Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 171
Filtrar
1.
J Nanobiotechnology ; 19(1): 83, 2021 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33766057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chemokine therapy with C-C motif chemokine ligand 25 (CCL25) is currently under investigation as a promising approach to treat articular cartilage degeneration. We developed a delayed release mechanism based on Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticle encapsulation for intraarticular injections to ensure prolonged release of therapeutic dosages. However, CCL25 plays an important role in immune cell regulation and inflammatory processes like T-cell homing and chronic tissue inflammation. Therefore, the potential of CCL25 to activate immune cells must be assessed more thoroughly before further translation into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reaction of different immune cell subsets upon stimulation with different dosages of CCL25 in comparison to CCL25 released from PLGA particles. RESULTS: Immune cell subsets were treated for up to 5 days with CCL25 and subsequently analyzed regarding their cytokine secretion, surface marker expression, polarization, and migratory behavior. The CCL25 receptor C-C chemokine receptor type 9 (CCR9) was expressed to a different extent on all immune cell subsets. Direct stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with high dosages of CCL25 resulted in strong increases in the secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), tumor-necrosis-factor-α (TNF-α) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), upregulation of human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) on monocytes and CD4+ T-cells, as well as immune cell migration along a CCL25 gradient. Immune cell stimulation with the supernatants from CCL25 loaded PLGA microparticles caused moderate increases in MCP-1, IL-8, and IL-1ß levels, but no changes in surface marker expression or migration. Both CCL25-loaded and unloaded PLGA microparticles induced an increase in IL-8 and MCP-1 release in PBMCs and macrophages, and a slight shift of the surface marker profile towards the direction of M2-macrophage polarization. CONCLUSIONS: While supernatants of CCL25 loaded PLGA microparticles did not provoke strong inflammatory reactions, direct stimulation with CCL25 shows the critical potential to induce global inflammatory activation of human leukocytes at certain concentrations. These findings underline the importance of a safe and reliable release system in a therapeutic setup. Failure of the delivery system could result in strong local and systemic inflammatory reactions that could potentially negate the benefits of chemokine therapy.


Assuntos
Quimiocinas CC/farmacologia , Quimiocinas CC/uso terapêutico , Preparações de Ação Retardada/farmacologia , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Quimiocina CCL2/metabolismo , Quimiocinas/farmacologia , Quimiocinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Interferon gama , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Interleucina-8/metabolismo , Leucócitos Mononucleares , Ligantes , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Monócitos , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico e Ácido Poliglicólico , Receptores CCR/metabolismo , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismo
2.
Z Rheumatol ; 75(5): 459-65, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117306

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis in men is an important public health problem with more than 1 million cases in Germany. Although osteoporotic fractures have a much higher mortality in men than in women, male patients are still underdiagnosed and undertreated. OBJECTIVE: Epidemiology of male osteoporosis and current treatment situation, pathophysiological aspects at the hormonal level, risk factors, diagnostic work-up and therapeutic options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overview of data concerning male osteoporosis, recommendations for diagnostic work-up and presentation of the study situation on pharmaceutical therapies. RESULTS: As risk factors for osteoporosis are present in 50-70 % of male patients, a detailed patient history is necessary for assessment of the risk factors. Radiological imaging of the spine is primarily recommended to identify individuals with prevalent vertebral fractures, as approximately 10 % of males above the age of 50 years have suffered a vertebral fracture. Laboratory testing of relevant parameters helps to rule out other metabolic bone diseases. In Germany, specific medications available for the treatment of male osteoporosis comprise the active vitamin D analogue alfacalcidol, the oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate, the intravenous biphosphonate zoledronic acid, the anti- receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) antibody denosumab, which can be given as intravenous injection and strontium ranelate, a drug with a complex mode of action. Teriparatide, a recombinant form of the 34 N-terminal amino acid sequence of parathyroid hormone is the only anabolic agent approved for male osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis in men is increasingly being recognized as an important public health problem and affected patients need to be adequately diagnosed and treated. Nowadays, a broad spectrum of well-proven therapeutic options with different modes of action allow individual treatment strategies for male osteoporosis patients.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/estatística & dados numéricos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causalidade , Comorbidade , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Saúde do Homem/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 26(6): 1667-71, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25868510

RESUMO

Osteoporosis accounts for about 3 % of total European health-care spending. The low proportion of costs for the pharmacological prevention of osteoporotic fracture means that it is highly cost saving, especially in patient with severe osteoporosis or patients who cannot take certain osteoporosis medications due to issues of contraindications or tolerability. Following recent regulatory changes, strontium ranelate is now indicated in patients with severe osteoporosis for whom treatment with other osteoporosis treatments is not possible, and without contraindications including uncontrolled hypertension, established, current or past history of ischaemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease. We review here today's evidence for the safety and efficacy of strontium ranelate. The efficacy of strontium ranelate in patients complying with the new prescribing information (i.e. severe osteoporosis without contraindications) has been explored in a multivariate analysis of clinical trial data, which concluded that the antifracture efficacy of strontium ranelate is maintained in patients with severe osteoporosis without contraindications and also demonstrated how the new target population mitigates risk. Strontium ranelate is therefore an important alternative in today's management of osteoporosis, with a positive benefit-risk balance, provided that the revised indication and contraindications are followed and cardiovascular risk is monitored. The bone community should be reassured that there remain viable alternatives in patients in whom treatment with other agents is not possible and protection against the debilitating effects of fracture is still feasible in patients with severe osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Aprovação de Drogas , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Tiofenos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Osteoporos Int ; 25(11): 2507-29, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25023900

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: This consensus article reviews the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in geriatric populations. Specifically, it reviews the risk assessment and intervention thresholds, the impact of nutritional deficiencies, fall prevention strategies, pharmacological treatments and their safety considerations, the risks of sub-optimal treatment adherence and strategies for its improvement. INTRODUCTION: This consensus article reviews the therapeutic strategies and management options for the treatment of osteoporosis of the oldest old. This vulnerable segment (persons over 80 years of age) stands to gain substantially from effective anti-osteoporosis treatment, but the under-prescription of these treatments is frequent. METHODS: This report is the result of an ESCEO (European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis) expert working group, which explores some of the reasons for this and presents the arguments to counter these beliefs. The risk assessment of older individuals is briefly reviewed along with the differences between some intervention guidelines. The current evidence on the impact of nutritional deficiencies (i.e. calcium, protein and vitamin D) is presented, as are strategies to prevent falls. One possible reason for the under-prescription of pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis in the oldest old is the perception that anti-fracture efficacy requires long-term treatment. However, a review of the data shows convincing anti-fracture efficacy already by 12 months. RESULTS: The safety profiles of these pharmacological agents are generally satisfactory in this patient segment provided a few precautions are followed. CONCLUSION: These patients should be considered for particular consultation/follow-up procedures in the effort to convince on the benefits of treatment and to allay fears of adverse drug reactions, since poor adherence is a major problem for the success of a strategy for osteoporosis and limits cost-effectiveness.


Assuntos
Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico
6.
Rheumatol Int ; 34(5): 727-32, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23334374

RESUMO

Almost 50 % of osteoporosis (OP) patients discontinue bisphosphonate (BP) therapy within 1-2 years after the start of their treatment. Denosumab's longer dosing interval with its administration every 6 months (Q6M) as a subcutaneous (sc) injection might result in a better real-life treatment adherence and persistence than weekly or monthly oral BP treatment regimen. The objectives of this open, investigator-initiated, prospective, observational, single-center study were to evaluate adherence with denosumab 60 mg sc every 6 months (Q6M) (Prolia(®)) injections in osteoporotic patients in a routine clinical care setting and to describe whether positive feedback to OP patients based on measured bone mineral density (BMD) increases and good safety profile have an impact on patients' real-life adherence. Results indicate that the rarity of adverse events and reduced dosage frequency together with the consistency of rapid and highly significant increases in BMD already after 6 months of denosumab therapy used as a positive reinforcement during doctor-patient interactions had a significant, positive impact on osteoporotic patient's adherence to continue with the 6-monthly sc denosumab injections.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Adesão à Medicação , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Comunicação , Denosumab , Esquema de Medicação , Retroalimentação , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/patologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Reforço Psicológico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Osteoporos Int ; 24(12): 2971-81, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23740422

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Changes of the bone formation marker PINP correlated positively with improvements in vertebral strength in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) who received 18-month treatment with teriparatide, but not with risedronate. These results support the use of PINP as a surrogate marker of bone strength in GIO patients treated with teriparatide. INTRODUCTION: To investigate the correlations between biochemical markers of bone turnover and vertebral strength estimated by finite element analysis (FEA) in men with GIO. METHODS: A total of 92 men with GIO were included in an 18-month, randomized, open-label trial of teriparatide (20 µg/day, n = 45) and risedronate (35 mg/week, n = 47). High-resolution quantitative computed tomography images of the 12th thoracic vertebra obtained at baseline, 6 and 18 months were converted into digital nonlinear FE models and subjected to anterior bending, axial compression and torsion. Stiffness and strength were computed for each model and loading mode. Serum biochemical markers of bone formation (amino-terminal-propeptide of type I collagen [PINP]) and bone resorption (type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide degradation fragments [CTx]) were measured at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 18 months. A mixed-model of repeated measures analysed changes from baseline and between-group differences. Spearman correlations assessed the relationship between changes from baseline of bone markers with FEA variables. RESULTS: PINP and CTx levels increased in the teriparatide group and decreased in the risedronate group. FEA-derived parameters increased in both groups, but were significantly higher at 18 months in the teriparatide group. Significant positive correlations were found between changes from baseline of PINP at 3, 6 and 18 months with changes in FE strength in the teriparatide-treated group, but not in the risedronate group. CONCLUSIONS: Positive correlations between changes in a biochemical marker of bone formation and improvement of biomechanical properties support the use of PINP as a surrogate marker of bone strength in teriparatide-treated GIO patients.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Osteogênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Fenômenos Biomecânicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos/fisiologia , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácido Etidrônico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Etidrônico/uso terapêutico , Colo do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteogênese/fisiologia , Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Pró-Colágeno/sangue , Ácido Risedrônico , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 29(4): 305-13, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23320612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D insufficiency has deleterious consequences on health outcomes. In elderly or postmenopausal women, it may exacerbate osteoporosis. SCOPE: There is currently no clear consensus on definitions of vitamin D insufficiency or minimal targets for vitamin D concentrations and proposed targets vary with the population. In view of the potential confusion for practitioners on when to treat and what to achieve, the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) convened a meeting to provide recommendations for clinical practice, to ensure the optimal management of elderly and postmenopausal women with regard to vitamin D supplementation. FINDINGS: Vitamin D has both skeletal and extra-skeletal benefits. Patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D) levels <50 nmol/L have increased bone turnover, bone loss, and possibly mineralization defects compared with patients with levels >50 nmol/L. Similar relationships have been reported for frailty, nonvertebral and hip fracture, and all-cause mortality, with poorer outcomes at <50 nmol/L. CONCLUSION: The ESCEO recommends that 50 nmol/L (i.e. 20 ng/mL) should be the minimal serum 25-(OH)D concentration at the population level and in patients with osteoporosis to ensure optimal bone health. Below this threshold, supplementation is recommended at 800 to 1000 IU/day. Vitamin D supplementation is safe up to 10,000 IU/day (upper limit of safety) resulting in an upper limit of adequacy of 125 nmol/L 25-(OH)D. Daily consumption of calcium- and vitamin-D-fortified food products (e.g. yoghurt or milk) can help improve vitamin D intake. Above the threshold of 50 nmol/L, there is no clear evidence for additional benefits of supplementation. On the other hand, in fragile elderly subjects who are at elevated risk for falls and fracture, the ESCEO recommends a minimal serum 25-(OH)D level of 75 nmol/L (i.e. 30 ng/mL), for the greatest impact on fracture.


Assuntos
Cálcio da Dieta/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Vitamina D/sangue , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densidade Óssea , Osso e Ossos/fisiologia , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Pós-Menopausa , Deficiência de Vitamina D/sangue , Deficiência de Vitamina D/mortalidade
9.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 98(2): 592-601, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23341486

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Strontium ranelate reduces vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in osteoporosis in men over 2 years (main analysis after 1 year). DESIGN: This was an international, unbalanced (2:1), double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial (MALEO [MALE Osteoporosis]). SETTING: This international study included 54 centers in 14 countries. PARTICIPANTS: PARTICIPANTS were 261 white men with primary osteoporosis. INTERVENTION: Strontium ranelate at 2 g/d (n = 174) or placebo (n = 87) was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lumbar spine (L2-L4), femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical bone markers, and safety were measured. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups in the whole population (age, 72.9 ± 6.0 years; lumbar spine BMD T-score, -2.7 ± 1.0; femoral neck BMD T-score, -2.3 ± 0.7). Men who received strontium ranelate over 2 years had greater increases in lumbar spine BMD than those who received placebo (relative change from baseline to end, 9.7% ± 7.5% vs 2.0% ± 5.5%; between-group difference estimate (SE), 7.7% (0.9%); 95% confidence interval, 5.9%-9.5%; P < .001). There were also significant between-group differences in relative changes in femoral neck BMD (P < .001) and total hip BMD (P < .001). At the end of treatment, mean levels of serum cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen, a marker of bone resorption, were increased in both the strontium ranelate group (10.7% ± 58.0%; P = .022) and the placebo group (34.9% ± 65.8%; P < .001). The corresponding mean changes of bone alkaline phosphatase, a marker of bone formation, were 6.4% ± 28.5% (P = .005) and 1.9% ± 25.4% (P = .505), respectively. After 2 years, the blood strontium level (129 ± 66 µmol/L) was similar to that in trials of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Strontium ranelate was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of strontium ranelate on BMD in osteoporotic men were similar to those in postmenopausal osteoporotic women, supporting its use in the treatment of osteoporosis in men.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Compostos Organometálicos/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Compostos Organometálicos/efeitos adversos , Tiofenos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Rheumatol Int ; 33(3): 637-43, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22527138

RESUMO

Due to pleiotropic-synergistic actions on bone, muscle, gut, brain and different other non-skeletal tissues, alfacalcidol is an interesting drug for treating osteoporosis. In studies on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, men have always been treated with calcitriol or this active D-hormone prodrug, but there is no study of male patients only in the literature. The AIM-Trial (Alfacalcidol In Men) is an extension of the control group (n = 158) of our former risedronate study in male osteoporosis (Ringe et al. in Rheumatol Int 29:311-315, 2009). In that study, we treated daily those controls with prevalent vertebral fractures with 1 µg alfacalcidol + 500 mg calcium (group A) and those without prevalent vertebral fractures with 1,000 IU plain vitamin D (Vit. D) + 1,000 mg calcium (group B). Subsequently, we added an additional 56 pairs of patients to these two groups: 28 with and 28 without prevalent vertebral fractures, reaching a total of 214 cases. That means with this design, we are comparing two groups with a different risk at onset. Due to the prevalent vertebral fractures and lower average bone mineral density (BMD) values, there was a higher risk of incident fractures in group A. After 2 years, we found significantly higher increases in lumbar spine BMD (+3.2 vs. +0.8 %) and total hip BMD (+1.9 vs. -0.9 %) in group A and B, respectively. Eighteen incident falls were recorded in the alfacalcidol group and 38 in the group treated with Vit. D (p = 0.041). There were significantly lower rates of patients with new vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in group A than in group B. Back pain was significantly reduced only with alfacalcidol. Concerning the incidence of new non-vertebral fractures, we found that there was a relation to renal function in the two groups. The advantage for alfacalcidol was mainly due to a higher non-vertebral fracture-reducing potency in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) below 60 ml/min (p = 0.0019). There were no serious adverse events (SAE), and the numbers of mild-to-moderate adverse events (AE) were not different between groups. Despite the higher initial fracture risk in the alfacalcidol group, 2-year treatment with this active D-hormone prodrug showed a higher therapeutic efficacy in terms of BMD, falls and fractures. One important advantage of alfacalcidol may be that it is effective even in patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Hidroxicolecalciferóis/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Determinação de Ponto Final , Humanos , Hidroxicolecalciferóis/efeitos adversos , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem
11.
Osteoporos Int ; 24(1): 263-9, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22736069

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: This study aims to estimate bisphosphonate effectiveness by comparing fracture incidence over time on therapy in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO). From this observational study, alendronate and risedronate decreased clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over time. The effectiveness of each bisphosphonate is consistent with their efficacies demonstrated on surrogate markers in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). INTRODUCTION: This study aims to estimate bisphosphonate effectiveness by comparing fracture incidence over time on therapy with fracture incidence during a short period after starting a therapy. METHODS: The study population was a subgroup of a larger cohort study comprising two cohorts of women aged ≥65 years, prescribed with alendronate or risedronate. Within the two study cohorts, 11,007 women were identified as having received glucocorticoids. Within each cohort, the baseline incidence of clinical fractures at nonvertebral and vertebral sites was defined by the initial 3-month period after starting therapy. Relative to these baseline data, we then compared the fracture incidence during the subsequent 12 months on therapy. RESULTS: The baseline incidence of clinical nonvertebral and vertebral fractures was similar in the alendronate cohort (5.22 and 5.79/100 person-years, respectively) and in the risedronate cohort (5.51 and 5.68/100 person-years, respectively). Relative to the baseline incidence, fracture incidence was significantly lower in the subsequent 12 months in both cohorts of alendronate (33 % lower at nonvertebral sites and 59 % at vertebral sites) and risedronate (28 % lower at nonvertebral sites and 54 % at vertebral sites). CONCLUSION: From this observational study not designed to compare drugs, both alendronate and risedronate decreased clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over time. The reductions observed in fracture incidence, within each cohort, suggest that the effectiveness of each bisphosphonate in clinical practice is consistent with their efficacies demonstrated on surrogate markers in randomized controlled trials.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Administração Oral , Idoso , Alendronato/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Ácido Etidrônico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Etidrônico/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Seguimentos , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Ácido Risedrônico
12.
Bone ; 53(1): 134-44, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23201268

RESUMO

SUMMARY: Aspects of osteoporosis in men, such as screening and identification strategies, definitions of diagnosis and intervention thresholds, and treatment options (both approved and in the pipeline) are discussed. INTRODUCTION: Awareness of osteoporosis in men is improving, although it remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. A European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) workshop was convened to discuss osteoporosis in men and to provide a report by a panel of experts (the authors). METHODS: A debate with an expert panel on preselected topics was conducted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although additional fracture data are needed to endorse the clinical care of osteoporosis in men, consensus views were reached on diagnostic criteria and intervention thresholds. Empirical data in men display similarities with data acquired in women, despite pathophysiological differences, which may not be clinically relevant. Men should receive treatment at a similar 10-year fracture probability as in women. The design of mixed studies may reduce the lag between comparable treatments for osteoporosis in women becoming available in men.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Saúde do Homem , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Algoritmos , Densidade Óssea , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia
13.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(1): 213-21, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21953472

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The competitive price of generic bisphosphonates has had a marked effect on practice guidelines, but an increasing body of evidence suggests that they have more limited effectiveness than generally assumed. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to review the impact of generic bisphosphonates on effectiveness in the treatment of osteoporosis. METHODS: This study is a literature review. RESULTS: A substantial body of evidence indicates that many generic formulations of alendronate are more poorly tolerated than the proprietary preparations which results in significantly poorer adherence and thus effectiveness. Poorer effectiveness may result from faster disintegration times of many generics that increase the likelihood of adherence of particulate matter to the oesophageal mucosa. Unfortunately, market authorisation, based on the bioequivalence of generics with a proprietary formulation, does not take into account the potential concerns about safety. The poor adherence of many generic products has implications for guideline development, cost-effectiveness and impact of treatment on the burden of disease. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of generic bisphosphonates requires formal testing to re-evaluate their role in the management of osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Química Farmacêutica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos Genéricos/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Humanos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle
14.
Cartilage ; 3(1): 43-57, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26069618

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: It is well known that expression of markers for WNT signaling is dysregulated in osteoarthritic (OA) bone. However, it is still not fully known if the expression of these markers also is affected in OA cartilage. The aim of this study was therefore to examine this issue. METHODS: Human cartilage biopsies from OA and control donors were subjected to genome-wide oligonucleotide microarrays. Genes involved in WNT signaling were selected using the BioRetis database, KEGG pathway analysis was searched using DAVID software tools, and cluster analysis was performed using Genesis software. Results from the microarray analysis were verified using quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. In order to study the impact of cytokines for the dysregulated WNT signaling, OA and control chondrocytes were stimulated with interleukin-1 and analyzed with real-time PCR for their expression of WNT-related genes. RESULTS: Several WNT markers displayed a significantly altered expression in OA compared to normal cartilage. Interestingly, inhibitors of the canonical and planar cell polarity WNT signaling pathways displayed significantly increased expression in OA cartilage, while the Ca(2+)/WNT signaling pathway was activated. Both real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry verified the microarray results. Real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that interleukin-1 upregulated expression of important WNT markers. CONCLUSIONS: WNT signaling is significantly affected in OA cartilage. The result suggests that both the canonical and planar cell polarity WNT signaling pathways were partly inhibited while the Ca(2+)/WNT pathway was activated in OA cartilage.

15.
MMW Fortschr Med ; 154 Suppl 1: 10-21, 2012 Apr 05.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23427364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic strategy for the reduction of fracture risk in osteoporosis should not only aim to increase bone strength, but should also improve muscle function and reduce falls without increasing the risk of significant side effects. Since 2008 a combination therapy of the antiresorptive active bisphosphonatealendronate and the pleiotropic active D-hormone-prodrug alfacalcidol is licensed in Germanyfor treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (Tevabone). METHODS: In the review the results of numerous preclinical and clinical studies are reported, showing the efficacy of the combination of alendronate plus alfacalcidol. RESULTS: In preclinical trials with ovariectomized rats the combination has shown a significantly better effect on increased bone turnover in comparison with bisphosphonate monotherapy. Presumably the "oversuppression" of bone remodeling and the resulting risk of reduced microfracture healing, which is known to occur after long-term therapy with bisphosphonates, will be reduced by the combination. Clinical studies have shown better efficacy of the combination in the increase of bone density and reduction of fracture rate (vertebral and non-vertebral fractures). Less falls were reported compared to alendronate plus genuine vitamin D. The reduction of increased parathormone levels by the alendronate plus alfacalcidol combination compared to alendronate alone was proven to increase the responder rate of the alendronate therapy. The potential risks of alendronate-induced hypocalcemia as well as alfacalcidol-induced hypercalcemia or hypercalcuria are reduced due to the contrasting mode of action of both compounds. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the alendronate plus alfacalcidol combination meets the demands of an optimized therapy for osteoporosis.With the especially developed, self-explanatory combination package better compliance and less dispensing mistakes can be expected.


Assuntos
Alendronato/administração & dosagem , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Hidroxicolecalciferóis/administração & dosagem , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Alendronato/efeitos adversos , Animais , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Combinação de Medicamentos , Interações Medicamentosas , Ácido Etidrônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Etidrônico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Etidrônico/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Humanos , Hidroxicolecalciferóis/efeitos adversos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ratos , Ácido Risedrônico
16.
Eur Heart J ; 32(17): 2168-78, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21183501

RESUMO

AIMS: Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3)-induced myocarditis, initially considered a sole immune-mediated disease, also results from a direct CVB3-mediated injury of the cardiomyocytes. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have, besides immunomodulatory, also anti-apoptotic features. In view of clinical translation, we first analysed whether MSCs can be infected by CVB3. Next, we explored whether and how MSCs could reduce the direct CVB3-mediated cardiomyocyte injury and viral progeny release, in vitro, in the absence of immune cells. Finally, we investigated whether MSC application could improve murine acute CVB3-induced myocarditis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Phase contrast pictures and MTS viability assay demonstrated that MSCs did not suffer from CVB3 infection 4-12-24-48 h after CVB3 infection. Coxsackievirus B3 RNA copy number decreased in this time frame, suggesting that no CVB3 replication took place. Co-culture of MSCs with CVB3-infected HL-1 cardiomyocytes resulted in a reduction of CVB3-induced HL-1 apoptosis, oxidative stress, intracellular viral particle production, and viral progeny release in a nitric oxide (NO)-dependent manner. Moreover, MSCs required priming via interferon-γ (IFN-γ) to exert their protective effects. In vivo, MSC application improved the contractility and relaxation parameters in CVB3-induced myocarditis, which was paralleled with a reduction in cardiac apoptosis, cardiomyocyte damage, left ventricular tumour necrosis factor-α mRNA expression, and cardiac mononuclear cell activation. Mesenchymal stem cells reduced the CVB3-induced CD4- and CD8- T cell activation in an NO-dependent way and required IFN-γ priming. CONCLUSION: We conclude that MSCs improve murine acute CVB3-induced myocarditis via their anti-apoptotic and immunomodulatory properties, which occur in an NO-dependent manner and require priming via IFN-γ.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coxsackievirus , Enterovirus Humano B , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/fisiologia , Miocardite/terapia , Animais , Apoptose/fisiologia , Enterovirus Humano B/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Humanos , Interferon gama/farmacologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/virologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Miocardite/fisiopatologia , Miocardite/virologia , Óxido Nítrico/biossíntese , Função Ventricular/fisiologia , Replicação Viral/fisiologia
17.
MMW Fortschr Med ; 153 Suppl 4: 115-8, 2011 Dec 15.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23964472

RESUMO

Vitamin D regulates the calcium-phosphate metabolism and thereby plays an important role for the integrity and functioning of bone, muscle and nerves. Studies have shown furthermore an influence on certain types of cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Vitamin D is mainly produced by the skin. During exposure to sunlightthe precursor7-dehydrocholesterol is transformed to colecalciferol (vitamin D3). Smaller amounts are supplied by nutrition. In our latitude vitamin D synthesis takes only place during summertime. The vitamin stored in fat tissue in generally is not sufficient for the whole winter period and accordingly insufficiency is very frequent. In a cross-sectional study all over Germany (DeViD, 2007) only about 8% of the population was vitamin D sufficient in spring time.Two prospective studies (2008) proved a correlation between vitamin D supply and overall mortality. An amelioration of vitamin D supply can be achieved either by increasing sun exposure or daily oral intake of 800-2000 IU (=20-50 microg) colecalciferol.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Colecalciferol/deficiência , Deficiência de Vitamina D/mortalidade , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colecalciferol/fisiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Estações do Ano , Fatores Sexuais , Estatística como Assunto , Deficiência de Vitamina D/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 18(11): 1458-66, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20709179

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The microfracture technique activates mesenchymal progenitors that enter the cartilage defect and form cartilage repair tissue. Synovial fluid (SF) has been shown to stimulate the migration of subchondral progenitors. The aim of our study was to determine the chemokine profile of SF from normal, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) donors and evaluate the chemotactic effect of selected chemokines on human subchondral progenitor cells. METHOD: Chemokine levels of SF were analyzed using human chemokine antibody membrane arrays. The chemotactic potential of selected chemokines on human mesenchymal progenitors derived from subchondral cortico-spongious bone was tested using 96-well chemotaxis assays. Chemokine receptor expression of subchondral progenitors was assessed by real-time gene expression analysis and immuno-histochemistry. RESULTS: Chemokine antibody array analysis showed that SF contains a broad range of chemokines. Ten chemokines that showed significantly reduced levels in RA or OA compared to normal SF or robustly high levels in all SF tested were used for further chemotactic analysis. Chemotaxis assays showed that the chemokines MDC/CCL22, CTACK/CCL27, ENA78/CXCL5 and SDF1α/CXCL12 significantly inhibited migration of progenitors, while TECK/CCL25, IP10/CXCL10 and Lymphotactin/XCL1 effectively stimulated cell migration. MCP1/CCL2, Eotaxin2/CCL24 and NAP2/CXCL7 showed no chemotactic effect on subchondral progenitors. Gene expression and immuno-histochemical analysis of corresponding chemokine receptors document presence of low levels of chemokine receptors in subchondral progenitors, with the CXCL10 receptor CXCR3 showing the highest expression level. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SF contains chemokines that may contribute to the recruitment of human mesenchymal progenitors from the subchondral bone in microfracture.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , Quimiocinas/metabolismo , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/metabolismo , Osteoartrite/imunologia , Líquido Sinovial/imunologia , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Ensaios de Migração Celular , Quimiocina CXCL10/metabolismo , Quimiocinas C/metabolismo , Quimiocinas CC/metabolismo , Quimiotaxia , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica
20.
Osteoporos Int ; 21 Suppl 2: S431-6, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20464377

RESUMO

Osteoporosis is listed by the WHO among the ten most frequent and socio-economically important, chronic diseases of mankind. The term osteoporosis however comprises a number of different pathophysiological conditions and clinical situations of weakened bones with increased risk of fragility fractures. A modern anti-osteoporotic drug should provide qualified study results proving therapeutic efficacy over this broad range of daily clinical appearances of osteoporosis. The decision for treatment in the individual patients depends no longer only on bone mineral density. Today, the major criterion for decision making is the prospective 10-year risk for fractures. Since this risk is calculated on the basis of age, sex, bone mineral density, prevalent fractures, and a number of other contributing risk factors (Kanis et al., Osteoporos Int 12:989-995, 2001; Kanis et al., Osteoporos Int 19:385-397, 2008), it seems to be of interest to have a look whether the fracture-reducing potency of a drug is influenced by these risk factors. The purpose of this review is to analyze whether the fracture-reducing efficacy of strontium ranelate in patients with osteoporosis can be achieved independently of sex, etiology of osteoporosis, and the major diagnostically relevant risk factors.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Compostos Organometálicos/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...