Spasticity treatment facilitates direct care delivery for adults with profound intellectual disability.

Many adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) have spasticity, where increased muscle tone impairs activities of daily living (ADL) self-performance and care delivery. There are few reports of spasticity treatment for people with ID, and none of functionally meaningful outcomes. Our objective is to determine the effect of comprehensive spasticity management on ADL self-performance and care delivery. Baseline evaluation included repeated modified Ashworth and range of motion assessments, and timed and videotaped care task observations. Spasticity treatment was initiated immediately thereafter. Follow-up evaluation was conducted after spasticity management was optimized, one year after initiation. All individuals with spasticity at a single developmental center for whom treatment goals could be identified were included. Treatment was recommended by a neurologist from any accepted treatment for spasticity except oral medications, including botulinum neurotoxin A, intrathecal baclofen and orthopedic procedures. The main outcome measure is comparison of ease of videotaped care delivery, rated by direct caregivers blinded to participant treatment status. Spasticity treatment resulted in significant improvement across all outcome measures. Range of motion improved by 9 degrees (P = 0.005) and MAS by 0.4 (P = 0.022). Participants took 14% percent less time to complete tasks post-treatment (P = 0.01). Thirteen caregivers completed evaluations of 35 video pairs with an intra-class correlation of 0.9. After treatment, undergarment change (P = 0.031) and shirt change (P = 0.017) were rated easier, and all goals (P = 0.0006). Transfers trended toward improvement (P = 0.053). This study shows comprehensive spasticity management provides meaningful improvement in ADL care for patients with ID, which may improve quality of life and reduce caregiver burden.

Spasticity in adults living in a developmental center.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the prevalence of spasticity among adults living in a developmental center and to document the development of spasticity treatment plans for this population. DESIGN: Descriptions of the clinical features of medical disorders and a prevalence survey. SETTING: Residential developmental center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred three adults. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics described included the prevalence of spasticity in this population, the specific spasticity diagnosis, functional goals for spasticity treatment identified by the participants' multidisciplinary teams, and the specific treatment indicated by the neurologist. RESULTS: Of the 103 people diagnosed by the neurologist, 24 had diplegic spasticity, 4 had hemiplegic spasticity, 44 had quadriplegic spasticity, and 31 had no spasticity. Functional goals identified by multidisciplinary teams were undergarment change (46.3% of the persons for whom goals were identified), splinting hands (11%), dressing (57.4%), hygiene (20.4%), wheelchair positioning (25.9%), ambulation improvement (14.8%), and transfers (9.3%). After physical and occupational therapy, the first invasive treatments indicated for people with spasticity included botulinum toxin injections (60%), intrathecal baclofen (26.4%), orthopedic surgery (5.6%), and medication (1.4%). No treatment was recommended for 25% of the spasticity patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of spasticity was 35% in this developmental center population of 205 individuals. A multidisciplinary team approach to the evaluation of adults with spasticity who live in a developmental center makes it possible to identify functional goals that are amenable to spasticity treatment and minimizes treatment that does not target specific functional goals.

Deep brain stimulation: a new treatment for Parkinson's disease.

Patients suffering from advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) often experience an array of symptoms that greatly affect their quality of life. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the bilateral subthalamic nuclei (STN) has produced remarkable improvements in people with advanced PD whose symptoms are not adequately controlled with medication. We present a case report on a patient who has benefitted immensely from bilateral STN stimulation. Levodopa responsiveness, disabling motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, cognition, and concurrent illness are major factors in identifying candidates who will receive the greatest benefit.