Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Full-Field Digital Mammography? A Multireader, Multicase Study of Wide-Angle Tomosynthesis.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis whether two-view wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can replace full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for breast cancer detection. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In a multireader multicase study, bilateral two-view FFDM and bilateral two-view wide-angle DBT images were independently viewed for breast cancer detection in two reading sessions separated by more than 1 month. From a pool of 764 patients undergoing screening and diagnostic mammography, 330 patient-cases were selected. The endpoints were the mean ROC AUC for the reader per breast (breast level), ROC AUC per patient (subject level), noncancer recall rates, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS. Twenty-nine of 31 readers performed better with DBT than FFDM regardless of breast density. There was a statistically significant improvement in readers' mean diagnostic accuracy with DBT. The subject-level AUC increased from 0.765 (standard error [SE], 0.027) for FFDM to 0.835 (SE, 0.027) for DBT (p = 0.002). Breast-level AUC increased from 0.818 (SE, 0.019) for FFDM to 0.861 (SE, 0.019) for DBT (p = 0.011). The noncancer recall rate per patient was reduced by 19% with DBT (p < 0.001). Masses and architectural distortions were detected more with DBT (p < 0.001); calcifications trended lower (p = 0.136). Accuracy for detection of invasive cancers was significantly greater with DBT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Reader performance in breast cancer detection is significantly higher with wide-angle two-view DBT independent of FFDM, verifying the robustness of DBT as a sole view. However, results of perception studies in the vision sciences support the inclusion of an overview image.

Low Compliance in a Health-Conscience Spending Era Likely Helps Obviates the Need for 6 month BI-RADS 3 Breast MRI Follow-up After 1 year.

The goal of our IRB-approved study was to assess if a follow-up MRI every 6 months for 2 years is the most appropriate short-interval follow-up schedule. 203 breast MRI exams were performed from October 2009 to January 2014 as part of a BI-RADS 3 follow-up representing 2.6% of all breast MRIs (7,822) performed. We performed a retrospective longitudinal medical records review of compliance; malignancy rate of BI-RADS 3 exams; and average time and number of breast MRIs necessary prior to definitive disposition. While 77.8% eventually returned, only 45.5% of patients were compliant with follow-up at or near 6 months (4.5-7.5 months). Of those who eventually returned, it took an average of 1.31 follow-up MRIs (95% CI: 1.20-1.43 exams) and 10.3 months (95% CI: 9.0-11.7 months) before definitive disposition. 93.5% of initial findings were dispositioned as benign after two follow-up MRI exams (malignancy rate: 0.98%). Our results lend support to the possibility that the follow-up interval for BI-RADS 3 breast MRIs could be lengthened to 12 months if additional follow-up MRIs are necessary after the first year of 6-month follow-up breast MRIs. Foremost, this appears to be a safe follow-up alternative since benign definitive disposition can usually be made in less than 1 year. Supplemental reasons include persistent low-patient compliance (as redemonstrated in our study) and the higher cost of breast MRI compared to mammogram/ultrasound follow-up. Finally, this paper's findings further support the suggested MRI follow-up interval in the newest BI-RADS atlas.

Speed of sound imaging: improved image quality in breast sonography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate blindly breast ultrasound images corrected for the speed of sound in breast tissue compared with conventional images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 409 images from 153 patients were obtained on an Antares Ultrasound system. The system was modified to process the radiofrequency data with the standard 1540 m/s as the speed of sound and at a corrected speed of sound for breast tissue. An offline MATLAB-developed program randomized the image pairs, and 3 blinded reviewers who were unaware of the new technique reviewed these. The reviewers were asked to rate the image quality of the pair on a 5-point scale (right++, right+, equal, left+, left++). Comments on differences in the images were also recorded. RESULTS: Conventional images were graded much better in 0.0% and better in 15.1% +/- 6.2%. Corrected speed of sound images were rated much better in 10.5% +/- 14.3%, better in 48.4% +/- 14.3%, and equal in 25.9% +/- 27.6%. Improvements in image quality with corrected speed of sound images included better margin characterization and improved resolution of calcifications. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting for the speed of sound in breast ultrasound improved the overall image quality in 59% of cases, whereas 26% were of similar quality. Specific improvements noted included better characterization of mass margins, tissue interfaces, and depiction of calcifications.

Guidelines for using breast magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate implant integrity.

The purpose of this report was to review our experience with using breast magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate breast implant integrity and to offer a decision tree to assist physicians in managing these patients. Data were available for 81 patients with 146 implants placed either unilaterally or bilaterally for either cosmesis or breast reconstruction. The chief complaint for a majority of patients (n = 24) was breast pain. Thirty-two patients were found to have 44 ruptured implants, the majority of whom were found to have either contracture (n = 7) or negative findings (n = 7) on physician examination. The likelihood of rupture increased with number of years in place. When a patient presents for a possible implant rupture, the initial concern is to rule out malignancy, but because clinical and radiologic findings are often convoluted and complicated, a decision tree is helpful.

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in early breast cancer: implications for partial breast irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) of patients with early breast cancer is being investigated on a multi-institutional protocol National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-39/RTOG 0413. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than mammography (MG) and may aid in selection of patients appropriate for PBI. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) routinely undergo contrast-enhanced, bilateral breast MRI at the Cleveland Clinic. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all early-stage breast cancer patients who had a breast MRI, MG, and surgical pathology data at our institution between June of 2005 and December of 2006. Any suspicious lesions identified on MRI were further evaluated by targeted ultrasound +/- biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients met eligibility criteria for NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 by MG, physical exam, and surgical pathology. The median age was 57 years. DCIS was present in 63 patients, and invasive breast cancer was found in 197 patients. MRI identified suspicious lesions in 35 ipsilateral breasts (13%) and in 16 contralateral breasts (6%). Mammographically occult, synchronous ipsilateral foci were found by MRI in 11 patients (4.2%), and in the contralateral breast in 4 patients (1.5%). By univariate analysis, lobular histology (infiltrating lobular carcinoma [ILC]), pathologic T2, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II were significantly associated with additional ipsilateral disease. Of patients with ILC histology, 18% had ipsilateral secondary cancers or DCIS, compared with 3% in the remainder of histologic subtypes (P = .004). No patient older than 70 years had synchronous cancers or DCIS detected by MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI identified synchronous mammographically occult foci in 5.8% of early breast cancer patients who would otherwise be candidates for APBI.

The importance of preoperative breast MRI for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

The use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI) for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer has been criticized for increasing the number of therapeutic mastectomies performed, as well as increasing the cost of treatment. The purpose of this report is to examine one surgeon's practice and to describe the MRI findings for patients with breast cancer to determine if those findings changed the therapeutic options for those patients in. Data were collected prospectively between August 2003 and January 2006 for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Diagnoses were made by core biopsy or fine-needle aspiration; all lesions were intact at the time of MRI. Twenty-five percent of patients were found to have previously occult, but suspicious lesions on MRI that required additional diagnostic evaluation, including ultrasound, core biopsy, excisional biopsy, or any combination; for approximately half of these patients a separate cancer was confirmed. For most of these patients, the new lesion was ipsilateral and multicentric, and most required mastectomy. For the remaining 75% of patients, MRI confirmed the index lesion was the only area of concern, and appropriate surgical treatment was completed. Preoperative bMRI for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer identified previously occult and separate tumors in 13% of patients, resulting in surgical treatment change for many.

Trends in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Screening mammography is the single most effective method of early breast cancer detection and is recommended on an annual basis beginning at age 40 for women at average risk of breast cancer. In addition to traditional film-screen mammograms, digital mammograms now offer digital enhancement to aid interpretation, which is especially helpful in women with dense breast tissue. Useful emerging adjuncts to mammography include ultrasonography, which is particularly helpful for further assessment of known areas of interest, and magnetic resonance imaging, which shows promise for use in high-risk populations. Image-guided biopsy--directed by ultrasonograpy or stereotactic mammography views--plays a critical role in histologic confirmation of suspected breast cancer.

How should we screen for breast cancer? Mammography, ultrasonography, MRI.

Of the imaging techniques currently available to evaluate women for breast disease, mammography remains the mainstay of breast cancer screening, but recent guidelines have included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the screening of some women at high risk. Whole-breast ultrasonography for screening has not been established as useful and so should not be offered routinely to patients.

Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Screening mammography has led to earlier diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the increased tissue density of young women can complicate mammographic interpretation. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has value in detection of mammographically occult breast cancers, particularly in premenopausal women for whom the sensitivity of mammography is compromised. METHODS: Data were available for 89 women with biopsy-proven breast cancer who had undergone both mammography and breast MRI. Variables evaluated included menopausal status and radiographic findings. Data were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test; P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 89 women in our study, 69 were perimenopausal or postmenopausal and 20 were premenopausal at the time of diagnosis. The malignant lesion was identified on mammography and MRI for a majority of patients. One third of premenopausal women had negative mammography but positive MRI findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a role for breast MRI in supplementing conventional mammography for early detection of breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Increased ipsilateral whole breast vascularity as measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-induced neovessel formation identified by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a commonly used marker for breast malignancy. The purpose of this study was to assess possible differences in whole-breast vascularity as measured by contrast-enhanced MRI in the ipsilateral and contralateral breasts of patients with unilateral breast malignancies. METHODS: Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the breast using a Siemens 1.0-T scanner with dedicated breast coil was performed on 22 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed unilateral breast carcinoma. Whole-breast vascularity of the breast containing the carcinoma was estimated as increased, decreased, or similar compared with the contralateral unaffected breast. Breast vascularity was then correlated to clinical factors including tumor size, histology, multifocality, nodal involvement, and patient age and menopausal status. RESULTS: Twenty patients had infiltrating carcinomas, and 2 patients had ductal carcinoma in situ. Four were multifocal. Fifteen of 22 patients demonstrated clear evidence of increased whole-breast vascularity in the ipsilateral breast containing the primary breast cancer compared with the contralateral breast. Although there was no clear correlation between the presence of increased whole-breast vascularity in the cancer-bearing breast with tumor size, histology, grade, mammographic appearance, or patient age and menopausal status, increased vascularity was present in 3 of 4 patients with multifocal disease and in 4 of 5 patients with metastatic disease in the axillary nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Measurable increases in whole-breast vascularity can be identified by contrast-enhanced MRI and appear with increased frequency in the cancer-bearing breast. These findings suggest that factors other than tumor size and histology may influence development of macroscopic vessels during tumor progression and may be indicative of angiogenic tumor biology.

Does core needle breast biopsy accurately reflect breast pathology?

BACKGROUND: Core needle breast biopsy (CB) has replaced excisional biopsy as the initial diagnostic biopsy procedure for many suspicious breast lesions; however, CB remains a sampling procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of agreement between histology obtained at CB and that obtained at a subsequent excisional procedure (EP). We hypothesized a high degree of agreement. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for 3035 CBs performed by breast radiologists using either ultrasound or stereotactic guidance between January 1995 and July 2002, 1410 (46%) of which had a subsequent EP within 1 year. Histologic categories were defined as invasive breast cancer, duct carcinoma in-situ, atypia/lobular carcinoma in-situ, and benign. The principal histology (PH) from CB and EP was identified and compared. RESULTS: Overall, there was moderate agreement (kappa=0.669) between CB and EP histology. Complete agreement occurred in 1168 (83%) procedures. For the remaining 242, the PH was identified only at CB for 78 (5%) procedures, and only after EP for 164 (12%) procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority (83%) of CB and EP demonstrated exact histologic agreement, CB was diagnostic for 1246 (88%) procedures.

Does ultrasound core breast biopsy predict histologic finding on excisional biopsy?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultrasound-guided core breast biopsy accurately predicts the histologic finding of a subsequent excisional procedure. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 1997 to 2001 for 832 ultrasound-guided core breast biopsies (USB) that were followed by excisional breast procedure (EP) within 1 year at our institution. The principal histologic finding obtained at USB and EP was identified for each procedure and the degree of agreement was assessed. RESULTS: The USB histology predicted EP histology in 90% (n = 746) of the procedures. The USB histology was more significant than EP histology in 3% (n = 22) of procedures; USB histology underdetermined EP histology in 7% (n = 64) of procedures. Overall, our results indicate moderate agreement between the principal histology identified at USB relative to that identified at EP. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided core breast biopsy is an effective diagnostic method, but sampling limitations do exist.

A prospective review of the decline of excisional breast biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Although excisional breast biopsy has long been considered the standard for breast cancer diagnosis, core biopsies are now used more frequently. Whether core biopsy can eventually replace excisional biopsy remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between diagnostic excisional and core biopsies relative to surgical treatment procedures. METHODS: We analyzed our data collected prospectively from 1995 through 2000, which included inpatient and outpatient surgical data, office visits, and radiology biopsy data including stereotactic, mammotome, and ultrasound core biopsies. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to assess the shift in diagnostic technique. RESULTS: From 1995 through 2000 there were 2,631 core biopsies performed, 2,685 excisional biopsies, 2,881 surgical procedures for breast cancer, and 51,109 office visits. Although the percentage of core biopsies relative to excisional biopsies increased from 31% to 68% (P <0.001), the percentage of biopsies relative to the number of office visits remained stable at 10% to 11%. The percentage of breast cancer procedures relative to office visits also remained stable at 5% to 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that core biopsies are being performed more often than excisional biopsies. Nevertheless, one in three biopsies done at our institution is excisional.