A Rare Case of Giant Bilateral Adrenal Myelolipomas in a Patient With Classical Congenital Hyperplasia.

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is caused by genetic defects in the enzymes involved in cortisol biosynthesis in the adrenal gland and, in more than 90% of cases, due to a deficiency in the 21-hydroxylase enzyme. Classical CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency is a severe form of the disease that presents with cortisol deficiency and is further categorized into salt-wasting or simple-virilizing types. Appropriate steroid replacement has been shown to effectively treat patients with classical CAH and prevent complications. Individuals who receive inadequate treatment or fail to comply with their prescribed steroid hormone regimen are susceptible to the development of adrenal myelolipomas. Myelolipomas are benign tumors composed of both adipose and hematopoietic tissues. While documented cases of adrenal myelolipomas exist in medical literature, instances of large bilateral myelolipomas remain exceedingly rare. This case report highlights a 40-year-old female patient with a known history of classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia who presented with unusually large bilateral adrenal myelolipomas. A diagnostic CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a 13.4 x 10.8 cm myelolipoma on the left adrenal gland and a 10 x 8.6 cm myelolipoma on the right adrenal gland. Prior to her presentation, the patient experienced recurrent nausea and vomiting, along with left upper quadrant pain, over five months. Hormonal assessments indicated significantly elevated serum androgen levels, suggesting inadequate management of her CAH. In this report, we present a rare case of symptomatic bilateral large adrenal myelolipomas, underscoring the significance of adhering to treatment regimens, diagnostic assessments, and management for adrenal myelolipomas in individuals diagnosed with CAH.

An Evaluation of Critical Factors for the Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection: Sensitivity and Threshold Analyses Using a Microsimulation Model.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The use of computer-aided detection (CAD) increases the adenoma detection rates (ADRs) during colorectal cancer (CRC) screening/surveillance. This study aimed to evaluate the requirements for CAD to be cost-effective and the impact of CAD on adenoma detection by endoscopists with different ADRs. METHODS: We developed a semi-Markov microsimulation model to compare the effectiveness of traditional colonoscopy (mean ADR, 26%) to colonoscopy with CAD (mean ADR, 37%). CAD was modeled as having a $75 per-procedure cost. Extensive 1-way sensitivity and threshold analysis were performed to vary cost and ADR of CAD. Multiple scenarios evaluated the potential effect of CAD on endoscopists' ADRs. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year. RESULTS: When modeling CAD improved ADR for all endoscopists, the CAD cohort had 79 and 34 fewer lifetime CRC cases and deaths, respectively, per 10,000 persons. This scenario was dominant with a cost savings of $143 and incremental effectiveness of 0.01 quality-adjusted life years. Threshold analysis demonstrated that CAD would be cost-effective up to an additional cost of $579 per colonoscopy, or if it increases ADR from 26% to at least 30%. CAD reduced CRC incidence and mortality when limited to improving ADRs for low-ADR endoscopists (ADR <25%), with 67 fewer CRC cases and 28 CRC deaths per 10,000 persons compared with traditional colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: As CAD is implemented clinically, it needs to improve mean ADR from 26% to at least 30% or cost less than $579 per colonoscopy to be cost-effective when compared with traditional colonoscopy. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of CAD when used in community practice.

Improved Survival with Immunotherapy but Lack of Synergistic Effect with Radiation for Stage IV Melanoma of the Head and Neck.

Prospective randomized studies have demonstrated a survival benefit of immunotherapy in stage IV cutaneous melanoma. Some retrospective studies have hypothesized a synergistic effect of radiation and immunotherapy. Our objective was to identify whether there is a survival benefit for patients treated with radiation and immunotherapy in stage IV cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (CMHN). The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with stage IV CMHN between 2012 and 2014. These patients were stratified based on receipt of radiation and immunotherapy. Adjusted Cox regression was used to analyze overall survival. A total of 542 patients were identified with stage IV CMHN, of whom 153 (28%) patients received immunotherapy. Receipt of immunotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, P = 0.02) and negative LNs (HR 0.50, P = 0.002) were independently associated with improved survival, whereas radiation conferred no survival benefit (HR 1.17, P = 0.26). Patients who received immunotherapy without radiation were associated with significantly improved survival compared with those who received immunotherapy with radiation (P < 0.0001). However, of patients who received radiation, the addition of immunotherapy did not seem to improve survival (P = 0.979). In stage IV CMHN, immunotherapy confers a 32 per cent survival benefit. The use of immunotherapy in patients who require radiation, however, is not associated with improved survival.