Association between Changes in the Patterns of Antinuclear Autoantibodies during Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Therapy and the Development of Severe Immune Related Adverse Events.

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are unpredictable autoimmune-like toxicities induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). irAEs are a consequence of a breakdown in self-tolerance. ICIs can induce autoantibody formation, and the presence of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) has been reported in patients who developed irAEs. Our goal was to compare ANA patterns by indirect immunofluorescence at different timepoints before (baseline) and after the initiation of ICI treatment and to analyze the role of ANA pattern changes as predictors of irAEs. This is a 2-year-follow-up prospective study of 152 consecutive patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents. They were included from September 2018 until March 2020 in the Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain). We grouped patients into three groups: ANA de novo (patients who showed new ANA patterns at any time after ICI initiation), ANA (ANA positive at baseline without changes in the ANA patterns after initiation of treatment) and non-ANA (ANA negative at baseline and after ICI initiation). We did not find any association between the appearance of ANAs and irAE rates or the number and types of irAEs. However, patients in the ANA de novo group showed higher severe irAE rates (grade ≥ 3) than the other groups. Additionally, in most of the patients with severe irAEs (83.3%), changes in ANA patterns preceded irAE onset. In conclusion, we found ANA induction during ICI therapies in 22 patients and our results suggest that the appearance of ANAs may predict the severity of the irAE.

The integration of systemic and tumor PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1blockade agents.

BACKGROUND: Tumor PD-L1 expression is a predictive biomarker for patients with NSCLC receiving PD-(L)1 blockade agents. However, although increased tumor PD-L1 expression predicts responsiveness, clinical benefit has been observed regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression, suggesting the existence of other PD-L1 sources. The aim of our study was to analyze whether integrating systemic and tumor PD-L1 is more predictive of efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PD-(L)1 blockade agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy donors and 119 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 drug were prospectively included. Pretreatment blood samples were collected to evaluate PD-L1 levels on circulating immune cells, platelets (PLTs), platelet microparticles (PMPs), and the plasma soluble PD-L1 concentration (sPD-L1). Tumor PD-L1 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The percentages of circulating PD-L1 + leukocytes, sPD-L1 levels, and tumor PD-L1 were correlated with efficacy. RESULTS: No differences in the percentages of circulating PD-L1 + leukocytes were observed according to tumor PD-L1 expression. Significantly longer progression-free survival was observed in patients with higher percentages of PD-L1 + CD14 + , PD-L1 + neutrophils, PD-L1 + PLTs, and PD-L1 + PMPs and significantly longer overall survival was observed in patients with higher percentages of PD-L1 + CD14 + and high tumor PD-L1 expression. Integrating the PD-L1 data of circulating and tumor PD-L1 results significantly stratified patients according to the efficacy of PD-(L1) blockade agents. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that integrating circulating PD-L1 + leukocytes, PLT, PMPs, and sPD-L1 and tumor PD-L1 expression may be helpful to decide on the best treatment strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC who are candidates for PD-(L)1 blockade agents.