week 12. The proportion of patients who achieved special area clearance at week 12 was assessed. Missing outcome data were imputed as non-response. Comparative treatment analyses were conducted using frequentist model averaging. Results: Of the 1,978 patients included, 83.4% had at least one special area involved at baseline with the scalp (66.7%) as the most frequently affected part, followed by nails (37.9%), face/neck (36.9%), genitalia (25.6%), and palms and/or soles (22.2%). Patients with scalp, nail, or genital, but not palmoplantar or face/neck psoriasis, had significantly higher odds of achieving clearance at week 12 in the anti-IL-17A cohort compared to the other biologics cohort. Patients with scalp psoriasis had a 10-20% higher response rate and significantly greater odds (1.8-2.3) of achieving clearance at week 12 with ixekizumab compared to included biologics. Conclusion: Biologics demonstrate a high level of clearance of special areas at week 12 in a real-world setting. Patients with scalp, nail, or genital involvement have significantly higher odds of clearance at week 12 with anti-IL-17A biologics compared to other biologics.

Baricitinib provides rapid and sustained improvements in absolute EASI and SCORAD outcomes in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate absolute Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) outcomes over 16 weeks and to link disease severity categories to quality of life (QoL) improvements. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included patients enrolled in Phase3 monotherapy (BREEZE-AD1/AD2) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) combination therapy (BREEZE-AD7) trials and analyzed baricitinib 2 and 4 mg vs. placebo. Categorical outcomes were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Significantly more baricitinib-treated patients reached EASI ≤ 7 and SCORAD < 25 as early as week 1 in monotherapy and week 2 in TCS combination therapy, compared to placebo. Significant response vs. placebo was sustained until week 16 for EASI ≤ 7 (AD1/2 [p-value vs. placebo]: 2 mg = 19.9%, 4 mg = 25.4% [p = 0.001] and AD7: 2 mg = 40.4% [p = 0.087], 4 mg = 48.6% [p = 0.003]) and SCORAD < 25 (AD1/2: 2 mg = 12.2%, 4 mg = 19.4% [p = 0.001] and AD7: 2 mg = 30.3% [p = 0.025], 4 mg = 34.2% [p = 0.004]) severity categories. These effects were accompanied by rapid improvements in QoL. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib-treated patients rapidly achieved recommended absolute EASI and SCORAD treatment outcomes which were sustained until week 16. Improvements in QoL were greater than EASI severity categories reflected, indicating that physician-assessed scores do not necessarily correlate with patients' impression of AD severity.

Integrated Safety Analysis on Skin Cancers among Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Ixekizumab in Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist on skin cancer risk in patients with psoriasis using biologics. Here, we report treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of skin cancer in patients treated with ixekizumab from psoriasis clinical trials. METHODS: Integrated safety databases from 17 clinical trials of adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with ≥ 1 dose of ixekizumab for ≤ 5 years were used to analyze exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years of exposure (PYE) and clinically characterize dermatologist-adjudicated skin cancer TEAEs. RESULTS: Of 6892 patients, 58 presented with ≥ 1 skin cancer TEAE (IR 0.3) with IRs remaining stable with longer ixekizumab exposure. Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) was the most common event (IR 0.3) affecting 55 patients; of those, 44 had basal cell carcinoma (IR 0.2) and 16 had squamous cell carcinoma (IR 0.1). Two treatment-emergent melanoma events were identified; neither were classified as serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of skin neoplasms in patients with psoriasis treated with ixekizumab for ≤ 5 years was low, and among those events, NMSC was most common. Limitations included that longer exposure may be required to confirm risk of skin cancer and that the study exclusion criteria of several studies, which excluded patients with skin cancer events within 5 years prior to baseline, might limit interpretation of skin cancer risk in this cohort. These findings support the safety profile of ixekizumab for patients requiring long-term psoriasis control.

Early improvements in signs and symptoms predict clinical response to baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Early prediction of therapeutic response can optimize treatment strategies in atopic dermatitis (AD). Baricitinib is approved for moderate-to-severe AD in Europe, Japan and other countries. OBJECTIVES: To identify early clinical improvements that can reliably predict a later clinical response to baricitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: Using data from one topical corticosteroid combination study [BREEZE-AD7 (NCT03733301)] and data pooled from two monotherapy studies [(BREEZE-AD1 (NCT03334396) and BREEZE-AD2 (NCT03334422)], we calculated the sensitivity and specificity, along with the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), of predefined changes in single and combined clinical scores at weeks 2, 4 and 8, to predict clinical response at week 16. Clinical response was defined as ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75), ≥ 4-point improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS ≥ 4), or a combination of both. RESULTS: Composite predictors had higher predictive accuracy for week 16 response outcomes than did single parameters. This was evident as early as week 4 for the combination of EASI 50 or Itch NRS ≥ 3 and of validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) score ≤ 2 or Itch NRS ≥ 3 (sensitivity 87-100%; NPV 68-100%). The predictive accuracy of these composite clinical predictors for week 16 response outcomes was highest at week 8 (sensitivity 92-100%; NPV 80-100%). At both weeks 4 and 8, EASI 50 or Itch NRS ≥ 3 had higher sensitivity and NPV than did vIGA-AD score ≤ 2 or Itch NRS ≥ 3. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in signs and symptoms early during treatment with baricitinib 4 mg once daily predicts clinical response at week 16, providing a tool for dermatologists when choosing treatment strategies for patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Factors Predicting Quality of Life Impairment in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a Patient Survey and Machine Learning Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disorder that impairs patients' quality of life (QoL). Physician assessment of AD disease severity is determined by clinical scales and assessment of affected body surface area (BSA), which might not mirror patients' perceived disease burden. METHODS: Using data from an international cross-sectional web-based survey of patients with AD and a machine learning approach, we sought to identify disease attributes with the highest impact on QoL for patients with AD. Adults with dermatologist-confirmed AD participated in the survey between July-September 2019. Eight machine learning models were applied to the data with dichotomised Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) as the response variable to identify factors most predictive of AD-related QoL burden. Variables tested were demographics, affected BSA and affected body areas, flare characteristics, activity impairment, hospitalisation and AD therapies. Three machine learning models, logistic regression model, random forest and neural network, were selected on the basis of predictive performance. Each variable's contribution was computed via importance values from 0 to 100. For relevant predictive factors, further descriptive analyses were conducted to characterise those findings. RESULTS: In total, 2314 patients completed the survey with mean age 39.2 years (standard deviation 12.6) and average disease duration of 19 years. Measured by affected BSA, 13.3% of patients had moderate-to-severe disease. However, 44% of patients reported a DLQI > 10, indicative of a very large to extremely large impact on QoL. Activity impairment was the most important factor predicting high QoL burden (DLQI > 10) across models. Hospitalisation during the past year and flare type were also highly ranked. Current BSA involvement was not a strong predictor of AD-related QoL impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Activity impairment was the single most important factor for AD-related QoL impairment while current extent of AD did not predict higher disease burden. These results support the importance of considering patients' perspectives when determining the severity of AD.

Live-streaming Activity and Relaxation Breaks: a (Home-)Office-Compatible Approach to Promote Break Recovery, Mood, and Attention?

The aim of this study is to investigate whether short, live-streaming activity and relaxation lunch breaks have positive associations with office workers' mood (calmness, valence, and energetic arousal), back pain, and attention after break and whether these associations are mediated by better break recovery. Additionally, we considered the two respite interventions as resources possibly buffering the effects of elevated situational job demands. Ten-minute break exercises were conducted during lunch breaks via Zoom live-stream, and data on those days were compared with data on days on which participants spent their breaks as usual. Our sample of 34 office workers provided data for 277 work days (209 in the home office and 68 on site at the company). Multilevel path models revealed positive total associations of both respite interventions with the mood dimension of calmness. Activity breaks additionally showed a positive association with the energetic arousal dimension of mood, while relaxation breaks were positively related to objectively measured cognitive performance. Interestingly, activity breaks moderated the relationships of job demands with calmness and valence, indicating their function as a stress-buffering resource. There were no significant associations between the two respite interventions and back pain. Supplemented by participants' feedback, the findings of this study suggest that offering short virtually guided break exercises may represent a feasible and office-compatible approach to promote break recovery, mood and functionality at work, especially regarding home-office work. Possible advantages and disadvantages of the live-streaming format are discussed.

Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics Across Subgroups of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results at Week 12 from the PSoHO Study in a Real-World Setting.

INTRODUCTION: In routine clinical care, important treatment outcomes among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) have been shown to vary according to patient demographics and disease characteristics. This study aimed to provide direct comparative effectiveness data at week 12 between anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics relative to other approved biologics for the treatment of PsO across seven clinically relevant patient subgroups in the real-world setting. METHODS: From the international, non-interventional Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), 1981 patients with moderate-to-severe PsO were grouped a priori according to seven clinically relevant demographic and disease variables with binary categories, which were sex (male or female), age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), body mass index (≤ 30 or > 30 kg/m2), race (White or Asian), PsO disease duration (< 15 or ≥ 15 years), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) comorbidity (present or absent), and prior biologic use (never or ≥ 1). Across these subgroups, effectiveness was compared between the anti-IL-17A cohort (ixekizumab, secukinumab) versus all other approved biologics and ixekizumab versus five individual biologics. The proportion of patients in each subgroup who achieved 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) and/or static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1, PASI100, or PASI90 at week 12 were assessed. Comparative analyses were conducted using frequentist model averaging (FMA). Missing data were imputed using non-responder imputation. RESULTS: Patients in each of the seven subgroups achieved similar response rates to those of the overall treatment cohort, apart from patients with PsA treated with other biologics who had 7-10% lower response rates. Consequently, patients with comorbid PsA had significantly higher odds of achieving skin clearance at week 12 with anti-IL-17A biologics compared to other biologics. Patients in all subgroups had significantly higher odds of achieving PASI90 and/or sPGA (0,1), PASI100, and PASI90 in the anti-IL-17A cohort relative to the other biologics cohort, except for the Asian subgroup. No sex- or age-specific differences in treatment effectiveness after 12 weeks were identified, neither between the treatment cohorts nor between the individual treatment comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Despite relative consistency of comparative treatment effectiveness across subgroups, the presence of comorbid PsA may affect a patient's clinical response to some treatments.

Application of an Interactive Diagnosis Ranking Algorithm in a Simulated Vignette-based Environment for General Dermatology.

Introduction: Diagnostic algorithms may reduce noise and bias and improve interrater agreement of clinical decisions. In a practical sense, algorithms may serve as alternatives to specialist consultations or decision support in store-and-forward tele-dermatology. It is, however, unknown how dermatologists interact with algorithms based on questionnaires. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a questionnaire-based diagnostic algorithm when applied by users with different expertise. Methods: We created 58 virtual test cases covering common dermatologic diseases and asked five raters with different expertise to complete a predefined clinical questionnaire, which served as input for a disease ranking algorithm. We compared the ranks of the correct diagnosis between users, analyzed the similarity between inputs of different users, and explored the impact of different parts of the questionnaire on the final ranking. Results: When applied by a board-certified dermatologist, the algorithm top-ranked the correct diagnosis in the majority of cases (median rank 1; interquartile range: 1.0; mean reciprocal rank 0.757). The median rank of the correct diagnosis was significantly lower when the algorithm was applied by four dermatology residents (median rank 2-5, P < 0.01). The lowest similarity between inputs of the residents and the board-certified dermatologist was found for questions regarding morphology. Sensitivity analysis showed the highest deterioration in performance after omission of information on morphology and anatomic site. Conclusions: A simple questionnaire-based disease ranking algorithm provides accurate ranking for a wide variety of dermatologic conditions. When applied in clinical practice, additional measures may be needed to ensure robustness of data entry for inexperienced users.

Sustained Resolution of Nail Psoriasis Through 5 Years with Ixekizumab: A Post-Hoc analysis from UNCOVER-3.

Nail psoriasis is a chronic, difficult-to-treat condition affecting almost half of patients with psoriasis. It is associated with considerable social stigma and impairment of patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess improvements in objective measures of nail psoriasis among patients from the long-term extension of the UNCOVER-3 study who received the interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab and had either any degree of nail psoriasis (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) >=1) or significant nail psoriasis (fingernail NAPSI ≥ 16 and ≥ 4 fingernails involved) at baseline. Efficacy outcomes reported through week 264 included the mean percentage improvements from baseline in NAPSI score and the proportion of patients achieving nail psoriasis resolution (NAPSI=0). In UNCOVER-3, 56.9% (219/385) of patients had nail psoriasis at baseline; of those, 61.2% (134/219) had significant nail psoriasis. At week 60, a total of 66.9% and 59.1% of patients with baseline nail psoriasis and significant baseline nail psoriasis, respectively, reported complete clearance of nail psoriasis, an effect which was sustained through week 264. This analysis demonstrates that continuous treatment with ixekizumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe-psoriasis through 264 weeks was associated with improvements and clearance of fingernail psoriasis, irrespective of the severity of nail psoriasis at baseline.

Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-naïve Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results From the Randomized SPIRIT-H2H Trial.

Introduction: The randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group SPIRIT-H2H trial (NCT03151551) demonstrated superiority of ixekizumab over adalimumab in simultaneously achieving improvement in joint symptoms (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]50) and skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]100) in biologic-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and plaque psoriasis (PsO) at Week (W) 24. Higher efficacy of ixekizumab versus adalimumab was maintained through W52. Objectives: This analysis investigated efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in the subgroup of patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO through W52. Methods: Efficacy and safety outcomes were analyzed in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO (PASI ≥ 12, Body Surface Area ≥ 10%, static Physician Global Assessment ≥ 3) through W52. Categorical and continuous outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression models and mixed model for repeated measures, respectively. Results: More ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients simultaneously achieved PASI100 and ACR50 at W24 (40.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.015) and W52 (38.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.026). Likewise, more ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients achieved PASI100 (59.2% versus 25.5%, P = 0.001) and PASI90 (81.6% versus 60.8%, P = 0.028) through W52, and nail PsO clearance at W24. Joint symptom improvements were comparable between groups. No new safety findings were reported. Conclusions: Ixekizumab had higher efficacy than adalimumab in simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 at W24 and W52 in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO. Ixekizumab-treated patients showed higher response rates for nail PsO clearance and for reporting minimal or no impact on quality of life at W24.

Comparative effectiveness of biologics in clinical practice: week 12 primary outcomes from an international observational psoriasis study of health outcomes (PSoHO).

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials study treatment outcomes under stringent conditions, capturing incompletely the heterogeneity of patient populations and treatment complexities encountered in real-world practice. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics relative to other approved biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: The Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year observational cohort study in adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. Primary study endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and/or static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1 at Week 12 (W12) in the anti-IL-17A cohort (ixekizumab [IXE], secukinumab) vs. all other approved biologics. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients who achieve PASI 75/90/100, absolute PASI scores ≤5, ≤2 and ≤1, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0/1 at W12 between the two cohorts and among the individual biologics. Comparative effectiveness analyses were conducted using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA), a novel causal inference machine learning approach. Missing data for binary outcomes were imputed as non-response. RESULTS: Patient profiles in the anti-IL-17A cohort and other biologics cohort were similar, with more frequent comorbid psoriatic arthritis and less frequent exposure to conventional treatments in the patients receiving anti-IL-17A biologics. At W12, 71.4% of patients who received an anti-IL-17A biologic achieved PASI 90 and/or sPGA 0/1 compared to 58.6% of patients who received other biologics (odds ratios [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence intervals [CI], [1.6, 2.4]). Similar findings were observed for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These results reflect the high efficacy and early onset of skin clearance of IL-17A inhibitors observed in randomized clinical trials and confirm the effectiveness of anti-IL-17A biologics in the real-world setting.

Subgroup Analyses by European Country-Specific Reimbursement Requirements Confirm Efficacy for Ixekizumab in Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Biologic drugs are generally recommended for treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. While eligibility criteria are primarily defined by clinical treatment guidelines, access to these therapies varies between European countries and is regulated by country-specific reimbursement criteria. This post-hoc subgroup analysis of integrated data from two phase III trials (UNCOVER-2 and -3) reports the efficacy of ixekizumab relative to that of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis selected into groups defined by original reimbursement criteria from eight European countries. METHODS: This analysis included baseline and 12-week data from the ixekizumab- and etanercept-treated study populations from UNCOVER-2 and -3. Patients were classified as meeting/not meeting each country-specific biologic eligibility criterion. Efficacy was defined by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, 90, and 100 response rates and by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (0,1) response rates. Treatment responses across subgroups were analysed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: PASI 75/90/100 response rates were significantly higher for ixekizumab-treated patients than for etanercept-treated patients at week 12 (P<0.05), irrespective of whether predefined reimbursement criteria were met, for all countries, with the exception of PASI 100 response in those meeting reimbursement criteria in Belgium, where sample size was very small. Clinical efficacy outcomes were corroborated by proportions of patients achieving DLQI (0,1) responses. CONCLUSIONS: The overall high efficacy of ixekizumab, and the consistency of the higher treatment effect compared with etanercept, in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis across a range of European biologic treatment reimbursement eligibility criteria provides new insights to inform treatment decisions in clinical practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(6):659-667. doi:10.36849/JDD.6620.

Time to Loss of Response following Withdrawal of Ixekizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.

In clinical practice, interruption of treatment may not result in immediate cessation of disease control, and some patients even experience sustained treatment response following treatment interruption. This post hoc analysis of UNCOVER-1 and -2 Phase 3 clinical trials characterized the time to loss of treatment response in patients with psoriasis who responded to ixekizumab through a 12-week treatment period, and who were then re-randomized to placebo for the following 48 weeks. For those with static Physician Global Assessment [sPGA]0/1 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]90 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI90 was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 12.7-16.4). For those with PASI100 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI100 was 12.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 9.0-13.0). A small subset of patients maintained high levels of disease control through Week 60. This study adds to the growing body of evidence on sustained treatment response following treatment interruption.

A subset analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes from phase 3 clinical studies of ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with severe plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Factors beyond the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) contribute to disease severity in psoriasis and potentially affect treatment responses. OBJECTIVE: This subset analysis of data from two phase 3 clinical studies assessed baseline parameters in patients with different degrees of psoriasis severity in order to determine treatment responses to ixekizumab and safety outcomes. METHODS: This study used integrated data from the UNCOVER-2 and -3 trials involving 2709 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis to assess the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in three subgroups of patients, defined by PASI > 15 (group 1), PASI > 15 and history of ≥3 non-biologic systemic therapies (group 2), or PASI = 12-15 (group 3). RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, additional baseline features were identified that could influence treatment responses, including age at disease onset, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and work productivity. Irrespective of subgroup, ixekizumab demonstrated high PASI responses at weeks 12 and 60, which were evident as early as week 2. Adverse events did not differ across subgroups. CONCLUSION: Our data support the efficacy, early onset of action, and maintained response of ixekizumab as observed in previous trials, and highlight the complexity of comprehensively defining disease severity in psoriasis.

Modeling Heterogeneity in Patients' Preferences for Psoriasis Treatments in a Multicountry Study: A Comparison Between Random-Parameters Logit and Latent Class Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Either a random-parameters logit (RPL) or latent class (LC) model can be used to model or explain preference heterogeneity in discrete-choice experiment (DCE) data. The former assumes continuous distribution of preferences across the sample, while the latter assumes a discrete distribution. This study compared RPL and LC models to explore preference heterogeneity when analyzing patient preferences for psoriasis treatments. METHODS: Using DCE data collected from respondents with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, we calculated and compared preference weights derived from RPL and LC models. We then compared how RPL and LC explain preference heterogeneity by exploring differences across subgroups defined by observed characteristics (i.e., country, age, gender, marital status, and psoriasis severity). RESULTS: While RPL and LC models resulted in the same mean preference weights, different preference-heterogeneity patterns emerged from the two approaches. In both models, country of residence and self-reported disease severity could be linked to systematic differences in preferences. The RPL also identified gender and marital status, but not age, as sources of heterogeneity; the LC membership probability model indicated that age was a significant factor, but not gender or marital status. CONCLUSIONS: Using data from a psoriasis patient survey to compare two widely used methods for exploring heterogeneity identified differences in results between stated-preferences: subgroup analysis in the RPL model and inclusion of subgroup characteristics in the class membership probability function of the LC model. Researchers should model data using the most adaptable approach to address the initial study question.