Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 9(8): e105281, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25148393

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are no existing studies that provide data regarding the epidemiology of, and risk factors for, fecal impaction, either in the general population or in any sub-group of people. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal impaction on a representative sample of the institutionalized elderly population. DESIGN: Two-phase study. Phase 1: pilot study validating the methodology in which all residents of a single nursing home participated. Phase 2: national multi-center cross-sectional study. SETTING: 34 randomly selected nursing homes. MEASUREMENTS: The presence of fecal impaction and associated factors were evaluated using three different tools: data collected from medical records; a self-completion questionnaire filled out by the subjects or a proxy; and a rectal examination. SUBJECTS: Older subjects living in nursing homes. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic constipation was 70.7% (95%CI: 67.3-74.1%), of which 95.9% of patients were properly diagnosed and 43.1% were properly controlled. The prevalence of FI according to patient history was 47.3% (43.6-51.0%) and 6.6% (4.7-8.5%) according to rectal examination. Controlled constipation (OR: 9.8 [5.2-18.4]) and uncontrolled constipation (OR: 37.21 [19.7-70.1]), the number of medications (OR: 1.2 [1.1-1.3]), reduced functional capacity (OR: 0.98 [0.97-0.99]) and the occasional use of NSAIDs were independent risk factors for fecal impaction. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation affects more than 70% of people living in nursing homes. Although it is properly diagnosed in more than 95% of cases, the disease is only controlled in less than 50%. Constipation, especially when not controlled, is the most significant risk factor leading to fecal impaction, which is prevalent in almost 50% of this population.


Assuntos
Impacção Fecal/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Constipação Intestinal/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Impacção Fecal/diagnóstico , Impacção Fecal/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Laxantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 13: 24, 2013 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23496919

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies on the epidemiology of fecal impaction are limited by the absence of a valid and reliable instrument to identify the condition in the elderly. Our aim is to validate a questionnaire for identifying fecal impaction in the elderly and to assess the impact of cognitive impairment and the aid of a proxy on its reliability. METHODS: We developed a 5 questions' questionnaire. The questionnaire was presented to twenty doctors to test its face validity. Feasibility was pre-tested with ten non institutionalized subjects who completed the questionnaire twice, once alone or with the help of a proxy, and another along with the researcher.For the validation of the questionnaire all residents in a single nursing-home were invited to participate, allowing the self-decision of using a proxy. Medical records of all subjects were abstracted without knowledge of subjects' answers and agreement between fecal impaction according to self-reported and medical records analyzed. Physical impairment was measured with the Barthel's test and cognitive impairment with the mini-mental test. RESULTS: In the face validity only minor changes in wording were suggested. In the feasibility pre-test all subjects were able to understand and complete the questionnaire and all questions were considered appropriate and easily understandable.One-hundred and ninety-nine of the 244 residents participated in the study (mean age 86,1 ± 6,6). One hundred and forty two subjects understood all questions; not understanding them was inversely associated with cognitive impairment score (aOR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.82-0.91). One hundred and sixty decided to use a proxy; the use of a proxy was inversely associated with educative level (0.13 (0.02-0.72), minimental's score (0.85; 0.76-0.95) and Barthel's score (0.96; 0.94-0.99). Agreement between medical records and self-completed questionnaire was 85.9% (kappa 0.72 (0,62- 0,82). Disagreement was unrelated to education and cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple questionnaire is reliable for identifying fecal impaction in the elderly by self-report. Limitation imposed by cognitive impairment is minimized with the aid of a proxy.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Impacção Fecal/diagnóstico , Procurador , Autorrelato/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos Cognitivos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Impacção Fecal/epidemiologia , Impacção Fecal/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Casas de Saúde/normas , Procurador/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...