Safety of Subcutaneous Daratumumab in Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody-Naïve Patients with Plasma Cell Disorders: A Multicenter Real-Life Experience.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is used for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and light chain amyloidosis at an intravenous dosage of 16 mg/kg or at a subcutaneous fixed dose of 1800 mg. However, the subcutaneous formulation has only recently been approved in Europe, and real-life data on its safety are still few. OBJECTIVE: In this multicenter retrospective real-life experience, we provided evidence for the safety of subcutaneous daratumumab in plasma cell disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 189 patients diagnosed with MM or light chain amyloidosis were included in this retrospective study, and all subjects were daratumumab-naïve. Primary endpoint was safety of subcutaneous daratumumab, especially for infusion-related reaction (IRR) incidence and severity. All patients received premedication with dexamethasone, paracetamol, and antihistamine, with montelukast usage in 85% of cases. RESULTS: Eight patients (4%) experienced IRRs, mainly of grade I-II, and other frequent toxicities were: hematological (thrombocytopenia, 4%; neutropenia, 5%; lymphopenia, 6%) and non-hematological (pneumonia, 4%; diarrhea, 2%; and cytomegalovirus reactivation, 0.5%). In our multicenter retrospective real-life experience, subcutaneous daratumumab was well-tolerated with an excellent safety profile with a very low (4%) IRR incidence, even in frailer MM patients with severe renal impairment or increased body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous daratumumab was safe in a real-life setting including patients with severe renal failure and advanced disease. However, further studies on larger and prospective cohorts are required to confirm our real-life observations.

Efficacy and safety of belantamab-mafodotin in triple-refractory multiple myeloma patients: A multicentric real-life experience.

Belantamab-mafodotin is an innovative and selective treatment for multi-refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients; however, available real-life experiences on efficacy and safety are limited. In this real-world multicentric retrospective study, we enrolled 28 MM patients treated in four Hematology units of Campania region, Italy, who received a median of six treatment lines prior to belantamab-mafodotin. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (complete remission, CR, 11%; very good partial remission, VGPR, 11%; and partial remission, PR, 18%), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3 and 8 months, respectively. One of the most frequent drug-related adverse events was keratopathy observed in nine (32%) patients, leading to therapy discontinuation in only three (11%) of them. Moreover, 22 out of 28 total patients who were treated with at least two administrations achieved an ORR of 50% (CR, 14%; VGPR, 14%; and PR, 22%) with a median PFS and OS of 5 and 11 months, respectively. In conclusion, our multicentric study confirmed efficacy and safety of belantamab-mafodotin in triple-refractory MM patients even in the real-life setting.

Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended 3-year follow-up of a multicenter, retrospective clinical experience with 319 cases outside of controlled clinical trials.

The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloRd) enhanced the clinical benefit over Rd with a manageable toxicity profile in the ELOQUENT-2 trial, leading to its approval in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The present study is a 3-year follow-up update of a previously published Italian real-life RRMM cohort of patients treated with EloRd. This revised analysis entered 319 RRMM patients accrued in 41 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 6-55), 236 patients experienced disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18.4 and 34 months, respectively. The updated multivariate analyses showed a significant reduction of PFS and OS benefit magnitude only in cases with International Staging System stage III. Major adverse events included grade 3/4 neutropenia (18.5%), anemia (15.4%), lymphocytopenia (12.5%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%), while infection rates and pneumonia were 33.9% and 18.9%, respectively. No new safety signals with longer follow-up have been observed. Of 319 patients, 245 (76.7%) reached at least a partial remission. A significantly lower response rate was found in patients previously exposed to lenalidomide. In conclusion, our study confirms that EloRd is a safe and effective regimen for RRMM patients, maintaining benefits across multiple unfavorable subgroups.

Early mortality in myeloma patients treated with first-generation novel agents thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib at diagnosis: A pooled analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Early toxic death (≤60 days of diagnosis) in elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients is attributable to active disease, age and co-morbidities. Rate of early toxic deaths is 10% with conventional chemotherapy mainly due to infection and renal failure. Novel agents have improved MM outcome at the expense of newer toxicity. METHODS: We analyzed 1146 individual patient data to assess toxic deaths during induction treatment with first-generation novel agents thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib. RESULTS: During first-line therapy, 119/1146 patients (10%) died for any cause, and 47/1146 (4%) due to toxicity, including 12/1146 (1%) early deaths. The 24-month cumulative incidence was 4.1% without any difference between bortezomib (18/503 patients, 4%) and lenalidomide (29/643patients, 5%; p = 0.31). Toxic deaths occurred in 34/1039 (3%) patients <80 years and 13/107 (12%) patients ≥80 years. Causes were cardiac events (28%), infections (26%) and vascular complications (15%). In a multivariate analysis, older age and unfavorable ISS stage increased the risk of death. CONCLUSION: First-generation novel agents significantly reduced toxic deaths compared to conventional chemotherapy. One third of deaths during first-line therapy were due to cumulative drug-related toxicities, thus supportive approaches and prevention strategies should be optimized. The higher mortality rate for toxicity in octogenarians confirms the need for a careful frailty assessment.

Maintenance in myeloma patients achieving complete response after upfront therapy: a pooled analysis.

PURPOSE: Maintenance demonstrated to improve survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients and the achievement of complete response (CR) is a strong predictor of survival. Nevertheless, the role of maintenance according to response after induction/consolidation has not been investigated so far. To evaluate the impact of maintenance according to response, we pooled together and retrospectively analyzed data from 955 NDMM patients enrolled in two trials (GIMEMA-MM-03-05 and RV-MM-PI-209). METHODS: Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS)1, PFS2 and overall survival (OS) of CR patients randomized to maintenance and no maintenance. Secondary endpoints were PFS1, PFS2 and OS in very good partial response/partial response (VGPR/PR) patients. RESULTS: Overall, 213 patients obtained CR after induction/consolidation, 118 received maintenance and 95 no maintenance. In patients achieving CR, maintenance significantly improved PFS1 (HR 0.50, P < 0.001), PFS2 (HR 0.58, P 0.02) and OS (HR 0.51, P 0.02) compared with no maintenance; the advantage was maintained across all the analyzed subgroups according to age, International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetic profile and treatment. Similar features were seen in VGPR/PR patients. CONCLUSION: Maintenance prolonged survival in CR and in VGPR/PR patients. The benefit in CR patients suggests the importance of continuing treatment in patients with chemo-sensitive disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The two source studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: identification numbers NCT01063179 and NCT00551928.

Analytical and clinical performance of a fully automated cardiac multi-markers strategy based on protein biochip microarray technology.

OBJECTIVES: The analytical and clinical performance of the Evidence Cardiac Panel were evaluated. DESIGN AND METHODS: The Evidence Cardiac Panel, an automated protein biochip microarray system, allows the simultaneous determination of creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), myoglobin (MYO), glycogen phosphorylase BB (GPBB), heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), carbonic anhydrase III (CA III), cardiac troponin I (cTnI). Precision: 3 levels of quality control (QC) and 2 in house pools (P) were assayed. Method comparison: MYO and cTnI concentrations measured on Evidence (E) and on Dimension RxL (D) analyzers were compared. Clinical study: 132 non-consecutive patients admitted to the Emergency Department for chest pain were enrolled. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The between-day imprecision was CK-MB=6.80-10.08%; MYO=5.36-16.50%; GPBB=6.51-12.12%; H-FABP=6.26-12.63%; CA III=6.98-13.61%; cTnI=6.02-9.80%. Method comparison: E-MYO vs. D-MYO, Bias=-29.22, 95% CI from -40.25 to -18.18; E-cTnI vs. D-cTnI, Bias=-2.75, 95% CI from -4.04 to -1.46. In patients studied (at discharge: AMI, acute myocardial infarction n=42; non-AMI, n=90) H-FABP showed the highest accuracy (ROC analysis, AUC=0.92) and "cTnI+H-FABP" the greatest diagnostic efficacy (89.4%) in AMI diagnosis.

Analytical and clinical evaluation of a new heart-type fatty acid-binding protein automated assay.

BACKGROUND: The accurate and rapid recognition of myocardial injury in patients presenting in the emergency department (ED) with chest pain continues to be a clinical challenge. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) appears to be one of the best candidates among the new early cardiac markers studied. METHODS: We evaluated the analytical characteristics of a new quantitative and fully automated H-FABP assay (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, UK) and compared its clinical performance with respect to the myoglobin (Myo) assay (Dade Behring, Milan, Italy). A precision study was carried out by testing three levels of quality control (QC) material and two in-house pool (P) samples. To test the accuracy of H-FABP determinations in plasma (lithium-heparin) samples, H-FABP concentrations measured in a set of matched sera and plasma samples were compared. A total of 77 non-consecutive patients (51 males and 26 females; 62+/-16 years) who presented to the ED with chest pain suggesting myocardial ischemia were enrolled. The patients were classified into two groups (acute myocardial infarction, n=22; non-acute myocardial infarction, n=55) on the basis of the discharge diagnosis. RESULTS: The between-day imprecision for three levels of control material and serum pool samples was 6.26%-8.04% (range 2.32-44.03 microg/L) and 9.03%-12.63% (range 11.85-65.13 microg/L), respectively. In the serum vs. plasma study, bias was +0.178 (95% CI -0.033 to +0.389). The best cut-off and the associated diagnostic efficacy were 95 microg/L and 89.47% for Myo and 5.09 microg/L and 98.70% for H-FABP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: H-FABP determination in patients with ischemic symptoms may be a more reliable early indication of cardiac damage than myoglobin.

NT-proBNP in the differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to verify the usefulness of NT-proBNP in the differential diagnosis of dyspnea in a population of patients presenting in the ER with breathlessness. DESIGN AND METHODS: In samples from 122 patients presenting in the ER with acute-severe dyspnea and from 25 subjects enrolled as a "comparison group" (NORM), NT-proBNP levels were measured. Patients have been classified on the basis of discharge diagnosis: pulmonary disease (PD, n = 23), pulmonary concomitant to cardiac disease (MIXED, n = 17), pulmonary embolism (EMB, n = 8), cardiac disease (CARD, n = 56), acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n = 11) and other disease (OTHER, n = 7). RESULTS: A significant difference in NT-proBNP values (P