Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urolithiasis ; 42(3): 255-62, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24468916

RESUMO

The aim of our study is to determine the predictive factors for placement of percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PNT) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure and to evaluate the optimal cutoff points of the predictive factors. 229 patients, who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation between February 2009 and February 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Five patients were excluded from the study because of solitary kidney. All characteristics of 224 patients, stones and operative data were investigated. Patient and stone-related factors, such as age, BMI, history of previous surgery or SWL, characteristics of the stone, renal parenchymal thickness (RPT), as well as procedural factors, such as percutaneous access number and location were analyzed by univariate and multivariate tests. The continuous variables were analyzed using Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. There were no differences in sex, age, BMI and hemoglobin decrease between the groups. Previous operation status, RPT, stone size, multiplicity of the stone, stone localization, blood transfusion presence, access points, access number and operation time were found statistically different according to univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that RPT, operation time and stone size were the independent factors that affected the PNT insertion. For RPT, operation time and stone size, the optimal cutoff points for insertion PNT were 13.75 mm, 75.5 min and 890 mm(2), respectively. Tubeless PCNL should be chosen in patients with stone area less than 890 mm(2), and parenchymal thickness thicker than 13.75 mm and procedure with operation period <75.5 min.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/diagnóstico , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Duração da Cirurgia , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Urology ; 82(4): 948-54, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23910560

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare interfascial (IEF) or intrafascial (IAF) periprostatic nerve dissection technique in prostate tissue using immunohistochemical methods in fresh cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate tissues of 25 fresh cadavers were removed from rectum and other surrounding structures. IEF nerve dissection (n = 25) was performed on the right and IAF nerve (n = 25) dissection on the left side of each prostate under direct visualization. The base, center, and apex of each prostate lobes and fascia dissected were sampled for blind histopathologic evaluation. Total counts of nerve, artery, and vein were performed on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, whereas sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve counts were performed on immunohistochemical stained sections. Iatrogenic surgical margin injury at base, center, and apex detected were compared between groups. RESULTS: Thickness of neurovascular bundle dissected in IAF was found significantly higher than IEF technique. The number of residual sympathetic fibers after dissection of neurovascular bundle was found significantly higher in IAF group. There were significant decreases in total nerve, parasympathetic, and sympathetic nerve counts only at the central region of prostate in IAF group. A significant decrease was found in the number of residual vein left in the fascia only at the apex by IAF dissection. Of surgical margin injury results, no significant difference was detected between IAF and IEF groups at any location. CONCLUSION: IAF provides better preservation of sympathetic but not parasympathetic fibers without increasing surgical injury of prostate capsule.


Assuntos
Próstata/irrigação sanguínea , Próstata/inervação , Prostatectomia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cadáver , Fáscia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão
3.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 41(3): 473-81, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18853272

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Chronic renal failure (CRF) and renal replacement treatments have a negative effect on sexual function and quality of life (QoL). The literature on female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in patients with CRF is limited. The aim of this study is to compare the sexual function and QoL in predialysis (PreD), dialysis, and transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 women including 21 PreD, 45 dialysis, 20 renal transplantation (Tx), and 20 control patients were enrolled in the study. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and SF-36 scales were used to assess all patients, and demographic and clinical variables were documented. The FSFI and QoL scale scores were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The rates of FSD were 50, 81, 66.7, 75, and 50% in the control, PreD, peritoneal dialysis (PD), hemodialysis (HD) and Tx patients respectively. Total FSFI scores for desire, arousal and orgasm scores in the PreD group were significantly lower than those in Tx and control patients (P < 0.05). Physical components of QoL in CRF patients were significantly worse than in the control group (P < 0.0001). On logistic regression analysis, age, glucose and creatinine were significantly associated with FSD. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study documented that Tx is the most effective way to retain good sexual function in women, and a diagnosis of FSD should be made routinely in CRF patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal , Sexualidade/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Urology ; 72(3): 508-12, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18653217

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Stone disease is a rare complication after renal transplantation, and the management of these stones can be difficult. In many cases, the best modality to treat stones in transplanted kidneys/ureters is with a percutaneous approach. The goal of this study was to review our series of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) to evaluate the success rates and present the key technical points to achieve a successful outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our series of PNL from January 1997 to December 2007 and identified 15 patients who had had PNL performed in a transplanted kidney. We evaluated multiple perioperative variables and how the patients' urolithiasis presented. We also collected intraoperative data. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients underwent successful PNL in a transplanted kidney. In all patients, but 3, access into an anterior, upper pole calix was achieved, and access was obtained with ultrasound guidance alone or a combination of ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy. Ten patients had a pre-existing nephrostomy tube, and this was used in all but 1 patient. Of the 15 patients, 8 (53%) were treated with percutaneous flexible nephroscopy/ureteroscopy, and 7 had tracts dilated to 30F to perform rigid PNL. All patients were rendered stone free at the end of the procedure, no complications developed, and no patient required a blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrolithiasis in a transplanted kidney can be challenging to diagnose and to treat. PNL is most often the best modality to render patients stone free.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/etiologia , Cálculos Renais/terapia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Urologia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Fibrose , Humanos , Cálices Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA