Is a Three-component Video-based Version of the Foot Posture Index Valid for Assessing Pediatric Patients With Orthopaedic and Neurologic Foot Conditions?

BACKGROUND: The Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI6) is an assessment of foot position that can be useful for patients with orthopaedic complaints. The FPI6 rates six components of foot position from -2 to +2, resulting in a total score on a continuum between -12 (severe cavus or supination) to +12 (severe planus or pronation). The subscores are ratings made by the examiner and are subjective assessments of deformity severity. The FPI6 requires palpation of bony structures around the foot and therefore must be administered live during physical examination. Because it is sometimes impractical to perform these assessments live, such as for retrospective research, a valid and reliable video-based tool would be very useful. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study examines a version of the FPI using three of the original six components to determine: (1) Are scores from the three-component version of the FPI (FPI3) associated with those from the original six-component version (FPI6)? (2) Is the three-component FPI3 as reliable as the original six-component FPI6? (3) Are FPI3 assessments done retrospectively from video as reliable as those done live? METHODS: A retrospective group of 155 participants (106 males; mean age 13 ± 4 years) was studied. All had undergone gait analysis including videotaping and in-person assessment using the FPI6. Ratings for three components (calcaneus inversion/eversion, medial arch congruence, and forefoot abduction/adduction) were extracted yielding an FPI3 score ranging from -6 to +6. The other three components of the FPI6 (talar head palpation, curves above and below the lateral malleolus, talonavicular joint bulge) were excluded from the FPI3. FPI6 and FPI3 scores and side-to-side asymmetry were compared for all participants and for diagnosis subgroups (cerebral palsy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease) using a Pearson correlation. Agreement for foot posture categorization between the FPI6 and FPI3 was assessed using weighted kappa. Intra- and interrater reliability of live and video-based assessments for the FPI3 and its components were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Scores from the FPI3 and FPI6 are highly associated with each other, suggesting the FPI3 is an adequate substitute for the FPI6. FPI6 and FPI3 scores (r = 0.98) and asymmetry (r = 0.96) were highly correlated overall and within the cerebral palsy (r = 0.98 for scores; r = 0.98 for asymmetry) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth (r = 0.96 for scores; r = 0.90 for asymmetry) subgroups (all p < 0.001). Agreement between the FPI6 and FPI3 was high for foot posture categorization (weighted agreement = 95%, weighted κ = 0.88; p < 0.001). Interrater reliability for live ratings was similar for FPI3 and FPI6 and high for both measures (ICC = 0.95 for FPI6 and 0.94 for FPI3; both p < 0.001). High reliability was seen in video versus live ratings for the FPI3 total score and each of its components regardless of whether they were performed by the same (ICC = 0.98) or different (ICC = 0.97) raters (both p < 0.001), and interrater reliability remained high when the FPI3 was scored from video recordings (ICC = 0.96; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The FPI3 is valid and reliable when done live or from video or by the same or different examiners. It is suitable for retrospective and multicenter research studies, provided videos are done using standardized protocols. Further research is recommended investigating possible ceiling and floor effects in patients with pathologic conditions.Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.

Natural history of ankle function during gait in youth with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types 1 and 2.

BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) can cause progressive muscle weakness and contracture, leading to gait abnormalities such as increased and delayed peak ankle dorsiflexion and reduced ankle power generation in terminal stance. Understanding strength loss on ankle function during gait is important for interpreting treatment outcomes and evaluating new therapies designed to improve gait. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do ankle kinematics and kinetics vary as a function of age, disease progression with associated loss of muscle strength and CMT type in youth with CMT types 1 and 2? METHODS: A prospective convenience sample of 45 participants with CMT1 and 2, ages 7-22 years, underwent comprehensive gait analysis. Seventeen patients underwent repeat analyses totaling 67 tests. Generalized mixed effects linear modeling was used to compare CMT1 versus CMT2 and to examine the effects of age on ankle strength, range of motion, kinematics, and kinetics within each CMT type. RESULTS: Plantarflexor and dorsiflexor strength were less in CMT2 compared with CMT1 (p ≤ 0.05), while peak dorsiflexion in terminal stance (TST) was greater (p = 0.02). Peak plantarflexion moment and power generation were also less in CMT2 (p ≤ 0.02). In CMT1, peak dorsiflexion in TST increased with age through 13 years (p = 0.004); then plateaued in the normal range (p = 0.73). Peak ankle angle in mid-swing was closely related to the angle in TST (p < 0.001) following a similar pattern with age. In CMT2, no significant associations were observed between age, peak dorsiflexion in TST, and peak ankle angle in mid-swing (p ≥ 0.19). There were no consistent trends with age for individual patients with repeat tests. SIGNIFICANCE: The heterogeneity of joint level impairments and gait kinematics and kinetics point to the importance of having an in-depth understanding of gait at the individual patient level using comprehensive gait analysis including valid and reliable strength measures.

Preliminary Outcomes of a Cross-Site Cognitive-Behavioral and Neuromuscular Integrative Training Intervention for Juvenile Fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in reducing disability among youth with juvenile fibromyalgia (FM); however, engagement in moderate to vigorous physical activity remains poor, even after CBT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of an innovative program combining CBT with specialized neuromuscular exercise: the Fibromyalgia Integrative Training for Teens (FIT Teens) program. METHODS: Adolescents with juvenile FM (n = 22, all female, ages 12-18 years) from 2 urban children's hospitals participated in the 8-week FIT Teens intervention. Participants completed measures of pain intensity, functional disability, depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and readiness to change at baseline and after the intervention. RESULTS: The feasibility of the intervention across 2 sites was documented, including high retention rates (80%). Participants showed significant decreases in functional disability (P < 0.05), depression (P < 0.001), fear of movement (P < 0.01), and pain catastrophizing (P < 0.001) from pre- to postintervention. Results of the readiness to change measure indicated a significant decrease in precontemplation (P < 0.01) and increase in action/maintenance scores (P < 0.001). All results demonstrated medium to large effect sizes. CONCLUSION: Adolescents with juvenile FM reported significant improvements in physical function and reduced fear of movement following the intervention. Improvement in physical function was achieved in a shorter time frame than in a prior trial of CBT without an exercise component. Further work is needed to compare the FIT Teens program with existing approaches and determine whether objective changes in exercise participation are achieved.