Spinal Anesthesia Reduces Perioperative Polypharmacy and Opioid Burden in Patients Over 65 Who Undergo Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy and opioid administration are thought to increase the risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium in elderly patients. Spinal anesthesia (SA) holds potential to reduce perioperative polypharmacy in spine surgery. As more geriatric patients undergo spine surgery, understanding how SA can reduce polypharmacy and opioid administration is warranted. We aim to compare the perioperative polypharmacy and dose of administered opioids in patients ≥65 years who undergo transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) under SA versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 200 patients receiving a single-surgeon TLIF procedure at a single academic center (2014-2021) was performed. Patients underwent the procedure with SA (n = 120) or GA (n = 80). Demographic, procedural, and medication data were extracted from the medical record. Opioid consumption was quantified as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Statistical analyses included χ2 or Student's t-test. RESULTS: Patients receiving SA were administered 7.45 medications on average versus 12.7 for GA patients (P < 0.001). Average perioperative opioid consumption was 5.17 MME and 20.2 MME in SA and GA patients, respectively (P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving antiemetics and opioids remained comparable postoperatively, with a mean of 32.2 MME in the GA group versus 27.5 MME in the SA group (P = 0.14). Antiemetics were administered less often as a prophylactic in the SA group (32%) versus 86% in the GA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SA reduces perioperative polypharmacy in patients ≥65 years undergoing TLIF procedures. Further research is necessary to determine if this reduction correlates to a decrease the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Placement Utilizing Fluoroscopic Guidance Improves Efficiency in Lumbar Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional analgesic technique which improves postoperative outcomes in lumbar surgery patients including length of hospitalization, days to ambulation, and postoperative opioid use. Traditionally, the block is administered by anesthesiologists trained in the ultrasound guidance technique. The use of fluoroscopic guidance may improve the efficiency and accessibility of the ESPB for spine surgeons. We aim to measure the time to administer an ESPB using fluoroscopic guidance and localize the anesthetic using intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging. METHODS: Two neurosurgeons administered an ESPB to patients undergoing lumbar surgery. Time from insertion of the spinal needle to localize the erector spinae plane using C-arm guidance to time of complete injection and removal of the needle from the skin was recorded. One patient underwent O-arm imaging following injection of an Isovue-Exparel solution at the L3 level to visualize spread of the anesthetic. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were enrolled in this study. The average duration to perform an ESPB under fluoroscopic guidance was 1.2 minutes. The Isovue-Exparel solution was injected at the L3 level and was well distributed along the ESP on intraoperative O-arm imaging. The anesthetic dissected the erector spinae muscle from the transverse process at L2, L3, and L4. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopic guidance allows efficient and appropriate delivery of the anesthetic to the erector spinae plane. Performing an ESPB with fluoroscopic guidance improves efficiency and accessibility of the analgesic technique for spine surgeons, reducing dependence on anesthesiology personnel trained in administering the block.

The Relationship of Spinal Anesthesia Dosing Based on Thecal Sac Area to Anesthetic Failure in Lumbar Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Greater thecal sac volumes are associated with an increased risk of spinal anesthesia (SA) failure. The thecal sac cross-sectional area accurately predicts thecal sac volume. The thecal sac area may be used to adjust the dose and prevent anesthetic failure. We aim to assess the rate of SA failure in a prospective cohort of lumbar surgery patients who receive an individualized dose of bupivacaine based on preoperative measurement of their thecal sac area. METHODS: A total of 80 patients prospectively received lumbar spine surgery under SA at a single academic center (2022-2023). Before surgery, the cross-sectional area of the thecal sac was measured at the planned level of SA injection using T2-weighted MRI. Patients with an area <175 mm2, equal to or between 175 and 225 mm2, and >225 mm2 received an SA injection of 15, 20, or 25 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, respectively. Instances of anesthetic failure and adverse outcomes were noted. Incidence of SA failure was compared with a retrospectively obtained control cohort of 250 patients (2019-2022) who received the standard 15 mg of bupivacaine. RESULTS: No patients in the individualized dose cohort experienced failure of SA compared with 14 patients (5.6%) who experienced failure in the control cohort (P = .0259). The average thecal sac area was 187.49 mm2, and a total 28 patients received 15 mg of bupivacaine, 42 patients received 20 mg of bupivacaine, and 10 patients received 25 mg of bupivacaine. None of the patients experienced any adverse outcomes associated with SA. Patients in the individualized dose cohort and control cohort were comparable and had a similar distribution of lumbar procedures and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Adjusting the dose of SA according to thecal sac area significantly reduces the rate of SA failure in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Spinal anesthesia in elective lumbar spinal surgery.

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is gaining recognition as a safe and efficacious regional alternative to general anesthesia for elective lumbar surgery. However, unfamiliarity with management issues related to its use has limited the adoption of awake spine surgery, despite its benefits. Few centers in the United States routinely offer SA for elective lumbar surgery, and a comprehensive workflow to standardize SA for lumbar surgery is lacking. In this article, we examine recent literature on the use of SA in lumbar surgery, review the experience of our institution with SA in lumbar surgery, and provide a cohesive outline to streamline the implementation of SA from the perspective of the anesthesiologist. We review the critical features of SA in contemporary lumbar surgery, including selection of patients, methods of SA, intraoperative sedation, and management of several important technical considerations. We aimed to flatten the learning curve to improve the availability and accessibility of the technique for eligible patients.

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Significant Comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is an effective modality for lumbar surgery. Patient eligibility with respect to medical comorbidities remains a topic of debate. Obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, reoperation at the same level, and multilevel operations have variously been reported as relative contraindications. We hypothesize that patients undergoing common lumbar surgeries with these comorbidities do not experience greater rates of complications compared with controls. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery under spinal anesthesia and identified 422 cases. Surgeries were less than 3 hours (the duration of action of intrathecal bupivacaine) and include microdiscectomies, laminectomies, and both single-level and multilevel fusions. Procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a single academic center. In overlapping groups, 149 patients had a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, 95 had diagnosed anxiety, 79 underwent multilevel surgery, 98 had obstructive sleep apnea, and 65 had a previous operation at the same level. The control group included 132 patients who did not have these risk factors. Differences in important perioperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative complications except 2 cases of pneumonia in the anxiety group and 1 case in the reoperative group. There were also no significant differences for patients with multiple risk factors. Rates of spinal fusion were similar among groups, although mean length of stay and operative time were different. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia is a safe option for patients with significant comorbidities and can be considered for most patients undergoing routine lumbar surgeries.

The Emerging Significance of Amyloid Deposits in the Ligamentum Flavum of Spinal Stenosis Patients: A Review.

Spinal stenosis is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases and a leading cause of pain and disability. Wild-type transthyretin amyloid (ATTRwt) has been found in the ligamentum flavum (LF) of a significant subset of patients with spinal stenosis who undergo decompression surgery. Histologic and biochemical analyses of LF specimens from spinal stenosis patients, normally discarded as waste, have the potential to help elucidate the underlying pathophysiology of spinal stenosis and possibly allow for medical treatment of stenosis and screening for other systemic diseases. In the present review, we discuss the utility of analyzing LF specimens after spinal stenosis surgery for ATTRwt deposits. Screening for ATTRwt amyloidosis cardiomyopathy through LF specimens has led to the early diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis in several patients, with more expected to benefit from this process. Emerging evidence in the literature also point to ATTRwt as a contributor to a previously unrecognized subtype of spinal stenosis in patients who might, in the future, benefit from medical therapy. In the present report, we review the current literature regarding the early detection of ATTRwt cardiomyopathy via LF screening and the possible contribution of ATTRwt deposits in the LF to spinal stenosis development.

Intraoperative Triggered Electromyography for Pedicle Screw Placement Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: Triggered electromyography (tEMG) is an intraoperative neuromonitoring technique used to assess pedicle screw placement during instrumented fusion procedures. Although spinal anesthesia is a safe alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing lumbar fusion, its use may potentially block conduction of triggered action potentials or may require higher threshold currents to elicit myotomal responses when using tEMG. Given the broad utilization of tEMG for confirmation of pedicle screw placement, adoption of spinal anesthesia may be hindered by limited studies of its use alongside tEMG. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether spinal anesthesia affects the efficacy of tEMG, we compare the baseline spinal nerve thresholds during lumbar fusion procedures under general vs spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients (12 general and 11 spinal) undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were included in the study. Baseline nerve threshold was determined through direct stimulation of the spinal nerve using tEMG. RESULTS: Baseline spinal nerve threshold did not differ between the general and spinal anesthesia cohorts (3.25 ± 1.14 vs 3.64 ± 2.16 mA, respectively; P = .949). General and spinal anesthesia cohorts did not differ by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score status, or surgical indication. CONCLUSION: We report that tEMG for pedicle screw placement can be safely and effectively used in procedures under spinal anesthesia. The baseline nerve threshold required to illicit a myotomal response did not differ between patients under general or spinal anesthesia. This preliminary finding suggests that spinal anesthetic blockade does not contraindicate the use of tEMG for neuromonitoring during pedicle screw placement.

Periprocedural Polypharmacy in Lumbar Fusions Performed Under Spinal Anesthesia Compared With General Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe and effective alternative to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) for lumbar surgery. Foremost among the reasons to avoid GEA is the desire to minimize postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Although POCD is a complex and multifactorial entity, the risk of its development has been associated with anesthetic modality and perioperative polypharmacy, among others. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SA reduced polypharmacy compared with GEA in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: Demographic and procedural data of 424 consecutive TLIF patients were extracted retrospectively. Patients undergoing single-level TLIF through GEA (n = 186) or SA (n = 238) were enrolled into our database. Perioperative medications, excluding antibiotic prophylaxis and local anesthetics, were classified into various categories. RESULTS: Patients in the SA cohort received a mean of 4.5 medications vs a mean of 10.5 medications in the GEA cohort ( P < .0001). This reduction in perioperative medications remained significant after a multivariate analysis to control for confounders ( P < .001 for all variables). The use of vasopressors was significantly reduced in the SA cohort ( P < .001), which coincided with a significant reduction in hypotensive episodes ( P < .001). Patients undergoing TLIF through GEA had 3.6 times greater odds of experiencing a hypotensive episode intraoperatively (odds ratio = 3.62, 95% CI [2.38-5.49]). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is associated with a significant decrease in perioperative medications and may confer superior intraoperative hemodynamic stability, which lowers pressor requirements. The decrease of perioperative medications may be an important contribution in reducing the incidence of POCD in patients undergoing TLIFs, although this requires further study.

A Second Prone Dose Algorithm for Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia During Thoracolumbar Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is safe and effective in lumbar surgeries, with numerous advantages over general anesthesia (GA). Nevertheless, 1 major concern preventing the widespread adoption of this anesthetic modality in spine surgeries is the potential for intraprocedural anesthetic failure, resulting in the need to convert to GA intraoperatively. OBJECTIVE: To present a novel additional prone dose algorithm for when a first spinal dose fails to achieve the necessary effect. METHODS: A total of 422 consecutive patients undergoing simple and complex thoracolumbar surgeries under spinal anesthesia were prospectively enrolled into our database. Data were retrospectively collected through extraction of electronic health records. RESULTS: Sixteen of 422 required a second prone dose, of whom 1 refused and was converted to GA preoperatively. After 15 were given a prone dose, only 2 required preoperative conversion to GA. There were no instances of intraoperative conversion to GA. The success rate for spinal anesthesia without the need for conversion rose from 96.4% to 99.5%. In patients who required a second prone dose, there were no instances of spinal headache, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, readmission within 30 days, acute pain service consult, return to operating room, durotomy, or cerebrospinal fluid on puncture. CONCLUSION: Use of an additional prone dose algorithm was able to achieve a 99.5% success rate, and those who received this second dose did not experience any complications or negative operative disadvantages. Further research is needed to investigate which patients are at increased risk of inadequate analgesia with spinal anesthesia.

Clinical Outcomes of Liposomal Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Block in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is a barrier to early mobility and discharge after lumbar surgery. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been shown to decrease postoperative pain and narcotic consumption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) when injected into the marginal suprafascial/subfascial plane-liposomal bupivacaine (MSSP-LB). Erector spinae plane (ESP) infiltration is a relatively new analgesic technique that may offer additional benefits when performed in addition to MSSP-LB. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative outcomes of combining ESP-LB with MSSP-LB compared with MSSP-LB alone after single-level TLIF. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients undergoing single-level TLIFs under spinal anesthesia, 25 receiving combined ESP-LB and MSSP-LB and 25 receiving MSSP-LB alone. The primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, time to ambulation, and narcotics usage. RESULTS: Baseline demographics and length of surgery were similar between groups. Hospitalization was significantly decreased in the ESP-LB + MSSP-LB cohort (2.56 days vs 3.36 days, P = .007), as were days to ambulation (0.96 days vs 1.29 days, P = .026). Postoperative pain area under the curve was significantly decreased for ESP-LB + MSSP-LB at 12 to 24 hours (39.37 ± 21.02 vs 53.38 ± 22.11, P = .03) and total (44.46 ± 19.89 vs 50.51 ± 22.15, P = .025). Postoperative narcotic use was significantly less in the ESP-LB + MSSP-LB group at 12 to 24 hours (13.18 ± 4.65 vs 14.78 ± 4.44, P = .03) and for total hospitalization (137.3 ± 96.3 vs 194.7 ± 110.2, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Combining ESP-LB with MSSP-LB is superior to MSSP-LB alone for single-level TLIFs in decreasing length of hospital stay, time to ambulation, postoperative pain, and narcotic use.

The New England Neurosurgical Society: growth and evolution over 70 years.

The New England Neurosurgical Society (NENS) was founded in 1951 under the leadership of its first President (Dr. William Beecher Scoville) and Secretary-Treasurer (Dr. Henry Thomas Ballantine). The purpose of creating the NENS was to unite local neurosurgeons in the New England area; it was one of the first regional neurosurgical societies in America. Although regional neurosurgical societies are important supplements to national organizations, they have often been overshadowed in the available literature. Now in its 70th year, the NENS continues to serve as a platform to represent the needs of New England neurosurgeons, foster connections and networks with colleagues, and provide research and educational opportunities for trainees. Additionally, regional societies enable discussion of issues uniquely relevant to the region, improve referral patterns, and allow for easier attendance with geographic proximity. In this paper, the authors describe the history of the NENS and provide a roadmap for its future. The first section portrays the founders who led the first meetings and establishment of the NENS. The second section describes the early years of the NENS and profiles key leaders. The third section discusses subsequent neurosurgeons who steered the NENS and partnerships with other societies. In the fourth section, the modern era of the NENS and its current activities are highlighted.

Radiographic risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is a devastating complication. Demographic risk factors for ICH in LVAD patients are defined, however anatomic predispositions to ICH are unknown. We sought to interrogate intracranial radiographic risk factors for ICH in LVAD patients. METHODS: We reviewed 440 patients who received an LVAD from 2008-2021. We selected patients with CT scans of the head either before or after LVAD placement, but typically within 5 years. 288 patients (21 ICH, 267 Control) with imaging were included. A detailed chart review was performed on demographics, radiographic features, and management. RESULTS: The incidence of ICH in our total cohort was 8.6% (38/440). The presence of pump thrombosis (p=0.001), driveline infection (p=0.034), other hemorrhage (p=0.001), or previous placement of a cardio-defibrillator (p=.003) was associated with increased risk for ICH. An analysis of imaging revealed that the presence of a mass (p=0.006), vascular pathology (p=0.001), and microangiopathy (p=0.04) was significantly associated with ICH in LVAD patients. These radiographic features were validated with a multivariate logistic regression which confirmed presence of a mass (aOR 332.1, 95% CI: 14.7-7485.1, p<0.001), vascular pathology (aOR 69.7, 95% CI: 1.8-2658.8, p=0.022), and microangiopathy (aOR 6.5, 95% CI: 1.1-37.6, p=0.035) were independently associated with ICH. CONCLUSION: Radiographic evidence of microangiopathy, intracranial mass, and vascular pathology are independent risk factors for ICH which are readily identified by imaging. We advocate that CT imaging be used to further stratify patients at highest risk of ICH during treatment with an LVAD.

Assessing the impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative urinary retention in elective spinal surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common and vexing complication in elective spine surgery. Efficacious prevention strategies are still lacking, and existing studies focus primarily on identifying risk factors. Spinal anesthesia has become an attractive alternative to general anesthesia in elective lumbar surgery, with the potential of having a differential impact on POUR. METHODS: 422 spinal anesthesia procedures were prospectively collected between 2017 and 2021 and compared to 416 general anesthesia procedures retrospectively collected between 2014 and 2017, at a single academic center by the same senior neurosurgeon. The main outcome was POUR, defined as the need for straight bladder catheterization or indwelling bladder catheter placement after surgery due to failure to void. A power calculation was performed prior to data collection. RESULTS: The general anesthesia group had a higher rate of POUR (9.1 %) compared with the spinal anesthesia group (4.3 %), p = 0.005. At baseline, the spinal anesthesia cohort had an older average age and fewer patients with a history of previous spine surgery. Other comorbid conditions were comparable between the groups. For perioperative characteristics, spinal anesthesia patients had higher ASA scores, shorter operative times, shorter lengths of hospital stay, less operative levels, and zero use of intraoperative bladder catheterization. Acute pain service consult was similar between the groups. A multivariable logistic regression revealed that spinal anesthesia was associated with a significantly lower rate of urinary retention in the spinal anesthesia group (p = 0.0130), after adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Other statistically significant risk factors for POUR included diabetes, (p = 0.003), BPH (p = 0.014), operative time (p = 4.94e-06), and ASA score (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We collect and analyze one of the largest available cohorts of patients undergoing simple and complex surgeries under spinal and general anesthesia, finding that spinal anesthesia is independently associated with a lower incidence of POUR compared to general anesthesia, even when adjusted for potentially confounding risk factors. Further prospective trials are needed to explore this finding.

Arnold Max Meirowsky: champion of the American mobile neurosurgical unit during the Korean War.

Dr. Arnold Max Meirowsky (1910-1984) was enormously influential to military neurosurgery during the Korean War, introducing to the American military the concept of the mobile neurosurgical unit. After implementation of the neurosurgical detachment, meningocerebral infections saw a decrease from 41% to less than 1%, with similar improvements in mortality and complication rates. Additionally, Meirowsky developed many techniques and improvements in neurosurgery, specifically in the field of neurosurgical trauma, which he dedicated himself to even after reentering civilian practice. Furthermore, his mentorship of Korean surgeons and the influence of his mobile neurosurgical unit were major influences cited to be pivotal to the founding of neurosurgery as a specialty in South Korea. As he is underrecognized for these accomplishments in the neurosurgical literature, the authors seek to review his wartime and career contributions. They also specifically present details of his standardization of the mobile neurosurgical unit and showcase several of his other advancements in the treatment of neurosurgical trauma.

Analysis of lumbar spine stenosis specimens for identification of amyloid.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common reason for spine surgery in which ligamentum flavum is resected. Transthyretin (TTR) amyloid is an often unrecognized and potentially modifiable mechanism for LSS that can also cause TTR cardiac amyloidosis. Accordingly, older adult patients undergoing lumbar spine (LS) surgery were evaluated for amyloid and if present, the precursor protein, as well as comprehensive characterization of the clinical phenotype. METHODS: A prospective, cohort study in 2 academic medical centers enrolled 47 subjects (age 69 ± 7 years, 53% male) undergoing clinically indicated LS decompression. The presence of amyloid was evaluated by Congo Red staining and in those with amyloid, precursor protein was determined by laser capture microdissection coupled to mass spectrometry (LCM-MS). The phenotype was assessed by disease-specific questionnaires (Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) and the 36-question short-form health survey, as well as biochemical measures (TTR, retinol-binding protein, and TTR stability). Cardiac testing included technetium-99m-pyrophosphate scintigraphy, electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, and cardiac biomarkers as well as measures of functional capacity. RESULTS: Amyloid was detected in 16 samples (34% of participants) and was more common in those aged ≥ 75 years of age (66.7%) compared with those <75 years (22.3%, p < 0.05). LCM-MS demonstrated TTR as the precursor protein in 62.5% of participants with amyloid while 37.5% had an indeterminant type of amyloid. Demographic, clinical, quality-of-life measures, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and biochemical measures did not differ between those with and without amyloid. Among those with TTR amyloid (n = 10), one subject had cardiac involvement by scintigraphy. CONCLUSIONS: Amyloid is detected in more than a third of older adults undergoing LSS. Amyloid is more common with advancing age and is particularly common in those >75 years old. No demographic, clinical, biochemical, or cardiac parameter distinguished those with and without amyloid. In more than half of subjects with LS amyloid, the precursor protein was TTR indicating the importance of pathological assessment.

Lumbar stenosis due to wild-type transthyretin amyloid-induced thickening of the ligamentum flavum: a separate etiology from degeneration of intervertebral discs?

OBJECTIVE: Wild-type transthyretin amyloid (ATTRwt) is deposited in the ligamentum flavum (LF) of a subset of patients with spinal stenosis who undergo decompressive surgery, although its role in the pathophysiology of spinal stenosis is unknown. It has been theorized that degeneration of intervertebral discs causes increased mechanical stress and inflammatory/degenerative cascades and ultimately leads to LF fibrosis. If ATTRwt deposits contribute to LF thickening and spinal stenosis through a different pathway, then patients with ATTRwt may have less severe disc degeneration than those without it. In this study, the authors compared the severity of disc degeneration between patients with lumbar stenosis with and without amyloid in their LF to test whether ATTRwt is a unique contributor to LF thickening and spinal stenosis. METHODS: Of 324 consecutive patients between 2018 and 2019 who underwent decompression surgery for spinal stenosis and had LF samples sent for pathological analysis, 31 harboring ATTRwt were compared with 88 controls. Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic and surgical information. Disc degeneration was assessed on preoperative T2-weighted MR images with the modified Pfirrmann grading system at every lumbar disc level. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for a statistically significant increase in age in the ATTRwt group. The crude unadjusted comparisons between the groups trended toward a less severe disc degeneration in the ATTRwt group, although this difference was not statistically significant. A multivariable linear mixed-effects model was created to adjust for the effects of age and to isolate the influence of ATTRwt, the presence of an operation at the level, and the specific disc level (between L1 and S1). This model revealed that ATTRwt, the presence of an operation, and the specific level each had significant effects on modified Pfirrmann scores. CONCLUSIONS: Less severe disc degeneration was noted in patients with degenerative spinal stenosis harboring ATTRwt compared with those without amyloid. This finding suggests that ATTRwt deposition may play a separate role in LF thickening from that played by disc degeneration. Future studies should aim to elucidate this potentially novel pathophysiological pathway, which may uncover an exciting potential for the development of amyloid-targeted therapies that may help slow the development of spinal stenosis.

Fibrous Nonunion of Odontoid Fractures: Is It Safe To Accept Nonoperative Management? A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures can result in solid fusion, unstable nonunion, and fibrous nonunion. Odontoid fractures with fibrous nonunion will not demonstrate dynamic instability on imaging studies. However, the safety of accepting this outcome has been debated. We have provided, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic review of the existing literature to explore the safety of allowing fibrous nonunion as an acceptable outcome for odontoid fractures. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched in January 2022. The outcomes were extracted and categorized according to the mortality, neurologic sequelae, pain, neck disability index, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Of a total of 700 abstracts screened, the full text of 79 reports was assessed, with 13 studies included. Of the included patients, 141 had had a fibrous nonunion, all described in observational studies. The follow-up ranged from 0.6 to 5.8 years. None of the 141 patients had experienced a neurologic event. One patient had died of trauma-related issues; however, causality was not reported. Most of the studies had reported good to excellent pain scores. Most of the neck disabilities reported had ranged from mild to moderate in severity. However, 1 study of 5 patients had reported severe disability. All the patients reported good or excellent satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence we found supports that it is safe to forgo surgery for carefully selected patients with nonunited odontoid fractures when near-anatomic alignment is present, dynamic instability is lacking on imaging studies, the neurologic examination findings are normal, and the risk of neck injury is low. Further study is needed to define the full natural history of fibrous nonunion of odontoid fractures.

Safety and feasibility of spinal anesthesia during simple and complex lumbar spine surgery in the extreme elderly (≥80 years of age).

OBJECTIVE: The extreme elderly population (≥80 years of age) is expected to triple globally by 2050 and surgeries in this age group are likely to increase. Spinal anesthesia has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia in lumbar surgery and may particularly benefit extreme elderly patients concerned with post-operative cognitive dysfunction, poor physiological reserves, and polypharmacy. However, literature supporting its use in this population is lacking and there are potential challenges such as degenerative anatomy and medical comorbidities. Here, we assess the safety and feasibility of using spinal anesthesia in the extreme elderly. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, 424 consecutive lower thoracic and lumbar spine surgeries were performed under spinal anesthesia by a single surgeon at a large academic hospital and procedural details were collected in a prospective database. Forty-six patients were ≥ 80 years in age. Demographic, surgical, perioperative, and anesthetic data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The extreme elderly cohort had increased ASA scores, levels of surgery, and length of stay. Similar rates occurred for spinal headache, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, readmission within 30 days, acute pain service consult, return to the operating room, and durotomy. Intraoperative visualization of the spinal anesthesia dural puncture was increased in the extreme elderly (3 vs. 1 patient). CONCLUSION: We report one of the largest series of extreme elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for simple and complex lumbar spine surgeries and demonstrate that spinal anesthesia can be safe and feasible in this population.

Dataset for carbon footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions performed under spinal or general anesthesia.

The datasets presented here quantify and compare the relative carbon footprints emitted by general versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs). Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent a single-level TLIF from a single neurosurgeon at a U.S. academic center. 50 patients were under general anesthesia, and another 50 patients were under spinal anesthesia. Clinic and operative notes were used to extract demographic and surgical information, whereas anesthesia records were used to extract anesthetic information. Using the anesthetic information, carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) were calculated for each type of anesthetic and summed together to compute the total carbon footprint for each patient. Our article entitled "Assessing the environmental carbon footprint of spinal versus general anesthesia in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions" is based on this data [1]. Raw datasets of the primary data collection as well as cleaned and analyzed datasets are presented. These datasets highlight the first known environmental impact calculation from medical records of a spine procedure, serving as a model for other interested investigators to explore and emulate. This data brief may help to pave the way towards future environmental research and practice changes within neurosurgical and orthopedic literature, an issue critical to the sustainability of our modern society.

The Relationship Between Wild-Type Transthyretin Amyloid Load and Ligamentum Flavum Thickness in Lumbar Stenosis Patients.

BACKGROUND: One key contributor to lumbar stenosis is thickening of the ligamentum flavum (LF), a process still poorly understood. Wild-type transthyretin amyloid (ATTRwt) has been found in the LF of patients undergoing decompression surgery, suggesting that amyloid may play a role. However, it is unclear whether within patients harboring ATTRwt, the amount of amyloid is associated with LF thickness. METHODS: From an initial cohort of 324 consecutive lumbar stenosis patients whose LF specimens from decompression surgery were sent for analysis (2018-2019), 33 patients met the following criteria: 1) Congo red-positive amyloid in the LF, 2) ATTRwt by mass spectrometry-based proteomics, and 3) an available preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Histological specimens were digitized, and amyloid load was quantified through Trainable Weka Segmentation machine learning. LF thicknesses were manually measured on axial T2-weighted preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans at each lumbar level, L1-S1. The sum of thicknesses at every lumbar LF level (L1-S1) equals "lumbar LF burden". RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 72.7 years (range = 59-87), were mostly male (61%) and white (82%), and predominantly had surgery at L4-L5 levels (73%). Amyloid load was positively correlated with LF thickness (R = 0.345, P = 0.0492) at the levels of surgical decompression. Furthermore, amyloid load was positively correlated with lumbar LF burden (R = 0.383, P = 0.0279). CONCLUSIONS: Amyloid load is positively correlated with LF thickness and lumbar LF burden across all lumbar levels, in a dose-dependent manner. Further studies are needed to validate these findings, uncover the underlying pathophysiology, and pave the way toward using therapies that slow LF thickening.