Oxygen uptake kinetics during treadmill walking in adolescents with clinically stable cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen uptake (V̇O2) kinetics have been shown to be slowed in adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF) during heavy-intensity cycling and maximal exercise testing. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated V̇O2 kinetics in adolescents with CF compared to control adolescents (CON) during a treadmill-walking exercise. METHODS: Eight adolescents with CF and mild-to-moderate pulmonary obstruction (5 girls; 13.1 ± 2.5 years; FEV1 67.8 ± 21.4%) and 18 CON adolescents (10 girls; 13.8 ± 1.8 years) were recruited. Pulmonary gas exchange and ventilation were measured during a single transition of 10 min of treadmill walking and a 5 min seated recovery period. Participant's walking speed was determined during a one-minute self-paced walking task along a 50-m corridor. A six-parameter, non-linear regression model was used to describe the changes in V̇O2 function during the treadmill walking and recovery, with monoexponential curve fitting used to describe the mean response time (MRT1) at the onset of exercise, and the half-life (T1/2V̇O2) at the offset of exercise. V̇O2 baseline and amplitude, minute ventilation and respiratory equivalents were recorded. RESULTS: V̇O2 kinetics were slower in CF group compared to CON group during the treadmill walking with a greater MRT1 (32 ± 14 s vs 21 ± 16 s; p = .04, effect size = 0.75). The T1/2V̇O2 was prolonged during recovery in CF group compared to CON group (86 ± 24 s vs 56 ± 22 s; p = .04, effect size = 1.31). The mean VE/V̇CO2 during exercise was the only parameter significantly greater in CF group compared to CON group (32.9 ± 2.3 vs 29.0 ± 2.4; p < .01, effect size = 1.66). CONCLUSION: V̇O2 kinetics were found to be slowed in adolescents with CF during treadmill walking.

Functional Electrical Stimulation Changes Muscle Oxygenation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease During Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Secondary Analysis.

We previously showed that functional electrical stimulation during cycle ergometry (FES-cycling) increased oxygen consumption (VO2), indicating that metabolism during exercise was increased. However, the effects on muscle oxygenation have never been studied. The aim of this secondary analysis was to analyse changes in muscle oxygenation during an FES-cycling session. Eight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme were enrolled. Each participant carried out 30 minutes of cycle ergometry with a constant load at 50% of peak oxygen uptake, either (i) with FES or (ii) without (Placebo-FES). Oxygenation of the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle over time was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during both sessions. External power output on the cycle ergometer was the same in both conditions. There were no differences in dyspnoea between the groups, although the concentrations of deoxygenated haemoglobin and myoglobin (deoxy(Hb + Mb)) in the VL were significantly greater during Placebo-FES than FES-Cycling (respectively +212 ± 65% vs. +84 ± 29%; p < 0.001), as was the decrease in muscle oxygen saturation (StO2) (p < 0.001). When adjusted for VO2, there was a greater increase over time in the deoxy(Hb + Mb)/VO2 ratio during Placebo-FES than FES-cycling (p < 0.0001). FES-cycling could be a useful strategy to decrease muscular deoxy(Hb + Mb) and limit decreases in muscle StO2, however this should be confirmed in larger studies.

Effect of backpack carrying on forced vital capacity in cystic fibrosis: A randomized crossover-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Backpack carrying impacts lung function in healthy children but the effect in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is unknown. METHODS: Three backpack positions were tested: no backpack (NB), a 12.5% body-weight backpack carried bilaterally (BB) or unilaterally (UB), at rest and during a 10 minute walk. Primary outcome was forced vital capacity (FVC). Secondary outcomes included comparison of cardio-respiratory variables within and between groups. RESULTS: Nine children with CF (13.3±2.6 years; FEV1 66±22%) and 18 healthy children (13.8±1.8 years; FEV1 107±30%) were included. FVC was reduced with UB compared to NB (68.5±23.3% vs 72.1±24.3%, p = 0.024) in children with CF. FEV1, MIP and MEP decreased more with UB in children with CF than in healthy peers. Increases in VO2, VCO2 and minute ventilation with UB were greater in the CF group during walking. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral backpack wearing affects FVC in children with CF and requires greater cardio-respiratory adjustments compared to healthy peers.

Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND: In the ICU, out-of-bed rehabilitation is often delayed and in-bed exercises are generally low-intensity. Since the majority of rehabilitation is carried out in bed, it is essential to carry out the exercises that have the highest intensity. The aim of this study was to compare the physiological effects of four common types of bed exercise in intubated, sedated patients confined to bed in the ICU, in order to determine which was the most intensive. METHODS: A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was carried out to evaluate the effects of four bed exercises (passive range of movements (PROM), passive cycle-ergometry, quadriceps electrical stimulation and functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling) on cardiac output. Each exercise was carried out for ten minutes in ventilated, sedated patients. Cardiac output was recorded using cardiac Doppler ultrasound. The secondary aims were to evaluate right heart function and pulmonary and systemic artery pressures during the exercises, and the microcirculation of the vastus lateralis muscle. RESULTS: The results were analysed in 19 patients. FES cycling was the only exercise that increased cardiac output, with a mean increase of 1 L/min (15%). There was a concomitant increase in muscle oxygen uptake, suggesting that muscle work occurred. FES cycling thus constitutes an effective early rehabilitation intervention. No muscle or systemic effects were induced by the passive techniques. CONCLUSION: Most bed exercises were low-intensity and induced low levels of muscle work. FES cycling was the only exercise that increased cardiac output and produced sufficient intensity of muscle work. Longer-term studies of the effect of FES cycling on functional outcomes should be carried out. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02920684 . Registered on 30 September 2016. Prospectively registered.

Effects of different early rehabilitation techniques on haemodynamic and metabolic parameters in sedated patients: protocol for a randomised, single-bind, cross-over trial.

INTRODUCTION: Early rehabilitation has become widespread practice for patients in intensive care; however, the prevalence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness remains high and the majority of physiotherapy is carried out in bed. Several inbed rehabilitation methods exist, but we hypothesise that techniques that provoke muscle contractions are more effective than passive techniques. METHODS: A randomised, controlled cross-over study will be carried out to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of early rehabilitation techniques on cardiac output (CO) in sedated patients in intensive care. 20 intubated and sedated patients will undergo 4 10 min rehabilitation sessions. 2 sessions will involve 'passive' techniques based on mobilisations and inbed cycle ergometry and 2 involving electrostimulation of the quadriceps muscle and Functional Electrical Stimulation-cycling (FES-cycling). The primary outcome is CO measured by Doppler ultrasound. The secondary outcomes are right ventricular function, pulmonary systolic arterial pressure, muscle oxygenation and minute ventilation during exercise. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Approval has been granted by our Institutional Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest 3). The results of the trial will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02920684.

Respiratory weakness after mechanical ventilation is associated with one-year mortality - a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragm dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients is associated with poor outcome. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) can be used to evaluate inspiratory muscle function. However, it is unclear whether respiratory weakness is independently associated with long-term mortality. The aim of this study was to determine if low MIP is independently associated with one-year mortality. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in an 18-bed ICU. Adults requiring at least 24 hours of mechanical ventilation with scheduled extubation and no evidence of pre-existing muscle weakness underwent MIP evaluation just before extubation. Patients were divided into two groups: low MIP (MIP ≤30 cmH2O) and high MIP (MIP >30 cmH2O). Mortality was recorded for one year after extubation. For the survival analysis, the effect of low MIP was assessed using the log-rank test. The independent effect of low MIP on post mechanical ventilation mortality was analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients underwent MIP evaluation (median age 66 years (25(th)-75(th) percentile 56-74), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 2 = 45 (33-57), duration of mechanical ventilation 7 days (4-10)). Fifty-four percent of patients had low MIP. One-year mortality was 31 % (95 % CI 0.21, 0.43) in the low MIP group and 7 % (95 % CI 0.02, 0.16) in the high MIP group. After adjustment for SAPS 2 score, body mass index and duration of mechanical ventilation, low MIP was independently associated with one-year mortality (hazard ratio 4.41, 95 % CI 1.5, 12.9, p = 0.007). Extubation failure was also associated with low MIP (relative risk 3.0, 95 % CI 1, -9.6; p = 0.03) but tracheostomy and ICU length of stay were not. CONCLUSION: Low MIP is frequent in patients on mechanical ventilation and is an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation. MIP is easily evaluated at the patient's bedside. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02363231) in February 2015.

Comparison of oxygen uptake during cycle ergometry with and without functional electrical stimulation in patients with COPD: protocol for a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has systemic repercussions that can lead to peripheral muscle dysfunction. Muscle atrophy reduces aerobic capacity, greatly limiting activities of daily living and quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation is the gold standard treatment for these patients, however, patients may not be able to reach sufficient training intensities for benefits to occur. Technologies such as functional electrical stimulation (FES) are currently being adapted and tested to enhance exercise training. We hypothesise that FES coupled with cycling (FES-cycling) will improve maximal uptake of oxygen (VO2) and aerobic capacity more than endurance training with placebo stimulation. METHODS: A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial will be carried out to evaluate the effects of FES-cycling on VO2 during endurance exercise on a cycle ergometer in patients with COPD. 25 patients with COPD will carry out two 30 min sessions at a constant load; one session with active and one with placebo FES. The primary outcome is oxygen uptake recorded with a metabolic measurement system. Secondary outcomes include ventilation equivalent for oxygen, ventilation equivalent for carbon dioxide, cardiac output, lactate values, perceived dyspnoea and perceived muscle fatigue. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Approval has been granted by our Institutional Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest 3). The results of the trial will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02594722.