Utilization of 3D MRI for the Evaluation of Sphincter Pharyngoplasty Insertion Site in Patients With Velopharyngeal Dysfunction.

Sphincter pharyngoplasty is a surgical method to treat velopharyngeal dysfunction. However, surgical failure is often noted and postoperative assessment frequently reveals low-set pharyngoplasties. Past studies have not quantified pharyngoplasty tissue changes that occur postoperatively and gaps remain related to the patient-specific variables that influence postoperative change. The purpose of this study was to utilize advanced three-dimensional imaging and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to visualize and quantify pharyngoplasty insertion site and postsurgical tissue changes over time.A prospective, repeated measures design was used for the assessment of craniometric and velopharyngeal variables postsurgically. Imaging was completed across two postoperative time points. Tissue migration, pharyngoplasty dimensions, and predictors of change were analyzed across imaging time points.Significant differences were present between the initial location of pharyngoplasty tissue and the pharyngoplasty location 2 to 4 months postoperatively. The average postoperative inferior movement of pharyngoplasty tissue was 6.82 mm, although notable variability was present across participants. The pharyngoplasty volume decreased by 30%, on average.Inferior migration of the pharyngoplasty tissue was present in all patients. Gravity, scar contracture, and patient-specific variables likely interact, impacting final postoperative pharyngoplasty location. The use of advanced imaging modalities, such as 3D MRI, allows for the quantification and visualization of tissue change. There is a need for continued identification of patient-specific factors that may impact the amount of inferior tissue migration and scar contracture postoperatively.

Nasalance in Arabic-Speaking Jordanians: A Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: This investigation sought to establish nasalance scores for Jordanian Arabic (JA) speakers, to develop nasalance speech stimuli for JA speakers, and to compare JA adult nasalance scores with those of Standard American English (SAE) speakers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Participants included normal native JA speakers (n = 100; males/females and adults/children) and adult SAE speakers (n = 49). Four speech tasks for JA speakers were developed, which included repetition of vowels, syllables, words, and sentences. Parallel speech tasks were also developed for SAE speakers. A nasometer (Nasometer II 6400; PENTAX Medical, Montvale, NJ, USA) was used to establish nasalance scores for all speakers across all speech tasks. RESULTS: Nasalance values were established for adult and child JA speakers. The nasalance values were higher for Jordanian adults than for Jordanian children. No differences in nasalance were found between male and female Arabic speakers for nonnasal elements. JA speakers were significantly more nasal than SAE speakers on selected speech tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Nasalance values for JA speakers were established for both adults and children, and Arabic speech materials were developed. The results of this investigation add to the growing body of research documenting differences in nasalance scores for normal speakers across different languages.

Evaluating the Accuracy of Using at Rest Images to Determine the Height of Velopharyngeal Closure.

Prior to performing secondary surgeries, lateral cephalograms have been used during phonation to evaluate the point of attempted velopharyngeal contact along the posterior pharyngeal wall relative to the palatal plane and the first cervical vertebra. The ability to quantify the height of velopharyngeal closure is an important aspect of planning corrective surgeries for velopharyngeal dysfunction. However, issues with patient compliance during the imaging process can present difficulties for obtaining adequate preoperative imaging data. The purpose of this study was to assess if the height of velopharyngeal closure can be accurately estimated and quantified from at rest images. Results demonstrate that the height of velopharyngeal closure above C1 can be accurately quantified using at rest images in children with cleft palate. No statistically significant difference was found between the measures obtained at rest or during sustained phonation images (P = 0.573). Thus, quantitative measures from at rest images can aid in the preoperative planning process by providing surgeons with a numeric distance for tissue insertion along the posterior pharyngeal wall above C1. This distance is correlated to the height of velopharyngeal closure and successfully placing tissue at this height is likely tied to improved postoperative speech outcomes.

Changes in the Height of Velopharyngeal Closure Relative to the Cervical Spine From Infancy Through Adolescence in Patients With Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: Palpation is often used to identify C1, an intraoperative landmark, for placement of the pharyngoplasty. However, little is known about the relationship between the palatal plane (PP) and this cervical spine landmark across select variables. This study seeks to analyze variations in the height of velopharyngeal closure relative to C1 across differing cleft types and age groups. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Large, multidisciplinary center for craniofacial disorders. METHODS: Clinical lateral cephalograms were analyzed in nonsyndromic patients who underwent primary palatoplasty. Regression analysis and analysis of covariance were completed to determine how age and cleft type impact underlying cervical and velopharyngeal measures. RESULTS: Age ( P < .001) and cleft type ( P = .036) were significant predictors of the distance between the height of velopharyngeal closure and C1. Those with greater severity of clefting demonstrated larger distances between the height of velopharyngeal closure and C1. Compared to normative data, children with cleft palate have significantly larger distances between the PP and C1. The height of velopharyngeal closure above C1 was observed to range from 3.6 to 12.6 mm across cleft populations. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the variability in C1 as a landmark across variables including cleft type and age. Because of differences in the height of velopharyngeal closure across cleft types relative to C1, it is necessary to preoperatively quantify the vertical distance between the PP and palpable intraoperative landmark, C1, to determine the appropriate height of pharyngoplasty insertion.

Age-Related Changes Between the Level of Velopharyngeal Closure and the Cervical Spine.

The primary focus of this study was to assess age-related changes in the vertical distance of the estimated level of velopharyngeal closure in relation to a prominent landmark of the cervical spine: the anterior tubercle of cervical vertebra 1 (C1). Midsagittal anatomic magnetic resonance images were examined across 51 participants with normal head and neck anatomy between 4 and 17 years of age. Results indicate that age is a strong predictor (P = 0.002) of the vertical distance between the level of velopharyngeal closure relative to C1. Specifically, as age increases, the vertical distance between the palatal plane and C1 becomes greater resulting in the level of velopharyngeal closure being located higher above C1 (range 4.88-10.55 mm). Results of this study provide insights into the clinical usefulness of using C1 as a surgical landmark for placement of pharyngoplasties in children with repaired cleft palate and persistent hypernasal speech. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed.

Sphincterplasty for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in the Child Without a Cleft-Palate: Etiologies and Speech Outcomes.

The aim of this study is to report on speech outcomes following surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) on a broad spectrum of patients without a cleft palate. Inclusion criteria included patients without a cleft palate operated on by a single surgeon (JKW) over a 10-year period and postoperative speech evaluation within 1 year. All patients underwent a sphincter pharyngoplasty. The main outcome measures were perceptual speech assessment using a 6-point scale (1 = none or normal, 6 = severe); velopharyngeal function (VPF) (1 = adequate, 2 = marginal, 3 =  dequate); and quantitative nasalance score. Forty children (mean age 7.5 y) were included. Eight unique conditions were identified; the most common was 22q deletion syndromes (27.5%). All patients had a deep nasopharynx, mean nasopharyngeal depth >0.67. Two novel cases are presented in each child with mosaic Trisomy 14 and ring chromosome 18 abnormality. Of all patients, 87.5% improved their postoperative hypernasality score. Preoperatively, all patients had either marginal or inadequate VPF (2 or 3). Postoperatively, 90% of patients (n = 36) achieved adequate velar function, the remainder did not improve at the first postoperative evaluation. Intelligibility and audible nasal emissions improved in between 57% and 65% of patients. Articulation proficiency was the only perceptual rating not to improve initially, but then did so on the most recent postoperative speech evaluation. This study demonstrates successful speech outcomes in a diverse group of patients. It also increases awareness of noncleft VPI amenable to surgical correction.

Effect of nasal decongestion on nasalance measures.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of nasal decongestant on nasalance scores for a group of 100 individuals. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one subjects with hypernasality and 59 subjects without hypernasality underwent nasometric assessment at the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil. DESIGN: Nasalance scores were obtained for each subject before the application of a nasal decongestant and again 10 minutes after subjects received a topical nasal decongestant applied into both nostrils. RESULTS: The nasalance scores obtained after the application of the nasal decongestant were significantly higher than those obtained before the decongestant. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal decongestion had a small but statistically significant effect on nasalance scores, suggesting that in some individuals, nasal congestion should be a variable of concern when using the Nasometer. Both nasal congestion (i.e., due to nasal rhinitis) and the effects of nasal decongestant sprays may influence Nasometer test results. Interpretation of nasalance scores, therefore, should be done carefully. Furthermore, nasometry, with and without nasal decongestant, can be a valuable clinical tool for screening anterior nasal obstruction, helping to isolate obstruction due to nasal congestion from structural obstruction in the nasal cavities.

Surgical correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children with velocardiofacial syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children with velocardiofacial syndrome is inherently more difficult, with the need for revision being high. The purpose of this report was to evaluate and document the authors' experience with sphincter pharyngoplasty in the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children with velocardiofacial syndrome, and compare outcome. METHODS: In part I, 32 patients with velocardiofacial syndrome underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency between January of 1987 and March of 2001. There were 18 girls and 14 boys, with a mean age at primary sphincter pharyngoplasty of 6.7 years. Pharyngoplasty revision was defined as any secondary surgical revision of the sphincter as determined by clinical evaluation and objective speech assessment. In part II, comparisons were made to 218 non-velocardiofacial syndrome patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency who underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty (cleft palate, n = 127; velopharyngeal insufficiency alone, n = 63; submucous cleft, n = 15; other, n = 13). There was no significant difference in the average age or gender in the two groups. All patients underwent screening of velopharyngeal function, which included perceptual speech evaluation, clinical screening of velopharyngeal closure, and oral examination. RESULTS: In part I, success of the primary sphincter pharyngoplasty was demonstrated in 78 percent of the velocardiofacial syndrome patients (n = 25), with a revision rate of 22 percent. Patients who required revision were slightly older, 8.6 versus 6.3 years (p = not significant). Preoperative nasometry scores were significantly higher in patients who required a pharyngoplasty revision (69 versus 54; p = 0.002). Patients who required revision of the pharyngoplasty were more likely to have larger velopharyngeal areas (30 mm versus 22 mm). In part II, the revision rate in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome was significantly higher than in those patients in the original cohort without velocardiofacial syndrome (22 percent versus 11 percent; p < 0.05). Preoperative objective speech data demonstrated significantly greater velopharyngeal incompetence in all categories (nasometry scores, pressure flow measurements, and radiographic measurements) for patients with velocardiofacial syndrome, and age at initial sphincter repair was slightly older (8.5 versus 7.7 years; p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The management of velopharyngeal insufficiency using sphincter pharyngoplasty in children with velocardiofacial syndrome is safe and effective. The higher need for surgical revision in velocardiofacial syndrome patients is most likely attributable to a greater degree of preoperative nasalance and a slightly later age of presentation. This should provide insight into various technique modifications in an attempt to minimize pharyngoplasty revision.

An outcome evaluation of sphincter pharyngoplasty for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Sphincter pharyngoplasty is frequently used for the management of children with velopharyngeal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcome and revision rates of sphincter pharyngoplasty at the authors' institution. Two hundred fifty patients underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency between January of 1987 and March of 2001. There were 117 female patients and 133 male patients, with a mean age at primary sphincter pharyngoplasty of 7.6 years (range, 1 to 45 years). Diagnoses included velopharyngeal insufficiency alone (n = 63), velopharyngeal insufficiency associated with cleft palate (n = 127), velocardiofacial syndrome (n = 32), submucous cleft (n = 15), and other (n = 13). Pharyngoplasty revision was defined as any secondary surgical revision of the sphincter as determined by clinical evaluation and objective speech assessment. The pharyngoplasty revision rate was found to be 12.8 percent (n = 32). A favorable outcome was demonstrated in 30 of these patients (93.8 percent) after pharyngoplasty revision. Two patients, one with a diagnosis of a submucous cleft and velocardiofacial syndrome and the other with a cleft palate, required a second revision because of persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency. The revision rate was highest in those patients with velocardiofacial syndrome (21.8 percent) and lowest in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency alone (6.3 percent). Patients who required revision had significantly higher preoperative oral sentence nasometry (55.2 percent versus 46.1 percent; p < 0.01) and larger velopharyngeal areas (23.7 mm2 versus 18.9 mm2). There was no significant difference in age or sex for those patients who required a revision compared with those who did not require revision. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 4 months to 13.6 years). Sphincter pharyngoplasty is an effective procedure for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency using revision rate as the standard of success. It had an 87 percent primary success rate that increased to 99 percent after a single revision. Patients with velocardiofacial syndrome, more severe preoperative hypernasal resonance, and larger velopharyngeal areas were more likely to require pharyngoplasty revision.