Implementing Dementia Care Mapping to develop person-centred care: results of a process evaluation within the Leben-QD II trial.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Dementia Care Mapping implementation in nursing homes. BACKGROUND: Dementia Care Mapping, an internationally applied method for supporting and enhancing person-centred care for people with dementia, must be successfully implemented into care practice for its effective use. Various factors influence the implementation of complex interventions such as Dementia Care Mapping; few studies have examined the specific factors influencing Dementia Care Mapping implementation. DESIGN: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design embedded in a quasi-experimental trial was used to assess Dementia Care Mapping implementation success and influential factors. METHODS: From 2011-2013, nine nursing units in nine different nursing homes implemented either Dementia Care Mapping (n = 6) or a periodic quality of life measurement using the dementia-specific instrument QUALIDEM (n = 3). Diverse data (interviews, n = 27; questionnaires, n = 112; resident records, n = 81; and process documents) were collected. Each data set was separately analysed and then merged to comprehensively portray the implementation process. RESULTS: Four nursing units implemented the particular intervention without deviating from the preplanned intervention. Translating Dementia Care Mapping results into practice was challenging. Necessary organisational preconditions for Dementia Care Mapping implementation included well-functioning networks, a dementia-friendly culture and flexible organisational structures. Involved individuals' positive attitudes towards Dementia Care Mapping also facilitated implementation. Precisely planning the intervention and its implementation, recruiting champions who supported Dementia Care Mapping implementation and having well-qualified, experienced project coordinators were essential to the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: For successful Dementia Care Mapping implementation, it must be embedded in a systematic implementation strategy considering the specific setting. Organisational preconditions may need to be developed before Dementia Care Mapping implementation. Necessary steps may include team building, developing and realising a person-centred care-based mission statement or educating staff regarding general dementia care. The implementation strategy may include attracting and involving individuals on different hierarchical levels in Dementia Care Mapping implementation and supporting staff to translate Dementia Care Mapping results into practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The identified facilitating factors can guide Dementia Care Mapping implementation strategy development.

Dementia care mapping: effects on residents' quality of life and challenging behavior in German nursing homes. A quasi-experimental trial.

BACKGROUND: Person-centered care (PCC) is a widely recognized concept in dementia research and care. Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) is a method for implementing PCC. Prior studies have yielded heterogeneous results regarding the effectiveness of DCM for people with dementia (PwD). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of DCM with regard to quality of life (QoL) and challenging behavior in PwD in nursing homes (NHs). METHODS: Leben-QD II is an 18-month, three-armed, pragmatic quasi-experimental trial. The sample of PwD was divided into three groups with three living units per group: (A) DCM applied since 2009, (B) DCM newly introduced during the study, and (C) a control intervention based on a regular and standardized QoL rating. The primary outcome was QoL measured with the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) proxy, and the secondary outcomes were QoL (measured with QUALIDEM) and challenging behavior (measured with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Nursing Home version, NPI-NH). RESULTS: There were no significant differences either between the DCM intervention groups and the control group or between the two DCM intervention groups regarding changes in the primary or secondary outcomes. At baseline, the estimated least square means of the QoL-AD proxy for groups A, B, and C were 32.54 (confidence interval, hereafter CI: 29.36-35.72), 33.62 (CI: 30.55-36.68), and 30.50 (CI: 27.47-33.52), respectively. The DCM groups A (31.32; CI: 28.15-34.48) and B (27.60; CI: 24.51-30.69) exhibited a reduction in QoL values, whereas group C exhibited an increase (32.54; CI: 29.44-35.64) after T2. CONCLUSIONS: DCM exhibited no statistically significant effect in terms of QoL and challenging behavior of PwD in NHs. To increase the likelihood of a positive effect for PwD, it is necessary to ensure successful implementation of the intervention.

[The role of family carers of people with dementia in the assessment of need on the example of the CarenapD study]. / Die Rolle pflegender Angehöriger von Menschen mit Demenz in der Bedarfsbestimmung am Beispiel der CarenapD-Studie.

Need driven dementia care at home requires the use of needs assessments like CarenapD. The CarenapD Manual states that the person with dementia (PwD) and caregivers (CA) should be included in the assessment process. In a pre-post study CarenapD has been applied in PwD (n = 55) and CA (n = 49) by professional staff (n = 15), CA were much more involved than PwD. Needs in PwD in T0 and T1 showed frequently functional needs(50 %), no need were frequently found in dementia-specific needs (42 %) and frequently unmet need was present in social needs (35 %). Burden-related needs in CA were reduced from T0 to T1 in daily difficulties (-14 %), support (-20 %) and breaks from caring (-9 %).This secondary analysis compares the need results of PwD and CA to discuss the unequal involvement of clients. In this secondary analysis needs data of PwD and CA is included. Need in PwD at T0 and T1 showed frequently met functional need (50 %), frequently no need in dementia specific needs (42 %) and high unmet need in social needs (35 %). Burden in CA could be reduced from T0 to T1 in Daily Difficulties (-14 %), Support (-20 %) and Breaks from Caring (9 %). Compared to the literature it is remarkable that a high rate in no need was found in dementia specific needs. Needs of CA show congruent results, it seems to have come to relief of burden in CA. Lack of knowledge and shame in CA as well as the continuous presence of both clients within the assessment process may have caused that dementia-specific needs were not enough addressed. PwD and CA should be actively involved in the assessment process and should contribute their individual point of view, as stated in the CarenapD Manual.

The experience of people with dementia in a social care group: case study.

In Germany hourly care for people with dementia and relief for family caregivers are often delivered through social care groups. The existing literature describes these groups from the perspective of professionals or family caregivers, with little involvement of people with dementia. This qualitative study is the first step in exploring the experiences of people with dementia in social care groups. Five persons suffering from dementia in one group were interviewed and additionally observed with DCM in three group sessions. The interview transcripts were coded open and axial according to Grounded Theory. The DCM data was analysed descriptive. The main phenomena in the interviews are 'familiar community' and 'personal meaning'. The DCM results show that people with lower cognitive function are excluded from most activities, whereas more staff attention causes better well-being. To create a 'familiar community' in a social care group, staff skills and knowledge are required.

The effects of dementia care mapping on nursing home residents' quality of life and staff attitudes: design of the quasi-experimental study Leben-QD II.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of care for people with dementia is the maintenance and promotion of quality of life (Qol). Most of the residents in nursing homes have challenging behaviors that strongly affect their Qol. Person-centered care (PCC) is an approach that aims to achieve the best possible Qol and to reduce challenging behaviors. Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) is a method of implementing PCC that has been used in Germany for several years. However, there are no data on the effectiveness of DCM or the challenges of implementation of DCM in German nursing homes. METHODS/DESIGN: In this quasi-experimental non-randomized cluster-controlled study, the effects of DCM will be compared to 2 comparison groups. 9 nursing homes will take part: 3 will implement DCM, 3 will implement a comparison intervention using an alternative Qol assessment, and 3 have already implemented DCM. The main effect outcomes are Qol, challenging behaviors, staff attitudes toward dementia, job satisfaction and burnout of caregivers. These outcomes will be measured on 3 data points. Different quantitative and qualitative data sources will be collected through the course of the study to investigate the degree of implementation as well as facilitators of and barriers to the implementation process. DISCUSSION: This study will provide new information about the effectiveness of DCM and the implementation process of DCM in German nursing homes. The study results will provide important information to guide the national discussion about the improvement of dementia-specific Qol, quality of care in nursing homes and allocation of resources. In addition, the study results will provide information for decision-making and implementation of complex psychosocial interventions such as DCM. The findings will also be important for the design of a subsequent randomized controlled trial (e.g. appropriateness of outcomes and measurements, inclusion criteria for participating nursing homes) and the development of a successful implementation strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43916381.

[Promoting patient-oriented dementia research - current issues in the German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases at the Witten/Herdecke University]. / Versorgungsnahe Demenzforschung ermöglichen - Fragestellungen im Deutschen Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen an der Universität Witten/Herdecke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: caring for people with dementia presents a growing challenge in an ageing society. We urgently need innovative future-oriented concepts of evidence-based health care which would improve the care for people with dementia, even under adverse circumstances. The German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) in Witten is willing to meet this challenge. FOCUS OF RESEARCH: the DZNE in Witten supports interdisciplinary research and houses three scientific work groups acting in close co-operation and focusing on 1) care structures, 2) care interventions, and 3) knowledge circulation and implementation research. A comprehensive project plan focuses on people with dementia's perspective in the early stages of the disease. It intends to investigate their needs, requirements und activities as a basis for the development of appropriate concepts. Apart from specific research questions methodological issues arising from the complexity of the subject are of interest. DISCUSSION: the institutional funding of the location offers an unparalleled opportunity to plan long-term and more complex projects. This might lead to a close co-operation with the Witten/Herdecke University, where health care research is of particular relevance.