RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective pediatric intensive care requires addressing many important aspects of care delivery during morning rounds, often achieved using a rounding checklist. Our objective was to develop a care goal rounding template and then double the reliability of discussion of rounding topics during morning rounds without the use of a checklist. METHODS: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement was used for this initiative. A care goal rounding template was established through discussions and consensus with pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) faculty. Rounds were audited in a blinded fashion over a 3-month period to obtain baseline data on rounding topic discussion. Three interventions were then trialed (plan, do, study, act cycles) over a 12-month period. Weekly reliability in rounding topic discussion was tracked. RESULTS: Baseline reliability with discussion of rounding topics was 36%. The first intervention included the use of a standardized progress note in the electronic health record, which contained topics and served to prompt the discussion on rounds. The second intervention was implementation of laminated cards provided to PICU fellows highlighting the elements of the care goal rounding template. The third intervention addressed a standardized handoff sheet often used during rounds. Mean reliability for discussion of rounding topics improved to 52% shortly following the second intervention. Reliability was sustained more than 1 year later. CONCLUSIONS: Following the establishment of a PICU care goal rounding template and various interventions, the reliability in discussing important care goal elements on patient rounds improved.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data describing the risk factors for extubation failure (EF) or tracheostomy placement in pediatric neurocritical care (NCC) patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit who were intubated for >24 h with an acute neurocritical illness and had an extubation attempt. Bivariate and multivariate statistical analysis was performed to determine significant associations of demographic, neurologic, pulmonary, and clinical variables with EF and tracheostomy placement. Analysis of predictive factors for EF (within 48 h) and tracheostomy placement during the hospitalization was conducted on a first extubation attempt group (n = 193) and a second attempt group (n = 23) who experienced either EF or a "late re-intubation" (>48 h-7 days). RESULTS: Traumatic brain injury (37.3%) and seizures/status epilepticus (31.4%) were the most common diagnoses with neuromuscular weakness patients having the highest risk for EF and tracheostomy placement. EF occurred in 20/193 (10.4%) patients after their first attempt and 6/23 (26.1%) after a second attempt. Compared to those with a fair/strong cough, patients with a weak/absent cough had a relative risk (RR) of 9.4 for EF (95% CI, 4.9-17.9, p < 0.001) and 6.7 (95% CI, 2.3-18.9, p = 0.01) for tracheostomy placement on the first and second attempts, respectively. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), endotracheal tube (ETT) secretion characteristics, and pulmonary variables were not associated with EF or tracheostomy placement. CONCLUSIONS: A weak/absent cough reflex is associated with an increased risk of failing extubation and placement of a tracheostomy in intubated pediatric NCC patients.
