Effect of light-curing time and direction on microhardness of a light-cured resin composite to cement CAD-CAM restorations.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of light-curing exposure time and location on polymerization of a restorative bulk-fill resin composite to lute endocrowns. METHODS: A light-cured restorative bulk-fill resin composite (Filtek One Bulk Fill) was submitted to direct light-curing by a high-power LED light-curing unit for 20 seconds as the positive control group (n= 10). Five more groups (n= 10) were light-cured in a natural tooth mold from two sites (labial and lingual) through a nanohybrid resin composite CAD-CAM restoration (Lava Ultimate A2 LT), for different irradiation times: 90 seconds per site, 40 seconds per site, 30 seconds per site, 20 seconds per site and 10 seconds per site. Vickers microhardness measurements were made at two different depths and test/control ratios were calculated. Ratios of 0.8 were considered as an adequate level of curing. A quantile regression was run to identify the minimally sufficient time of light-curing, and a two-way ANOVA was used to compare the results to previous findings and evaluate the effect of curing location. RESULTS: Analysis showed that 40 seconds x 2 is the minimal irradiation time that presents a test/control ratio above 0.8. Quantile regressions showed that the required irradiation time to reach a test/control ratio of 0.8 at a confidence level of 95% is 41.5 seconds and 39.2 seconds at 200 µm and 500 µm depths in the luting agent, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between microhardness of the two depths except for the irradiation time of 10 seconds. The two-site to three-site light curing comparison showed no statistically significant difference except for the 90-second time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Systematic light-curing through the labial, lingual and occlusal surfaces of thick indirect restorations is not always required for sufficient polymerization and can even waste valuable clinical time especially in the case of multiple restorations luted with resin composites.

Fractography of clinical failures of indirect resin composite endocrown and overlay restorations.

OBJECTIVES: Compare failure modes and fracture origins using fractography on recovered clinically fractured parts of indirect resin composite endocrowns and overlay restorations on endodontically treated teeth (ETT). METHODS: Four endocrowns (3 molars, 1 premolar) and one overlay (molar) adhesively luted on ETT were recovered after fracturing during function. The time in service ranged between 4 and 48 months. The composite materials were (i) CAD/CAM LAVA Ultimate (N = 1), (ii) Premise Indirect (N = 2), and (iii) Colombus (N = 2). Fractography was performed by means of digital microscopy and SEM. Occlusal surfaces were checked for signs of fatigue degradation and contact wear. Cuspal plane angles were measured from profiles obtained from 3D digital microscope images with respect to the horizontal plane of the occlusal central crown groove. RESULTS: All five cases showed a wedge-opening mode I fracture, splitting the crown and tooth in two parts through the crown's central groove. Classic brittle fracture features (arrest lines, twist and wake hackle) were easily identified on the fracture surfaces. Multiple origins were located along the central groove in conjunction with the presence of fatigue cracks. Contact wear surfaces showed pitting and cracking. Cuspal plane angles were around 30-35°, except a 50° palatal cusp slope for the Lava Ultimate overlay. SIGNIFICANCE: Fractography on clinical fractures of resin composites was enlightening. Occlusal surface fatigue degradation from cyclic loading, mode I fracture from applied mastication forces on cuspal planes, and stress concentration within the crown's central groove, indicate limitations of use of these materials for endocrowns in posterior teeth.

Fracture strength of non-invasively reinforced MOD cavities on endodontically treated teeth.

The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the fracture resistance and failure mode of non-invasively reinforced endodontically treated mandibular molars. Sixty freshly extracted defect-free mandibular molars were divided into four experimental groups with extensive MOD cavities on endodontically treated teeth with different restoration types and one control group with intact teeth (n = 12). The groups were as follows: "Normal": direct resin composite; "Ring": glass fiber-reinforced strip (Dentapreg) wrapped around buccal and lingual walls followed by direct resin composite; "Inlay": indirect CAD/CAM resin composite inlay; "Onlay": indirect CAD/CAM resin composite onlay; "Intact": Intact teeth (Control). Tetric EvoCeram and Adhese Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent) were used for direct restorations and Tetric CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent) adhesively luted with Adhese Universal and Variolink Esthetic LC (Ivoclar Vivadent) were used for indirect restorations. All teeth were submitted to thermo-mechanical cyclic loading. All samples were then submitted to a compressive load until fracture. Fracture load was noted and teeth were analyzed to classify the failure mode as either catastrophic (C) or non-catastrophic (NC). No statistically significant difference was found between fracture strength of the five groups when all specimens were considered (p = 0.1461). Intact group showed the lowest percentage of catastrophic failures (41.67%). Ring group presents less catastrophic failures (75%) than Normal group (83.34%), and failures of indirect restorations-Inlay and Onlay-were almost all catastrophic (91.67% and 100%, respectively).