Effect on the adherence to concomitant medications after initiation of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus / Efecto sobre la adherencia a medicaciones concomitantes tras el inicio del tratamiento con antivíricos de acción directa para el virus de la hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have associated comorbidities that require complex treatments. We sought to determine the impact of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for HCV on adherence to prescribed concomitant medications for associated comorbidities and to identify predictors of non-adherence to comedications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HCV-infected patients treated with DAAs in a Spanish hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 and followed-up by the pharmacy unit were included in the study. Adherence to concomitant comedication prescribed before and during HCV therapy with DAAs was compared to adherence during the same number of weeks before DAA initiation. Demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapy variables were analyzed to determine factors associated with non-adherence. A multivariate regression model was created for prediction of non-adherence to concomitant medication. RESULTS: Data from 214 patients using prescribed concomitant therapies were analyzed. Significant reduction on adherence to comedications was observed after initiation of DAA treatment compared with a similar period before therapy initiation (29.9% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.032). The univariate analysis showed that polypharmacy and presence of vascular disease were associated negatively with adherence to concomitant medications (87.8%, p = 0.006 and 84.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that HIV/HBV coinfection was associated with adherence (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.09-0.39), while polypharmacy was a predictor for non-adherence (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.48-13.92). DISCUSSION: Adherence to concomitant medications decreases in HCV-infected patients when DAA therapy is initiated. Polypharmacy is a predictor for non-adherence, while HIV/HBV coinfection reduce non-adherence rates. Polymedicated patients on DAAs might benefit from close follow-up and educational programmes to improve their adherence

INTRODUCCIÓN: Muchos pacientes con virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) presentan comorbilidades que requieren tratamientos complejos. Queremos determinar el impacto del tratamiento con antivirales de acción directa (AAD) para el VHC en la adherencia a medicaciones concomitantes e identificar factores predictivos de no adherencia a comedicaciones. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Pacientes tratados con AAD entre 2015 y 2016 se incluyeron en el estudio y se comparó su adherencia a medicaciones concomitantes antes y durante la terapia con AAD en un periodo de tiempo similar. Múltiples variables fueron analizadas para identificar factores asociados a la no-adherencia. Se creó un modelo de regresión multivariable para predecir la no adherencia a medicaciones concomitantes. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron datos de 214 pacientes en tratamientos concomitantes. Tras iniciar la terapia con AAD, la adherencia a las comedicaciones disminuyó respecto a la adherencia en ausencia de AAD (29,9% respecto al 36,9%; p = 0,032). El análisis univariante demostró que la polifarmacia y la enfermedad vascular estaban asociadas negativamente con la adherencia a las medicaciones concomitantes (87,8%, p = 0,006 y 84,7%, p < 0,001, respectivamente). El análisis multivariante indicó que la coinfección con VIH/VHB estaba asociada con la adherencia (OR: 0,19; IC 95%: 0,09-0,39), mientras que la polifarmacia era un predictor de no adherencia (OR: 4,54; IC 95%: 1,48-13,92). DISCUSIÓN: El inicio del tratamiento con AAD disminuye la adherencia a la comedicación en pacientes con VHC. La polifarmacia es predictor de no adherencia mientras que la coinfección con VIH/VHB la reduce. Aquellos pacientes polimedicados y en tratamiento con AAD podrían beneficiarse de un seguimiento estrecho para aumentar su adherencia

Effect on the adherence to concomitant medications after initiation of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have associated comorbidities that require complex treatments. We sought to determine the impact of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for HCV on adherence to prescribed concomitant medications for associated comorbidities and to identify predictors of non-adherence to comedications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HCV-infected patients treated with DAAs in a Spanish hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 and followed-up by the pharmacy unit were included in the study. Adherence to concomitant comedication prescribed before and during HCV therapy with DAAs was compared to adherence during the same number of weeks before DAA initiation. Demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapy variables were analyzed to determine factors associated with non-adherence. A multivariate regression model was created for prediction of non-adherence to concomitant medication. RESULTS: Data from 214 patients using prescribed concomitant therapies were analyzed. Significant reduction on adherence to comedications was observed after initiation of DAA treatment compared with a similar period before therapy initiation (29.9% vs. 36.9%, p=0.032). The univariate analysis showed that polypharmacy and presence of vascular disease were associated negatively with adherence to concomitant medications (87.8%, p=0.006 and 84.7%, p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that HIV/HBV coinfection was associated with adherence (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.09-0.39), while polypharmacy was a predictor for non-adherence (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.48-13.92). DISCUSSION: Adherence to concomitant medications decreases in HCV-infected patients when DAA therapy is initiated. Polypharmacy is a predictor for non-adherence, while HIV/HBV coinfection reduce non-adherence rates. Polymedicated patients on DAAs might benefit from close follow-up and educational programmes to improve their adherence.

Diseño y validación de una encuesta de satisfacción con la atención farmacéutica recibida en las consultas de farmacia hospitalaria / Design and validation of a satisfaction survey with pharmaceutical care received in hospital pharmacyconsultation

Objetivo: Diseñar y validar un cuestionario para valorar la satisfacción con la Atención Farmacéutica (AF) recibida en la farmacia hospitalaria. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico en cinco hospitales andaluces. En enero 2013 se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en PUBMED; términos MESH pharmaceutical services, patients satisfaction and questionnaire. Seguidamente se elaboró el cuestionario, según metodología Delphi, formado por 10 ítems, con variables demográficas, sociales, farmacológicas y clínicas; donde se preguntaba al paciente sobre la repercusión de la AF en su tratamiento y enfermedad y sobre la conformidad con el servicio prestado. El paciente podía responder desde uno=muy deficiente a cinco=excelente. Se realizó una fase piloto previa a la fase de validación de los cuestionarios. Análisis descriptivos y la medida del valor del alfa de Cronbach y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase (CCI) se llevaron a cabo en ambas fases. Se utilizó el programa estadístico SPSS versión 20.0. Resultados: Se incluyeron 21 encuestas en la fase piloto y 154 en la fase de validación (índice de respuesta 100%). De esta última fase, el 62% (N=96) eran hombres. Más del 50% de los pacientes contestaron de forma “excelente” a todos los ítems de la encuesta en ambas fases. Los valores del alfa de Cronbach y CCI fueron 0.921 y 0.915 (IC95%: 0.847-0.961) y 0.916 y 0,910 (IC95%: 0.886-0.931) para fase piloto y validación, respectivamente. Conclusión: Se ha diseñado y validado un instrumento de alta fiabilidad para medir la satisfacción de los pacientes con la AF recibida en las consultas de farmacia hospitalaria (AU)

Object: To design and to validate a questionnaire to assess satisfaction with pharmaceutical care (PC) received at the hospital pharmacy. Methods: Multicentric study in five andalusian hospital in January 2013. A bibliography search was performed in PUBMED; MESH term; pharmaceutical services, patients satisfaction and questionnaire. Next, the questionnaire was produced by Delphi methodology with ten items and with the following variables; demographics, socials, pharrmacologicals and clinics which the patient was asked for the consequences of the PC in his treatment and illness and for the acceptance with the received service. The patient could answer between one= very insufficient and five= excellent. Before the validation phase questionnaire, a pilot phase was carried out. Descriptive analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were performed in both phases. Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS statistical software package release 20.0. Results: In the pilot phase were included 21 questionnaires and 154 of them in validation phase (response index of 100%). In the last phase, 62% (N=96) of patients were men. More than 50% of patients answered “excelent” in all items of questionnaire in both phases. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and ICC were 0.921 and 0.915 (95%IC: 0.847-0.961) and 0.916 and 0,910 (95%IC: 0.886-0.931) in pilot and validation phases, respectively. Conclusions: A high reliability instrument was designed and validated to evaluate the patient satisfaction with PC received at hospital pharmacy (AU)