RESUMO
Few researchers have explored Canadian migrants' experiences of mental health and service access. We interviewed 10 migrants to Canada from a local settlement organization about mental health and services and 5 organization staff about their experiences supporting migrants' mental health and service access. Our interviews with migrants revealed cultural perceptions of mental health and unmet service needs. Our focus group with staff indicated challenges experienced by migrants and the tension between their openness with mental health difficulties and stigmatization from their cultural communities. A call to restructure existing mental health support for this underserved population is needed.
Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Migrantes , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Canadá , Grupos FocaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The current study evaluated the use of MYmind, a concurrent mindfulness program in which youth with autism and their parents simultaneously receive group specific mindfulness training. Youth with autism can experience emotional and behavioral challenges, which are associated with parental stress. Mindfulness-based programs are emerging as a promising support for these challenges, for both children and parents. While two studies have documented the use of concurrent parent-child programs, neither involve control conditions. METHODS: Using a within-subject repeated measures design with a baseline component, 23 parent-child dyads were assessed on mindfulness, mental health, and youth emotion regulation and autism symptoms. Participants also rated their perceived improvement on a social validity questionnaire. RESULTS: There was improvement in youth autism symptoms, emotion regulation, and adaptive skills, and in parent reports of their own mindfulness following the program. There was also some indication of a waitlist effect for parent mental health, but not for other outcome variables. Participant feedback was mainly positive. CONCLUSIONS: MYmind has the potential to contribute to emotion regulation and adaptability in youth with autism, and mindfulness in parents, though more rigorous controlled trials are needed.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intervention fidelity has important implications for the interpretation of intervention outcomes. Reviews on fidelity implementation for psychosocial interventions targeting children and adolescents with comorbid mental health problems are scarce. The purpose of this study was to systematically review reported fidelity of psychosocial interventions for children with comorbid mental health conditions. METHOD: Fidelity and quality ratings were calculated based on an analysis of articles resulting from a previously reported systematic search of the literature (using PsycINFO, MEDLINE and ERIC databases between 1994 and 2009), using the Intervention Fidelity Assessment Checklist for the fidelity measure and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias for the quality measure. RESULTS: Overall, few studies were found to have a high level of fidelity adherence. Only 1 of the 10 studies met the 'high' intervention fidelity cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that current psychosocial interventions for children and adolescents with comorbid mental health disorders must be interpreted with caution, given many studies either do not measure intervention fidelity or have variable levels of fidelity adherence. Including fidelity components in future studies would aid in determining the effectiveness and generalizability of interventions targeted at children with comorbid disorders.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Comorbidity is common among child clinical samples. Reviews on effective intervention for comorbid problems are lacking. METHOD: Based on a literature search of three databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE and ERIC), initial data analysis was carried out on 865 studies; of these,10 randomised trials fully met study inclusion criteria and were subject to final analysis, with quality assessments and effect sizes calculated. RESULTS: Overall, effect sizes for externalising (M = 1.12) and internalising (M = 1.09) outcomes were large. Effect sizes were large for family-based (M = 1.80) compared to individual (M = 0.78) and group-based (M = 0.54) interventions. Studies with homotypic comorbidity (M= 1.18) displayed larger treatment effect sizes than ones with heterotypic comorbidity (M = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: While the overall quality ratings of the reviewed studies varied from mediocre to good, with a variety of measures used across studies to assess the same outcomes, findings suggest that current interventions are effective for reducing internalising and externalising problems in children with comorbidity. More substantive evidence for the beneficial effects of psychosocial interventions for children with comorbid problems may arise as more robust studies, which more explicitly address and describe comorbidity, become available.