Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Med ; 12(7): 8970-8980, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36583228

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bladder tumor-infiltrating CD56bright NK cells are more tumor cytotoxic than their CD56dim counterparts. Identification of NK cell subsets is labor-intensive and has limited utility in the clinical setting. Here, we sought to identify a surrogate marker of bladder CD56bright NK cells and to test its prognostic significance. METHODS: CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells were characterized with the multiparametric flow (n = 20) and mass cytometry (n = 21) in human bladder tumors. Transcriptome data from bladder tumors (n = 351) profiled by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. The expression levels of individual markers in intratumoral CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells were visualized in tSNE plots. Expressions of activation markers were also compared between Killer Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily F Member 1 (KLRF1)+ and KLRF1- NK cells. RESULTS: Intratumoral CD56bright NK cells displayed a more activated phenotype compared to the CD56dim subset. Multiple intratumoral cell types expressed CD56, including bladder tumor cells and nonspecific intratumoral CD56 expression was associated with worse patient survival. Thus, an alternative to CD56 as a marker of CD56bright NK cells was sought. The activation receptor KLRF1 was significantly increased on CD56bright but not on CD56dim NK cells. Intratumoral KLRF1+ NK cells were more activated and expressed higher levels of activation molecules compared with KLRF1- NK cells, analogous to the distinct effector function of NK cells across CD56 expression. High intratumoral KLRF1 was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, p = 0.01), cancer-specific survival (HR 0.47, p = 0.02), and overall survival (HR 0.54, p = 0.02) on multivariable analyses that adjusted for clinical and pathologic variables. CONCLUSIONS: KLRF1 is a promising prognostic marker in bladder cancer and may guide treatment decisions upon validation.


Assuntos
Células Matadoras Naturais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Células Matadoras Naturais/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Fenótipo , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/genética , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA