Evaluación del estado nutricional en la enfermedad de Alzheimer y su influencia en la progresión tras el diagnóstico / Nutritional status assessment in Alzheimer disease and its influence on disease progression

Introducción: Las deficiencias nutricionales son frecuentes en la enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA), incluso en fases iniciales. El deterioro nutricional (DN) puede asociarse con una progresión más rápida de la enfermedad. El objetivo fue describir la frecuencia y los factores de riesgo asociados a DN en el momento del diagnóstico y analizar su influencia en la evolución posterior.MétodosEstudio observacional, multicéntrico, prospectivo. Se incluyeron sujetos recién diagnosticados de EA prodrómica (EAp) o demencia por EA (EAd). Se realizaron dos evaluaciones en un periodo de 18 meses. Para estimar el estado nutricional se empleó el Mini Nutritional Assessment Test (MNA, rango 0-30; DN: MNA < 24). El criterio de progresión fue un incremento en la Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes ≥ 3.ResultadosSe incluyeron 50 sujetos con EAp (edad 76,1 ± 5,3 años; 68% mujeres) y 127 con EAd (edad 80 ± 5,9 años; 72,4% mujeres); 141 (79,7%) completaron las dos evaluaciones. La prevalencia de DN fue del 28,2% (EAp 24%, EAd 29,9%; p = 0,43), la mayoría (92%) en riesgo de desnutrición. El DN se asoció con el sexo femenino (OR: 4,2; IC 95%: 1,7-10,5; p < 0,001) y mayor afectación conductual (OR: 5,8; IC 95%: 2,6-12,7; p < 0,001). Se observó mayor proporción de sujetos con progresión entre los que tenían un DN respecto a estado nutricional normal (50% vs 28,7%, p < 0,05; EAd 53,6% vs 31,8%, p < 0,05; EAp 41,7% vs 22,9%; p = 0,21). Una mayor afectación cognitiva (OR: 2,1; IC 95%: 1,03-4,4; p < 0,05) y un DN (OR: 2,4; IC 95%: 1,1-5,1; p < 0,05) fueron factores de riesgo independientes de progresión.ConclusionesLa prevalencia de DN en la EA es elevada. La evaluación del estado nutricional en el momento del diagnóstico puede permitir identificar pacientes con mayor riesgo de progresión de la enfermedad. (AU)

Introduction: Nutritional deficiencies are frequent in Alzheimer disease (AD), even in early stages. Nutritional impairment (NI) may be associated with faster disease progression. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of NI and the associated risk factors at the time of diagnosis and to analyse its influence on subsequent progression.MethodsWe performed a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients recently diagnosed with prodromal AD (pAD) or dementia due to AD (ADd). Two clinical assessments were conducted over a period of 18 months. The Mini Nutritional Assessment test (MNA; score range, 0-30; cut-off point for NI, < 24) was used to estimate nutritional status. Progression was defined as an increase of ≥ 3 points on the Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes test.ResultsThe sample included 50 patients with pAD (mean [standard deviation] age, 76.1 [5.3] years; 68% women), and 127 with ADd (80 [5.9] years; 72.4% women). A total of 141 (79.7%) completed both evaluations. The prevalence of NI was 28.2% (24% for pAD, 29.9% for ADd; P = .43), with the majority (92%) at risk of malnutrition. NI was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-10.5; P < .001) and greater behavioural involvement (OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 2.6-12.7; P < .001). A larger proportion of patients with progression was observed among those with NI than among those with normal nutritional status (50% vs 28.7%, P < .05; ADd: 53.6% vs 31.8%, P < .05; pAD: 41.7% vs 22.9%, P = .21). Greater cognitive impairment (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.03-4.4; P < .05) and NI (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.1; P < .05) were independent risk factors for disease progression.ConclusionsNI is highly prevalent in patients with AD. Assessing nutritional status at the time of diagnosis may enable identification of patients at greater risk of disease progression. (AU)

Nutritional status assessment in Alzheimer disease and its influence on disease progression.

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional deficiencies are frequent in Alzheimer disease (AD), even in early stages. Nutritional impairment (NI) may be associated with faster disease progression. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of NI and the associated risk factors at the time of diagnosis and to analyse its influence on subsequent progression. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients recently diagnosed with prodromal AD (pAD) or dementia due to AD (ADd). Two clinical assessments were conducted over a period of 18 months. The Mini Nutritional Assessment test (MNA; score range, 0-30; cut-off point for NI, < 24) was used to estimate nutritional status. Progression was defined as an increase of ≥ 3 points on the Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes test. RESULTS: The sample included 50 patients with pAD (mean [standard deviation] age, 76.1 [5.3] years; 68% women), and 127 with ADd (80 [5.9] years; 72.4% women). A total of 141 (79.7%) completed both evaluations. The prevalence of NI was 28.2% (24% for pAD, 29.9% for ADd; P = .43), with the majority (92%) at risk of malnutrition. NI was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-10.5; P < .001) and greater behavioural involvement (OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 2.6-12.7; P < .001). A larger proportion of patients with progression was observed among those with NI than among those with normal nutritional status (50% vs 28.7%, P < .05; ADd: 53.6% vs 31.8%, P < .05; pAD: 41.7% vs 22.9%, P = .21). Greater cognitive impairment (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.03-4.4; P < .05) and NI (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.1; P < .05) were independent risk factors for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: NI is highly prevalent in patients with AD. Assessing nutritional status at the time of diagnosis may enable identification of patients at greater risk of disease progression.

Nutritional status assessment in Alzheimer disease and its influence on disease progression. / Evaluación del estado nutricional en la enfermedad de Alzheimer y su influencia en la progresión tras el diagnóstico.

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional deficiencies are frequent in Alzheimer disease (AD), even in early stages. Nutritional impairment (NI) may be associated with faster disease progression. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of NI and the associated risk factors at the time of diagnosis and to analyse its influence on subsequent progression. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients recently diagnosed with prodromal AD (pAD) or dementia due to AD (ADd). Two clinical assessments were conducted over a period of 18months. The Mini Nutritional Assessment test (MNA; score range, 0-30; cut-off point for NI, <24) was used to estimate nutritional status. Progression was defined as an increase of ≥3points on the Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes test. RESULTS: The sample included 50 patients with pAD (mean [standard deviation] age, 76.1 [5.3] years; 68% women), and 127 with ADd (80 [5.9] years; 72.4% women). A total of 141 (79.7%) completed both evaluations. The prevalence of NI was 28.2% (24% for pAD, 29.9% for ADd; P=.43), with the majority (92%) at risk of malnutrition. NI was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-10.5; P<.001) and greater behavioural involvement (OR: 5.8; 95%CI: 2.6-12.7; P<.001). A larger proportion of patients with progression was observed among those with NI than among those with normal nutritional status (50% vs 28.7%, P<.05; ADd: 53.6% vs 31.8%, P<.05; pAD: 41.7% vs 22.9%, P=.21). Greater cognitive impairment (OR: 2.1; 95%CI: 1.03-4.4; P<.05) and NI (OR: 2.4; 95%CI: 1.1-5.1; P<.05) were independent risk factors for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: NI is highly prevalent in patients with AD. Assessing nutritional status at the time of diagnosis may enable identification of patients at greater risk of disease progression.

Experience with botulinum toxin in chronic migraine. / Experiencia con toxina botulínica en la migraña crónica.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to describe our 16-month experience with onabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA) for the treatment of chronic migraine (CM) in the Spanish province of Segovia, evaluate its benefits, and determine clinical markers of good response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study of patients with CM who received OnabotA for 16 months. The effectiveness of OnabotA was evaluated based on the reduction in the number of headache days, pain intensity, and side effects. We used two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess the effects of treatment according to the time factor. We studied the correlation between treatment effects and other variables using a linear regression model to establish the clinical markers of good response to treatment. RESULTS: We included 69 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for CM. Patients underwent an average of 2 infiltrations. Mean age was 43 years; 88.4% were women. The number of headache days and pain intensity decreased significantly (P < .005); improvements remained over time. We found a negative correlation between the reduction in pain intensity and the number of treatments before OnabotA. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of OnabotA for CM continue over time. OnabotA is a safe and well-tolerated treatment whose use for refractory CM should not be delayed since early treatment provides greater benefits.

Blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm: long-term treatment with botulinum toxin.

INTRODUCTION: Our purpose is to describe the demographic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics of patients with blepharospasm (BS) and hemifacial spasm (HFS) in treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BtA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with BS or HFS and treated with BtA in the Neurology Department at Complejo Asistencial de Segovia between March 1991 and December 2009. RESULTS: Different variables were collected from 34 patients with BS and 55 with HFS, of whom 44.1% and 32.7% respectively had been undergoing treatment with BtA for more than 10 years. Elapsed time from symptom onset to the first visit was 24 months in the BS group and 59.7 months in the HFS group. Diagnosis was given on the first visit for 76.5% of the BS patients and 90.7% of the HFS patients. Patients were referred by their primary care centres in 34.6% of the cases with BS and in 77.6% of the cases with HFS. The most commonly used BtA preparation was BOTOX(®) in both groups, and there were no cases of primary or secondary resistance. The median dose of BtA was raised gradually in both groups, and the increase was statistically significant during the early years of treatment. The most common side effect was ptosis (47.1% in BS, 32.5% in HFS). CONCLUSIONS: BS and HFS are the most common facial movement disorders. The demographic and clinical characteristics and therapeutic findings from this study show that treatment with BtA is both effective and safe over the long term.