Nutritional status assessment in Alzheimer disease and its influence on disease progression.

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional deficiencies are frequent in Alzheimer disease (AD), even in early stages. Nutritional impairment (NI) may be associated with faster disease progression. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of NI and the associated risk factors at the time of diagnosis and to analyse its influence on subsequent progression. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients recently diagnosed with prodromal AD (pAD) or dementia due to AD (ADd). Two clinical assessments were conducted over a period of 18 months. The Mini Nutritional Assessment test (MNA; score range, 0-30; cut-off point for NI, < 24) was used to estimate nutritional status. Progression was defined as an increase of ≥ 3 points on the Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes test. RESULTS: The sample included 50 patients with pAD (mean [standard deviation] age, 76.1 [5.3] years; 68% women), and 127 with ADd (80 [5.9] years; 72.4% women). A total of 141 (79.7%) completed both evaluations. The prevalence of NI was 28.2% (24% for pAD, 29.9% for ADd; P = .43), with the majority (92%) at risk of malnutrition. NI was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-10.5; P < .001) and greater behavioural involvement (OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 2.6-12.7; P < .001). A larger proportion of patients with progression was observed among those with NI than among those with normal nutritional status (50% vs 28.7%, P < .05; ADd: 53.6% vs 31.8%, P < .05; pAD: 41.7% vs 22.9%, P = .21). Greater cognitive impairment (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.03-4.4; P < .05) and NI (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.1; P < .05) were independent risk factors for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: NI is highly prevalent in patients with AD. Assessing nutritional status at the time of diagnosis may enable identification of patients at greater risk of disease progression.

Nutritional status assessment in Alzheimer disease and its influence on disease progression. / Evaluación del estado nutricional en la enfermedad de Alzheimer y su influencia en la progresión tras el diagnóstico.

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional deficiencies are frequent in Alzheimer disease (AD), even in early stages. Nutritional impairment (NI) may be associated with faster disease progression. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of NI and the associated risk factors at the time of diagnosis and to analyse its influence on subsequent progression. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients recently diagnosed with prodromal AD (pAD) or dementia due to AD (ADd). Two clinical assessments were conducted over a period of 18months. The Mini Nutritional Assessment test (MNA; score range, 0-30; cut-off point for NI, <24) was used to estimate nutritional status. Progression was defined as an increase of ≥3points on the Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes test. RESULTS: The sample included 50 patients with pAD (mean [standard deviation] age, 76.1 [5.3] years; 68% women), and 127 with ADd (80 [5.9] years; 72.4% women). A total of 141 (79.7%) completed both evaluations. The prevalence of NI was 28.2% (24% for pAD, 29.9% for ADd; P=.43), with the majority (92%) at risk of malnutrition. NI was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-10.5; P<.001) and greater behavioural involvement (OR: 5.8; 95%CI: 2.6-12.7; P<.001). A larger proportion of patients with progression was observed among those with NI than among those with normal nutritional status (50% vs 28.7%, P<.05; ADd: 53.6% vs 31.8%, P<.05; pAD: 41.7% vs 22.9%, P=.21). Greater cognitive impairment (OR: 2.1; 95%CI: 1.03-4.4; P<.05) and NI (OR: 2.4; 95%CI: 1.1-5.1; P<.05) were independent risk factors for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: NI is highly prevalent in patients with AD. Assessing nutritional status at the time of diagnosis may enable identification of patients at greater risk of disease progression.

Anosognosia en la enfermedad de Alzheimer: prevalencia, factores asociados e influencia en la evolución de la enfermedad / Anosognosia in Alzheimer disease: Prevalence, associated factors, and influence on disease progression

Introducción: La anosognosia es frecuente en la enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA). El objetivo fue describir su prevalencia en el momento del diagnóstico y analizar los factores predisponentes y su influencia en la evolución posterior de la EA. Métodos: Estudio observacional, multicéntrico, prospectivo, analítico, realizado en consultas de neurología general. Se incluyó a pacientes recién diagnosticados de EA (criterios NINCDS-ADRDA). Se realizaron 2 evaluaciones -cognitivas, funcionales y neuropsiquiátricas-, con un intervalo de 18 meses. Se empleó la Clinical Insight Rating scale como medida de anosognosia (CIR, rango 0-8). El criterio de progresión fue un incremento en la Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes mayor a 2,5 puntos. Las variables predictoras se analizaron mediante regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyó a 127 pacientes, 94 completaron las 2 evaluaciones. El 31,5% mostraba anosognosia grave (CIR 7-8), el 39,4% conciencia alterada (CIR 3-6) y el 29,1% conciencia normal (CIR 0-2). La mediana del CIR basal en la cohorte fue 4 (Q1-Q3: 1-7) y a los 18 meses 6 (Q1-Q3: 3-8); p < 0,001. La edad avanzada (odds ratio [OR] 2,43; IC del 95%, 1,14-5,19), menor escolaridad (OR 2,15; IC del 95%, 1,01-4,58) y mayor afectación neuropsiquiátrica (OR 2,66; IC del 95%, 1,23-5,74) fueron variables predictoras de anosognosia. El CIR basal fue similar en los grupos con y sin progresión clínica significativa. Conclusiones: La gran mayoría de los pacientes con EA en el momento del diagnóstico muestran un grado significativo de anosognosia que se asocia a mayor edad, menor escolaridad y mayor afectación conductual. No se demostró influencia de la anosognosia sobre la evolución inicial de la EA tras el diagnóstico

Introduction: Anosognosia is a frequent symptom in Alzheimer disease (AD). The objective of this article is to describe prevalence of this condition at time of diagnosis and analyse any predisposing factors and their influence on disease progression. Methods: Observational, prospective, and analytical multi-centre study in an outpatient setting. Patients recently diagnosed with AD (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) were included. Each patient underwent two cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric assessments separated by an interval of 18 months. The Clinical Insight Rating Scale was employed as a measure of anosognosia (CIR, scored 0-8). Progression was defined as an increase in the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-sum of boxes of more than 2.5 points. The predictor variables were analysed using binary logistic regression. Results: The study included 127 patients, and 94 completed both assessments. Of the total, 31.5% displayed severe anosognosia (CIR 7-8); 39.4%, altered level of consciousness (CIR 3-6); and 29.1%, normal awareness (CIR 0-2). The median baseline CIR in this cohort was 4 (Q1-Q3: 1-7), and at 18 months, 6 (Q1-Q3: 3-8), P<.001. Advanced age (odds ratio (OR) 2.43; CI 95%:1.14-5.19), lower educational level (OR 2.15; CI 95%:1.01-4.58), and more marked neuropsychiatric symptoms (OR 2.66; CI 95%:1.23-5.74) were predictor variables of anosognosia. Baseline CIR was similar in the groups with and without significant clinical progression. Conclusions: The large majority of patients with AD at the time of diagnosis showed significant anosognosia, and this condition was associated with advanced age, lower educational level, and more marked behavioural symptoms. Our results did not show that anosognosia had an effect on the initial clinical progression of AD after diagnosis

Anosognosia in Alzheimer disease: Prevalence, associated factors, and influence on disease progression. / Anosognosia en la enfermedad de Alzheimer: prevalencia, factores asociados e influencia en la evolución de la enfermedad.

INTRODUCTION: Anosognosia is a frequent symptom in Alzheimer disease (AD). The objective of this article is to describe prevalence of this condition at time of diagnosis and analyse any predisposing factors and their influence on disease progression. METHODS: Observational, prospective, and analytical multi-centre study in an outpatient setting. Patients recently diagnosed with AD (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) were included. Each patient underwent two cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric assessments separated by an interval of 18 months. The Clinical Insight Rating Scale was employed as a measure of anosognosia (CIR, scored 0-8). Progression was defined as an increase in the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-sum of boxes of more than 2.5 points. The predictor variables were analysed using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The study included 127 patients, and 94 completed both assessments. Of the total, 31.5% displayed severe anosognosia (CIR 7-8); 39.4%, altered level of consciousness (CIR 3-6); and 29.1%, normal awareness (CIR 0-2). The median baseline CIR in this cohort was 4 (Q1-Q3: 1-7), and at 18 months, 6 (Q1-Q3: 3-8), P<.001. Advanced age (odds ratio (OR) 2.43; CI 95%:1.14-5.19), lower educational level (OR 2.15; CI 95%:1.01-4.58), and more marked neuropsychiatric symptoms (OR 2.66; CI 95%:1.23-5.74) were predictor variables of anosognosia. Baseline CIR was similar in the groups with and without significant clinical progression. CONCLUSIONS: The large majority of patients with AD at the time of diagnosis showed significant anosognosia, and this condition was associated with advanced age, lower educational level, and more marked behavioural symptoms. Our results did not show that anosognosia had an effect on the initial clinical progression of AD after diagnosis.