Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJUI Compass ; 5(3): 366-373, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38481667

RESUMO

Objective: The aim of this study is to report the updated 2-year results of the intervention arm of the ROBUST III randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus standard endoscopic management of recurrent male anterior urethral stricture. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients included men with recurrent anterior urethral stricture ≤3 cm in length and ≤12Fr in diameter, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥11 and peak flow rate (Qmax) <15 mL/s. Patients were randomized to treatment with the Optilume DCB or standard-of-care endoscopic management. Primary efficacy endpoints measured at 2 years included freedom from re-intervention and changes in IPSS, Qmax and post-void residual (PVR). Secondary endpoint was impact on sexual function using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 127 patients enrolled at 22 sites in the United States and Canada (48 randomized to standard-of-care dilation and 79 to DCB dilation). Seventy-five patients in the DCB arm entered the open-label phase after 6 months. Participants averaged 3.2 prior endoscopic interventions (range 2-10); most (89.9%) had bulbar strictures with an average stricture length of 1.63 cm (SD 0.76). Significant improvements in IPSS, average Qmax and PVR were maintained at 2 years. Freedom from repeat intervention was significantly higher in the Optilume DCB arm at 2 years versus the Control arm at 1 year (77.8% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, there were 15 treatment failures and two non-study-related deaths. Treatment-related AEs were rare and generally self-limited (haematuria, dysuria and urinary tract infection). Conclusion: The Optilume DCB shows sustained improvement in both objective and subjective voiding parameters at 2-year follow-up. Optilume appears to provide a safe and effective endoscopic treatment alternative for short recurrent anterior urethral strictures among men who wish to avoid or delay formal urethroplasty.

3.
J Urol ; 210(3): 500-509, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555604

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Optilume BPH Catheter System is a novel drug/device combination minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The PINNACLE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Optilume BPH against a sham surgical procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were men 50 years or older with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and a prostate size between 20 and 80 g. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive treatment with Optilume BPH or a sham surgical procedure. Blinding was maintained for subjects in both arms and evaluating personnel through 1 year postprocedure. Follow-up assessments included the International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry, and other quality-of-life and sexual function assessments. RESULTS: A total of 148 men were randomized (100 active, 48 sham) at 18 centers in the U.S. and Canada. Subjects randomized to receive Optilume BPH saw a reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score of 11.5±7.8 points at 1 year posttreatment, as compared to a reduction of 8.0±8.3 points at 3 months in the sham arm. Flow rate was dramatically improved after treatment with Optilume BPH, with an improvement of +10.3 mL/s from baseline to 1 year (+125%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Optilume BPH provides immediate and sustained improvements in obstructive symptoms and flow rate while preserving erectile and ejaculatory function. Treatment is well tolerated and can be done in an office or ambulatory setting.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior , Hiperplasia Prostática , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Ereção Peniana , Ejaculação , Método Duplo-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Urol ; 207(4): 866-875, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34854748

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Optilume® drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a urethral dilation balloon with a paclitaxel coating that combines mechanical dilation for immediate symptomatic relief with local drug delivery to maintain urethral patency. The ROBUST III study is a randomized, single-blind trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Optilume DCB against endoscopic management of recurrent anterior urethral strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were adult males with anterior strictures ≤12Fr in diameter and ≤3 cm in length, at least 2 prior endoscopic treatments, International Prostate Symptom Score ≥11 and maximum flow rate <15 ml per second. A total of 127 subjects were enrolled at 22 sites. The primary study end point was anatomical success (≥14Fr by cystoscopy or calibration) at 6 months. Key secondary end points included freedom from repeat treatment, International Prostatic Symptom Score and peak flow rate. The primary safety end point included freedom from serious device- or procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with subjects having an average of 3.6 prior treatments and average length of 1.7 cm. Anatomical success for Optilume DCB was significantly higher than control at 6 months (75% vs 27%, p <0.001). Freedom from repeat intervention was significantly higher in the Optilume DCB arm. Immediate symptom and urinary flow rate improvement was significant in both groups, with the benefit being more durable in the Optilume DCB group. The most frequent adverse events included urinary tract infection, post-procedural hematuria and dysuria. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this randomized controlled trial support that Optilume is safe and superior to standard direct vision internal urethrotomy/dilation for the treatment of recurrent anterior urethral strictures <3 cm in length. The Optilume DCB may serve as an important alternative for men who have had an unsuccessful direct vision internal urethrotomy/dilation but want to avoid or delay urethroplasty.


Assuntos
Dilatação/métodos , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Adulto , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Dilatação/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 37(1): 440-448, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29095516

RESUMO

AIMS: The SUCCESS trial is a phase III study of the Vesair® balloon in the United States for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The purpose of this manuscript is to present the 3 month primary efficacy and tolerability outcome data. METHODS: The SUCCESS trial is a multi-center, prospective, single blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. Subjects were randomized on a 2.33:1 basis to either Vesair balloon placement or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of both a >50% reduction from baseline on 1 h provocative pad weight test and a ≥10-point improvement in symptoms on the Incontinence Quality of Life Survey (I-QOL) questionnaire assessed at the 3 month study visit. RESULTS: A total of 221 subjects were randomized, including 157 treatment arm subjects and 64 controls. The 3 month composite primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 42.1% of treatment group subjects compared with 28.1% of controls on intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.046). Treatment arm subjects were significantly more likely to report at least a 50% reduction in incontinence frequency on 7-day voiding diary (55.2% vs 32.3%, P = 0.002, ITT) and more commonly reported their incontinence was improved on Patient Global Impression of Improvement in Incontinence (PGI-I) at 3 months compared with controls (58.0% vs 37.7%, P = 0.007, ITT). No device- or procedure-related serious adverse events nor unanticipated adverse events were reported and no cases of urinary retention were observed. All adverse events fully resolved following balloon removal. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase three trial, the Vesair intravesical balloon achieved 3 month primary and secondary endpoints both objectively and subjectively.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/terapia , Oclusão com Balão/efeitos adversos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/psicologia
7.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 24(3): 222-231, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953076

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The "Stress Incontinence Control, Efficacy and Safety Study" (SUCCESS) is a phase III study of the Vesair Balloon in women with stress urinary incontinence who had failed conservative therapy, and either failed surgery, were not candidates for surgery, or chose not to have surgery. The safety and efficacy of the balloon at 12 months is reported for those participants in the treatment arm who elected to continue with the SUCCESS trial beyond the primary end point at 3 months. METHODS: The SUCCESS trial is a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled study. Participants were randomized on a 2.33:1 basis to either Vesair Balloon placement or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of both a greater than 50% reduction from baseline on 1-hour provocative pad weight test and an at least 10-point improvement in symptoms on the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire assessed at the 3-month study visit. Patients in the treatment arm who opted to continue in the trial were followed up prospectively up to 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 221 participants were randomized, including 157 in the treatment arm and 64 in the control arm. Sixty-seven participants in the treatment arm (42.7% of participants enrolled) were evaluated at 12 months, with 56.3% achieving the composite end point and 78.7% having greater than 50% reduction in pad weight from baseline in a per-protocol analysis. In an intent-to-treat analysis treating all participants who did not continue with the balloon as failures, 24% of the participants achieved the composite end point and 33.6% had a greater than 50% reduction in pad weight from baseline. Treatment-related adverse events in this group included dysuria (40.1%), gross hematuria (36.9%), and urinary tract infection (26.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In this phase III trial, symptom relief was maintained for those participants who continued therapy for 12 months. The balloon was found to be safe with no device- or procedure-related serious adverse events reported. Additional studies are warranted to determine which patient populations are more tolerant of the balloon and to assess the efficacy and safety of its longer-term use. Additional screening methods, including screening patients for balloon tolerability, are warranted to reduce participant withdrawals.


Assuntos
Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tampões Absorventes para a Incontinência Urinária/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento , Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia
8.
J Urol ; 167(5): 2123-4, 2002 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11956455

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We describe a novel technique of enhanced exposure during radical retropubic prostatectomy in cases with significant cartilage overgrowth at the junction of the symphysis pubis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At our institution 74 radical retropubic prostatectomies were performed between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 1999. In 9 cases (12%) exposure was limited by overgrowth of cartilage at the posterior aspect of the pubic symphysis. Electrovaporization of this cartilaginous outgrowth was performed using an extended Bovie tip on cut settings of approximately 250 W. using the Bard System 5000, Birtcher 5000 and 6400 series (Valley Lab, Boulder, Colorado). The cartilage was vaporized until flush with the pubic bone. RESULTS: This technique provided optimal exposure for direct visualization during the most critical part of the procedure. Added operative time was only 1 to 3 minutes. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were associated with this technique. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend this technique of vaporization when surgical exposure is limited by overhanging pubic symphysis cartilage. This technique enables better visualization during apical dissection, control of the dorsal vein complex and division of the urethra without additional operative time or surgical complications.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia/métodos , Cartilagem/patologia , Cartilagem/cirurgia , Eletrocirurgia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Sínfise Pubiana/patologia , Sínfise Pubiana/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...