Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 260: 84-90, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103875

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the ophthalmology primary practice emphasis area by underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status using the American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO) Diplomates database. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The study was based on a retrospective review of the ABO database from 1992 to 2020. The datapoints recorded included age at time of graduation and at time of certification, sex/gender, self-reported race/ethnicity, year of graduation and of certification, region of practice in the United States, and the self-reported primary practice emphasis area within ophthalmology. The URiM cohort included self-identified Black, Hispanic/Latinx, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander individuals. Statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson χ2, Student t, and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 575 (10.1%) ophthalmologists self-identified as URiM, vs 5132 (89.9%) as non-URiM. Diplomates who were URiM were more likely to be female and to be older at the time of ABO certification than those who were not URiM (P < .001). Over time, there was a steady decrease in the percentage of diplomates who were URiM (P < .001). There was a statistically significantly higher percentage of URiM ophthalmologists who reported glaucoma as their primary area of emphasis (P = .039) and non-URiM ophthalmologists who reported oncology, pathology, international, or genetics (P = .015), but no significant differences in the remaining subspecialties (P ≥ .123). CONCLUSIONS: There were modest differences in reported ophthalmology primary practice emphasis areas between URiM and non-URiM ABO diplomates. Despite efforts to increase diversity in ophthalmology, the percentage of graduating URiM ABO diplomates has decreased over the past 2 decades.


Assuntos
Oftalmologistas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Certificação , Etnicidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Grupos Raciais
2.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 17: 1967-1974, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37457873

RESUMO

Purpose: To evaluate a novel sutureless glueless technique using a triple-layer dehydrated amniotic membrane (TLDAM) for pterygia excisions in surgical time, postoperative pain, epiphora, irritation, and FBS. Methods: Twenty eyes with pterygia underwent excision with mitomycin C. The conjunctival defect was closed with TLDAM placed on the dried scleral bed with the edges of the amniotic membrane tucked under the edges of the conjunctival defect. Surgical times were measured from injection of lidocaine to final placement of bandage contact lens. After a bandage contact lens was placed, the eye was patched until POD1. Patients graded self-administered questionnaires to rate pain, FBS, irritation, and epiphora on a scale of 1-5 (1-none; 5-severe) at POD1 and POW1. Results: Surgical times ranged from 6:55 to 12:00, with mean of 8:29. Compared with a previous study of sutureless glueless methodology, the difference in mean surgical time was 11.9 (p < 0.0001). Mean questionnaire scores were as follows: POD1 pain 1.8, FBS 2.3, irritation 1.0, and epiphora 2.6; POW1 pain 1.5, FBS 1.6, irritation 1.6, and epiphora 1.6. Compared to previous studies, this technique showed significantly improved pain at POD1 (p=0.0086, p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p<0.0001) and POW1 (p=0.0002, p=0.0016, p<0.0001). Significant improvement in irritation and FBS was noted at POD1 and POW1. See Table 1 for full analysis. Conclusion: The sutureless glueless technique using TLDAM is a safe and effective technique compared to current standard methods. There appears to be a significant benefit regarding surgical time and postoperative pain, irritation, epiphora, and FBS compared to previous studies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...