Enteroendocrine Connections in Congenital Isolated GH Deficiency Due to a GHRH Receptor Gene Mutation.

CONTEXT: GH and IGF-1 are crucial for attainment of normal body size and regulation of food intake, nutrient storage, and insulin sensitivity. Enteroendocrine connections exist between the GH-IGF-1 axis and insulin, ghrelin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). The status of these connections in GH deficiency (GHD) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To study the enteroendocrine connections before and after a standard meal test in a homogeneous population of adults with congenital untreated isolated GHD (IGHD) due to a mutation in the GHRH receptor gene. DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study of 20 individuals with IGHD and 20 control subjects, we measured glucose, insulin, ghrelin, and GLP-1 before and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after a standardized test meal. Homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-ß were calculated. Participants scored feelings of hunger, fullness, and prospective food consumption on a visual analog scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the curve (AUC) values of glucose, insulin, ghrelin, GLP-1, hunger, fullness, and prospective food consumption. RESULTS: Fasting HOMA-IR and HOMA-ß were lower in individuals with IGHD than in control subjects (P = 0.002 and P = 0.023, respectively). AUC was higher for hunger (P < 0.0001), glucose (P = 0.0157), ghrelin (P < 0.0001), and GLP-1 (P < 0.0001) and smaller for fullness (P < 0.0001) in individuals with IGHD compared with control subjects. There was no difference in AUC for prospective food consumption or insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Untreated IGHD is associated with increased GLP-1 secretion and reduced postprandial ghrelin and hunger attenuation in response to a mixed meal. These enteroendocrine connections can result in a favorable outcome in terms of environmental adaptation and guaranteeing appropriate food intake and can confer metabolic benefits.

Brazilian adult individuals with untreated isolated GH deficiency do not have accelerated subclinical atherosclerosis.

GH and its principal mediator IGF1 have important effects on metabolic and cardiovascular (CV) status. While acquired GH deficiency (GHD) is often associated with increased CV risk, the consequences of congenital GHD are not known. We have described a large group of patients with isolated GHD (IGHD) due to a homozygous mutation (c.57+1G>A) in the GH releasing hormone receptor gene, and shown that adult GH-naïve individuals have no evidence of clinically evident premature atherosclerosis. To test whether subclinical atherosclerosis is anticipated in untreated IGHD, we performed a cross-sectional study of 25 IGHD and 27 adult controls matched for age and gender. A comprehensive clinical and biochemical panel and coronary artery calcium scores were evaluated by multi-detector tomography. Height, weight, IGF1, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, creatinine and creatininekinase were lower in the IGHD group. Median and interquartile range of calcium scores distribution was similar in the two groups: IGHD 0(0) and control 0(4.9). The vast majority of the calcium scores (20 of 25 IGHD (80%) and 18 of 27 controls (66.6%)) were equal to zero (difference not significant). There was no difference in the calcium scores classification. None of IGHD subjects had minimal calcification, which were present in four controls. Three IGHD and four controls had mild calcification. There were two IGHD individuals with moderate calcification and one control with severe calcification. Our study provides evidence that subjects with congenital isolated lifetime and untreated severe IGHD do not have accelerated subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

Comparison between the growth response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity or mild GH deficiency.

OBJECTIVES: GH therapy is still controversial, except in severe GH deficiency (SGHD). The objective of this study was to compare the response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity (PGHIS) and mild GH deficiency (MGHD) with those with SGHD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen PGHIS, 11 MGHD, and 19 SGHD subjects, followed up for more than one year in the Brazilian public care service, were evaluated regarding anthropometric and laboratory data at the beginning of treatment, after one year (1st year) on treatment, and at the last assessment (up to ten years in SGHD, up to four years in MGHD, and up to eight years in PGHIS). RESULTS: Initial height standard deviation score (SDS) in SGHD was lower than in MGHD and PGHIS. Although the increase in 1 st year height SDS in comparison to initial height SDS was not different among the groups, height-SDS after the first year of treatment remained lower in SGHD than in MGHD. There was no difference in height-SDS at the last assessment of the children among the three groups. GH therapy, in the entire period of observation, caused a trend towards lower increase in height SDS in PGHIS than SGHD but similar increases were observed in MGHD and SGHD. CONCLUSION: GH therapy increases height in PGHIS and produces similar height effects in MGHD and SGHD.

Comparison between the growth response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity or mild GH deficiency / Comparação entre a resposta de crescimento ao tratamento com hormônio de crescimento (GH) em crianças com insensibilidade parcial ao GH ou deficiência de GH leve

Objectives: GH therapy is still controversial, except in severe GH deficiency (SGHD). The objective of this study was to compare the response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with partial GH insensitivity (PGHIS) and mild GH deficiency (MGHD) with those with SGHD.Subjects and methods: Fifteen PGHIS, 11 MGHD, and 19 SGHD subjects, followed up for more than one year in the Brazilian public care service, were evaluated regarding anthropometric and laboratory data at the beginning of treatment, after one year (1 st year) on treatment, and at the last assessment (up to ten years in SGHD, up to four years in MGHD, and up to eight years in PGHIS).Results: Initial height standard deviation score (SDS) in SGHD was lower than in MGHD and PGHIS. Although the increase in 1 st year height SDS in comparison to initial height SDS was not different among the groups, height-SDS after the first year of treatment remained lower in SGHD than in MGHD. There was no difference in height-SDS at the last assessment of the children among the three groups. GH therapy, in the entire period of observation, caused a trend towards lower increase in height SDS in PGHIS than SGHD but similar increases were observed in MGHD and SGHD.Conclusion: GH therapy increases height in PGHIS and produces similar height effects in MGHD and SGHD.

Objetivos: O tratamento com GH é ainda controverso, salvo na deficiência grave de GH (SGHD). O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a resposta ao tratamento com GH em indivíduos com insensibilidade parcial ao GH (PGHIS) e na deficiência moderada do GH (MGHD) com SGHD.Sujeitos e métodos: Quinze pacientes com PGHIS, 11 com MGHD e 19 com SGHD, seguidos por mais de um ano no Sistema Único de Saúde, foram avaliados antropométrica e laboratorialmente, no início, com um ano de tratamento e na última avaliação (tempo máximo de dez anos na SGHD, quatro anos na MGHD e oito anos na PGHIS).Resultados: O escore de desvio-padrão (EDP) da estatura inicial foi menor nos indivíduos com SGHD do que naqueles com MGHD e PGHIS. Embora o aumento no EDP da estatura no primeiro ano em comparação com o inicial não fosse diferente entre os grupos, o EDP da altura no primeiro ano de tratamento permaneceu menor na SGHD que na MGHD. Não houve diferença no EDP da estatura na última avaliação entre os três grupos. O tratamento com GH, no período completo da observação, provocou uma tendência a menor aumento no EDP da estatura nos pacientes com PGHIS que naqueles com SGHD, entretanto aumentos semelhantes foram encontrados nos grupos MGHD e SGHD.Conclusão: O tratamento com GH aumentou a estatura nos indivíduos com PGHIS e produziu efeitos similares na estatura em MGHD e SGHD.

Lifetime congenital isolated GH deficiency does not protect from the development of diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: Adult subjects with untreated, lifetime, isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) due to a homozygous GHRH receptor gene mutation (MUT/MUT) residing in Itabaianinha, Brazil, present with lower BMI, higher prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), increased insulin sensitivity (IS), and reduced ß-cell function (ßCF) when compared with non-BMI-matched homozygous normal controls. However, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in this cohort is unknown. Comparing their IS and ßCF with BMI-matched individuals heterozygous for the same mutation (MUT/N) may be useful to elucidate the role of the GH-IGF1 axis in IS and ßCF. The purposes of this work were to verify the prevalence of IGT and DM in adult MUT/MUT subjects from this kindred and to compare IS and ßCF in MUT/MUT and MUT/N. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We studied most (51) of the living IGHD adults of this kindred who are GH naive. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) could be performed in 34 subjects, fasting glucose was measured in 15, while two had a previous diagnosis of DM. The OGTT results of 24 MUT/MUT subjects were compared with those of 25 BMI-matched MUT/N subjects. IS was assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative IS check index, and oral glucose IS index for 2 and 3 h. ßCF was assayed by HOMA-ß, insulinogenic index, and the area under the curve of insulin:glucose ratio. RESULTS: The prevalence of DM and IGT in IGHD was 15.68 and 38.23% respectively. IS was increased and ßCF was reduced in MUT/MUT in comparison with MUT/N. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime, untreated IGHD increases IS, impairs ßCF, and does not provide protection from diabetes.

Prolactin and sex steroids levels in congenital lifetime isolated GH deficiency.

Growth hormone (GH) and prolactin share similarities in structure and function. We have previously shown that women with congenital isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) caused by a homozygous mutation in the GHRH receptor gene (GHRHR) (MUT/MUT) have a short reproductive life, with anticipated climacteric. At climacteric, they have lower prolactin levels than normal controls (N/N). Because they are able to breast feed, we hypothesized that this prolactin reduction is limited to climacteric, as result of lower estradiol exposure of the lactotrophs. The purposes of this work were to assess prolactin levels in broader age adults homozygous and heterozygous (MUT/N) for the mutation and in normal controls (N/N), and to correlate them to sex steroids levels. We enrolled 24 GH-naïve MUT/MUT (12 female), 25 MUT/N (14 female), and 25 N/N (11 female) subjects, aged 25-65 years. Anthropometric data and serum prolactin, estradiol, total testosterone, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were measured. Free testosterone was calculated. Prolactin levels were similar in the three groups. In males, testosterone and SHBG levels were higher in MUT/MUT in comparison to N/N. There was no difference in free testosterone among groups. In all 74 individuals, prolactin correlated inversely with age (p < 0.0001) and directly with serum estradiol (p = 0.018). Prolactin levels in subjects with IGHD due to a homozygous GHRHR mutation are similar to heterozygous and normal homozygous, but total testosterone and SHBG are higher in male MUT/MUT, with no difference in free testosterone. The reduced prolactin level is limited to climacteric period, possibly due to reduced estrogen exposure.

Insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function in adults with lifetime, untreated isolated growth hormone deficiency.

CONTEXT: GH reduces insulin sensitivity (IS), whereas IGF-I increases it. IGF-I seems to be critical for the development of the ß-cells, and impaired IS has been reported in GH deficiency (GHD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess IS and ß-cell function in adult patients with untreated isolated GHD (IGHD) due to a homozygous mutation in the GHRH receptor gene. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 24 GH-naive adult IGHD subjects and 25 controls. INTERVENTION: We performed an oral glucose tolerance test with glucose and insulin measurements at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IS was assessed by homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance (IR), quantitative IS check index, oral glucose IS in 2 h (OGIS2) and 3 h (OGIS3). ß-Cell function was assayed by homeostasis model assessment index-ß, insulinogenic index, and area under the curve of insulin-glucose ratio. RESULTS: During the oral glucose tolerance test, glucose levels were higher in IGHD subjects (P<0.0001), whereas insulin response presented a trend toward reduction (P=0.08). The number of individuals with impaired glucose tolerance was higher in the IGHD group (P=0.001), whereas the frequency of diabetes was similar in the two groups. Homeostasis model assessment index of IR was lower (P=0.04), and quantitative IS check index and OGIS2 showed a nonsignificant trend toward elevation (P=0.066 and P=0.09, respectively) in IGHD. OGIS3 showed no difference between the groups. Homeostasis model assessment index-ß, insulinogenic index, and ratio of the areas of the insulin and glucose curves were reduced in the IGDH group (P=0.015, P<0.0001, and P=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adult subjects with lifetime congenital untreated IGHD present reduced ß-cell function, no evidence of IR, and higher frequency of impaired glucose tolerance.

Heterozygosity for a mutation in the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor gene does not influence adult stature, but affects body composition.

CONTEXT: Biallelic mutations in the GHRH receptor (GHRHR) gene (GHRHR) are a frequent cause of isolated GH deficiency (IGHD). Although heterozygous carriers of these mutations appear normal, we hypothesized that heterozygosity for a GHRHR mutation might be associated with a subclinical phenotype. METHODS: We studied members of a large Brazilian kindred with IGHD (Itabaianinha cohort) caused by a homozygous null GHRHR mutation. We compared 76 adult subjects (age, 25-75 yr) heterozygous for the mutation (WT/MT) with 77 sex-matched controls from the same population who are homozygous for the wild-type GHRHR allele (WT/WT). RESULTS: We found no difference in adult height and sd score for serum IGF-I between the two groups. Body weight, body mass index, skin folds, waist and hip circumferences, and lean mass were all reduced in WT/MT subjects. Percentage fat mass and waist/hip ratio were similar in the two groups. Fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were lower in WT/MT. The other biochemical parameters [total and fractionated cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), and C-reactive protein] were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Heterozygosity for a null GHRHR mutation is not associated with reduction in adult stature or in serum IGF-I but is associated with changes in body composition and possibly an increase in insulin sensitivity. These effects do not seem to be modulated by changes in circulating IGF-I.