Which patients benefit from preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer?

Recent studies have indicated that preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) should not be routinely performed in all patients suffering from obstructive jaundice before pancreatic surgery. The severity of jaundice that mandates PBD has yet to be defined. The evaluated paper examines the impact of PBD on intra-operative, and post-operative outcomes in patients initially presenting with severe obstructive jaundice (bilirubin ≥250 µmol/L). In this key paper evaluation, the impact of PBD versus a direct surgery (DS) approach is discussed. The arguments for and against each approach are considered with regards to drainage associated morbidity and mortality, resection rates, survival and the impact of chemotherapy and malnutrition. Concentrating on resectable head of pancreas tumors, this mini-review aims to scrutinize the authors' recommendations, alongside those of prominent papers in the field.

Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancies: Its' role and outcomes. A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Left hepatic trisectionectomy (LHT) is a complex hepatic resection; its' role and outcomes in hepatobiliary malignancies remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing LHT at the tertiary HPB referral unit at RSCH, Guildford, UK from September 1996 to October 2015 were included. Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent LHT. The M:F ratio was 1.8:1. Median age was 60 years (range 43-76 years). Diagnoses included colorectal liver metastases (CRLM; n = 20); cholangiocarcinoma (CCA; n = 4); and other (neuroendocrine tumour metastases (NET; n = 3) and breast metastases (n = 1)). Median duration of surgery was 270 min (range 210-585 min). Median blood loss was 750 ml (300-2400 ml) with a perioperative transfusion rate of 21% (n = 6/28). The rate of all post-operative complications was 21% for all patients, and given the extensive resection performed four patients (14%) developed varying degrees of hepatic insufficiency. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma developed severe hepatic insufficiency, which was fatal within 90 days of surgery. 1 and 3-year survivals were 92% and 68% respectively. CONCLUSION: This study supports LHT in patients with significant tumour burden. Despite extensive resection, our favourable morbidity and mortality rates show this is a safe and beneficial procedure for patients with all hepatobiliary malignancies. Given the nature of resection the incidence of post-operative hepatic insufficiency is higher than less extensive hepatic resections.

Liver resections combined with closure of loop ileostomies: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with colorectal liver metastases and loop ileostomies remains controversial. This study was performed to assess the outcome of combined liver resection and loop ileostomy closure. METHODS: Analysis of prospectively collected perioperative data, including morbidity and mortality, of 283 consecutive hepatectomies for colorectal liver metastases was undertaken. Consecutive liver resections were performed from 1996 to 2006 in one centre by a single surgeon (NDK). Fourteen of these patients had combined liver resection and ileostomy closure. Case-matched analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Six (2.2%) patients died in the hepatectomy only group and none died in the combined group. There was no difference in operative blood loss between the two groups (0.09). Perioperative morbidity was 36% in the combined group and 23% in the hepatectomy alone group (P = 0.33). Mean hospital stay was 14 days in the combined group and 11 days in the hepatectomy only group (P = 0.046). Case-matched analysis showed a significant increase in hospital stay (P = 0.03) and complications (P = 0.049) in the combined group. CONCLUSION: In patients with CRLM, combined liver resection and closure of ileostomy may be associated with a higher operative morbidity and a prolonged hospital stay.