The Norwegian naturalistic treatment study of depression in general practice (NORDEP)-I: randomised double blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of emotional support and counselling combined with placebo or antidepressants with single or dual mechanism of action in the treatment of depression in primary care. DESIGN: Randomised double blind study. SETTING: Several locations in Norway. SUBJECTS: 372 patients with depression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement (clinical remission) reported both by the patient (Montgomery Asberg depression rating scale) and the physician (clinical global improvement and impression scales). RESULTS: Intention to treat analyses showed 47% remission in patients randomised to placebo compared with 61% remission in patients randomised to sertraline (odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.96) and 54% in patients randomised to mianserin (0.75, 0.44 to 1.27). Women responded better than men (1.86, 1.17 to 2.96). Subgroup analyses showed that subjects with recurrent depression (n=273) responded more frequently to sertraline than to placebo (0.43, 0.23 to 0.82) than those having their first episode of depression (1.18, 0.39 to 3.61). Statistically significant interactions between type of drug treatment and history of depression were not shown by logistic regression. CONCLUSION: The combination of active drug and simple psychological treatment (counselling, emotional support, and close follow up over a 24 week period) was more effective than simple psychological treatment alone, in particular for those with recurrent depression. Overall, women may benefit more than men. If confirmed in future studies, the findings should lead to more differentiated treatment guidelines for depression in primary care.

Withdrawal reactions to diazepam in combined imipramine/diazepam treatment of primary nonagitated depressed outpatients.

Twenty-seven outpatients who had primary nonagitated depression that had been treated for 3.5 months with imipramine were included in the study. Of these, 14 patients were given additional diazepam treatment (10 mg/day) and 13 patients got placebo. The additional medication was stopped, and withdrawal reactions were observed after two weeks. The depression scores (both global evaluation and CPRS) increased significantly in the diazepam group, without any changes in the placebo group. Eleven patients in the diazepam group and four in the placebo group reported their condition as impaired after discontinuing their additional medication. Four patients in the placebo group and none in the diazepam group reported improvement. The level of working activity decreased significantly in the diazepam group and increased in the placebo group. The serum level of imipramine decreased in the placebo group (P = 0.07), but not in the diazepam group. Serum levels of desipramine decreased significantly in both groups (P less than 0.05). Our study indicates that the discontinuation of diazepam, even when given in moderate dosage over a relatively short period of time, may cause withdrawal reactions in combined antidepressant/diazepam treatment. This may be caused by a possible tendency for the depression to become chronic. Such chronicity may be the reason for secondary dependency to diazepam.

Comparison of the serum levels in primary non-agitated depressed out-patients treated with imipramine in combination with placebo, diazepam or dixyrazine.

Sixty-three non-agitated depressed out-patients were selected according to the Feighner-Robins-Guze criteria for primary depressions for a double-blind, between-patient randomized study for an 8 week duration. All the patients were treated with imipramine following a fixed dose schedule for the first 2 weeks and thereafter according to clinical response (100-200 mg/day). This treatment was combined with either placebo, diazepam (10 mg/day) or dixyrazine (50 mg/day). The serum concentration of imipramine both at 2 weeks and later was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in the group treated with dixyrazine than in the other two groups. In the group treated with diazepam, the serum levels of imipramine and desipramine were significantly lower than in the placebo group. The serum concentrations of diazepam, desmethyldiazepam and dixyrazine were almost unchanged during the study. No significant correlation was found between the dosage and the serum concentration of imipramine or desipramine. The change in mean CPRS-score correlated neither with the imipramine nor with the desipramine serum levels, it did correlate but negatively with the degree of side effects. The degree of side effects correlated positively with the serum concentration of desipramine.

A double blind study in out-patients with primary non-agitated depression treated with imipramine in combination with placebo, diazepam or dixyrazine.

Sixty-three out-patients suffering from primary non-agitated depression were included in a double-blind, between-patient randomized study. All patients were treated with imipramine (100-200 mg-day) combined with either placebo, diazepam (10 mg/day) or dixyrazine (50 mg/day) for 8 weeks. The clinical efficacy assessed with a subscale of CPRS was significantly (p1 less than or equal to 0.05) better for the imipramine-dixyrazine combination than for the imipramine-diazepam or imipramine-placebo combination. Serum concentration of imipramine was significantly higher (p1 less than or equal to 0.05) in the group treated with dixyrazine than in the other two groups. Further, serum concentration of imipramine in the diazepam group was significantly lower (p1 less than or equal to 0.05) than in the placebo group. At the end of the study, 67% in both the placebo and the diazepam group and 86% in the dixyrazine group were practically symptom-free.