RESUMO
The reaction of the trivalent lanthanoide triflates Ln(OTf)3 (Ln=Sm, Eu; OTf=CF3SO3 -) with the respective metals in acetonitrile leads to the Ln(II)-triflates Eu(OTf)2(CH3CN) (monoclinic, P21/n, Z=4, a=1053.54(1), b=610.28(5), c=1946.92(2) pm, ß =98.611(4)) and Sm(OTf)2(CH3CN) (monoclinic, P21/n, Z=4, a=1054.41(4), b=612.16(2), c=1952.65(7) pm, ß =98.524(2)). The isotypic strontium compound Sr(OTf)2(CH3CN) (monoclinic, P21/n, Z=4, a=1056.39(5), b=610.05(3), c=1950.1(1) pm, ß =98.900(2)°) has been obtained from SrCO3 and triflic acid. The compounds have been investigated by X-ray diffraction, vibrational spectroscopy, luminescence spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, thermal analysis, and magnetic measurements.
RESUMO
Two isomeric 2-bromomethylpyridine Cu(II) complexes [Cu(C6H9NBr)2(NO3)2] with 2-bromo-5-methylpyridine (L1) and 2-bromo-4-methylpyridine (L2) were synthesized as air-stable blue materials in good yields. The crystal structures were different with [Cu(L1)2(NO3)2] (CuL1) crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P21/c, while the 4-methyl derivative CuL2 was solved and refined in triclinic P1¯. The orientation of the Br substituents in the molecular structure (anti (CuL1) vs. syn (CuL2) conformations) and the geometry around Cu(II) in an overall 4 + 2 distorted coordination was very different with two secondary (axially elongated) Cu-O bonds on each side of the CuN2O2 basal plane in CuL1 or both on one side in CuL2. The two Br substituents in CuL2 come quite close to the Cu(II) centers and to each other (Brâ¯Br ~3.7 Å). Regardless of these differences, the thermal behavior (TG/DTA) of both materials is very similar with decomposition starting at around 160 °C and CuO as the final product. In contrast to this, FT-IR and Raman frequencies are markedly different for the two isomers and the UV-vis absorption spectra in solution show marked differences in the π-π* absorptions at 263 (CuL2) or 270 (CuL1) nm and in the ligand-to-metal charge transfer bands at around 320 nm which are pronounced for CuL1 with the higher symmetry at the Cu(II) center, but very weak for CuL2. The T-dependent susceptibility measurements also show very similar results (µeff = 1.98 µB for CuL1 and 2.00 µB for CuL2 and very small Curie-Weiss constants of about -1. The EPR spectra of both complexes show axial symmetry, very similar averaged g values of 2.123 and 2.125, respectively, and no hyper-fine splitting.