Laparoscopic Approach for Reconstructive and Ablative Procedures in Ectopic Pelvic Kidneys: A Challenge in 8 Cases.

Introduction and Objective: Laparoscopy is the most widely followed approach in ablative or reconstructive kidney surgeries. The aim of this study is to assess the utility and safety of laparoscopic approach in pelvic ectopic kidney surgeries. Methods: Between July 1, 2021 and June 30, 2022, 8 patients with pelvic kidneys; 4 with pelviureteric junction obstruction, 3 with pelvic stones, and 1 nonfunctioning kidney underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty, pyelolithotomy, and nephrectomy, respectively. The records of all 8 patients were evaluated retrospectively for analyzing the operating time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, intra- and postoperative complications, surgical difficulty, and the success in completing the case laparoscopically. The patients were followed for at least 6 months to know the outcome. After pyeloplasty the improvement in function and drainage as well were recorded. Results: Of 8 cases, 6 (75%) were completed laparoscopically. One pyelolithotomy and 1 pyeloplasty patient were converted to open surgery. The median operative time was 180 (140-240) minutes, median blood loss was 100 (50-300) mL, and median hospital stay was 4 (3-6) days. One patient, who had open conversion, had Clavien grade I complication in the form of prolonged fever. Pyeloplasty patients at 6 months follow-up showed improvement in symptoms as well as function. Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach has obvious benefits in pelvic surgeries. Laparoscopy for ectopic pelvic kidneys are challenging due to abnormal anatomy of vessels and kidneys. Proper exposure of kidneys and exact identification of vessels can accomplish laparoscopic procedure in ectopic kidneys successfully with patients having nil complications and early convalescence.

Prospective comparison of suture ligation and electrothermal sealing for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients.

Background: The use of sutures as ligatures has proven to be safe and reliable for the control of lymphatic vessels. The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) is a relatively new type of device that can be used to seal lymphatics. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EBVS for preparation of the recipient vessel during renal transplantation. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, EBVS (Medtronic) was compared with conventional ligature for the control of perivascular lymphatics in kidney transplant recipients. A total of 52 kidney transplant recipients were randomly assigned to two groups. In group 1, EBVS was used to control perivascular lymphatics, while conventional silk ligatures were used in group 2. Demographic characteristics, as well as preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables, were noted and compared between the groups. Results: The mean recipient vessel preparation time was 8.3±1.9 minutes in group 1 and 14.5±4 minutes in group 2 (P<0.001). The mean anastomosis time was 28.2±5.4 minutes in group 1 and 28.2±4.2 minutes in group 2 (P=1.000). The mean estimated blood loss was 101.54±44.60 mL in group 1 and 125.19±74.17 mL in group 2 (P=0.270), and the mean drain output was 51.42 mL per day and 57.50 mL per day in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.590). Conclusions: EBVS can be employed safely and effectively for recipient iliac lymphatic vessel dissection and sealing. EBVS is a fast, secure, and effective choice to permanently fuse the vessels and is a good option to avoid posttransplant lymphatic complications.

Consequences of the first and second COVID-19 wave on kidney transplant recipients at a large Indian transplant centre.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of data comparing the consequences of first and second COVID-19 waves on kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in India. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of 259 KTRs with COVID-19 to compare first wave (March 15-December 31 2020, n = 157) and second wave (April 1-May 31 2021, n = 102). RESULTS: KTRs during second wave were younger (43 vs. 40 years; p-value .04) and also included paediatric patients (0 vs. 5.9%; p-value .003). Symptoms were milder during the second wave (45 vs. 62.7%; p-value .007); COVID-19 positive patients had less frequent cough (32 vs. 13.8%; p-value .001), fever was less frequent (58 vs. 37%; p-value .001), and we observed fewer co-morbidities (11 vs. 20.6%; p-value .04). The percentages of neutrophils (77 vs. 83%; p-value .001) and serum ferritin (439 vs. 688; p-value .0006) were higher during second wave, while lymphocyte counts were reduced (20 vs. 14%; p-value .0001). Hydroxychloroquine (11 vs. 0%; p-value .0001) and tocilizumab (7 vs. 0%; p-value .004) were more frequently prescribed during first wave, while utilization of dexamethasone (6 vs. 27%; p-value .0001) and remdesivir (47 vs. 65%; p-value .03) increased during the second wave. Mucormycosis (1.3 vs. 10%; p-value .01) and ICU admissions (20 vs. 37.2%; p-value .002) were more frequent during second wave. The 28-day mortality rate (9.6 vs. 10%; p-value 1) was not different. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a different clinical spectrum of COVID-19 amongst KTR with similar mortality between the two waves at a large Indian transplant centre.

Donor and Recipient Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Obese Versus Nonobese Donors: A Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Obese donors are increasingly accepted for living kidney donation. Obese individuals benefit the most from minimal access surgery; however, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be technically challenging in these individuals. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RLDN) in particular may be hampered by excessive perinephric fat. We performed a prospective nonrandomized controlled study comparing outcomes of RLDN in obese and nonobese kidney donors. AIM: To compare operative parameters, donor complications, and recipient outcomes in RLDN performed in obese and nonobese donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2014 to April 2016, 200 donors underwent RLDN. Of these, 160 were nonobese (group I), and 40 were obese (group II). Preoperative parameters including body mass index, age, and sex, and operative parameters including total operative time, warm ischemia time, and estimated blood loss were recorded. Complications were compared using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Recipients' serum creatinine at day 7, 15, and 30 was compared between recipients who received grafts from obese and nonobese donors. RESULTS: There were 17.5% right-sided donors in group I and 15% in group II. Operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications were similar in the 2 groups, and there were no statistically significant differences. Serum creatinine in the recipients was similar on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RLDN is safe and efficacious in obese donors. It gives all the benefits of minimal-access surgery without compromising on recipient outcomes.

Extrarenal retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma with oncocytoma.

The simultaneous presence of renal angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma is a rare occurrence. Extrarenal retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma is an even more rare neoplasm, and its simultaneous presence with renal oncocytoma has not been documented. We present herein the first case to be reported in English literature.

Pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy in duplication of inferior vena cava: A series of four cases.

AIM: Complex vascular anatomy poses a major challenge to the donor surgeon. Here, we have described the technical nuances in retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy for the left kidney in the situations of a rare vascular anomaly of duplication of inferior vena. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2005 and June 2016, 1460 retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy were carried out in single surgical unit of our institution. Out of these four donors were found to have duplication of inferior vena cava (IVC). We retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data of these donors and studied the operative details for managing the duplicated limb of the IVC. RESULTS: The mean age of the donors was 42.5 (range 30-54) years. Mean body mass index was 26.9 (range 25.2-28.6) kg/m2. Mean operative time (defined as between giving skin incision to the skin closure [O. T]), was 230 (range 185-310 min). Mean Warm ischemia time (defined from clamping of the renal artery to the starting of the cold HTK perfusion, [WIT]) was 136 s (range 105-178 s). In two cases, the renal vein could be controlled distal to the duplicated limb. In one case, the duplicated limb was clipped while in another a stapler was used to take a cuff of IVC. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy can be performed safely in cases of duplication of IVC. Preoperative computerized tomography angiography with vascular reconstruction and surgical expertise is desirable in carrying out the procedure.

Laparoscopic repair of urogenital fistulae: A single centre experience.

CONTEXT: Sparse literature exists on laparoscopic repair of urogenital fistulae (UGF). AIMS: The purpose of the following study is to report our experience of laparoscopic UGF repair with emphasis on important steps for a successful laparoscopic repair. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Data of patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of UGF from 2003 to 2012 was retrospectively reviewed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was reviewed as to the aetiology, prior failed attempts, size, number and location of fistula, mean operative time, blood loss, post-operative storage/voiding symptoms and episodes of urinary tract infections (UTI). RESULTS: Laparoscopic repair of 22 supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistulae (VVF) (five recurrent) and 31 ureterovaginal fistulae (UVF) was performed. VVF followed transabdominal hysterectomy (14), lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) (7) and oophrectomy (1). UVF followed laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy (18), transvaginal hysterectomy (2) and transabdominal hysterectomy (10) and LSCS (1). Mean VVF size was 14 mm. Mean operative time and blood loss for VVF and UVF were 140 min, 75 ml and 130 min, 60 ml respectively. In 20 VVF repairs tissue was interposed between non-overlapping suture lines. Vesico-psoas hitch was done in 29 patients of urterovaginal fistulae. All patients were continent following surgery. There were no urinary complaints in VVF patients and no UTI in UVF patients over a median follow-up of 3.2 years and 2.8 years respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of UGF gives easy, quick access to the pelvic cavity. Interposition of tissue during VVF repair and vesico-psoas hitch during UVF repair form important steps to ensure successful repair.

Outcome of renal transplantation from deceased donors: experience from developing country.

BACKGROUND: In India, there are a large number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients waiting for renal transplantation (RT). Organ retrieval from brain dead deceased donor (DD) is getting increased attention as the waiting list for organ recipients far exceeds the organ donor pool. In our country, despite a large population, the number of brain dead donors undergoing organ donation is very less. DDRT is the possible solution to bridge the disparity between organ supply and demand. In India, the potential for DDRT is huge due to the high number of fatal road traffic accidents and this pool is yet to be tapped. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report DDRT outcome in 294 patients (age: 36.5 ± 14.1 years; male:female, 200:94) between 2005 and 2012. All patients received single-dose rabbit-anti-thymocyte globulin for induction and steroids, calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil/azathioprine for maintenance immunosuppression. RESULTS: Our retrospective study in 294 DDRT shows a fairly successful outcome. Over a mean follow-up of 3.93 years, patient and graft survival rates were 81.7% and 92.6%, respectively, with a median serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dL. 20.7% had biopsy-proven acute rejection. CONCLUSION: Given the widespread organ shortage, DDRT has a potential to expand the donor pool and shorten the waiting list for RT, encouraging the use of this approach even in low-income countries. Aggressive donor management, increasing public awareness about the concept of organ donation, good communication between clinician and the family members, and a well-trained team of transplant coordinators can help in improving the number of organ donations.

Increasing access to renal transplantation in India through our single-center kidney paired donation program: a model for the developing world to prevent commercial transplantation.

Because access to transplantation with HLA-desensitization protocols and ABO incompatible transplantation is very limited due to high costs and increased risk of infections from more intense immunosuppression, kidney paired donation (KPD) promises hope to a growing number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient in India. We present a government and institutional ethical review board approved study of 56 ESRD patients [25 two-way and 2 three-way pairs] who consented to participate in KPD transplantation at our center in 2013, performed to avoid blood group incompatibility (n = 52) or positive cross-match (n = 4). All patients had anatomic, functional, and immunologically comparable donors. The waiting time in KPD was short as compared to deceased donor transplantation. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed in 54 donors. Donor relationships were spousal (n = 40), parental (n = 13), others (n = 3), with median HLA match of 1. Graft survival was 97.5%. Three patients died with functioning graft. 16% had biopsy-proven acute rejection. Mean serum creatinine was 1.2 mg/dl at 0.73 ± 0.32 months follow-up. KPD is a viable, legal, and rapidly growing modality for facilitating LDRT for patients who are incompatible with their healthy, willing living donor. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center report from India.

Laparoscopic en bloc kidney transplantation.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is well establish procedure and having advantages over open donor nephrectomy in terms of having less pain, early ambulation and rapid post operative recovery. To extend the advantages of laparoscopic surgery to the recipient, recently we have performed laparoscopic kidney transplantations when kidney was procured from deceased donors. As a further extension of the procedure, here we present a case of laparoscopic en bloc kidney transplantation in obese diabetic recipient who received kidneys from 70 year old non-heart beating donor.

Modified laparoscopic abdominal vesico-vaginal fistula repair--"Mini-O'Conor" vesicotomy.

AIM: The aim of this work was to report on our experience with the laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistulae and describe a modification in technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, 8 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula. All patients had fistulae secondary to gynecologic surgery. Two patients had undergone previous failed attempts at repair. The mean interval prior to repair was 3.5 months. Patient underwent repair by using a limited cystotomy. RESULTS: The operation was successfully completed in all cases. Mean operative time was 145 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss 60 mL. There were no complications. Catheter removal was done at 14 days. All patients were continent after catheter removal and remained continent at a mean follow-up of 29 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula is safe and effective. Bivalving of the bladder may be avoided by use of a small cystotomy, with the potential benefits of shorter operative time and reduced bladder spasms.

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for nephrocolonic fistula due to tuberculous nonfunctioning kidney.

AIM: The aim of this paper was to evaluate feasibility of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in a patient with nephrocolonic fistula due to tuberculosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 20-year-old female had presented with high-grade fever. Percutaneous drainage of the kidney for pyonephrosis was performed as an initial drainage procedure. Retrograde pyelography revealed a nephrocolonic fistula. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with intracorporeal suturing of the defect in the colon was performed. RESULTS: Operative time was 245 minutes and blood loss was 170 mL. Total hospital stay was 7 days. Histopathology of the removed kidney confirmed the diagnosis of tuberculosis. At 1 year of follow-up, she gained 5 kg of body weight after a complete course of antituberculous drugs. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for tuberculous nephrocolonic fistula is feasible and safe.