Factors Influencing Career Choice of Allergy and Immunology Fellows-in-Training: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Program Directors Assembly Executive Committee.

BACKGROUND: As the burden of allergic and immunologic disease continues to increase, there is increased demand for a larger Allergy and Immunology (AI) subspecialty workforce. The field must prioritize the expansion of our workforce and the recruitment of exceptional and diverse trainees to ensure the vitality of the specialty. Although the AI fellowship match has traditionally been competitive, recent trends in fellowship applications have demonstrated fewer applicants per fellowship position. This trend has made recruitment a priority on the agenda of the national AI societies. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate key factors influencing the decision to choose the field of AI by querying fellows-in-training. METHODS: A survey was created and distributed yearly to fellows-in-training from 2017 to 2021 to identify factors influencing a career choice in AI. RESULTS: Approximately 59% of respondents rotated with AI in residency and 35% in both medical school and residency. Most respondents reported having a mentor in the field before fellowship, and many had their first exposures to AI during medical school (40%) or residency (32%). Most respondents decided to pursue AI during residency. The most common factors that influenced the decision to pursue AI were work/life balance, clinical aspects of the field, mentorship, and research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the decision to pursue a career in AI often occurs during residency training and is motivated primarily by work/life balance, clinical aspects of the field, and clinician mentorship. Our survey results could provide guidance to AI training programs on strategies to recruit exceptional and diverse trainees.

Evaluation of association of anti-PEG antibodies with anaphylaxis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism for anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has been widely debated; understanding this serious adverse event is important for future vaccines of similar design. A mechanism proposed is type I hypersensitivity (i.e., IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation) to polyethylene glycol (PEG). Using an assay that, uniquely, had been previously assessed in patients with anaphylaxis to PEG, our objective was to compare anti-PEG IgE in serum from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine anaphylaxis case-patients and persons vaccinated without allergic reactions. Secondarily, we compared anti-PEG IgG and IgM to assess alternative mechanisms. METHODS: Selected anaphylaxis case-patients reported to U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System December 14, 2020-March 25, 2021 were invited to provide a serum sample. mRNA COVID-19 vaccine study participants with residual serum and no allergic reaction post-vaccination ("controls") were frequency matched to cases 3:1 on vaccine and dose number, sex and 10-year age category. Anti-PEG IgE was measured using a dual cytometric bead assay (DCBA). Anti-PEG IgG and IgM were measured using two different assays: DCBA and a PEGylated-polystyrene bead assay. Laboratorians were blinded to case/control status. RESULTS: All 20 case-patients were women; 17 had anaphylaxis after dose 1, 3 after dose 2. Thirteen (65 %) were hospitalized and 7 (35 %) were intubated. Time from vaccination to serum collection was longer for case-patients vs controls (post-dose 1: median 105 vs 21 days). Among Moderna recipients, anti-PEG IgE was detected in 1 of 10 (10 %) case-patients vs 8 of 30 (27 %) controls (p = 0.40); among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients, it was detected in 0 of 10 case-patients (0 %) vs 1 of 30 (3 %) controls (p >n 0.99). Anti-PEG IgE quantitative signals followed this same pattern. Neither anti-PEG IgG nor IgM was associated with case status with both assay formats. CONCLUSION: Our results support that anti-PEG IgE is not a predominant mechanism for anaphylaxis post-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

Beta-Lactam Allergy Association with Surgical Site Infections in Pediatric Procedures: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about surgical site infection (SSI) risk among pediatric patients with reported beta-lactam allergy (BLA). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study at a quaternary children's hospital and compared procedures in patients ages 1-19 years old with and without BLA that required antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) during 2010-2017. Procedures were matched 1:1 by patient age, complex chronic conditions, year of surgery, and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program current procedural terminology category. The primary outcome was SSI as defined by National Healthcare Safety Network. The secondary outcome was AMP protocol compliance as per American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. RESULTS: Of the 11 878 procedures identified, 1021 (9%) had a reported BLA. There were 35 (1.8%) SSIs in the matched cohort of 1944 procedures with no significant difference in SSI rates in BLA procedures (1.8%) compared to no-BLA (1.9%) procedures. Tier 3 AMP was chosen more frequently among BLA procedures (P < .01). Unmatched analysis of all procedures showed that 23.7% of BLA procedures received beta-lactam-AMP (vs. 93.7% of procedures without BLA). There were no major differences in SSI on sensitivity analysis of BLA procedures that did not receive beta-lactam AMP (1.4%) compared to no-BLA procedures with beta-lactam AMP (1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective matched analysis of 1944 pediatric procedures found no increase in SSIs in procedures with reported BLA, which differs from studies in adults. We observed that the choice of beta-lactam-AMP was common, even in BLA procedures. More data are needed to delineate an association between non-beta-lactam AMP and SSI in children.

Distinct Characteristics and Chronology of Amoxicillin-Associated Reactions in Pediatric Acute Care Settings.

BACKGROUND: Amoxicillin-associated reactions (AARs) in children presenting as rashes are common, and recent data suggest that >90% tolerate amoxicillin on re-exposure. However, additional data would help pediatricians and allergists gain confidence in referring and testing children who experienced systemic symptoms perceived as "worrisome," thus leading to urgent medical evaluations. By characterizing the entire spectrum of AAR symptoms in pediatric patients presenting to emergency department (ED)/urgent care (UC) settings, we sought to increase our diagnostic acumen to guide subsequent allergy evaluations. OBJECTIVE: To fully characterize clinical features of rash and systemic symptoms in children presenting to the ED/UC with AARs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children seen in the ED/UC from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017, was conducted. Clinical features, chronology, and seasonality were detailed, and cases were classified into 3 previously described AAR phenotypes: maculopapular exanthem (MPE), urticaria, and serum sickness-like reactions (SSLRs), if they experienced joint symptoms. RESULTS: Children (n = 668; median age: 1.8 years) presented to the ED/UC with urticaria (44%), MPE (36%), and SSLRs (11%) typically on days 7 to 10 of amoxicillin. Although children with SSLRs were more frequently treated with corticosteroids (28%, P < .0001) and exhibited higher rates of "worrisome" features (fever, angioedema, or gastrointestinal symptoms; 73%, P < .0001), delayed-onset systemic symptoms were identified frequently in all 3 groups. ED/UC reutilization was unexpectedly high with 66 children (10%) returning to the ED/UC for re-evaluation. CONCLUSION: "Worrisome" symptoms are common in children presenting to the ED/UC with AARs. Future studies are needed to determine the impact on subsequent referral and allergy testing.

Predictors of Acute Care Reutilization in Pediatric Patients With Amoxicillin-Associated Reactions.

BACKGROUND: Amoxicillin-associated reactions (AARs) contribute to substantial health care utilization, with a reutilization rate of 10% in pediatric emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) settings. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of ED/UC reutilization by examining patients' clinical features and providers' management of AARs. METHODS: Through a retrospective chart review of 668 patients presenting with AARs over 2 years to the pediatric ED/UC, we examined clinical features associated with ED/UC reutilization, including rash phenotype, systemic symptoms (fever, angioedema, joint involvement, gastrointestinal symptoms), and providers' management (pharmacologic treatment and counseling). We then constructed a statistical model to predict ED/UC reutilization using stepwise backward model selection. RESULTS: ED/UC reutilizers were more likely to be male (P = .008) and have fever (P = .0001), angioedema (P < .0001), joint involvement (P < .0001), and gastrointestinal symptoms (P = .0001) during their AAR course. Rash phenotypes differed between groups (P < .0001), as ED/UC reutilizers more frequently exhibited urticaria. However, there were no differences in clinical management between groups, including pharmacologic recommendations, at the initial ED/UC encounter. In addition, our statistical model identified younger patients <2 years of age as more likely to reutilize ED/UC resources if providers did not document specific return precautions (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-7.7). CONCLUSION: Recognition of clinical features and treatment gaps associated with ED/UC reutilization will guide interventions to optimize care in children presenting with AARs, such as improved anticipatory guidance and early allergy consultation. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether these interventions will reduce ED/UC reutilization and facilitate timely allergy testing.

Anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities: A consensus report.

BACKGROUND: Despite a better understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of patients with anaphylaxis, there remain knowledge gaps. Enumerating and prioritizing these gaps would allow limited scientific resources to be directed more effectively. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically describe and appraise anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities based on their potential impact and feasibility. METHODS: We convened a 25-member multidisciplinary panel of anaphylaxis experts. Panelists formulated knowledge gaps/research priority statements in an anonymous electronic survey. Four anaphylaxis themed writing groups were formed to refine statements: (1) Population Science, (2) Basic and Translational Sciences, (3) Emergency Department Care/Acute Management, and (4) Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention. Revised statements were incorporated into an anonymous electronic survey, and panelists were asked to rate the impact and feasibility of addressing statements on a continuous 0 to 100 scale. RESULTS: The panel generated 98 statements across the 4 anaphylaxis themes: Population Science (29), Basic and Translational Sciences (27), Emergency Department Care/Acute Management (24), and Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention (18). Median scores for impact and feasibility ranged from 50.0 to 95.0 and from 40.0 to 90.0, respectively. Key statements based on median rating for impact/feasibility included the need to refine anaphylaxis diagnostic criteria, identify reliable diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic anaphylaxis bioassays, develop clinical prediction models to standardize postanaphylaxis observation periods and hospitalization criteria, and determine immunotherapy best practices. CONCLUSIONS: We identified and systematically appraised anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities. This study reinforces the need to harmonize scientific pursuits to optimize the outcomes of patients with and at risk of anaphylaxis.

Respiratory Infections in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency.

Recurrent and life-threatening respiratory infections are nearly universal in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD). Early recognition, aggressive treatment, and prophylaxis with antimicrobials and immunoglobulin replacement have been the mainstays of management and will be reviewed here with an emphasis on respiratory infections. Genetic discoveries have allowed direct translation of research to clinical practice, improving our understanding of clinical patterns of pathogen susceptibilities and guiding prophylaxis. The recent identification of inborn errors in type I interferon signaling as a basis for life-threatening viral infections in otherwise healthy individuals suggests another targetable pathway for treatment and/or prophylaxis. The future of PIDD diagnosis will certainly involve early genetic identification by newborn screening before onset of infections, with early treatment offering the potential of preventing disease complications such as chronic lung changes. Gene editing approaches offer tremendous therapeutic potential, with rapidly emerging delivery systems. Antiviral therapies are desperately needed, and specific cellular therapies show promise in patients requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The introduction of approved therapies for clinical use in PIDD is limited by the difficulty of studying outcomes in rare patients/conditions with conventional clinical trials.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccine allergy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A known history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the vaccine is the only contraindication to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination. It is important for pediatricians to understand the likelihood of an allergic reaction to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including its excipients. RECENT FINDINGS: Episodes concerning for anaphylaxis were immediately reported following early administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to adults. Although allergic type symptoms were reported equally in recipients of placebos and test vaccines in phase 3 clinical trials, post-authorization prospective studies state that 0.2-2% of vaccine recipients have experienced allergic reactions. Subsequent allergy testing of affected individuals has focused largely on evaluation of allergic sensitization to a novel vaccine excipient, polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG is a polymer incorporated in numerous pharmaceutical products because of its favorable, inert properties. The results of allergy testing in adults to date indicate that IgE mediated anaphylaxis to PEG allergy is rarely identified after COVID-19 mRNA vaccine reactions. Numerous individuals with presumed anaphylaxis have tolerated a second vaccine after evaluation and testing by an allergist, suggesting either misdiagnosis or a novel immune mechanism. SUMMARY: Confirmed anaphylactic reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are rare, likely due to a lack of preexisting IgE against the vaccine components, including PEG.

Potential mechanisms of anaphylaxis to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

Anaphylaxis to vaccines is historically a rare event. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic drove the need for rapid vaccine production applying a novel antigen delivery system: messenger RNA vaccines packaged in lipid nanoparticles. Unexpectedly, public vaccine administration led to a small number of severe allergic reactions, with resultant substantial public concern, especially within atopic individuals. We reviewed the constituents of the messenger RNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine and considered several contributors to these reactions: (1) contact system activation by nucleic acid, (2) complement recognition of the vaccine-activating allergic effector cells, (3) preexisting antibody recognition of polyethylene glycol, a lipid nanoparticle surface hydrophilic polymer, and (4) direct mast cell activation, coupled with potential genetic or environmental predispositions to hypersensitivity. Unfortunately, measurement of anti-polyethylene glycol antibodies in vitro is not clinically available, and the predictive value of skin testing to polyethylene glycol components as a coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccine-specific anaphylaxis marker is unknown. Even less is known regarding the applicability of vaccine use for testing (in vitro/vivo) to ascertain pathogenesis or predict reactivity risk. Expedient and thorough research-based evaluation of patients who have suffered anaphylactic vaccine reactions and prospective clinical trials in putative at-risk individuals are needed to address these concerns during a public health crisis.

Severity grading system for acute allergic reactions: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: There is no widely adopted severity grading system for acute allergic reactions, including anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions, thus limiting the ability to optimize and standardize management practices and advance research. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a severity grading system for acute allergic reactions for use in clinical care and research. METHODS: From May to September 2020, we convened a 21-member multidisciplinary panel of allergy and emergency care experts; 9 members formed a writing group to critically appraise and assess the strengths and limitations of prior severity grading systems and develop the structure and content for an optimal severity grading system. The entire study panel then revised the grading system and sought consensus by utilizing Delphi methodology. RESULTS: The writing group recommended that an optimal grading system encompass the severity of acute allergic reactions on a continuum from mild allergic reactions to anaphylactic shock. Additionally, the severity grading system must be able to discriminate between clinically important differences in reaction severity to be relevant in research while also being intuitive and straightforward to apply in clinical care. Consensus was reached for all elements of the proposed severity grading system. CONCLUSION: We developed a consensus severity grading system for acute allergic reactions, including anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions. Successful international validation, refinement, dissemination, and application of the grading system will improve communication among providers and patients about the severity of allergic reactions and will help advance future research.

Persistent, refractory, and biphasic anaphylaxis: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The use of inconsistent definitions for anaphylaxis outcomes limits our understanding of the natural history and epidemiology of anaphylaxis, hindering clinical practice and research efforts. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to develop consensus definitions for clinically relevant anaphylaxis outcomes by utilizing a multidisciplinary group of clinical and research experts in anaphylaxis. METHODS: Using Delphi methodology, we developed agenda topics and drafted questions to review during monthly conference calls. Through online surveys, a 19-member panel consisting of experts in allergy and/or immunology and emergency medicine rated their level of agreement with the appropriateness of statements on a scale of 1 to 9. A median value of 1.0 to 3.4 was considered inappropriate, a median value of 3.5 to 6.9 was considered uncertain, and a median value of 7.0 to 9.0 was considered appropriate. A disagreement index was then calculated, with values less than 1.0 categorized as "consensus reached." If consensus was not reached after the initial survey, subsequent surveys incorporating the aggregate de-identified responses from prior surveys were sent to panel members. This process was repeated until consensus was reached or 4 survey rounds had been completed, after which the question was categorized as "no consensus reached." RESULTS: The panel developed outcome definitions for persistent, refractory, and biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as for persistent and biphasic nonanaphylactic reactions. There was also consensus among panel members regarding the need to develop an anaphylaxis severity grading system. CONCLUSION: Dissemination and application of these definitions in clinical care and research will help standardize the terminology used to describe anaphylaxis outcomes and serve as the foundation for future research, including research aimed at development of an anaphylaxis severity grading system.

Frequency and spectrum of disease-causing variants in 1892 patients with suspected genetic HLH disorders.

This article explores the distribution and mutation spectrum of potential disease-causing genetic variants in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-associated genes observed in a large tertiary clinical referral laboratory. Samples from 1892 patients submitted for HLH genetic analysis were studied between September 2013 and June 2018 using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel approach. Patients ranged in age from 1 day to 78 years. Analysis included 15 genes associated with HLH. A potentially causal genetic finding was observed in 227 (12.0%) samples in this cohort. A total of 197 patients (10.4%) had a definite genetic diagnosis. Patients with pathogenic variants in familial HLH genes tended to be diagnosed significantly younger compared with other genes. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the PRF1 gene were the most frequent. However, mutations in genes associated with degranulation defects (STXBP2, UNC13D, RAB27A, LYST, and STX11) were more common than previously appreciated and collectively represented >50% of cases. X-linked conditions (XIAP, SH2D1A, and MAGT1) accounted for 17.8% of the 197 cases. Pathogenic variants in the SLC7A7 gene were the least encountered. These results describe the largest cohort of genetic variation associated with suspected HLH in North America. Merely 10.4% of patients were identified with a clearly genetic cause by this diagnostic approach; other possible etiologies of HLH should be investigated. These results suggest that careful thought should be given regarding whether patients have a clinical phenotype most consistent with HLH vs other clinical and disease phenotypes. The gene panel identified known pathogenic and novel variants in 10 HLH-associated genes.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: Clinical Presentations and Diagnosis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an overwhelming clinical syndrome associated with extreme immune activation. Familial HLH is caused by autosomal-recessive inheritance of gene mutations that cripple lymphocyte cytotoxicity. X-linked lymphoproliferative diseases and mutations in Nod-like receptor caspase activation and recruitment domain containing protein 4 (NLRC4) also feature HLH as a predominant manifestation. In addition, "secondary" HLH may occur in immunocompromized patients or in individuals with previously intact immune responses in the context of strong immunologic triggers such as EBV infection, malignancy, rheumatologic disease, and drug hypersensitivity. Regardless of the etiology, HLH is often fatal unless recognized and treated aggressively. Research over the last 20 years has led to many advances in diagnosis and treatment. Rapid testing strategies designed to quickly screen for immune activation and cytotoxic lymphocyte dysfunction are now clinically available and genetic panels/testing algorithms may accelerate a genetic diagnosis. Immunosuppressive treatment protocols have been refined, and experience is gaining with alternative and salvage approaches. However, these advances improve the outcome of patients only when the diagnosis of HLH is made. Ongoing education is needed to ensure medical providers can appropriately recognize and diagnose HLH. This Grand Rounds Review will summarize the clinical and diagnostic features of HLH and highlight known genetic causes.

Aberrant tRNA processing causes an autoinflammatory syndrome responsive to TNF inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise the clinical features, immune manifestations and molecular mechanisms in a recently described autoinflammatory disease caused by mutations in TRNT1, a tRNA processing enzyme, and to explore the use of cytokine inhibitors in suppressing the inflammatory phenotype. METHODS: We studied nine patients with biallelic mutations in TRNT1 and the syndrome of congenital sideroblastic anaemia with immunodeficiency, fevers and developmental delay (SIFD). Genetic studies included whole exome sequencing (WES) and candidate gene screening. Patients' primary cells were used for deep RNA and tRNA sequencing, cytokine profiling, immunophenotyping, immunoblotting and electron microscopy (EM). RESULTS: We identified eight mutations in these nine patients, three of which have not been previously associated with SIFD. Three patients died in early childhood. Inflammatory cytokines, mainly interleukin (IL)-6, interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and IFN-induced cytokines were elevated in the serum, whereas tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-1ß were present in tissue biopsies of patients with active inflammatory disease. Deep tRNA sequencing of patients' fibroblasts showed significant deficiency of mature cytosolic tRNAs. EM of bone marrow and skin biopsy samples revealed striking abnormalities across all cell types and a mix of necrotic and normal-appearing cells. By immunoprecipitation, we found evidence for dysregulation in protein clearance pathways. In 4/4 patients, treatment with a TNF inhibitor suppressed inflammation, reduced the need for blood transfusions and improved growth. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations of TRNT1 lead to a severe and often fatal syndrome, linking protein homeostasis and autoinflammation. Molecular diagnosis in early life will be crucial for initiating anti-TNF therapy, which might prevent some of the severe disease consequences.

Severe Delayed Cutaneous and Systemic Reactions to Drugs: A Global Perspective on the Science and Art of Current Practice.

Most immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (IM-ADRs) involve the skin, and many have additional systemic features. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) are an uncommon, potentially life-threatening, and challenging subgroup of IM-ADRs with diverse clinical phenotypes, mechanisms, and offending drugs. T-cell-mediated immunopathology is central to these severe delayed reactions, but effector cells and cytokines differ by clinical phenotype. Strong HLA-gene associations have been elucidated for specific drug-SCAR IM-ADRs such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, although the mechanisms by which carriage of a specific HLA allele is necessary but not sufficient for the development of many IM-ADRs is still being defined. SCAR management is complicated by substantial short- and long-term morbidity/mortality and the potential need to treat ongoing comorbid disease with related medications. Multidisciplinary specialist teams at experienced units should care for patients. In the setting of SCAR, patient outcomes as well as preventive, diagnostic, treatment, and management approaches are often not generalizable, but rather context specific, driven by population HLA-genetics, the pharmacology and genetic risk factors of the implicated drug, severity of underlying comorbid disease necessitating ongoing treatments, and cost considerations. In this review, we update the basic and clinical science of SCAR diagnosis and management.

High Level of Perforin Expression Is Required for Effective Correction of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis.

Perforin-1 mutations result in a potentially fatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) with heightened immune activation, hypercytokinemia, pancytopenia, and end-organ damage. At present, hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is curative, but limited by donor availability and associated mortality, making gene therapy an attractive alternative approach for HLH. We reported that perforin expression driven by cellular promoters in lentiviral (LV) vectors resulted in significant, albeit partial, correction of the inflammatory features in a murine model of HLH. We hypothesized that the level of perforin expression achieved per cell from ectopic moderate-strength cellular promoters (phosphoglycerate kinase gene/perforin-1 gene) is inadequate and thus engineered an LV vector using a viral promoter (MND; a modified Moloney murine leukemia virus long terminal repeat with myeloproliferative sarcoma virus enhancer) containing microRNA126 target sequences to restrict perforin expression in HSCs. We show here that the MND-LV vector restored perforin expression to normal levels in a perforin-deficient human natural killer cell line and perforin gene-corrected Perforin1-/- transplant recipients, whereas cellular promoters drove only partial correction. On lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus challenge, the clinical scores and survival improved only with the MND-LV vector, but inflammatory markers and cytotoxicity were improved with all LV vectors. Our studies suggest that although moderate levels of expression can result in partial amelioration of the HLH phenotype, high levels of perforin expression per cell are required for complete correction of HLH.