Surrogacy validation for time-to-event outcomes with illness-death frailty models.

A common practice in clinical trials is to evaluate a treatment effect on an intermediate outcome when the true outcome of interest would be difficult or costly to measure. We consider how to validate intermediate outcomes in a causally-valid way when the trial outcomes are time-to-event. Using counterfactual outcomes, those that would be observed if the counterfactual treatment had been given, the causal association paradigm assesses the relationship of the treatment effect on the surrogate outcome with the treatment effect on the true, primary outcome. In particular, we propose illness-death models to accommodate the censored and semicompeting risk structure of survival data. The proposed causal version of these models involves estimable and counterfactual frailty terms. Via these multistate models, we characterize what a valid surrogate would look like using a causal effect predictiveness plot. We evaluate the estimation properties of a Bayesian method using Markov chain Monte Carlo and assess the sensitivity of our model assumptions. Our motivating data source is a localized prostate cancer clinical trial where the two survival outcomes are time to distant metastasis and time to death.

Solutions for surrogacy validation with longitudinal outcomes for a gene therapy.

Valid surrogate endpoints S can be used as a substitute for a true outcome of interest T to measure treatment efficacy in a clinical trial. We propose a causal inference approach to validate a surrogate by incorporating longitudinal measurements of the true outcomes using a mixed modeling approach, and we define models and quantities for validation that may vary across the study period using principal surrogacy criteria. We consider a surrogate-dependent treatment efficacy curve that allows us to validate the surrogate at different time points. We extend these methods to accommodate a delayed-start treatment design where all patients eventually receive the treatment. Not all parameters are identified in the general setting. We apply a Bayesian approach for estimation and inference, utilizing more informative prior distributions for selected parameters. We consider the sensitivity of these prior assumptions as well as assumptions of independence among certain counterfactual quantities conditional on pretreatment covariates to improve identifiability. We examine the frequentist properties (bias of point and variance estimates, credible interval coverage) of a Bayesian imputation method. Our work is motivated by a clinical trial of a gene therapy where the functional outcomes are measured repeatedly throughout the trial.

Persistent organic pollutant exposure contributes to Black/White differences in leukocyte telomere length in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Despite racial disparities in diseases of aging and premature mortality, non-Hispanic Black Americans tend to have longer leukocyte telomere length (LTL), a biomarker of cellular aging, than non-Hispanic White Americans. Previous findings suggest that exposure to certain persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is both racially-patterned and associated with longer LTL. We examine whether Black/White differences in LTL are explained by differences in exposure to 15 POPs by estimating the indirect effect (IE) of self-reported race on LTL that is mediated through nine polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), three furans, and three dioxins, as well as their mixtures. Our study population includes 1,251 adults from the 1999-2000 and 2001-2002 cycles of the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We characterized single-pollutant mediation effects by constructing survey-weighted linear regression models. We also implemented various approaches to quantify a global mediation effect of all POPs, including unpenalized linear regression, ridge regression, and examination of three summary exposure scores. We found support for the hypothesis that exposure to PCBs partially mediates Black/White differences in LTL. In single-pollutant models, there were significant IEs of race on LTL through six individual PCBs (118, 138, 153, 170, 180, and 187). Ridge regression (0.013, CI 0.001, 0.023; 26.0% mediated) and models examining summative exposure scores with linear combinations derived from principal components analysis (0.019, CI 0.009, 0.029; 34.8% mediated) and Toxic Equivalency Quotient (TEQ) scores (0.016, CI 0.005, 0.026; 28.8% mediated) showed significant IEs when incorporating survey weights. Exposures to individual POPs and their mixtures, which may arise from residential and occupational segregation, may help explain why Black Americans have longer LTL than their White counterparts, providing an environmental explanation for counterintuitive race differences in cellular aging.

Combined comparative genomics and clinical modeling reveals plasmid-encoded genes are independently associated with Klebsiella infection.

Members of the Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex frequently colonize the gut and colonization is associated with subsequent infection. To identify genes associated with progression from colonization to infection, we undertook a case-control comparative genomics study. Concordant cases (N = 85), where colonizing and invasive isolates were identical strain types, were matched to asymptomatically colonizing controls (N = 160). Thirty-seven genes are associated with infection, 27 of which remain significant following adjustment for patient variables and bacterial phylogeny. Infection-associated genes are not previously characterized virulence factors, but instead a diverse group of stress resistance, regulatory and antibiotic resistance genes, despite careful adjustment for antibiotic exposure. Many genes are plasmid borne, and for some, the relationship with infection is mediated by gut dominance. Five genes were validated in a geographically-independent cohort of colonized patients. This study identifies several genes reproducibly associated with progression to infection in patients colonized by diverse Klebsiella.

Estimating COVID-19 Vaccination and Booster Effectiveness Using Electronic Health Records From an Academic Medical Center in Michigan.

Introduction: Observational studies of COVID-19 vaccines' effectiveness can provide crucial information regarding the strength and durability of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and whether the protective response varies across different patient subpopulations and in the context of different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Methods: We used a test-negative study design to assess vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 resulting in hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or death using electronic health records data of 170,741 adults who had been tested for COVID-19 at the University of Michigan Medical Center between January 1 and December 31, 2021. We estimated vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of vaccination between cases and controls during each 2021 calendar quarter and stratified all outcomes by vaccine type, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and booster status. Results: Unvaccinated individuals had more than double the rate of infections (12.1% vs 4.7%) and >3 times the rate of severe COVID-19 outcomes (1.4% vs 0.4%) than vaccinated individuals. COVID-19 vaccines were 62.1% (95% CI=60.3, 63.8) effective against a new infection, with protection waning in the last 2 quarters of 2021. The vaccine effectiveness against severe disease overall was 73.7% (95% CI=69.6, 77.3) and remained high throughout 2021. Data from the last quarter of 2021 indicated that adding a booster dose augmented effectiveness against infection up to 87.3% (95% CI=85.0, 89.2) and against severe outcomes up to 94.0% (95% CI=89.5, 96.6). Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines showed comparable performance when controlling for vaccination timing. Vaccine effectiveness was greater in more socioeconomically affluent areas and among healthcare workers; otherwise, we did not detect any significant modification of vaccine effectiveness by covariates, including gender, race, and SES. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines were highly protective against infection and severe COVID-19 resulting in hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or death. Administration of a booster dose significantly increased vaccine effectiveness against both outcomes. Ongoing surveillance is required to assess the durability of these findings.

Incorporating baseline covariates to validate surrogate endpoints with a constant biomarker under control arm.

A surrogate endpoint S in a clinical trial is an outcome that may be measured earlier or more easily than the true outcome of interest T. In this work, we extend causal inference approaches to validate such a surrogate using potential outcomes. The causal association paradigm assesses the relationship of the treatment effect on the surrogate with the treatment effect on the true endpoint. Using the principal surrogacy criteria, we utilize the joint conditional distribution of the potential outcomes T, given the potential outcomes S. In particular, our setting of interest allows us to assume the surrogate under the placebo, S(0) , is zero-valued, and we incorporate baseline covariates in the setting of normally distributed endpoints. We develop Bayesian methods to incorporate conditional independence and other modeling assumptions and explore their impact on the assessment of surrogacy. We demonstrate our approach via simulation and data that mimics an ongoing study of a muscular dystrophy gene therapy.