The influence of electrode-tissue-coverage on RF lesion formation and local impedance: Insights from an ex vivo model.

BACKGROUND: The influence of power, duration and contact force (CF) on radiofrequency (RF) lesion formation is well known, whereas data on local impedance (LI) and electrode-tissue-coverage (ETC) is scarce. The objective was to investigate their effect on lesion formation in an ex vivo model. METHODS AND RESULTS: An ex vivo model was developed utilizing cross-sections of porcine heart preparations and a force-sensing, LI-measuring catheter. N = 72 lesion were created systematically varying ETC (minor/full), CF (1-5 g, 10-15 g, 20-25 g) and power (20 W, 30 W, 40 W, 50 W). In minor ETC, the distal tip of the catheter was in electric contact with the tissue, in full ETC the whole catheter tip was embedded within the tissue. Lesion size and all parameters were measured once per second (n = 3320). LI correlated strongly with lesion depth (r = -0.742 for ΔLI; r = 0.781 for %LI-drop). Lesions in full ETC were significantly wider and deeper compared to minor ETC (p < .001) and steam pops were more likely. Baseline LI, ΔLI, and %LI-drop were significantly higher in full ETC (p < .001). In lesions resulting in steam pops, baseline LI, and ΔLI were significantly higher. The influence of CF on lesion size was higher in minor ETC than in full ETC. CONCLUSIONS: ETC is a main determinant of lesion size and occurrence of steam pops. Baseline LI and LI-drop are useful surrogate parameters for real-time assessment of ETC and ΔLI correlates strongly with lesion size.

Deep sedation with propofol in patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures-Is it safe?

Background: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) or left atrial tachycardia is well established. To avoid body movement and pain, sedative and analgesic agents are used. Objective: The aim was to investigate safety of sedation/anti-pain protocol administered by electrophysiology (EP) staff. Methods: A total of 3211 consecutive patients (61% male) undergoing left atrial ablation for paroxysmal AF (37.1%), persistent AF (35.3%) or left atrial tachycardia (27.6%) were included. Midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol were administered by EP staff. In case of respiratory depression, endotracheal intubation (eIT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was implemented. Risk factors for eIT or NIV were analyzed. Results: Mean doses of propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl were 33.7 ± 16.7 mg, 3 ± 11.1 mg, and 0.16 ± 2.2 mg, respectively. Norepinephrine was administered in 396 of 3211 patients (12.3%) because of blood pressure drop (mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg). NIV was necessary in 47 patients (1.5%) and eIT in 1 patient (0.03%). Procedure duration, high body mass index (BMI), high CHADS2-VASC2 score, high age, low glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, and low baseline oxygen saturation were associated with NIV or eIT. The only independent predictor for NIV/eIT was high BMI (>30.1 ± 9.0 kg/m2). Therefore, patients with a BMI of ≥30 had a 40% higher risk for the need of NIV/eIT during the procedure in our study. Conclusion: Sedation/anti-pain control including midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl administered by EP staff is safe, with only 1.53% requirement of NIV/eIT. High BMI (>30 kg/m2) emerged as an independent predictor for eIT/NIV.

Feasibility and safety of left atrial access for ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava.

BACKGROUND: In patients with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) ablation procedures can be challenging. We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of left atrial ablations in patients with PLSVC, especially when PLSVC is unknown prior to the ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective analysis 15 adult patients (mean age 64.6 ± 14.5 years, 53.3% male) with PLSVC undergoing 27 ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter were included. In 5 (33.3%) patients PLSVC was only discovered during the procedure. Transseptal puncture (TSP) was declared "difficult" by the ablating physician in 13 of 27 (48.2%) procedures and was not successfully completed in the first attempt in two patients with known PLSVC. Once TSP was successfully completed, all relevant structures were reached both during mapping and ablation in all procedures independent of whether PLSVC was known prior to the procedure. One major complication (3.7%) occurred in 27 procedures in a patient with known PLSVC. In the patients with unknown PLSVC no complication occurred. CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, left atrial access and ablation in patients with PLSVC is feasible and safe, particularly with regard to patients in whom the PLSVC is unknown prior to the ablation procedure.

Early arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: is it predictive for late recurrence?

BACKGROUND: Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is common after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF), but its clinical significance in patients with persistent AF remains unclear. We sought to determine the predictive value of ERAT for rhythm outcome after RFCA for persistent AF. METHODS: The study included 207 consecutive patients (mean age 66.4 ± 10.7 years, male 66.2%) with persistent and long-standing persistent AF undergoing de novo pulmonary vein isolation (± atrial substrate ablation). All patients remained off antiarrhythmic drugs. ERAT was defined as any atrial arrhythmia ≥ 30 s occurring within the first 30 days. Late recurrence (LR) was determined during follow-up visits scheduled 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-ablation using 7-day Holter ECGs. RESULTS: ERAT occurred in 143/207 (69.1%) patients as AF (60%) or atrial tachycardia (40%) and was persistent in 82% of cases. During a median follow-up of 22.2 months, LR occurred significantly more often in patients with ERAT than in patients without ERAT (92.3 vs. 43.8%, P < 0.001). The only independent predictors for LR were ERAT (OR 16.8, 95% CI 6.184-45.797, P < 0.001) and intraprocedural termination to sinus rhythm (OR 0.052, 95% CI 0.003-0.851, P = 0.038). Extending the blanking period from 30 to 90 days did not impact LR rates. CONCLUSION: ERAT following ablation of persistent AF is strongly associated with late arrhythmia recurrence, which challenges the assumption that ERAT represents merely a transient phenomenon. While limiting the blanking period to 30 days seems justified, the benefit of early re-ablations remains to be addressed in future studies.

RF electrode-tissue coverage significantly influences steam pop incidence and lesion size.

BACKGROUND: Steam pops are a rare complication associated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation and are hard to predict. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of coverage between the RF ablation electrode and cardiac tissue on steam pop incidence and lesion size. METHODS AND RESULTS: An ex vivo model using porcine cardiac preparations and contact force sensing catheters was designed to perform RF ablations at different coverage levels between the RF electrode and cardiac tissue. During coverage level I, only the distal part of the ablation electrode was in contact with tissue. During coverage level II half of the ablation electrode, and during coverage level III the entire ablation electrode was embedded in tissue. RF applications (n = 60) at different coverage levels I-III were systematically performed using the same standardized ablation protocol. Ablations during coverage level III resulted in a significantly higher rate of steam pops (100%) when compared to ablations during coverage level II (10%) and coverage level I (0%), log rank p < .001. Coverage level I ablations resulted in significantly smaller lesion depths, diameters, and impedance drops when compared to higher coverage level ablations, p < .001. In the controlled ex vivo model, there was no difference in applied contact force or energy between different coverage levels. CONCLUSIONS: The level of coverage between RF electrode, cardiac tissue, and the surrounding fluid significantly influenced the incidence of steam pops in an ex vivo setup. Larger coverage between RF electrode and tissue resulted in significantly larger lesion dimensions.

Early recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation is associated with inferior long-term outcomes: Insights from a retrospective cohort study.

AIMS: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the influence of early recurrence (ER) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term outcomes and to identify clinical variables associated with ER. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical and procedural data from 1285 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent PVI from 2011 to 2016. Kaplan-Meier, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze the influence of ER on long-term outcomes. RESULTS: ER was observed in 13% of patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed significantly different outcomes in 1285 patients with and without ER (49% vs 74%, log rank P < .01) and in 286 patients in the subgroup that underwent reablation (44% vs 79%, log rank P < .01). The hazard ratio (HR) of ER was 1.7 within 48 hours (5% of patients), 2.7 within 1 month (5%), 3.0 within 2 months (2%), and 6.4 within 3 months (1%) for late recurrence (LR), P < .01. ROC analysis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.79) resulted in 70.3% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity for a 14-day blanking period, and 53.1% sensitivity and 85.5% specificity for a 30-day blanking period. Female patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, P < .01) and those with diabetes (OR 1.95, P = .01) were at higher risk for ER. CONCLUSIONS: ER is observed in a substantial number of patients with paroxysmal AF after PVI and has a continuous direct effect on LR according to the timing of ER. Randomized trials are required to assess the safety and effects of reablations in a shortened blanking period on long-term outcomes.

EP radiofrequency generators: Significant offsets between selected and delivered power?

INTRODUCTION: For radiofrequency (RF) ablation, the EP Shuttle® (Stockert GmbH, Freiburg, Germany), Ampere® (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA), and SmartAblate® (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) generator models are most frequently used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between selected and delivered RF power for different generators. METHODS AND RESULTS: In an experimental setup, ablation catheters were connected to the EP Shuttle® , Ampere® , and SmartAblate® generators. The power delivered by the generators was measured using a current converter and an oscilloscope. The selected power displayed on the generator was compared to the actually delivered power measured by the experimental setup (n = 800 measurements). The offsets between selected and delivered power increased significantly with impedance (EP Shuttle® ). For example, at a selected power of 30 W, the delivered power was 40.3 W (EP Shuttle® ), 30.1 W (Ampere® ), and 28.1 W (SmartAblate® ) at an impedance of 200 Ω. In addition, ablation lesions (n = 80) were created in ex vivo porcine cardiac muscle preparations. The resulting ablation lesion size was calculated in caliper measurements. When the EP Shuttle® generator was operated at 200 Ω, the resulting lesion size was significantly larger than at 100 Ω. There were no significant offsets between power delivery and lesion size when using the Ampere® or SmartAblate® generators. CONCLUSIONS: The Ampere® and SmartAblate® generator models deliver accurate power as selected by the user. The power delivered by the EP Shuttle® generator exceeds the selected power by up to 40% depending on impedance. The findings were confirmed in ex vivo porcine heart experiments and should be considered in clinical practice.