Selection of local therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA,B breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Stage IIIA,B breast cancer is commonly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy because of high objective response rates and improved operability. Criteria for subsequent selection of local therapy--mastectomy, radiotherapy, or both--are not well defined. We adopted a policy of selective local therapy based on rebiopsy of the breast and clinical axillary lymph node status at the time of best response to chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1980 and 1993, 126 patients with stage IIIA,B breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and definitive local therapy. The long-term incidence of locoregional failure (in-breast, chest wall, axilla, supraclavicular, neck), relapse-free survival, and overall survival was determined. RESULTS: The overall clinical objective response rate to chemotherapy was 95.2%. Eighty-three patients underwent mastectomy, with negative margins achieved in 91.6%. Forty-two patients had breast preservation; the overall in-breast recurrence rate was 19.0% (8 of 42 patients). The overall locoregional recurrence rate by site was: chest wall-8.7% (11 of 126 patients), axilla-8.7% (11 of 126 patients), supraclavicular-5.6% (7 of 126 patients), and neck-4.0% (5 of 126 patients). The axillary recurrence rate was 6.6% (5 of 76 patients) for clinically negative axilla treated with radiotherapy only, and 12.0% (6 of 50 patients) for clinically positive axilla treated with surgery only. The overall long-term survival probabilities (6 years) according to stage were: stage IIIA-58.0%, stage IIIB(noninflam)-58.0%, stage IIIB(inflam)-36.0%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a selective approach to local therapy in patients with stage IIIA,B breast cancer. This approach provides local control in most patients, and allows for breast preservation and elimination of axillary dissection in selected patients.

Early suppressive effects of chemotherapy and cytokine treatment on committed versus primitive haemopoietic progenitors in patient bone marrow.

These studies investigated the effectiveness of in vivo administration of cytokines in ameliorating potential marrow damage induced by chemotherapy. Breast cancer patients received 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FLAC) followed by either GM-CSF, PIXY321, or no cytokine. Marrow was obtained before and after one or two cycles of FLAC once blood cell counts had recovered. Colony-forming units for granulocytes and macrophages (CFU-GM) were used to indicate the effect of therapy on recovery of committed progenitor cells responsible for early blood cell recovery. The frequency and number of CFU-GM in marrow obtained after FLAC + PIXY321 were significantly lower than in marrow obtained after FLAC+GM-CSF or FLAC without cytokine. CD34+ cell numbers were also reduced after FLAC + PIXY321. CFU-GM production in marrow long-term cultures (LTC) was used to assess the effect of therapy on primitive progenitors. After 5 weeks the number of CFU-GM in LTC of post-therapy marrow from all three treatment arms was < 15% of the number in pre-therapy LTC. Suppressive effects of FLAC on primitive progenitors were observed even when committed progenitors and CD34+ cells had recovered to pre-therapy levels. These results demonstrate that cytokine treatment did not ameliorate suppressive or toxic effects of FLAC on the functional integrity of the marrow.

Prospective, randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in combination with the interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) fusion protein (PIXY321) versus GM-CSF in patients with advanced breast cancer.

We conducted a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the ability of the interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) fusion protein, PIXY321, to ameliorate cumulative thrombocytopenia after multiple cycles of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FLAC) chemotherapy compared with GM-CSF in patients with advanced breast cancer. Fifty-three patients were randomized to receive either PIXY321. 375 microg/m2 twice a day subcutaneously, or GM-CSF, 250 microg/m2 daily subcutaneously after FLAC chemotherapy. PIXY321 was less well tolerated than GM-CSF, with more patients developing chills and local skin reactions and more patients stopping PIXY321 due to intolerance. While no difference in the neutrophil nadirs was seen with the two cytokines, the duration of the absolute neutrophil count less than 1,000/muL for all cycles was significantly longer with PIXY321 than with GM-CSF. Fifty percent of patients treated with multiple cycles of FLAC chemotherapy on both study arms developed dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. No differences in platelet nadirs, duration of thrombocytopenia, or need for platelet transfusions were observed with PIXY321 versus GM-CSF. The average delivered doses of FLAC chemotherapy were somewhat higher in the GM-CSF study arm. PIXY321 was not superior to GM-CSF in ameliorating the cumulative thrombocytopenia observed with multiple cycles of FLAC chemotherapy and was less well tolerated.

Late extramedullary relapse following bone marrow transplant for AML presenting as acute renal failure and leukemic ascites.

A 22-year-old woman with AML in remission for 3.5 years after BMT relapsed with extramedullary disease presenting as leukemic ascites and recurrent obstructive renal failure. The duration of remission post-transplant and the absence of bone marrow involvement may suggest an improved likelihood of response to further chemotherapy.