Simultaneous Quantification of the 8 Human Herpesviruses in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Human herpesviruses may cause severe complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the impact of some of these infections on transplant outcomes is still unclear. A prospective survey on the incidence and clinical features of herpesviruses infections after HSCT has not yet been conducted in Brazilian patients, and the impact of these infections on HSCT outcome remains unclear. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed the incidence of infection of the eight human herpesviruses simultaneously in 1 045 peripheral blood samples from 98 allogeneic HSCT recipients. Samples were collected weekly starting at the time of transplant until day +100. All herpesviruses were screened and quantified in plasma by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Median follow up time was 24 months. RESULTS: The incidences of infection for each herpesvirus were as follows: cytomegalovirus (CMV), 44%; human herpesvirus [HHV] 6, 18%; HHV8, 6%; Epstein-Barr virus, 3%; herpes simplex virus 1, 3%; varicella zoster virus, 3%; HHV7, 2%; and herpes simplex virus 2, 1%. The CMV infection was significantly more frequent among adults and was associated with a higher risk of developing acute graft-versus-host disease. The HHV6 infection was significantly more frequent after umbilical cord blood transplant and was associated with an increased risk of platelet engraftment failure. There was no significant impact of these infections on the other transplant outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Herpesviruses infections were uncommon after HSCT, except for CMV and HHV6, which, although relatively frequent, had no clinically relevant impact on the outcomes.

Long-Term and Sustained Therapeutic Results of a Specific Promonocyte Cell Formulation in Refractory Angina: ReACT(®) (Refractory Angina Cell Therapy) Clinical Update and Cost-Effective Analysis.

Mononuclear stem cells have been studied for their potential in myocardial ischemia. In our previous published article, ReACT(®) phase I/II clinical trial, our results suggest that a certain cell population, promonocytes, directly correlated with the perceived angiogenesis in refractory angina patients. This study is ReACT's clinical update, assessing long-term sustained efficacy. The ReACT phase IIA/B noncontrolled, open-label, clinical trial enrolled 14 patients with refractory angina and viable ischemic myocardium, without ventricular dysfunction, who were not suitable for myocardial revascularization. The procedure consisted of direct myocardial injection of a specific mononuclear cell formulation, with a certain percentage of promonocytes, in a single series of multiple injections (24-90; 0.2 ml each) into specific areas of the left ventricle. Primary endpoints were Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification (CCSAC) improvement at the 12-month follow-up and ischemic area reduction (scintigraphic analysis) at the 12-month follow-up, in correlation with ReACT's formulation. A recovery index (for patients with more than 1 year follow-up) was created to evaluate CCSAC over time, until April 2011. Almost all patients presented progressive improvement in CCSAC beginning 3 months (p=0.002) postprocedure, which was sustained at the 12-month follow-up (p=0.002), as well as objective myocardium ischemic area reduction at 6 months (decrease of 15%, p<0.024) and 12 months (decrease of 100%, p<0.004) The recovery index (n=10) showed that the patients were graded less than CCSAC 4 for 73.9 ± 24.2% over a median follow-up time of 46.8 months. After characterization, ReACT's promonocyte concentration suggested a positive correlation with CCSAC improvement (r=-0.575, p=0.082). Quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) improved significantly in almost all domains. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed decrease in angina-related direct costs. Refractory angina patients presented a sustained long-term improvement in CCSAC and myocardium ischemic areas after the procedure. The long-term follow-up and strong improvement in quality of life reinforce effectiveness. Promonocytes may play a key role in myocardial neoangiogenesis. ReACT dramatically decreased direct costs.

Refractory angina cell therapy (ReACT) involving autologous bone marrow cells in patients without left ventricular dysfunction: a possible role for monocytes.

Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMC) transplantation has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for refractory angina patients. Previous studies have shown conflicting myocardium reperfusion results. The present study evaluated safety and efficacy of CellPraxis Refractory Angina Cell Therapy Protocol (ReACT), in which a specific BMMC formulation was administered as the sole therapy for these patients. The phase I/IIa noncontrolled, open label, clinical trial, involved eight patients with refractory angina and viable ischemic myocardium, without left ventricular dysfunction and who were not suitable for conventional myocardial revascularization. ReACT is a surgical procedure involving a single series of multiple injections (40-90 injections, 0.2 ml each) into ischemic areas of the left ventricle. Primary endpoints were Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification (CCSAC) improvement at 18 months follow-up and myocardium ischemic area reduction (assessed by scintigraphic analysis) at 12 months follow-up, in correlation with a specific BMMC formulation. Almost all patients presented progressive improvement in angina classification beginning 3 months (p = 0.008) postprocedure, which was sustained at 18 months follow-up (p = 0.004), as well as objective myocardium ischemic area reduction at 12 months (decrease of 84.4%, p < 0.004). A positive correlation was found between monocyte concentration and CCSAC improvement (r = -0.759, p < 0.05). Improvement in CCSAC, followed by correlated reduction in scintigraphic myocardium ischemic area, strongly suggests neoangiogenesis as the main stem cell action mechanism. The significant correlation between number of monocytes and improvement strongly supports a cell-related effect of ReACT. ReACT appeared safe and effective.