Continuous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Infusion Using a Minimally Invasive Irrigating Catheter for the Treatment of Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage Within the Basal Ganglia: Case Reports.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) is a debilitating and highly morbid type of stroke with limited effective treatment modalities. Minimally invasive evacuation with tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has demonstrated promise for mortality/functional improvements with adequate clot volume reduction. In this study, we report 2 cases of continuous rt-PA infusion using a closed circuit, dual lumen catheter, and irrigation system (IRRAflow) for IPH treatment. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old man was admitted for acute onset left hemiparesis; he was found to have right basal ganglia IPH. He was treated with continuous rt-PA irrigation using the IRRAflow device, at a rate of 30 mL/h for 119 hours, with a total volume reduction of 87.8 mL and post-treatment volume of 1.2 mL. At 3-month follow-up, he exhibited a modified Rankin score of 4 and improved hemiparesis. A 39-year-old woman was admitted for acute onset left facial droop, left hemianopsia, and left hemiparesis; she was diagnosed with a right basal ganglia IPH. She was treated with drainage and continuous rt-PA irrigation at 30 mL/h for 24 hours, with a total hematoma volume reduction of 41 mL and with a final post-treatment volume of 9.1 mL. At 3-month follow-up, she exhibited a modified Rankin score of 3 with some improvement in left hemiparesis. CONCLUSION: Continuous rt-PA infusion using a minimally invasive catheter with saline irrigation was feasible and resulted in successful volume reduction in 2 patients with IPH. This technique is similar to the Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus rt-PA for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation (MISTIE) approach but offers the potential advantages of less breaks in the sterile circuit, continuous intracranial pressure monitoring, and may provide more efficient clot lysis compared with intermittent bolusing.

Cognitive Impairment After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The present systematic review and meta-analysis analyzes the available clinical literature on post-intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) cognitive impairment. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. A search of bibliographic databases up to July 31, 2020 yielded 2155 studies. Twenty articles were included in our final qualitative systematic review and 18 articles in quantitative meta-analysis. RESULTS: Based on analysis of data from 18 studies (3270 patients), we found prevalence of post-ICH cognitive impairment to be 46% (confidence interval, 35.9-55.9), with a follow-up duration ranging from 8 days to 4 years. The estimated pooled prevalence of cognitive decline decreased over longitudinal follow-up, from 55% (range, 37.7%-71.15%) within 6 months of ICH to 35% (range, 27%-42.7%) with >6 months to 4 years follow-up after ICH. The modalities used to evaluate cognitive performance after ICH in studies varied widely, ranging from global cognitive measures to domain-specific testing. The cognitive domain most commonly affected included nonverbal IQ, information processing speed, executive function, memory, language, and visuoconstructive abilities. Prognostic factors for poor cognitive performance included severity of cortical atrophy, age, lobar ICH location, and higher number of hemorrhages at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of post-ICH cognitive impairment is high. Despite the heterogeneity among studies, the present study identified cognitive domains most commonly affected and predictors of cognitive impairment after ICH. In future, prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes and standardized cognitive domains testing could more accurately determine prevalence and prognostic factors of post-ICH cognitive decline.

Decision-making for decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury aided by multimodality monitoring: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires individualized, physiology-based management to avoid secondary brain injury. Recent improvements in quantitative assessments of metabolism, oxygenation, and subtle examination changes may potentially allow for more targeted, rational approaches beyond simple intracranial pressure (ICP)-based management. The authors present a case in which multimodality monitoring assisted in decision-making for decompressive craniectomy. OBSERVATIONS: This patient sustained a severe TBI without mass lesion and was monitored with a multimodality approach. Although imaging did not seem grossly worrisome, ICP, pressure reactivity, brain tissue oxygenation, and pupillary response all began worsening, pushing toward decompressive craniectomy. All parameters normalized after decompression, and the patient had a satisfactory clinical outcome. LESSONS: Given recent conflicting randomized trials on the utility of decompressive craniectomy in severe TBI, precision, physiology-based approaches may offer an improved strategy to determine who is most likely to benefit from aggressive treatment. Trials are underway to test components of these strategies.