Spinal immobilization in the field: clinical clearance criteria and implementation.

Awareness of the health and financial repercussions of unnecessary immobilization has made cervical spinal immobilization controversial in out-of-hospital care. Clinical criteria for clearance of the cervical spine in the hospital based on mechanism of injury have been supported by many trauma centers. However, implementation of clinical criteria for cervical spinal clearance in out-of-hospital settings is not as well validated by multicenter studies or accepted by many emergency departments. This consensus group recommends that clinical criteria to determine "low-risk" patients be available for use by emergency medical services providers in out-of-hospital settings; however, training, audits, quality management, integration into the medical community, and extent of program implementation should be decided based on individual emergency medical services systems.

Outcomes of cardiac arrest in the nursing home: destiny or futility? [see comment].

OBJECTIVE: To compare EMS system characteristics and outcomes between nursing home (NH) patients and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients whose arrests occurred in a residence (home). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study reviewing OHCA from July 1989 to December 1993. Variables were age, witnessed arrest, response intervals, automated external defibrillator (AED) use, and arrest rhythms. Outcomes were hospital admission and discharge. Pearson chi-square was used for analysis. SETTING: Suburban EMS system. SUBJECTS: Patients > or = 19 years old with arrest of presumed cardiac cause, with locations at home or at a NH. RESULTS: 2,348 total arrests were complete for analysis, 182 at a NH and 2,166 at home. BLS and ALS response intervals were shorter for the NH patients. The NH patients were more likely to receive CPR on collapse, were older (73.1 vs 67.5 years, p < 0.001), were less likely to have had an AED used (9.9% vs 30.0%, p < 0.001), and were more likely to have an arrest bradyasystolic rhythm (74.7% vs 51.5%, p < 0.001). They were less likely to survive to hospital admission (10.4% vs 18.5%, p < 0.006) and discharge (0.0% vs 5.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During this four-and-a-half-year study period, no NH patient survived, even though % CPR was increased. Arrest rhythm is an important factor in this finding. EMS initial care for ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation NH patients, with less application of AEDs, was identified. This different response may adversely contribute to dismal NH outcome.

Prehospital clinical findings associated with spinal injury.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify clinical findings that are associated with spinal fracture and/or spinal cord injuries in prehospital trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at three tertiary referral centers in Southeastern Michigan. All charts of patients with spinal fractures or spinal cord injuries during 1992 and 1993 were reviewed. Patients with available prehospital records were included in the study analysis. Prehospital data points included documentation of head injury; altered mental status; neurologic deficit; evidence of intoxication; cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pain or tenderness; nonspecified back pain or tenderness; and a narrative for all other documented injuries. Hospital data collected included type and level of spinal injury and age and sex of the patient. RESULTS: Of 867 injury patients identified, 536 were excluded, leaving 346 analyzable fractures in 331 patients. The 346 spinal fractures/spinal cord injuries were distributed as: 100 (29%) cervical, 83 (24%) thoracic, 128 (37%) lumbar, and 35 (10%) sacral. Prehospital documentation of altered mental status, neurologic deficit, evidence of intoxication, spinal pain, or suspected extremity fracture was found for every patient with a cervical injury, 82/83 patients with thoracic injuries (99%), and 124/128 patients with lumbar injuries (97%). All five patients who were not documented as having one of the predictors had stable injuries. CONCLUSION: Prehospital clinical findings of altered mental status, neurologic deficit, evidence of intoxication, spinal pain, and suspected extremity fracture were documented for all patients with significant spinal injuries in this series. These findings may be useful to identify patients who require prehospital spinal immobilization.

Bystander CPR, ventricular fibrillation, and survival in witnessed, unmonitored out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether bystander CPR (BCPR) on collapse affects initial rhythm and outcome in patients with witnessed, unmonitored out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Student's t test, the chi 2 test, and logistic regression were used for analysis. SETTING: Suburban emergency medical service (EMS) system. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 19 years or older with witnessed OHCA of presumed cardiac origin who experienced cardiac arrest before EMS arrival between July 1989 and July 1993. RESULTS: Of 722 patients who met the entry criteria, 153 received BCPR. Patients who received BCPR were younger than those who did not: 62.5 +/- 15.4 years versus 66.8 +/- 15.1 years (P < .01). We found no differences in basic or advanced life support response intervals or in frequency of AED use. More patients initially had ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the BCPR group: 80.9% versus 61.4% (P < .01). The interval to definitive care for ventricular tachycardia (VT)/VF was longer for the BCPR group (8.59 +/- 5.3 versus 7.45 +/- 4.7 minutes; P < .05). The percentage of patients discharged alive who were initially in VT/VF was higher in the BCPR group: 18.3% versus 8.4% (P < .001). In a multivariate model, BCPR is a significant predictor for VT/VF and live discharge with adjusted ORs of 2.7 (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.4) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.5 to 4.0), respectively. For those patients in VT/VF, BCPR predicted live discharge from hospital with an adjusted OR of 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2 to 3.6). CONCLUSION: Patients who receive BCPR are more often found in VT/VF and have an increased rate of live discharge, with controls for age and response and definitive care intervals. For VT/VF patients, BCPR is associated with an increased rate of live discharge.